Introduction
My Funded Futures futures prop firm review: My Funded Futures is a futures prop firm founded in 2023 with Builder, Rapid, Rapid EOD and Pro routes. Its one-step evaluations are built around exchange-traded futures risk, contract limits and trailing drawdown rather than the nominal account balance alone. Current account sizes range from $25K to $150K. Builder and Pro use EOD trailing drawdown in both evaluation and simulated-funded stages, while standard Rapid uses EOD trailing during evaluation and then changes to intraday trailing after funding. Rapid EOD keeps EOD trailing after funding. Current platform support includes Tradovate, TradingView, NinjaTrader, Quantower, Rithmic-supported platforms and Fintevo. The firm is relevant for disciplined ES, NQ, YM, CL, GC and other futures traders who want to choose between payout speed and drawdown style.
Bridge Verdict Preview
My Funded Futures has a strong overall profile. Its 86 / 100 PFB Score places it in the PFB Verified category, supporting a clearly positive assessment. Its strongest feature is the ability to choose between faster payout access and EOD-focused risk structures, while the biggest risk is misunderstanding the drawdown change on standard Rapid after funding. It best suits futures traders who size positions from the true loss allowance and contract cap.
TL;DR
- Best for: disciplined futures traders comparing faster payouts with EOD drawdown structures.
- Biggest strength: strong 86 / 100 score with several practical account paths.
- Main risk: standard Rapid changes drawdown behavior after the evaluation stage.
Quick Specs
| Feature | Detail |
|---|---|
| Firm Name | My Funded Futures |
| Founded Year | 2023 |
| Origin Country | United States |
| Market Type | Futures |
| Evaluation Type | One-Step |
| Max Account Size | $150K |
| Profit Target | 6% on standard current evaluations; 8% on recorded Pro 50K One-Day configuration |
| Drawdown Type | EOD trailing or stage-specific intraday trailing |
| Profit Split | 80% Builder/Pro; 90% Rapid on current recorded plans |
| Trading Platforms | Tradovate, TradingView, NinjaTrader, Quantower, Rithmic-supported platforms, Fintevo |
| News Trading | Program and stage-specific |
| PFB Score | 86 / 100 |
| Prop Firm Bridge Star Rating | 4.3 / 5 |
| Risk Status | PFB Verified |
Ratings Breakdown
Our Take
My Funded Futures received an 86 out of 100 score because its futures evaluation structure prioritizes account choice, practical EOD risk options and payout flexibility, but traders must understand the funded drawdown change on standard Rapid.
Who This Futures Firm Is For (and Not For)
My Funded Futures is a strong choice for futures traders who want to select an account around how they actually trade. Builder can suit traders who prefer a lower-cost progression route and can work with qualifying payout days. Rapid is attractive to traders prioritizing faster payout access and a 90% current trader split, but they need to be comfortable with intraday trailing drawdown after funding on the standard version. Rapid EOD is more suitable for traders who specifically want the drawdown to remain end-of-day based. Pro fits traders who prefer EOD drawdown and a more traditional 14-day payout cycle.
The firm is not suited to traders who treat nominal account size as spendable risk, use uncontrolled martingale exposure or ignore contract limits. It also requires careful plan selection because the same strategy can behave very differently under EOD trailing and intraday trailing risk.
Risk Profile Compared to Futures Industry Standards
My Funded Futures compares favorably with current futures industry structures because several plans use EOD trailing drawdown and most recorded routes do not impose a separate daily loss limit. EOD trailing is easier to model than a floor that follows open equity throughout the session because intraday unrealized peaks do not continuously raise the loss floor. Standard Rapid is the important exception after funding, where the drawdown becomes intraday trailing. That makes open-profit management more important. Futures accounts also feel stricter because contract value can move quickly relative to a small drawdown allowance. A $50K account with a $2,000 maximum loss should be managed as a $2,000 risk envelope, not as $50K of cash. The firm's 86 / 100 score reflects a strong set of choices when traders understand these mechanics.
First-Person Testing Signal
During our rule verification, the most important detail was the difference between Rapid and Rapid EOD. Both can look similar at the evaluation stage, but standard Rapid changes to an intraday trailing equity high-water mark after funding while Rapid EOD keeps the end-of-day method. For a trader who lets NQ or ES winners fluctuate before exit, that difference can materially change effective risk room.
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| 86 / 100 PFB Score and PFB Verified status | Standard Rapid changes to intraday trailing after funding |
| Multiple account structures for different futures styles | Evaluation routes use monthly subscription billing |
| Rapid can provide daily payout access when conditions are met | Payout buffers and caps vary materially by program |
| Most current routes have no daily loss limit | Builder payout rules require qualifying days and highest-day control |
| Rapid currently provides a 90% trader split | Tier-1 news restrictions apply in recorded simulated-funded stages |
| Broad platform ecosystem | Traders must distinguish EOD and intraday funded risk carefully |
In-Depth Review & Analysis
My Funded Futures Account Types and Rules
| Program | Sizes | Target | Maximum Loss | Daily Loss | Key Payout Rule |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Builder | $25K / $50K | 6% | 3–4% EOD trailing depending on configuration | 0% on 25K; 2% soft pause on listed 50K routes | 2 qualifying days; 50% highest-day payout rule |
| Rapid | $25K / $50K / $100K / $150K | 6% | 3–4% | 0% | Daily payout eligibility after buffer and minimum profit are met |
| Rapid EOD | $50K | 6% | 4% EOD trailing | 0% | Daily after the first-payout buffer; EOD drawdown remains in sim-funded stage |
| Pro | $50K / $100K / $150K | 6% | 3–4% EOD trailing | 0% | Every 14 calendar days under the listed plan |
| Pro 50K One-Day | $50K | 8% | 4% EOD trailing | 0% | One evaluation day; Pro payout structure after passing |
Builder
Builder currently includes a $25K route and two $50K configurations. The $25K account uses a $1,000 maximum-loss amount and no daily loss limit. The default $50K route uses a $2,000 maximum loss, while the reduced-MLL add-on uses $1,500. The listed $50K Builder routes use a $1,000 soft daily pause. Evaluation consistency is not required, but payouts use a 50% highest-day rule.
Rapid and Rapid EOD
Rapid uses a 6% evaluation target across $25K, $50K, $100K and $150K. The evaluation uses end-of-day trailing drawdown. Standard Rapid changes to an intraday trailing equity high-water mark in the sim-funded stage, while Rapid EOD keeps end-of-day trailing. This difference directly affects how quickly the loss floor can move during profitable sessions.
Pro
Pro is listed in $50K, $100K and $150K sizes with a 6% target and no daily loss limit. Its drawdown is end-of-day trailing in evaluation and sim-funded stages. The current Pro 50K One-Day add-on is a separate configuration with an 8% evaluation target and one evaluation day.
Payout Structure
Builder requires two qualifying days per payout cycle and uses a 50% highest-day rule. Rapid can become payout-eligible daily after its applicable buffer and minimum-profit requirements are satisfied. Pro uses a 14-calendar-day payout cycle under the currently listed rules. Minimum payouts and caps differ by program and account size, so the exact account card should be used for planning withdrawals.
Trading Permissions
News trading is allowed during evaluation under the listed Rapid and Pro rules but Tier-1 news is restricted in the sim-funded stage. Overnight holding is not allowed on the listed Builder route. Platform availability includes Tradovate, TradingView, NinjaTrader, Quantower, Rithmic-supported platforms and Fintevo.
Challenge accounts
Account sizes
Prices as the firm lists them
What this programme asks of you
One-Step — Builder6%
Profit target
4% EOD trailing; locks $100 above starting balance
Max drawdown
0% — no daily loss limit
Daily loss limit
1 evaluation day; 2 qualifying days per payout cycle
Min trading days
80% trader / 20% firm
Profit split
Every rule, stated
Including the ones firms leave off their pricing page.
A consistency rule caps how much of your total profit may come from a single day, so one outsized trade will not pass the challenge on its own.
My Funded Futures's conditions for this programme
Builder 25K has a $1,500 target, $1,000 EOD trailing maximum loss, no daily loss limit and a $1,000 maximum payout per cycle.
Payout methods
Final Verdict
Is My Funded Futures PFB Verified or a Risk for Futures Traders?
Verdict: PFB Verified. My Funded Futures receives an 86 / 100 PFB Score, which places it firmly in the PFB Verified category. The review is positive overall because the firm gives futures traders several useful ways to balance evaluation cost, drawdown style, payout speed and profit split.
Builder, Rapid, Rapid EOD and Pro are meaningfully different. Rapid can be attractive for payout velocity and its current 90% trader split. Rapid EOD gives traders a way to retain end-of-day drawdown after funding. Builder and Pro provide alternative payout structures while keeping EOD drawdown in their recorded stages. The main risk is not the number of plans itself, but choosing one without understanding its funded mechanics. Traders who manage CME futures contracts from the actual drawdown and contract limit rather than the headline balance should find the current structure competitive.
Prop Firm Bridge Recommendation Score: 86 / 100
Recommendation: My Funded Futures is recommended for disciplined futures traders who select their account by drawdown method and payout structure.
User Rating
PFB Score
Frequently Asked Questions
Prop Firm Bridge currently gives My Funded Futures an 86 / 100 score, placing it in the PFB Verified category. The positive rating reflects its range of current futures programs, EOD drawdown choices, payout flexibility, broad platform support and defined account rules. Traders still need to select the correct model because Builder, Rapid, Rapid EOD and Pro do not behave identically. The biggest distinction is standard Rapid's switch from EOD trailing drawdown during evaluation to intraday trailing after funding. Understanding that change is essential before trading larger futures contracts.
Drawdown depends on the selected plan. Builder and Pro currently use end-of-day trailing drawdown in evaluation and simulated-funded stages. Standard Rapid uses EOD trailing during evaluation and changes to intraday trailing after funding. Rapid EOD keeps EOD trailing after funding. With EOD drawdown, the reference typically updates from the session close rather than every unrealized intraday high. Intraday trailing is stricter because open profit can move the floor. Traders should calculate every position from the account's actual dollar loss allowance.
Payout timing is plan-specific. Builder uses qualifying-day and 50% highest-day requirements. Rapid can become payout-ready daily after its buffer and minimum-profit conditions are satisfied. Rapid EOD also uses a faster payout structure after its required buffer. Pro currently uses a 14-calendar-day payout cycle. Minimum withdrawals, payout caps and buffer requirements vary by account and size. A trader should therefore build a withdrawal plan from the exact account terms rather than assuming that all My Funded Futures programs share Rapid's payout schedule.
The main difference is funded drawdown behavior. Standard Rapid uses end-of-day trailing drawdown during the evaluation but changes to an intraday trailing equity high-water mark in the simulated-funded stage. Rapid EOD keeps end-of-day trailing drawdown in both stages. That difference matters when a futures position develops a large unrealized profit and then retraces. Under intraday trailing logic, the open-profit peak can affect the risk floor. Traders who prefer to let winners fluctuate may find the EOD structure easier to manage.
Current recorded Rapid and Pro rules allow Tier-1 news trading during evaluation but restrict Tier-1 news in the simulated-funded stage. Permissions can differ by program, so traders should use the exact account agreement for the route they select. This matters for ES, NQ, GC and other contracts that can move rapidly around scheduled economic releases. A trader whose edge depends on entering during major news should confirm the current funded-stage window before purchasing rather than relying only on evaluation permissions.
My Funded Futures is best for disciplined futures traders who want to choose between payout speed and drawdown style. Rapid is attractive for traders prioritizing frequent payout access, while Rapid EOD is better suited to traders who specifically prefer EOD risk behavior. Builder can suit traders seeking a structured progression route, and Pro can suit traders comfortable with a longer payout cycle. The 86 / 100 PFB Score supports a strong overall recommendation, provided the trader understands the exact contract, drawdown and payout rules.