Introduction
UProfit futures prop firm review: UProfit is a futures prop firm founded in 2019 with current Day Soft and Day Flex one-step evaluation routes. Both are designed around exchange-traded futures, use a 6% target and EOD trailing drawdown, and are listed in $50K, $100K and $150K sizes. Day Soft adds a soft daily loss limit, while Day Flex removes the separate daily limit. Both use 50% evaluation consistency and a 40% best-day condition for funded payout cycles. Current platform access includes TradingView and Tradovate/Tradoverse. The firm can be relevant for experienced ES, NQ, YM, CL, GC and other futures traders who prefer EOD risk calculation and can work with SafetyNet, consistency and profitable-day payout requirements.
Bridge Verdict Preview
UProfit has a Moderate overall profile with notable restrictions. Its 41 / 100 PFB Score falls inside the Moderate category, near the lower end of that range. EOD drawdown and the choice between a soft daily guardrail or no daily limit are useful, but SafetyNet, consistency and payout-day requirements materially reduce flexibility. It best suits experienced intraday traders who understand these conditions before subscribing.
TL;DR
- Best for: experienced intraday futures traders who prefer EOD trailing drawdown.
- Biggest strength: simple Day Soft versus Day Flex choice with same core target.
- Main risk: SafetyNet, evaluation consistency and funded payout consistency add friction.
Quick Specs
| Feature | Detail |
|---|---|
| Firm Name | UProfit |
| Founded Year | 2019 |
| Market Type | Futures |
| Evaluation Type | One-Step |
| Max Account Size | $150K |
| Profit Target | 6% |
| Drawdown Type | EOD trailing |
| Profit Split | Up to 90% under current DAY structure |
| Trading Platforms | TradingView, Tradovate / Tradoverse |
| PFB Score | 41 / 100 |
| Prop Firm Bridge Star Rating | 2.1 / 5 |
| Risk Status | Moderate |
Ratings Breakdown
Our Take
UProfit received a 41 out of 100 score because its futures evaluation structure provides EOD risk control and a simple two-plan choice, but traders must understand SafetyNet, consistency and payout-day requirements.
Who This Futures Firm Is For (and Not For)
UProfit can suit experienced futures traders who want EOD trailing drawdown and a straightforward choice between a daily guardrail and more intraday flexibility. Day Soft can be useful for traders who prefer a soft session stop to prevent one bad day from consuming the entire maximum loss. Day Flex is better suited to traders who want no separate daily loss limit and can enforce their own daily risk cap. Both require 50% evaluation consistency and can be completed in as little as two trading days when the target and consistency rule are satisfied.
It is less suitable for traders who dislike recurring evaluation subscriptions, non-withdrawable payout buffers or consistency calculations. The funded payout cycle also requires profitable days, which reduces payout freedom. The 41 score means UProfit remains Moderate, but our assessment is cautious because it sits much closer to the High Risk threshold than to Trusted.
Risk Profile Compared to Futures Industry Standards
Both current DAY routes use EOD trailing drawdown, which is a positive risk feature compared with intraday trailing. Day Soft adds a soft daily limit, while Day Flex leaves the maximum-loss floor as the primary risk boundary. The more restrictive part of the structure appears around payout access. Traders need the applicable non-withdrawable SafetyNet, three profitable days and a 40% best-day condition for the payout cycle. Evaluation also uses 50% consistency. A $50K account with a $2,000 maximum loss should be managed around that $2,000 risk envelope, not the nominal balance. UProfit's risk structure is understandable, but the combination of subscription cost and payout conditions supports the lower Moderate score.
First-Person Testing Signal
During our account-level verification, Day Soft and Day Flex were simpler than older UProfit summaries suggested. Their core target, EOD drawdown and payout framework are the same. The key difference is the daily-loss guardrail. That makes plan selection easier, but the shared SafetyNet and consistency requirements remain the main factors affecting funded flexibility.
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| EOD trailing drawdown | 41 / 100 PFB Score, lower Moderate range |
| Day Flex has no separate daily loss limit | Monthly evaluation subscriptions |
| Day Soft uses a soft daily guardrail | Non-withdrawable SafetyNet required |
| Evaluation can pass in two days | 50% evaluation consistency |
| Up to 90% current trader share | 40% funded payout consistency |
| TradingView and Tradovate access | Three profitable days required per payout |
In-Depth Review & Analysis
UProfit DAY Account Types and Rules
| Program | Sizes | Target | Maximum Loss | Daily Loss | Consistency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day Soft | $50K / $100K / $150K | 6% | 3–4% EOD trailing | 2–2.2% soft limit | 50% evaluation; 40% funded payout |
| Day Flex | $50K / $100K / $150K | 6% | 3–4% EOD trailing | 0% | 50% evaluation; 40% funded payout |
Day Soft
Day Soft uses a 6% target. Maximum-loss amounts are $2,000, $3,000 and $4,500 on $50K, $100K and $150K. Its soft daily-loss amounts are $1,100, $2,200 and $3,000. The daily rule pauses trading for the session, while the overall loss limit remains EOD trailing.
Day Flex
Day Flex uses the same 6% target and EOD maximum-loss amounts but removes the separate daily loss limit. This gives more intraday room, although the account still has to remain above the EOD trailing floor.
Payout Rules
Both DAY variants require three profitable days per withdrawal and a non-withdrawable SafetyNet. The current SafetyNet levels are $2,500, $4,500 and $6,500 above the nominal starting balances for $50K, $100K and $150K. Evaluation consistency is 50%, while funded payout eligibility uses a 40% best-day condition.
Trading Hours and Platforms
The current DAY session runs from the listed evening open to the 4:10 PM ET cutoff, with no holding between sessions. Current platform access includes TradingView and Tradovate/Tradoverse.
Challenge accounts
Account sizes
Prices as the firm lists them
What this programme asks of you
6%
Profit target
3–4% EOD trailing depending on size
Max drawdown
2–2.2% soft daily limit depending on size
Daily loss limit
Evaluation can pass in 2 trading days; each payout requires 3 profitable days
Min trading days
Up to 90% to trader
Profit split
Every rule, stated
Including the ones firms leave off their pricing page.
A consistency rule caps how much of your total profit may come from a single day, so one outsized trade will not pass the challenge on its own.
UProfit's conditions for this programme
Targets are $3,000 / $6,000 / $9,000, maximum loss is $2,000 / $3,000 / $4,500 and soft daily loss is $1,100 / $2,200 / $3,000 on $50K / $100K / $150K. SafetyNet is $2,500 / $4,500 / $6,500 above starting balance.
Payout methods
Final Verdict
Is UProfit Trusted or a Risk for Futures Traders?
Verdict: Moderate. UProfit receives a 41 / 100 PFB Score. Under the exact Prop Firm Bridge scoring rule, it remains inside the Moderate category, but it is close enough to the lower boundary that the review should be cautious.
The current DAY lineup is easy to understand: Day Soft adds a soft daily loss limit, while Day Flex removes it. Both use a 6% target and EOD trailing drawdown. Those are useful features. The main weakness is payout friction. Both structures use evaluation consistency, a non-withdrawable SafetyNet, profitable-day requirements and funded best-day control. Evaluation subscriptions also recur monthly. These conditions make the firm potentially suitable for experienced, disciplined traders but prevent a stronger recommendation at the current score.
PFB Score Breakdown
| Category | Rating |
|---|---|
| Trading Conditions | 2.5 / 5 |
| User Friendliness | 2.0 / 5 |
| Payout Process | 1.8 / 5 |
| Customer Care | 2.0 / 5 |
| Total Score | 41 / 100 |
| Prop Firm Bridge Star Rating | 2.1 / 5 |
| Risk Status | Moderate |
Prop Firm Bridge Recommendation Score: 41 / 100
Recommendation: UProfit is best considered cautiously by experienced traders comfortable with its SafetyNet and consistency requirements.
User Rating
PFB Score
Frequently Asked Questions
Prop Firm Bridge currently scores UProfit 41 / 100. That places it in the Moderate category, although it sits toward the lower end of the range. The positive side includes EOD trailing drawdown, a clear Day Soft versus Day Flex choice and up to a 90% current trader share. The main concerns are recurring evaluation subscriptions, a non-withdrawable SafetyNet, 50% evaluation consistency, funded payout consistency and profitable-day requirements. Traders should therefore approach UProfit as a rule-sensitive option rather than a strong universal recommendation.
Both current DAY variants use end-of-day trailing drawdown. Maximum-loss amounts are $2,000 on $50K, $3,000 on $100K and $4,500 on $150K. Day Soft adds a soft daily loss limit, while Day Flex removes the separate daily limit. EOD trailing is generally easier to manage than an intraday equity trail because the reference is based on the program's closing framework. Traders should still calculate contract risk from the actual maximum-loss amount rather than the nominal account size.
Day Soft and Day Flex share the same 6% target, account sizes, EOD maximum-loss amounts, 50% evaluation consistency and funded payout framework. The main difference is the daily-loss rule. Day Soft uses a soft daily loss limit that pauses trading for the session, while Day Flex has no separate daily loss limit. Traders who want a built-in daily guardrail may prefer Soft, while traders with strong personal risk controls may prefer Flex.
Current DAY payouts require three profitable days plus the applicable non-withdrawable SafetyNet and payout conditions. Funded payout eligibility also uses a 40% best-day condition. The SafetyNet levels vary by account size and must remain in the account. This means reaching profit alone does not automatically make the full amount withdrawable. Traders should plan their payout cycle around the SafetyNet and avoid using contract size that leaves too little room above the account's trailing loss floor.
Yes, the current DAY evaluation can be completed in as little as two trading days when the 6% target and 50% evaluation consistency rule are satisfied. The consistency rule means one day cannot dominate the total evaluation profit beyond the permitted relationship. Passing quickly therefore still requires profit distribution across the minimum practical number of sessions. Traders should not increase contract size simply to force a two-day pass because the EOD maximum-loss limit remains the primary breach boundary.
UProfit is best for experienced intraday futures traders who prefer EOD trailing drawdown and are comfortable with consistency and payout-buffer rules. Day Soft can suit traders who want a soft daily stop, while Day Flex suits traders who prefer no separate daily limit. Traders who want simpler payout access, no recurring subscription or fewer consistency requirements may find the structure less attractive. Its 41 / 100 PFB Score supports a cautious Moderate assessment.