Blue Guardian vs Atlas Funded 2026 comparison: rules, drawdown, payouts, platforms and “BRIDGE” coupon, promo and discount codes — 40% off Blue Guardian vs 50% off Atlas Funded.
Akash Mane is the Founder and CEO of Prop Firm Bridge, where he leads the company’s vision, platform growth, and long term strategic direction. He oversees operations across research, marketing, content systems, SEO, and product positioning while driving the platform’s mission of becoming a trusted authority in the prop firm industry. At Prop Firm Bridge, Akash plays a direct role in shaping educational frameworks, comparison systems, and trader focused resources designed to help users make informed decisions with transparency and confidence. His work focuses on building scalable organic growth systems, improving platform authority, and strengthening trust through accurate, structured, and search optimized content. In addition to leadership responsibilities, he actively manages growth strategy, social media marketing, search visibility, and brand development to expand the platform’s reach across global trading audiences.
Manoj Gholap is responsible for content accuracy, compliance, and factual integrity at Prop Firm Bridge. He acts as the final verification layer for all published content, ensuring that prop firm reviews, rules, and comparisons are clear, accurate, and aligned with transparency standards. Manoj plays a key role in maintaining trust and credibility across the platform.
Quick answer: In the current Blue Guardian vs Atlas Funded 2026 comparison, Atlas Funded has the higher PFB Score at 86/100 versus 82/100 for Blue Guardian, while both remain PFB Verified. The current Blue Guardian coupon code “BRIDGE” gives 40% off, while the current Atlas Funded coupon code “BRIDGE” gives 50% off. Atlas Funded’s current BRIDGE setup also matches qualifying added incentives from ongoing Atlas campaigns, including the current X2 requested-payout campaign benefit. That does not mean every Atlas payout is permanently doubled or that two coupon codes can be stacked. The checkout and campaign terms remain the final confirmation.
For traders comparing Blue Guardian review vs Atlas Funded review, the better firm depends less on the headline discount and more on the exact account model. Blue Guardian’s current 2-Step Standard uses an 8%/4% target structure, 4% daily loss and 8% static overall loss. Atlas Funded’s current 2-Step Standard uses 8%/5% targets, 5% daily loss and a wider 10% static maximum loss. Blue Guardian also offers Instant Standard, Instant Starter, Nano, Buy Now Pay Later and Fast Track structures, while Atlas Funded offers standard 1-Step, 2-Step and 3-Step evaluations, Instant Funded, Instant Zero and several Access/pay-after-pass routes.
This guide is intentionally built to answer the full search-intent family in one place: Blue Guardian vs Atlas Funded, Blue Guardian coupon code BRIDGE, Blue Guardian promo code BRIDGE, Blue Guardian discount code BRIDGE, Atlas Funded coupon code BRIDGE, Atlas Funded promo code BRIDGE, Atlas Funded discount code BRIDGE, verified 2026 coupon code, account rules, payouts, drawdown, platforms and trader fit.
For the full firm-level analysis, see the Blue Guardian review and Atlas Funded review. For dedicated offer pages, see the Blue Guardian “BRIDGE” 40% coupon guide and Atlas Funded “BRIDGE” 50% coupon guide.
The most useful way to compare these firms is to separate firm quality, account rules and current purchase offer. A larger discount can make an account cheaper, but it does not widen drawdown, remove consistency, change news restrictions or improve payout eligibility. Likewise, a higher PFB Score does not mean every account inside that firm is automatically better for every trader.
| Category | Blue Guardian | Atlas Funded |
|---|---|---|
| PFB Score | 82 / 100 | 86 / 100 |
| PFB Status | PFB Verified | PFB Verified |
| Current BRIDGE discount | 40% off | 50% off |
| Current campaign interaction | Current firm-level 40% BRIDGE offer; verify checkout | 50% off plus qualifying ongoing Atlas campaign incentives under the current setup |
| Main evaluation routes | 1-Step, 2-Step, Nano, BNPL | 1-Step, 2-Step, 3-Step, Access / Pay After Pass |
| Instant routes | Instant Standard, Instant Starter, Fast Track | Instant Funded, Instant Zero |
| Platforms | MT5, Match-Trader, TradeLocker | MT5, Match-Trader, TradeLocker |
| Core 2-Step maximum loss | 8% static on current 2-Step Standard | 10% static on current 2-Step Standard |
| Core 2-Step daily loss | 4% | 5% |
| Core funded split | 85% on current standard evaluation routes, model dependent | 80% default on many current models, upgradeable on eligible accounts |
| Scaling ceiling in current records | Up to $4M on eligible structures | Up to $2M on eligible structures |
| Overnight/weekend holding | Allowed on current recorded CFD models | Allowed on current recorded main models |
| Main caution | Rule variation, Guardian Shield, funded consistency and news windows | Rule variation, Atlas Protector, exposure controls, payout buffers and qualifying days |
Featured-snippet answer: Atlas Funded currently leads the overall PFB comparison by score, 86/100 versus 82/100, and also has the larger current BRIDGE discount at 50% versus 40%. Blue Guardian can still be the better account-level fit for traders who prefer its specific 2-Step, Nano, BNPL or instant structures. The better choice depends on the exact drawdown and payout rules, not only the coupon percentage.
Atlas Funded has the stronger current PFB score and a wider 2-Step Standard maximum-loss allowance. Blue Guardian has a lower score but still sits inside PFB Verified status, and its current lineup is unusually broad for traders comparing standard evaluation, instant, Nano and pay-after-pass structures.
From a search perspective, this is why “Blue Guardian vs Atlas Funded which is better?” cannot be answered by one metric. Atlas Funded leads on current score and BRIDGE percentage. Blue Guardian can lead on specific account preferences, platform familiarity, payout-processing expectations or a trader’s comfort with its current risk systems.
The current coupon comparison is straightforward. Blue Guardian coupon code “BRIDGE” gives 40% off under the current firm-level offer. Atlas Funded coupon code “BRIDGE” gives 50% off under the current firm-level offer. Both should be confirmed on the live checkout before payment because firms can change product availability, temporary campaigns and eligibility.
| Search query | Current answer |
|---|---|
| Blue Guardian coupon code 2026 | “BRIDGE” — 40% off |
| Blue Guardian promo code 2026 | “BRIDGE” — 40% off |
| Blue Guardian discount code 2026 | “BRIDGE” — 40% off |
| Atlas Funded coupon code 2026 | “BRIDGE” — 50% off |
| Atlas Funded promo code 2026 | “BRIDGE” — 50% off |
| Atlas Funded discount code 2026 | “BRIDGE” — 50% off |
“Coupon code,” “promo code” and “discount code” are different search phrases for the same commercial intent. A trader wants to know which code to enter, how much it currently saves, whether it is still working in 2026 and whether the selected account is eligible. Publishing separate thin pages for every synonym can split relevance. A comparison authority article can cover all of those phrases naturally while still answering the actual buying question.
At the same eligible pre-discount subtotal, Atlas Funded’s current 50% BRIDGE discount saves more than Blue Guardian’s current 40% BRIDGE discount. On a hypothetical eligible $500 subtotal, 40% off equals a $200 saving, while 50% off equals a $250 saving. The difference is $50.
That does not mean Atlas Funded is always cheaper in absolute dollars. Base prices differ by model and account size. A lower-priced Blue Guardian account can still cost less than a higher-priced Atlas Funded account after discounts. Traders should compare the exact final checkout totals for the models they actually intend to trade.
Do not assume two coupon codes can be stacked. Atlas Funded’s current BRIDGE setup is recorded as matching qualifying added incentives attached to ongoing Atlas campaigns. That is different from manually stacking two separate checkout codes. Blue Guardian promotions can also change independently. The visible final checkout should control.
The current Blue Guardian coupon code “BRIDGE” is a 40% off firm-level offer. The same current code can naturally answer searches for Blue Guardian promo code “BRIDGE”, Blue Guardian discount code “BRIDGE”, Blue Guardian working code 2026, Blue Guardian verified coupon 2026 and Blue Guardian 40% off code.
Use the Blue Guardian Auto-Discount Link or enter BRIDGE manually where the checkout provides a promo field. The practical confirmation is the reduced order total, not merely seeing the code typed into the box.
It changes eligible purchase pricing. It does not change the 1-Step or 2-Step profit target, daily loss, maximum loss, Guardian Shield, funded news window, payout consistency, minimum trading days, profit split or payout cap. A discounted Blue Guardian account remains the same trading product.
Blue Guardian has several current account structures, so the discount can matter differently by trader. A trader choosing 2-Step Standard is buying a relatively conventional evaluation with an 8%/4% target sequence and static overall loss. A trader choosing Instant Standard is skipping evaluation and accepting trailing drawdown, payout consistency and Guardian Shield from the start. A trader choosing Buy Now Pay Later is minimizing the upfront charge but still faces a post-pass activation fee.
That means the right purchase process is: choose the account from rules first, verify total cost second, then use the Blue Guardian promo code BRIDGE to optimize the price.
Blue Guardian can display separate product-specific or temporary promotions. Do not assume a current firm-level 40% BRIDGE offer must automatically combine with every displayed product campaign. If the checkout shows a different valid offer on a specific model, compare the final totals and current conditions before paying.
The current Atlas Funded coupon code “BRIDGE” gives 50% off. The same code also answers Atlas Funded promo code BRIDGE, Atlas Funded discount code BRIDGE, Atlas Funded working coupon 2026, Atlas Funded verified promo code and Atlas Funded 50% off code searches.
Use the Atlas Funded Auto-Discount Link or enter BRIDGE at checkout where required. Confirm the eligible subtotal before payment.
The current Atlas record states that BRIDGE gives 50% off and also matches qualifying added incentives from ongoing Atlas Funded campaigns. The current recorded example includes an X2 requested-payout campaign benefit. This should be interpreted carefully: it is a campaign benefit under the applicable current promotion, not a promise that every future Atlas payout is permanently doubled and not a permanent 200% profit split.
The safest public wording is simple: Atlas Funded promo code “BRIDGE” currently gives 50% off and matches qualifying ongoing campaign benefits under the current setup. Traders should confirm the exact campaign shown at checkout or in the current Atlas terms.
The 50% discount does not change static or trailing drawdown, daily-loss calculations, Atlas Protector, one-sided exposure limits, minimum profitable days, payout buffers, consistency, news-profit treatment or prohibited-strategy rules. It reduces purchase cost only.
Atlas has multiple current routes: standard evaluations, 3-Step, Instant Funded, Instant Zero, $1 Access, Free Access, 1-Step Access and 2-Step Access. Traders searching “Atlas Funded coupon code 100K,” “Atlas Funded instant funding promo code,” “Atlas Funded access discount code” or “Atlas Funded pay after pass coupon” are often already close to checkout. This article answers those transactional queries while reminding the trader that the underlying account rules are more important than the discount.
The evaluation comparison reveals one of the clearest differences between the two firms. Blue Guardian’s standard 2-Step is slightly tighter on total drawdown but uses a lower second-phase target. Atlas Funded gives more overall loss room on its current 2-Step Standard but requires a 5% Phase 2 target and more qualifying days.
| Model | Blue Guardian | Atlas Funded |
|---|---|---|
| 1-Step Standard | 9% target; 4% daily; 6% trailing max; 3 qualifying days | 11% target; 4% daily; 7% static max; 5 qualifying days |
| 2-Step Standard | 8% / 4%; 4% daily; 8% static max; 3 qualifying days per phase | 8% / 5%; 5% daily; 10% static max; 5 qualifying days per phase |
| Nano / lighter route | 1-Step Nano and 2-Step Nano available | Access routes provide low-upfront alternatives rather than Nano branding |
| 3-Step | Not the main current structured route in the live record | 6% / 6% / 6%; 4% daily; 8% static max |
For a trader who values maximum loss room, Atlas Funded’s current 10% static maximum loss is wider than Blue Guardian’s current 8% static overall loss. Atlas also gives a 5% daily limit versus 4% at Blue Guardian. On pure drawdown width, Atlas is more forgiving.
Blue Guardian has a lower second-phase target at 4% versus 5% for Atlas. It also currently requires three qualifying days per phase for newer purchases, while Atlas records five profitable days per phase on 2-Step Standard. A patient low-volatility trader may prefer Atlas’s wider cushion; a trader who dislikes long qualification requirements may prefer Blue Guardian’s shorter current day count.
Blue Guardian’s 1-Step Standard has a lower target, 9% versus 11%, but uses a 6% trailing maximum loss. Atlas Funded’s 1-Step Standard uses a 7% static maximum loss. The difference between trailing and static matters more than the 2-point target gap for many traders.
A trader who books profits and then gives part of them back can see a trailing floor tighten. A static floor remains anchored. Therefore Atlas’s 1-Step Standard can be easier to model even though the target is higher, while Blue Guardian’s lower target may appeal to traders who naturally protect closed profits and are comfortable tracking a moving floor.
Neither firm has one universal drawdown system. Both mix static and trailing structures across their product catalogs. The trader must identify the exact model and then calculate the nearest active boundary in cash.
Blue Guardian’s current 2-Step Standard uses static overall loss, while 1-Step Standard and Instant Standard use trailing closed-balance high-watermark logic with an equity breach condition. Funded accounts can also add Guardian Shield, which can close open positions at the defined floating-loss threshold. Repeated Shield triggers can reduce the profit split and eventually breach the account.
This means a Blue Guardian trader may have several active constraints at once: daily loss, maximum loss, Guardian Shield, payout consistency, minimum qualifying days and news restrictions. The smallest active boundary should drive position size.
Atlas Funded’s standard evaluations mainly use static maximum loss. Its instant and some Access routes introduce trailing or end-of-day trailing drawdown. Atlas also uses daily reset logic based on the previous day’s higher balance or equity on several models, which can create a tighter next-day floor after profitable floating equity.
Funded accounts can add Atlas Protector and one-sided exposure controls. On several funded structures, traders must keep same-instrument risk inside a defined fraction of the daily limit. That makes Atlas more complex than a basic “5% daily / 10% max” headline suggests.
If static drawdown is the priority, compare Blue Guardian 2-Step Standard against Atlas Funded 1-Step Standard, 2-Step Standard, 2-Step Pro or 3-Step. Atlas currently offers more standard-evaluation structures using static maximum loss. Blue Guardian also has static routes, especially 2-Step Standard and Fast Track, but several popular 1-Step and instant routes use trailing logic.
There is no firm-wide winner because consistency is model-specific. Blue Guardian 2-Step Standard currently has no standard evaluation consistency rule, while Nano and instant structures can add consistency. Atlas standard evaluations generally do not use a standard best-day consistency rule, while Instant Funded and Access routes can add one. Traders should choose at the account level rather than brand level.
Payout marketing can be misleading if the trader focuses only on the headline cycle. A 7-day or on-demand label does not mean profits are automatically withdrawable. Minimum trading days, consistency, payout buffers, news-profit treatment and account reviews can still delay a request.
| Area | Blue Guardian | Atlas Funded |
|---|---|---|
| Standard payout cycle | Often 14 days on evaluation-funded routes; some models offer faster/on-demand structures | Often 14 days on standard models; Instant Funded has a longer first cycle |
| Processing after valid request | Current records target within 24 business hours | General records show about 1–3 business days, with wider terms possible |
| Core standard profit split | 85% on current standard evaluation models | 80% default on many current models |
| Higher split options | 90% or 100% depending on model/add-on | Up to 100% on eligible models/add-ons |
| Consistency | Model specific; can apply on instant and Nano funded accounts | Model specific; 20% on Instant Funded, Access can use consistency |
| Special risk-control impact | Guardian Shield can reduce split after triggers | Atlas Protector can reduce split or affect account status after triggers |
Blue Guardian can appeal to traders who value faster operational processing after a valid request and an 85% standard split on core evaluation models. Atlas Funded can appeal to traders who want more payout add-on choices and a path to a 100% split on eligible accounts, but default splits are often lower and some instant structures have longer first payout cycles.
Neither should be chosen from profit split alone. A 90% or 100% split is irrelevant if a trader’s normal strategy repeatedly violates a consistency rule, news window or floating-loss control.
This is where the comparison becomes more interesting than a normal two-step challenge review.
Blue Guardian Instant Standard skips evaluation. Current records use a 3% daily loss and 6% trailing maximum loss, plus minimum qualifying days, payout consistency and Guardian Shield. The profit split starts lower than some evaluation routes and can be upgraded on eligible plans.
Atlas Instant Funded also skips evaluation. Current records use a 3% daily loss and 5% trailing maximum loss, five profitable days, a 20% consistency condition and additional same-asset risk limits. Its default first payout cycle is longer than the standard evaluation-funded route.
Blue Guardian Fast Track currently provides direct funded-stage access with a 4% daily and 10% static funded loss limit in the structured record. Atlas Instant Zero also skips evaluation but uses a tighter 2% daily and 4% end-of-day trailing maximum loss. Atlas Instant Zero removes the standard best-day consistency rule but adds payout-buffer and Protector conditions.
A trader who wants a larger static funded cushion may prefer the structure of Blue Guardian Fast Track, subject to live checkout and current plan terms. A trader who wants no standard best-day consistency and can operate inside a tighter EOD trailing framework may find Atlas Instant Zero more relevant.
Blue Guardian Buy Now Pay Later uses a small upfront payment and a size-specific activation fee after passing. Its current evaluation has a 4% target, 4% daily loss and 8% trailing maximum loss, with funded consistency and Shield conditions later.
Atlas offers several low-upfront alternatives: $1 Access, Free Access, 1-Step Access and 2-Step Access. These can dramatically reduce the first payment, but the trader must still pay the post-pass funded fee and then follow funded-stage drawdown, qualifying-day and consistency rules.
For both firms, the correct comparison is total expected cost after passing, not the first card charge. A $1, $5 or $10 entry is not the full economic cost of the funded path.
Platform choice is effectively a tie. Both firms currently list MetaTrader 5, TradeLocker and Match-Trader. That is useful for traders who want to keep the same general execution interface when switching firms.
Blue Guardian allows news trading in several evaluation stages, while funded accounts can restrict opening or closing within five minutes before or after designated high-impact events or FOMC. Instant Starter is an exception in the current record and permits news trading.
Atlas Funded also allows broad news trading during evaluations, while funded profit can be adjusted when trades are opened or closed inside the restricted high-impact-news window. This is not the same as a simple universal ban. The model and stage control.
Both firms currently allow EAs under their strategy and anti-abuse rules. Permission to use automation does not override drawdown, news, account ownership or prohibited-strategy requirements. A bot that over-risks, exploits latency or replicates prohibited signals can still breach the account.
Blue Guardian currently permits copying between accounts legally owned by the same trader under its conditions. Atlas Funded is stricter: copying is intended for permitted personal Atlas accounts, while external copying and third-party signal duplication can create a violation. Traders using a copier should verify exact account ownership rules before connecting it.
Both firms currently support overnight and weekend holding on many recorded CFD structures. Permission does not remove gap risk. Swing traders must size positions so a weekend or overnight gap cannot push equity through the daily or maximum-loss boundary.
Atlas Funded. Its current 2-Step Standard uses a 5% daily loss and 10% static maximum loss versus Blue Guardian’s 4% daily and 8% static overall loss.
Blue Guardian. Current 2-Step Standard uses 8% then 4%, while Atlas uses 8% then 5%.
Atlas Funded. BRIDGE is currently 50% off versus 40% at Blue Guardian.
Atlas Funded. Current score is 86/100 versus 82/100.
Blue Guardian has an 85% standard split on current core evaluation-funded structures, while Atlas commonly starts at 80% and offers upgrades on eligible models.
Blue Guardian currently records scaling up to $4M on eligible structures versus up to $2M in Atlas Funded’s current records. Scaling should still be treated as a long-term ceiling, not guaranteed starting capital.
Atlas Funded has more current standard evaluation routes using static maximum loss. Blue Guardian’s 2-Step Standard is also static, but popular 1-Step and instant structures use trailing logic. For a trader who dislikes moving floors, Atlas may provide more account-selection flexibility.
Atlas Funded currently offers more variations—$1 Access, Free Access, 1-Step Access and 2-Step Access—while Blue Guardian’s main equivalent is Buy Now Pay Later. Atlas therefore provides more pay-after-pass style entry choices.
Coupon percentage should be used after the trader chooses a suitable model. Do not buy a larger account simply because the dollar saving looks bigger.
| Illustrative eligible subtotal | Blue Guardian BRIDGE 40% | Atlas Funded BRIDGE 50% |
|---|---|---|
| $100 | Save $40; pay $60 | Save $50; pay $50 |
| $250 | Save $100; pay $150 | Save $125; pay $125 |
| $500 | Save $200; pay $300 | Save $250; pay $250 |
| $1,000 | Save $400; pay $600 | Save $500; pay $500 |
These are percentage examples, not promises that every Blue Guardian or Atlas product uses those exact base prices. Live base prices and campaigns can change.
The safest method is to size from the loss allowance, not the headline balance. A $100K account with 6% maximum loss gives $6,000 of broad maximum-loss room. A $50K account with 10% maximum loss gives $5,000. Those two accounts may be much closer in real risk capacity than their headline balances suggest.
Before using either coupon, calculate: maximum loss in dollars, daily loss in dollars, any floating-loss control, normal risk per trade, likely correlated exposure, payout consistency and total expected cost. Then apply BRIDGE to the account that still fits after those checks.
No. A 50% discount is financially stronger than a 40% discount on the same eligible subtotal, but a bad account-model fit can cost 100% of the fee. Drawdown compatibility has more expected value than an extra 10 percentage points of purchase discount.
Overall winner by current PFB score: Atlas Funded, 86/100 vs 82/100. Atlas also has the larger current BRIDGE discount at 50% versus 40% and offers more low-upfront Access structures. Its current 2-Step Standard provides wider 5% daily and 10% static maximum-loss limits.
Blue Guardian remains a strong PFB Verified alternative. It offers an 85% core standard split, current scaling records up to $4M, a lower 4% second-phase target on 2-Step Standard, several Nano and instant variants, BNPL and current payout-processing targets within 24 business hours after a valid request.
Choose Atlas Funded if: you prioritize the higher current score, larger current BRIDGE discount, wider current 2-Step drawdown, more static evaluation choices or more low-upfront Access routes.
Choose Blue Guardian if: you prefer its lower Phase 2 target, higher standard core split, broader current scaling ceiling, Nano models, Guardian-specific instant choices or its particular 2-Step/BNPL structure.
Coupon verdict: Blue Guardian coupon code “BRIDGE”, Blue Guardian promo code “BRIDGE” and Blue Guardian discount code “BRIDGE” currently refer to the same 40% offer. Atlas Funded coupon code “BRIDGE”, Atlas Funded promo code “BRIDGE” and Atlas Funded discount code “BRIDGE” currently refer to the same 50% offer. Atlas BRIDGE also currently matches qualifying ongoing campaign incentives under its recorded setup. Always confirm the final checkout before paying.
For broader risk education before choosing either firm, see the Prop Firm Drawdown Math Masterclass and Static vs Trailing Drawdown guide.
The structured FAQ below answers the most common Blue Guardian vs Atlas Funded review, coupon code, promo code, discount code, drawdown and payout questions in concise search-friendly language.
The current Blue Guardian coupon code is “BRIDGE” for 40% off under the current firm-level offer. Enter BRIDGE at checkout or use the current Auto-Discount Link and confirm the reduced final total before payment.
Blue Guardian promo code “BRIDGE” currently gives 40% off under the current offer. Coupon code, promo code and discount code are different search terms for the same current BRIDGE code.
The current Blue Guardian discount code is “BRIDGE” for 40% off. The discount reduces eligible purchase pricing but does not change drawdown, Guardian Shield, payout consistency or trading rules.
The current Atlas Funded coupon code is “BRIDGE” for 50% off. The current BRIDGE setup also matches qualifying added incentives from ongoing Atlas campaigns. Confirm the exact live campaign and checkout total before payment.
Atlas Funded promo code “BRIDGE” currently gives 50% off. Under the current setup it also matches qualifying ongoing Atlas campaign incentives, including the current X2 requested-payout campaign benefit where applicable.
The current Atlas Funded discount code is “BRIDGE” for 50% off. It changes eligible purchase price only and does not change the selected account’s drawdown, payout, exposure or prohibited-strategy rules.
On the same eligible pre-discount subtotal, Atlas Funded BRIDGE saves more because the current Atlas discount is 50% versus 40% at Blue Guardian. Base account prices differ, so compare the actual final checkout totals for the models you want.
Atlas Funded currently has the higher PFB Score at 86/100 versus 82/100 for Blue Guardian. Both are PFB Verified. Atlas also has the larger current BRIDGE discount, while Blue Guardian can be a better fit for traders who prefer its specific 2-Step, Nano, BNPL or instant structures.
Atlas Funded currently provides the wider 2-Step Standard loss limits: 5% daily and 10% static maximum loss versus Blue Guardian’s 4% daily and 8% static overall loss. Blue Guardian has a lower Phase 2 target at 4% versus Atlas Funded’s 5%.
Blue Guardian’s current core standard evaluation-funded structures commonly start at 85%, while Atlas Funded commonly starts at 80% and can be upgraded to 100% on eligible models. Exact split depends on the selected account and add-ons.
News permissions are model and stage specific. Several Blue Guardian evaluation accounts allow news trading, while many funded accounts restrict opening or closing around designated high-impact news and FOMC windows. Check the exact purchased model.
Atlas Funded broadly allows news trading during evaluation, while funded profit can be adjusted when trades are opened or closed inside the current restricted high-impact-news window. The exact model and account stage control.
Atlas Funded currently offers more standard evaluation routes with static maximum loss, including 1-Step Standard, 2-Step Standard, 2-Step Pro and 3-Step. Blue Guardian’s 2-Step Standard is also static, while several popular Blue Guardian 1-Step and instant routes use trailing logic.
Do not assume coupon-code stacking. Atlas Funded’s current BRIDGE setup can match qualifying campaign incentives, which is different from manually stacking two checkout codes. Blue Guardian promotions can also vary. The live checkout is the final confirmation.
It depends on risk preference. Blue Guardian offers Instant Standard, Instant Starter and Fast Track, while Atlas offers Instant Funded and Instant Zero. Blue Guardian Fast Track currently uses a static funded limit in the structured record, while Atlas Instant Zero uses tighter end-of-day trailing drawdown with no standard best-day consistency rule.
