Introduction
Tradeify futures prop firm review: Tradeify is a futures prop firm founded in 2024 with Growth Evaluation, Select Evaluation and Lightning Funded routes. Growth and Select use one-step evaluations, while Lightning provides a straight-to-sim-funded path. Current programs use end-of-day trailing maximum drawdown and contract-based futures risk. Growth adds a soft daily loss limit, Select changes the funded payout structure depending on whether the trader chooses Flex or Daily, and Lightning uses progressive payout-cycle consistency instead of an evaluation. Current sizes run from $25K to $150K. The firm is relevant for disciplined ES, NQ, YM, CL, GC and other exchange-traded futures traders who want a choice between evaluation and instant funding and who understand that drawdown, daily loss and payout caps matter more than the headline balance.
Bridge Verdict Preview
Tradeify has a strong overall futures profile. Its 84 / 100 PFB Score places it in the PFB Verified category. The biggest strength is the ability to choose between Growth, Select Flex, Select Daily and Lightning payout logic, while the main risk is assuming those funded rules are interchangeable. It suits disciplined intraday traders who can choose a plan around their preferred daily loss control and payout frequency.
TL;DR
- Best for: futures traders wanting multiple EOD evaluation and instant-funded paths.
- Biggest strength: Select removes funded consistency and offers Flex or Daily choices.
- Main risk: payout buffers, caps and consistency differ materially between programs.
Quick Specs
| Feature | Detail |
|---|---|
| Firm Name | Tradeify |
| Founded Year | 2024 |
| Origin Country | United States |
| Market Type | Futures |
| Evaluation Type | One-Step and straight-to-sim-funded |
| Max Account Size | $150K |
| Profit Target | 6% on Growth and Select evaluations |
| Drawdown Type | EOD trailing |
| Profit Split | 90% to trader on current funded structures |
| News Trading | Allowed under current recorded rules |
| PFB Score | 84 / 100 |
| Prop Firm Bridge Star Rating | 4.2 / 5 |
| Risk Status | PFB Verified |
Ratings Breakdown
Our Take
Tradeify received an 84 out of 100 score because its futures evaluation structure prioritizes EOD risk control, payout choice and multiple funding paths, but traders must understand plan-specific buffers, caps and consistency.
Who This Futures Firm Is For (and Not For)
Tradeify is a strong option for disciplined futures traders who want to choose how much structure sits around their trading. Growth suits traders who are comfortable with a soft daily loss limit and 35% funded payout consistency. Select is attractive to traders who can pass a 40% consistency evaluation and then want no funded consistency. After passing Select, Flex suits traders who prefer no funded daily loss limit and five-day payout qualification, while Daily suits traders prioritizing more frequent payout access and accepting a buffer plus soft daily loss limit. Lightning is designed for experienced traders who want to skip evaluation and can manage progressive consistency.
It is not suited to traders who ignore contract limits or treat every Tradeify plan as identical. Lightning in particular requires careful payout-cycle planning as consistency changes over successive withdrawals.
Risk Profile Compared to Futures Industry Standards
Tradeify compares favorably with current futures industry structures because Growth, Select and Lightning use end-of-day trailing drawdown. EOD trailing is generally easier to model than an intraday high-water mark because open-profit spikes do not continuously move the floor. Growth adds a soft daily limit, while Select Flex removes a funded daily limit. Select Daily and larger Lightning accounts use their own soft controls. The firm therefore gives traders several ways to manage risk. Futures accounts should still be sized from the actual maximum-loss allowance. A $50K account with a $2,000 drawdown is effectively a $2,000 risk envelope regardless of the nominal balance. Tradeify's 84 / 100 score reflects strong overall conditions with enough complexity that plan selection matters.
First-Person Testing Signal
During our account-level verification, Select's funded choice stood out. A trader passes one evaluation and then permanently chooses Flex or Daily. Flex removes the funded daily loss limit and uses qualifying days, while Daily adds a buffer and soft daily limit in exchange for a different payout path. That choice can materially change the same strategy's risk profile after passing.
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| 84 / 100 PFB Score and PFB Verified status | Rules vary materially between programs |
| EOD trailing drawdown across current structures | Growth uses 35% funded payout consistency |
| Select removes funded consistency | Lightning uses progressive consistency |
| Select Flex has no funded daily loss limit | Payout caps vary by size and cycle |
| 90% trader share on current funded structures | Select Daily requires a buffer and soft daily loss limit |
| Evaluation and straight-to-funded paths | Contract capacity can depend on funded scaling |
In-Depth Review & Analysis
Tradeify Account Types and Rules
| Program | Sizes | Target / Goal | Maximum Loss | Daily Loss | Consistency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Growth | $25K–$150K | 6% evaluation | 3.33–4% EOD trailing | 2.4–2.5% soft limit | None evaluation; 35% funded payout |
| Select | $25K–$150K | 6% evaluation | About 3–4% EOD trailing | 0% evaluation/Flex; about 1.17–2% Daily funded | 40% evaluation; none funded |
| Lightning | $25K–$150K | No evaluation; payout-cycle goals | 3.5–4% EOD trailing | 0% on $25K; 2–2.5% larger sizes | 20% first payout, 25% second, 30% third+ |
Growth Evaluation
Growth has a 6% evaluation target. Maximum-loss amounts are $1,000 / $2,000 / $3,500 / $5,000 on $25K / $50K / $100K / $150K. The soft daily-loss amounts are $600 / $1,250 / $2,500 / $3,750. Evaluation has no consistency rule; funded payout eligibility uses 35% consistency and five qualifying profit days.
Select Evaluation
Select also uses a 6% target. After passing, traders permanently choose Select Flex or Select Daily. Flex uses five-day payout qualification, no funded daily-loss limit and larger caps. Daily uses daily payout eligibility, a size-specific buffer and soft daily-loss amounts of $500 / $1,000 / $1,250 / $1,750. The evaluation uses 40% consistency; funded Select has no consistency rule.
Lightning Funded
Lightning has no evaluation. The first payout goal is $1,500 / $3,000 / $6,000 / $9,000 and later payout goals are $1,000 / $2,000 / $3,500 / $4,500 by size. The funded consistency requirement progresses from 20% to 25% and then 30% from the third payout onward.
Payout and Platform Notes
Payout caps and minimums are program-specific. Current payout methods include Rise and Plane. The page should use the exact selected account card for contract limits, drawdown and payout planning instead of treating Tradeify as one universal futures program.
Challenge accounts
Account sizes
Prices as the firm lists them
What this programme asks of you
One-Step — Growth6%
Profit target
3.33–4% EOD trailing depending on size
Max drawdown
2.4–2.5% soft Daily Loss Limit depending on size
Daily loss limit
Evaluation may be passed in 1 trading day; each funded payout cycle requires 5 qualifying profit days
Min trading days
90% to trader
Profit split
Every rule, stated
Including the ones firms leave off their pricing page.
A consistency rule caps how much of your total profit may come from a single day, so one outsized trade will not pass the challenge on its own.
Tradeify's conditions for this programme
Targets are $1,500 / $3,000 / $6,000 / $9,000. Maximum loss is $1,000 / $2,000 / $3,500 / $5,000. Soft daily loss is $600 / $1,250 / $2,500 / $3,750 on $25K / $50K / $100K / $150K.
Payout methods
Final Verdict
Is Tradeify PFB Verified or a Risk for Futures Traders?
Verdict: PFB Verified. Tradeify receives an 84 / 100 PFB Score, placing it clearly inside the PFB Verified category. The review is positive overall because the firm combines EOD trailing risk control, a current 90% trader share and several genuinely different routes for futures traders.
Growth provides a conventional one-step structure with funded consistency. Select is particularly flexible after passing because traders choose between Flex and Daily while funded consistency is removed. Lightning skips evaluation but uses progressive consistency and payout goals. These options make Tradeify adaptable, but they also mean traders must read the exact funded rule set before selecting an account. For disciplined futures traders who size contracts from actual drawdown and plan withdrawals around buffers and caps, Tradeify offers a strong current proposition.
Prop Firm Bridge Recommendation Score: 84 / 100
Recommendation: Tradeify is recommended for disciplined futures traders who choose the funded payout structure that matches their risk style.
User Rating
PFB Score
Frequently Asked Questions
Prop Firm Bridge currently scores Tradeify 84 / 100, placing it in the PFB Verified category. The positive rating reflects its EOD trailing drawdown, multiple futures funding paths, current 90% trader share and useful Select funded choices. Traders still need to understand that Growth, Select Flex, Select Daily and Lightning use different payout, daily-loss and consistency mechanics. Tradeify is strongest for traders who select the account around their actual strategy rather than assuming every plan behaves the same after funding.
Current Growth, Select and Lightning structures use end-of-day trailing maximum drawdown. The exact percentage, dollar amount and lock behavior depend on the selected account and size. EOD trailing generally means the risk reference updates through the program's end-of-day logic rather than continuously following every unrealized intraday high. Traders should still calculate position size from the actual maximum-loss amount. A $100K futures account with only a few thousand dollars of drawdown should be managed around that smaller risk envelope.
Payout rules depend on the program. Growth requires five qualifying profit days, 35% funded consistency and the size-specific balance condition. Select traders choose Flex or Daily after passing. Flex uses qualifying winning days and larger payout caps, while Daily uses a buffer and its daily payout framework. Lightning requires the cycle profit goal and progressive consistency. Minimums and caps vary by account. Traders should therefore plan withdrawals using the exact funded route rather than applying one Tradeify payout schedule to every program.
Both begin from the Select evaluation, but the funded structures differ. Select Flex uses five qualifying payout days, no funded daily loss limit and larger payout caps. Select Daily is designed around more frequent payout access but uses a size-specific buffer and soft daily loss limit. Current Select funded structures do not use a consistency rule. The choice is permanent after passing, so traders should decide whether they value wider day-to-day risk flexibility or a payout structure designed for more frequent requests.
Current Tradeify account data lists news trading as allowed under the published trading rules, subject to the selected account agreement. Futures traders should still account for the larger price movement and slippage that can occur around major economic releases. News permission does not change the maximum-loss or daily-loss limits. This is particularly important for NQ, ES, GC and CL, where a small number of contracts can move the account rapidly during high-volatility events.
Tradeify is best for disciplined futures traders who want to choose between a conventional evaluation, a flexible funded payout structure and a straight-to-funded route. Growth suits traders comfortable with funded consistency. Select is attractive for traders who want no funded consistency and a choice between Flex and Daily. Lightning suits experienced traders who can manage progressive payout-cycle consistency. Its 84 / 100 PFB Score supports a positive overall recommendation.