Audacity Capital vs FXIFY 2026 comparison of Ability vs FXIFY rules, static/trailing drawdown, payouts, prices and verified “BRIDGE” coupon savings.
Akash Mane is the Founder and CEO of Prop Firm Bridge, where he leads the company’s vision, platform growth, and long term strategic direction. He oversees operations across research, marketing, content systems, SEO, and product positioning while driving the platform’s mission of becoming a trusted authority in the prop firm industry. At Prop Firm Bridge, Akash plays a direct role in shaping educational frameworks, comparison systems, and trader focused resources designed to help users make informed decisions with transparency and confidence. His work focuses on building scalable organic growth systems, improving platform authority, and strengthening trust through accurate, structured, and search optimized content. In addition to leadership responsibilities, he actively manages growth strategy, social media marketing, search visibility, and brand development to expand the platform’s reach across global trading audiences.
Manoj Gholap is responsible for content accuracy, compliance, and factual integrity at Prop Firm Bridge. He acts as the final verification layer for all published content, ensuring that prop firm reviews, rules, and comparisons are clear, accurate, and aligned with transparency standards. Manoj plays a key role in maintaining trust and credibility across the platform.
Quick answer: Audacity Capital and FXIFY both offer one-step, two-step and instant-style prop trading, but they use different drawdown architectures. Audacity Capital currently concentrates on Ability One, Ability Challenge and FTP. FXIFY offers a broader family including One Phase, several Two Phase variants, Three Phase, Lightning and Instant products. The strongest comparison is therefore product-to-product, not brand-to-brand.
Coupon answer: Audacity Capital coupon code “BRIDGE”, promo code “BRIDGE” and discount code “BRIDGE” currently refer to the same verified 35.00% relationship under the stated coverage. FXIFY coupon code “BRIDGE” is currently 10.00% off under verified coverage. Confirm the final live checkout price before payment.
Featured-snippet answer: Audacity Capital vs FXIFY in 2026 is mainly a static-versus-trailing drawdown decision. Audacity Ability Challenge currently gives 7.5% daily and 15% maximum loss in Phase 1 before tightening to 5%/10%; Ability One uses 3%/6% static risk. FXIFY lets traders choose among static and trailing high-watermark models. Audacity BRIDGE is currently 35.00% and FXIFY BRIDGE 10.00% under their verified coverage.
Independent coupon verification: Prop Firm Bridge independently verified the current BRIDGE relationships stated on the related coupon pages. Coupon verification is separate from editorial scoring. Last verified in 2026. Always confirm the final checkout price before payment.
| Field | Audacity Capital | FXIFY |
|---|---|---|
| PFB Score | 88/100 | 80/100 |
| Status | PFB Verified | PFB Verified |
| Coupon | “BRIDGE” 35.00% | “BRIDGE” 10.00% |
| Current program count in PFB data | 3 | 10 |
Audacity currently carries a 88/100 PFB Score and FXIFY 80/100. The score difference is not the central decision variable for this matchup. Drawdown mechanics are. A static account and a trailing-high-watermark account can produce very different usable risk even when the headline maximum-loss percentage is identical.
Current 2026 Audacity official material confirms Ability Challenge, Ability One and FTP as separate paths. Ability Challenge gives unusually wide Phase-1 room and then tightens. Ability One is a compact static one-step. FTP is an instant-style growth route with a trailing daily component. FXIFY’s menu is broader and mixes static and trailing structures across its evaluation and instant products.
| Firm | Program | Type | Target | Daily | Max | Drawdown | Payout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Audacity Capital | Ability One | One Step | 10% | 3% | 6% | Static | First payout after 14 days; then every 14 days |
| Audacity Capital | Ability Challenge | Two Step | 10% / 5% | 7.5% Phase 1; 5% Phase 2 and funded | 15% Phase 1; 10% Phase 2 and funded | Static | First payout after 14 days; then every 14 days |
| Audacity Capital | Funded Trader Program (FTP) | Instant | 10% growth milestone | 5% trailing | 10% static | Static, Trailing Daily | On reaching each 10% growth milestone |
| FXIFY | One Phase | One Step | 10% | 3% | 6% | Trailing closed-balance high-watermark, Equity breach | First payout on demand; then every 30 days, or 14 days with add-on |
| FXIFY | Two Phase Classic | Two Step | 5% | 4% | 10% | Static, Equity breach | Every 30 days; optional 14-day add-on |
| FXIFY | Two Phase Standard | Two Step | 10% | 4% | 10% | Trailing closed-balance high-watermark, Equity breach | First payout on demand; then every 30 days, or 14 days with add-on |
| FXIFY | Two Phase Pro | Two Step | 4% | 4% | 8% | Static, Equity breach | Every 10 days |
| FXIFY | Three Phase | Three Step | 5% | 5% | 5% | Static, Equity breach | First payout on demand; then every 30 days, or 14 days with add-on |
| FXIFY | Instant Funding Standard | Instant Funding | no conventional profit target | 8% | 8% | Trailing closed-balance high-watermark, Equity breach | Every 14 days |
| FXIFY | Instant Funding Lite | Instant Funding | no conventional profit target | 3% | 4% | Trailing closed-balance high-watermark, Equity breach | Eligible after 10 calendar days from first trade and five trading days |
| FXIFY | Lightning Challenge | Lightning | 5% | 3% | 4% | Trailing closed-balance high-watermark, Equity breach | First payout 7 days after first funded trade; then every 14 days |
| FXIFY | Crypto Instant Funding | Crypto Instant Funding | no conventional profit target | 3% | 6% | Trailing closed-balance high-watermark, Equity breach | Every 14 days from first trade |
| FXIFY | Crypto Standard (1 Step) | Crypto One Step | 9% | 3% | 6% | Trailing closed-balance high-watermark, Equity breach | 14 days; 100% split option uses monthly payout |
The table shows why generic “Audacity vs FXIFY” summaries can become inaccurate. FXIFY is not one drawdown model. Audacity is not one daily-loss number. The exact program name must remain attached to the rule.
Both currently show a 10% target and 3% daily limit, with a 6% maximum-loss headline. Ability One is static. FXIFY One Phase currently uses trailing closed-balance high-watermark logic. That single mechanical difference can matter more than the matching percentages.
Audacity Ability Challenge currently uses 10%/5% targets and starts with 7.5% daily/15% max in Phase 1 before tightening to 5%/10%. FXIFY has multiple Two Phase variants, so the trader can choose static or trailing and different target/buffer combinations. The closest model depends on whether the trader values wide loss room, low target or static drawdown.
FTP uses a 10% growth milestone, five trading days, a trailing daily component and static absolute loss. FXIFY Instant products remove the conventional evaluation target but use trailing high-watermark risk and product-specific payout conditions. “Instant” does not make the structures equivalent.
Static drawdown keeps a fixed lifetime reference under the program rules. Trailing drawdown follows performance according to a high-watermark formula. If a $100K account with 6% static maximum loss earns $5,000, the original floor generally remains fixed. On a trailing structure, a new closed-balance high can move the floor upward, reducing how much profit can later be surrendered.
Audacity Ability One and Ability Challenge use static maximum-loss structures in current verified data. FXIFY includes static Two Phase variants and trailing models such as current One Phase/Standard and Instant structures. Audacity FTP is a hybrid because the current daily drawdown trails while the absolute maximum remains static.
The practical lesson is to model the sequence of profits and losses, not just the net result. A trailing account can be more sensitive to the order in which returns occur. A withdrawal can also matter if the account’s drawdown locks or the cushion is removed.
Audacity Ability Challenge is the clearest stage-change example. Current official 2026 material gives Phase 1 a 7.5% daily and 15% maximum-loss allowance, then tightens Verification and Live to 5% daily and 10% maximum loss. A trader who learns to depend on the Phase-1 width can face a behavioral shock after passing.
The safer approach is to trade Phase 1 with personal risk that would already survive the funded-stage rules. This turns the wider Phase-1 room into safety margin rather than permission to increase size.
FXIFY stage behavior differs by product, especially on trailing structures and after withdrawals. Traders should confirm how the loss floor behaves once funded and after the first payout request.
Audacity Ability One and Ability Challenge current data lists a 75%–90% profit-share progression and 14-day funded payout cycles. FTP currently lists a 50%–80% progression tied to growth milestones. Current Audacity material also describes scaling toward larger allocations under qualifying performance.
FXIFY current evaluation records generally show an 80% base share, while payout timing differs by model: selected evaluation routes can offer on-demand first payout positioning, Two Phase Pro currently lists a 10-day cycle, and Instant products use 14-day or product-specific eligibility windows.
A payout schedule should not be used as a trading deadline. The market does not know the withdrawal date. Risk should remain unchanged even if the next payout window is close.
Audacity current Ability routes allow news, weekend holding and EAs. Current 2026 Audacity material permits copy trading under conditions and describes prohibited practices separately. FTP has its own current news-window behavior.
FXIFY current evaluation products generally allow news, weekend holding and EAs, while selected Instant, Lightning and crypto structures have more restrictive flags. The product name is therefore essential to the answer.
Automation permission does not approve latency exploitation, prohibited arbitrage, account sharing or third-party ownership structures. Multi-account traders should read the detailed terms before synchronizing positions.
Audacity Capital “BRIDGE” is currently 35.00% off under verified coverage. The calculated subtotal is base fee × 0.65 before separate checkout charges.
| Audacity program | Size | Base | Saving | Subtotal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ability One | $5,000 | $69 | $24.15 | $44.85 |
| Ability One | $10,000 | $99 | $34.65 | $64.35 |
| Ability One | $25,000 | $249 | $87.15 | $161.85 |
| Ability One | $50,000 | $399 | $139.65 | $259.35 |
| Ability One | $100,000 | $699 | $244.65 | $454.35 |
| Ability Challenge | $5,000 | $49 | $17.15 | $31.85 |
| Ability Challenge | $10,000 | $79 | $27.65 | $51.35 |
| Ability Challenge | $25,000 | $195 | $68.25 | $126.75 |
| Ability Challenge | $50,000 | $329 | $115.15 | $213.85 |
| Ability Challenge | $100,000 | $549 | $192.15 | $356.85 |
| Ability Challenge | $200,000 | $1,049 | $367.15 | $681.85 |
| Funded Trader Program (FTP) | $5,000 | $119 | $41.65 | $77.35 |
| Funded Trader Program (FTP) | $10,000 | $279 | $97.65 | $181.35 |
| Funded Trader Program (FTP) | $25,000 | $449 | $157.15 | $291.85 |
| Funded Trader Program (FTP) | $50,000 | $1,299 | $454.65 | $844.35 |
FXIFY “BRIDGE” is currently 10.00% off under verified coverage. This is the same code entity whether a trader searches FXIFY coupon code, FXIFY promo code or FXIFY discount code.
| FXIFY program | Size | Base | Saving | Subtotal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| One Phase | $5,000 | $59 | $5.9 | $53.1 |
| One Phase | $10,000 | $89 | $8.9 | $80.1 |
| One Phase | $15,000 | $119 | $11.9 | $107.1 |
| One Phase | $25,000 | $199 | $19.9 | $179.1 |
| Two Phase Classic | $5,000 | $59 | $5.9 | $53.1 |
| Two Phase Classic | $10,000 | $89 | $8.9 | $80.1 |
| Two Phase Classic | $15,000 | $119 | $11.9 | $107.1 |
| Two Phase Classic | $25,000 | $199 | $19.9 | $179.1 |
| Two Phase Standard | $5,000 | $59 | $5.9 | $53.1 |
| Two Phase Standard | $10,000 | $89 | $8.9 | $80.1 |
| Two Phase Standard | $15,000 | $119 | $11.9 | $107.1 |
| Two Phase Standard | $25,000 | $199 | $19.9 | $179.1 |
| Two Phase Pro | $10,000 | $129 | $12.9 | $116.1 |
| Two Phase Pro | $25,000 | $225 | $22.5 | $202.5 |
| Two Phase Pro | $50,000 | $375 | $37.5 | $337.5 |
| Two Phase Pro | $100,000 | $599 | $59.9 | $539.1 |
| Three Phase | $5,000 | $39 | $3.9 | $35.1 |
| Three Phase | $10,000 | $59 | $5.9 | $53.1 |
| Three Phase | $15,000 | $79 | $7.9 | $71.1 |
| Three Phase | $25,000 | $149 | $14.9 | $134.1 |
| Instant Funding Standard | $1,000 | $69 | $6.9 | $62.1 |
| Instant Funding Standard | $2,500 | $119 | $11.9 | $107.1 |
| Instant Funding Standard | $5,000 | $229 | $22.9 | $206.1 |
| Instant Funding Standard | $10,000 | $449 | $44.9 | $404.1 |
| Instant Funding Lite | $2,500 | $19 | $1.9 | $17.1 |
| Instant Funding Lite | $5,000 | $44 | $4.4 | $39.6 |
| Instant Funding Lite | $10,000 | $89 | $8.9 | $80.1 |
| Instant Funding Lite | $25,000 | $169 | $16.9 | $152.1 |
Percentage discount is not the same as final price. Compare equivalent programs and the live order total. The coupon should be the last variable after rule fit.
Program snapshot: Ability One is currently a One Step route with 10%, a daily-loss rule of 3%, a maximum-loss rule of 6%, Static drawdown, a listed profit-share structure of 75%–90% and payout timing of First payout after 14 days; then every 14 days. The current minimum-day field is 3 trading days.
Target versus loss buffer: The target should never be read alone. A target that looks small can still be demanding when the maximum-loss allowance is tight, while a larger target paired with wider static room can give a strategy more recovery capacity. The headline maximum-loss figure is 6%, so a $100,000 nominal account would represent a gross $6,000 boundary from the starting reference before any stage-specific formula, trailing movement or prior-loss effects. This is the outer rule, not a recommended amount to risk.
Daily-risk interpretation: A 3% daily boundary on a $100,000 nominal account corresponds to $3,000 as a simple headline calculation. A disciplined trader normally places a personal daily stop far inside the firm boundary. For example, 0.5%–1% personal risk can create room for slippage, correlated positions and ordinary execution error.
Drawdown behavior: Because the program uses a static element in its current maximum-loss structure, the lifetime reference is easier to map. Profits can generally create distance above the original floor, although daily-loss and equity calculations still need to be monitored. The trader should record the current floor before every session rather than relying on memory. If withdrawals change the buffer, the post-withdrawal floor should be recalculated before the next trade.
Time and payout behavior: The minimum-day condition is 3 trading days and current payout timing is First payout after 14 days; then every 14 days. These two fields answer different questions. Minimum days control how quickly progression or eligibility can occur, while payout timing controls when eligible profit can be requested. Neither should be used as a reason to force low-quality trades.
Trading permissions: Current permission flags list news trading as allowed, weekend holding as allowed and EA use as allowed. Those flags are only the top-level answer. “Allowed” can still include high-impact-news windows, ownership restrictions, prohibited execution techniques, copied-strategy rules or platform-specific conditions, so the detailed agreement remains authoritative.
Current price context: $5,000 at $69, $10,000 at $99, $25,000 at $249, $50,000 at $399, $100,000 at $699 At the smallest currently stored tier, $69, a 35% BRIDGE calculation equals $24.15 of savings before separate checkout charges. At the largest stored tier shown here, $699, the same percentage would equal $244.65 if that tier is covered by the live code. The coupon changes purchase cost only; it does not make the target smaller, widen drawdown or accelerate a payout clock.
Who this structure fits: A trader should compare this model with the closest alternative at the other firm rather than with the other firm’s cheapest account. The strongest comparison uses target, daily limit, maximum-loss method, minimum days, payout, platform and permissions together. If the strategy must be altered materially to survive the account, the model is not a good structural match regardless of discount.
Program snapshot: Ability Challenge is currently a Two Step route with 10% / 5%, a daily-loss rule of 7.5% Phase 1; 5% Phase 2 and funded, a maximum-loss rule of 15% Phase 1; 10% Phase 2 and funded, Static drawdown, a listed profit-share structure of 75%–90% and payout timing of First payout after 14 days; then every 14 days. The current minimum-day field is 4 trading days per phase.
Target versus loss buffer: The target should never be read alone. A target that looks small can still be demanding when the maximum-loss allowance is tight, while a larger target paired with wider static room can give a strategy more recovery capacity. The headline maximum-loss figure is 151102%, so a $100,000 nominal account would represent a gross $151,102,000 boundary from the starting reference before any stage-specific formula, trailing movement or prior-loss effects. This is the outer rule, not a recommended amount to risk.
Daily-risk interpretation: A 7.5152% daily boundary on a $100,000 nominal account corresponds to $7,515.2 as a simple headline calculation. A disciplined trader normally places a personal daily stop far inside the firm boundary. For example, 0.5%–1% personal risk can create room for slippage, correlated positions and ordinary execution error.
Drawdown behavior: Because the program uses a static element in its current maximum-loss structure, the lifetime reference is easier to map. Profits can generally create distance above the original floor, although daily-loss and equity calculations still need to be monitored. The trader should record the current floor before every session rather than relying on memory. If withdrawals change the buffer, the post-withdrawal floor should be recalculated before the next trade.
Time and payout behavior: The minimum-day condition is 4 trading days per phase and current payout timing is First payout after 14 days; then every 14 days. These two fields answer different questions. Minimum days control how quickly progression or eligibility can occur, while payout timing controls when eligible profit can be requested. Neither should be used as a reason to force low-quality trades.
Trading permissions: Current permission flags list news trading as allowed, weekend holding as allowed and EA use as allowed. Those flags are only the top-level answer. “Allowed” can still include high-impact-news windows, ownership restrictions, prohibited execution techniques, copied-strategy rules or platform-specific conditions, so the detailed agreement remains authoritative.
Current price context: $5,000 at $49, $10,000 at $79, $25,000 at $195, $50,000 at $329, $100,000 at $549, $200,000 at $1,049 At the smallest currently stored tier, $49, a 35% BRIDGE calculation equals $17.15 of savings before separate checkout charges. At the largest stored tier shown here, $1,049, the same percentage would equal $367.15 if that tier is covered by the live code. The coupon changes purchase cost only; it does not make the target smaller, widen drawdown or accelerate a payout clock.
Who this structure fits: A trader should compare this model with the closest alternative at the other firm rather than with the other firm’s cheapest account. The strongest comparison uses target, daily limit, maximum-loss method, minimum days, payout, platform and permissions together. If the strategy must be altered materially to survive the account, the model is not a good structural match regardless of discount.
Program snapshot: Funded Trader Program (FTP) is currently a Instant route with 10% growth milestone, a daily-loss rule of 5% trailing, a maximum-loss rule of 10% static, Static, Trailing Daily drawdown, a listed profit-share structure of 50%–80% and payout timing of On reaching each 10% growth milestone. The current minimum-day field is 5 trading days per growth stage.
Target versus loss buffer: The target should never be read alone. A target that looks small can still be demanding when the maximum-loss allowance is tight, while a larger target paired with wider static room can give a strategy more recovery capacity. The headline maximum-loss figure is 10%, so a $100,000 nominal account would represent a gross $10,000 boundary from the starting reference before any stage-specific formula, trailing movement or prior-loss effects. This is the outer rule, not a recommended amount to risk.
Daily-risk interpretation: A 5% daily boundary on a $100,000 nominal account corresponds to $5,000 as a simple headline calculation. A disciplined trader normally places a personal daily stop far inside the firm boundary. For example, 0.5%–1% personal risk can create room for slippage, correlated positions and ordinary execution error.
Drawdown behavior: Because this program uses a trailing element, the trader must model how new highs affect the future loss floor. A profit cushion is not automatically permanent; the order of wins, withdrawals and later losses can change the available room. The trader should record the current floor before every session rather than relying on memory. If withdrawals change the buffer, the post-withdrawal floor should be recalculated before the next trade.
Time and payout behavior: The minimum-day condition is 5 trading days per growth stage and current payout timing is On reaching each 10% growth milestone. These two fields answer different questions. Minimum days control how quickly progression or eligibility can occur, while payout timing controls when eligible profit can be requested. Neither should be used as a reason to force low-quality trades.
Trading permissions: Current permission flags list news trading as allowed, weekend holding as allowed and EA use as allowed. Those flags are only the top-level answer. “Allowed” can still include high-impact-news windows, ownership restrictions, prohibited execution techniques, copied-strategy rules or platform-specific conditions, so the detailed agreement remains authoritative.
Current price context: $5,000 at $119, $10,000 at $279, $25,000 at $449, $50,000 at $1,299 At the smallest currently stored tier, $119, a 35% BRIDGE calculation equals $41.65 of savings before separate checkout charges. At the largest stored tier shown here, $1,299, the same percentage would equal $454.65 if that tier is covered by the live code. The coupon changes purchase cost only; it does not make the target smaller, widen drawdown or accelerate a payout clock.
Who this structure fits: A trader should compare this model with the closest alternative at the other firm rather than with the other firm’s cheapest account. The strongest comparison uses target, daily limit, maximum-loss method, minimum days, payout, platform and permissions together. If the strategy must be altered materially to survive the account, the model is not a good structural match regardless of discount.
Program snapshot: One Phase is currently a One Step route with 10%, a daily-loss rule of 3%, a maximum-loss rule of 6%, Trailing closed-balance high-watermark, Equity breach drawdown, a listed profit-share structure of 80 and payout timing of First payout on demand; then every 30 days, or 14 days with add-on. The current minimum-day field is 5.
Target versus loss buffer: The target should never be read alone. A target that looks small can still be demanding when the maximum-loss allowance is tight, while a larger target paired with wider static room can give a strategy more recovery capacity. The headline maximum-loss figure is 6%, so a $100,000 nominal account would represent a gross $6,000 boundary from the starting reference before any stage-specific formula, trailing movement or prior-loss effects. This is the outer rule, not a recommended amount to risk.
Daily-risk interpretation: A 3% daily boundary on a $100,000 nominal account corresponds to $3,000 as a simple headline calculation. A disciplined trader normally places a personal daily stop far inside the firm boundary. For example, 0.5%–1% personal risk can create room for slippage, correlated positions and ordinary execution error.
Drawdown behavior: Because this program uses a trailing element, the trader must model how new highs affect the future loss floor. A profit cushion is not automatically permanent; the order of wins, withdrawals and later losses can change the available room. The trader should record the current floor before every session rather than relying on memory. If withdrawals change the buffer, the post-withdrawal floor should be recalculated before the next trade.
Time and payout behavior: The minimum-day condition is 5 and current payout timing is First payout on demand; then every 30 days, or 14 days with add-on. These two fields answer different questions. Minimum days control how quickly progression or eligibility can occur, while payout timing controls when eligible profit can be requested. Neither should be used as a reason to force low-quality trades.
Trading permissions: Current permission flags list news trading as allowed, weekend holding as allowed and EA use as allowed. Those flags are only the top-level answer. “Allowed” can still include high-impact-news windows, ownership restrictions, prohibited execution techniques, copied-strategy rules or platform-specific conditions, so the detailed agreement remains authoritative.
Current price context: $5,000 at $59, $10,000 at $89, $15,000 at $119, $25,000 at $199, $50,000 at $379, $100,000 at $549, $200,000 at $1,049, $400,000 at $2,950 At the smallest currently stored tier, $59, a 10% BRIDGE calculation equals $5.9 of savings before separate checkout charges. At the largest stored tier shown here, $2,950, the same percentage would equal $295 if that tier is covered by the live code. The coupon changes purchase cost only; it does not make the target smaller, widen drawdown or accelerate a payout clock.
Who this structure fits: A trader should compare this model with the closest alternative at the other firm rather than with the other firm’s cheapest account. The strongest comparison uses target, daily limit, maximum-loss method, minimum days, payout, platform and permissions together. If the strategy must be altered materially to survive the account, the model is not a good structural match regardless of discount.
Program snapshot: Two Phase Classic is currently a Two Step route with 5%, a daily-loss rule of 4%, a maximum-loss rule of 10%, Static, Equity breach drawdown, a listed profit-share structure of 80 and payout timing of Every 30 days; optional 14-day add-on. The current minimum-day field is 4.
Target versus loss buffer: The target should never be read alone. A target that looks small can still be demanding when the maximum-loss allowance is tight, while a larger target paired with wider static room can give a strategy more recovery capacity. The headline maximum-loss figure is 10%, so a $100,000 nominal account would represent a gross $10,000 boundary from the starting reference before any stage-specific formula, trailing movement or prior-loss effects. This is the outer rule, not a recommended amount to risk.
Daily-risk interpretation: A 4% daily boundary on a $100,000 nominal account corresponds to $4,000 as a simple headline calculation. A disciplined trader normally places a personal daily stop far inside the firm boundary. For example, 0.5%–1% personal risk can create room for slippage, correlated positions and ordinary execution error.
Drawdown behavior: Because the program uses a static element in its current maximum-loss structure, the lifetime reference is easier to map. Profits can generally create distance above the original floor, although daily-loss and equity calculations still need to be monitored. The trader should record the current floor before every session rather than relying on memory. If withdrawals change the buffer, the post-withdrawal floor should be recalculated before the next trade.
Time and payout behavior: The minimum-day condition is 4 and current payout timing is Every 30 days; optional 14-day add-on. These two fields answer different questions. Minimum days control how quickly progression or eligibility can occur, while payout timing controls when eligible profit can be requested. Neither should be used as a reason to force low-quality trades.
Trading permissions: Current permission flags list news trading as allowed, weekend holding as allowed and EA use as allowed. Those flags are only the top-level answer. “Allowed” can still include high-impact-news windows, ownership restrictions, prohibited execution techniques, copied-strategy rules or platform-specific conditions, so the detailed agreement remains authoritative.
Current price context: $5,000 at $59, $10,000 at $89, $15,000 at $119, $25,000 at $199, $50,000 at $379, $100,000 at $549 At the smallest currently stored tier, $59, a 10% BRIDGE calculation equals $5.9 of savings before separate checkout charges. At the largest stored tier shown here, $549, the same percentage would equal $54.9 if that tier is covered by the live code. The coupon changes purchase cost only; it does not make the target smaller, widen drawdown or accelerate a payout clock.
Who this structure fits: A trader should compare this model with the closest alternative at the other firm rather than with the other firm’s cheapest account. The strongest comparison uses target, daily limit, maximum-loss method, minimum days, payout, platform and permissions together. If the strategy must be altered materially to survive the account, the model is not a good structural match regardless of discount.
Program snapshot: Two Phase Standard is currently a Two Step route with 10%, a daily-loss rule of 4%, a maximum-loss rule of 10%, Trailing closed-balance high-watermark, Equity breach drawdown, a listed profit-share structure of 80 and payout timing of First payout on demand; then every 30 days, or 14 days with add-on. The current minimum-day field is 5.
Target versus loss buffer: The target should never be read alone. A target that looks small can still be demanding when the maximum-loss allowance is tight, while a larger target paired with wider static room can give a strategy more recovery capacity. The headline maximum-loss figure is 10%, so a $100,000 nominal account would represent a gross $10,000 boundary from the starting reference before any stage-specific formula, trailing movement or prior-loss effects. This is the outer rule, not a recommended amount to risk.
Daily-risk interpretation: A 4% daily boundary on a $100,000 nominal account corresponds to $4,000 as a simple headline calculation. A disciplined trader normally places a personal daily stop far inside the firm boundary. For example, 0.5%–1% personal risk can create room for slippage, correlated positions and ordinary execution error.
Drawdown behavior: Because this program uses a trailing element, the trader must model how new highs affect the future loss floor. A profit cushion is not automatically permanent; the order of wins, withdrawals and later losses can change the available room. The trader should record the current floor before every session rather than relying on memory. If withdrawals change the buffer, the post-withdrawal floor should be recalculated before the next trade.
Time and payout behavior: The minimum-day condition is 5 and current payout timing is First payout on demand; then every 30 days, or 14 days with add-on. These two fields answer different questions. Minimum days control how quickly progression or eligibility can occur, while payout timing controls when eligible profit can be requested. Neither should be used as a reason to force low-quality trades.
Trading permissions: Current permission flags list news trading as allowed, weekend holding as allowed and EA use as allowed. Those flags are only the top-level answer. “Allowed” can still include high-impact-news windows, ownership restrictions, prohibited execution techniques, copied-strategy rules or platform-specific conditions, so the detailed agreement remains authoritative.
Current price context: $5,000 at $59, $10,000 at $89, $15,000 at $119, $25,000 at $199, $50,000 at $379, $100,000 at $549, $200,000 at $1,049, $400,000 at $2,950 At the smallest currently stored tier, $59, a 10% BRIDGE calculation equals $5.9 of savings before separate checkout charges. At the largest stored tier shown here, $2,950, the same percentage would equal $295 if that tier is covered by the live code. The coupon changes purchase cost only; it does not make the target smaller, widen drawdown or accelerate a payout clock.
Who this structure fits: A trader should compare this model with the closest alternative at the other firm rather than with the other firm’s cheapest account. The strongest comparison uses target, daily limit, maximum-loss method, minimum days, payout, platform and permissions together. If the strategy must be altered materially to survive the account, the model is not a good structural match regardless of discount.
Program snapshot: Two Phase Pro is currently a Two Step route with 4%, a daily-loss rule of 4%, a maximum-loss rule of 8%, Static, Equity breach drawdown, a listed profit-share structure of 80 and payout timing of Every 10 days. The current minimum-day field is 3.
Target versus loss buffer: The target should never be read alone. A target that looks small can still be demanding when the maximum-loss allowance is tight, while a larger target paired with wider static room can give a strategy more recovery capacity. The headline maximum-loss figure is 8%, so a $100,000 nominal account would represent a gross $8,000 boundary from the starting reference before any stage-specific formula, trailing movement or prior-loss effects. This is the outer rule, not a recommended amount to risk.
Daily-risk interpretation: A 4% daily boundary on a $100,000 nominal account corresponds to $4,000 as a simple headline calculation. A disciplined trader normally places a personal daily stop far inside the firm boundary. For example, 0.5%–1% personal risk can create room for slippage, correlated positions and ordinary execution error.
Drawdown behavior: Because the program uses a static element in its current maximum-loss structure, the lifetime reference is easier to map. Profits can generally create distance above the original floor, although daily-loss and equity calculations still need to be monitored. The trader should record the current floor before every session rather than relying on memory. If withdrawals change the buffer, the post-withdrawal floor should be recalculated before the next trade.
Time and payout behavior: The minimum-day condition is 3 and current payout timing is Every 10 days. These two fields answer different questions. Minimum days control how quickly progression or eligibility can occur, while payout timing controls when eligible profit can be requested. Neither should be used as a reason to force low-quality trades.
Trading permissions: Current permission flags list news trading as allowed, weekend holding as allowed and EA use as allowed. Those flags are only the top-level answer. “Allowed” can still include high-impact-news windows, ownership restrictions, prohibited execution techniques, copied-strategy rules or platform-specific conditions, so the detailed agreement remains authoritative.
Current price context: $10,000 at $129, $25,000 at $225, $50,000 at $375, $100,000 at $599, $150,000 at $849, $200,000 at $1,099, $250,000 at $1,350 At the smallest currently stored tier, $129, a 10% BRIDGE calculation equals $12.9 of savings before separate checkout charges. At the largest stored tier shown here, $1,350, the same percentage would equal $135 if that tier is covered by the live code. The coupon changes purchase cost only; it does not make the target smaller, widen drawdown or accelerate a payout clock.
Who this structure fits: A trader should compare this model with the closest alternative at the other firm rather than with the other firm’s cheapest account. The strongest comparison uses target, daily limit, maximum-loss method, minimum days, payout, platform and permissions together. If the strategy must be altered materially to survive the account, the model is not a good structural match regardless of discount.
Program snapshot: Three Phase is currently a Three Step route with 5%, a daily-loss rule of 5%, a maximum-loss rule of 5%, Static, Equity breach drawdown, a listed profit-share structure of 80 and payout timing of First payout on demand; then every 30 days, or 14 days with add-on. The current minimum-day field is 5.
Target versus loss buffer: The target should never be read alone. A target that looks small can still be demanding when the maximum-loss allowance is tight, while a larger target paired with wider static room can give a strategy more recovery capacity. The headline maximum-loss figure is 5%, so a $100,000 nominal account would represent a gross $5,000 boundary from the starting reference before any stage-specific formula, trailing movement or prior-loss effects. This is the outer rule, not a recommended amount to risk.
Daily-risk interpretation: A 5% daily boundary on a $100,000 nominal account corresponds to $5,000 as a simple headline calculation. A disciplined trader normally places a personal daily stop far inside the firm boundary. For example, 0.5%–1% personal risk can create room for slippage, correlated positions and ordinary execution error.
Drawdown behavior: Because the program uses a static element in its current maximum-loss structure, the lifetime reference is easier to map. Profits can generally create distance above the original floor, although daily-loss and equity calculations still need to be monitored. The trader should record the current floor before every session rather than relying on memory. If withdrawals change the buffer, the post-withdrawal floor should be recalculated before the next trade.
Time and payout behavior: The minimum-day condition is 5 and current payout timing is First payout on demand; then every 30 days, or 14 days with add-on. These two fields answer different questions. Minimum days control how quickly progression or eligibility can occur, while payout timing controls when eligible profit can be requested. Neither should be used as a reason to force low-quality trades.
Trading permissions: Current permission flags list news trading as allowed, weekend holding as allowed and EA use as allowed. Those flags are only the top-level answer. “Allowed” can still include high-impact-news windows, ownership restrictions, prohibited execution techniques, copied-strategy rules or platform-specific conditions, so the detailed agreement remains authoritative.
Current price context: $5,000 at $39, $10,000 at $59, $15,000 at $79, $25,000 at $149, $50,000 at $249, $100,000 at $399, $200,000 at $799, $400,000 at $1,599 At the smallest currently stored tier, $39, a 10% BRIDGE calculation equals $3.9 of savings before separate checkout charges. At the largest stored tier shown here, $1,599, the same percentage would equal $159.9 if that tier is covered by the live code. The coupon changes purchase cost only; it does not make the target smaller, widen drawdown or accelerate a payout clock.
Who this structure fits: A trader should compare this model with the closest alternative at the other firm rather than with the other firm’s cheapest account. The strongest comparison uses target, daily limit, maximum-loss method, minimum days, payout, platform and permissions together. If the strategy must be altered materially to survive the account, the model is not a good structural match regardless of discount.
Program snapshot: Instant Funding Standard is currently a Instant Funding route with no conventional profit target, a daily-loss rule of 8%, a maximum-loss rule of 8%, Trailing closed-balance high-watermark, Equity breach drawdown, a listed profit-share structure of 80 and payout timing of Every 14 days. The current minimum-day field is 0.
Target versus loss buffer: There is no conventional evaluation target, so difficulty moves away from passing a challenge and toward preserving the loss buffer while satisfying payout eligibility. The headline maximum-loss figure is 8%, so a $100,000 nominal account would represent a gross $8,000 boundary from the starting reference before any stage-specific formula, trailing movement or prior-loss effects. This is the outer rule, not a recommended amount to risk.
Daily-risk interpretation: A 8% daily boundary on a $100,000 nominal account corresponds to $8,000 as a simple headline calculation. A disciplined trader normally places a personal daily stop far inside the firm boundary. For example, 0.5%–1% personal risk can create room for slippage, correlated positions and ordinary execution error.
Drawdown behavior: Because this program uses a trailing element, the trader must model how new highs affect the future loss floor. A profit cushion is not automatically permanent; the order of wins, withdrawals and later losses can change the available room. The trader should record the current floor before every session rather than relying on memory. If withdrawals change the buffer, the post-withdrawal floor should be recalculated before the next trade.
Time and payout behavior: The minimum-day condition is 0 and current payout timing is Every 14 days. These two fields answer different questions. Minimum days control how quickly progression or eligibility can occur, while payout timing controls when eligible profit can be requested. Neither should be used as a reason to force low-quality trades.
Trading permissions: Current permission flags list news trading as restricted, weekend holding as restricted and EA use as restricted. Those flags are only the top-level answer. “Allowed” can still include high-impact-news windows, ownership restrictions, prohibited execution techniques, copied-strategy rules or platform-specific conditions, so the detailed agreement remains authoritative.
Current price context: $1,000 at $69, $2,500 at $119, $5,000 at $229, $10,000 at $449, $25,000 at $899, $50,000 at $1,749 At the smallest currently stored tier, $69, a 10% BRIDGE calculation equals $6.9 of savings before separate checkout charges. At the largest stored tier shown here, $1,749, the same percentage would equal $174.9 if that tier is covered by the live code. The coupon changes purchase cost only; it does not make the target smaller, widen drawdown or accelerate a payout clock.
Who this structure fits: A trader should compare this model with the closest alternative at the other firm rather than with the other firm’s cheapest account. The strongest comparison uses target, daily limit, maximum-loss method, minimum days, payout, platform and permissions together. If the strategy must be altered materially to survive the account, the model is not a good structural match regardless of discount.
Program snapshot: Instant Funding Lite is currently a Instant Funding route with no conventional profit target, a daily-loss rule of 3%, a maximum-loss rule of 4%, Trailing closed-balance high-watermark, Equity breach drawdown, a listed profit-share structure of 80 and payout timing of Eligible after 10 calendar days from first trade and five trading days. The current minimum-day field is 5.
Target versus loss buffer: There is no conventional evaluation target, so difficulty moves away from passing a challenge and toward preserving the loss buffer while satisfying payout eligibility. The headline maximum-loss figure is 4%, so a $100,000 nominal account would represent a gross $4,000 boundary from the starting reference before any stage-specific formula, trailing movement or prior-loss effects. This is the outer rule, not a recommended amount to risk.
Daily-risk interpretation: A 3% daily boundary on a $100,000 nominal account corresponds to $3,000 as a simple headline calculation. A disciplined trader normally places a personal daily stop far inside the firm boundary. For example, 0.5%–1% personal risk can create room for slippage, correlated positions and ordinary execution error.
Drawdown behavior: Because this program uses a trailing element, the trader must model how new highs affect the future loss floor. A profit cushion is not automatically permanent; the order of wins, withdrawals and later losses can change the available room. The trader should record the current floor before every session rather than relying on memory. If withdrawals change the buffer, the post-withdrawal floor should be recalculated before the next trade.
Time and payout behavior: The minimum-day condition is 5 and current payout timing is Eligible after 10 calendar days from first trade and five trading days. These two fields answer different questions. Minimum days control how quickly progression or eligibility can occur, while payout timing controls when eligible profit can be requested. Neither should be used as a reason to force low-quality trades.
Trading permissions: Current permission flags list news trading as restricted, weekend holding as restricted and EA use as restricted. Those flags are only the top-level answer. “Allowed” can still include high-impact-news windows, ownership restrictions, prohibited execution techniques, copied-strategy rules or platform-specific conditions, so the detailed agreement remains authoritative.
Current price context: $2,500 at $19, $5,000 at $44, $10,000 at $89, $25,000 at $169, $50,000 at $289 At the smallest currently stored tier, $19, a 10% BRIDGE calculation equals $1.9 of savings before separate checkout charges. At the largest stored tier shown here, $289, the same percentage would equal $28.9 if that tier is covered by the live code. The coupon changes purchase cost only; it does not make the target smaller, widen drawdown or accelerate a payout clock.
Who this structure fits: A trader should compare this model with the closest alternative at the other firm rather than with the other firm’s cheapest account. The strongest comparison uses target, daily limit, maximum-loss method, minimum days, payout, platform and permissions together. If the strategy must be altered materially to survive the account, the model is not a good structural match regardless of discount.
Program snapshot: Lightning Challenge is currently a Lightning route with 5%, a daily-loss rule of 3%, a maximum-loss rule of 4%, Trailing closed-balance high-watermark, Equity breach drawdown, a listed profit-share structure of 80 and payout timing of First payout 7 days after first funded trade; then every 14 days. The current minimum-day field is 3.
Target versus loss buffer: The target should never be read alone. A target that looks small can still be demanding when the maximum-loss allowance is tight, while a larger target paired with wider static room can give a strategy more recovery capacity. The headline maximum-loss figure is 4%, so a $100,000 nominal account would represent a gross $4,000 boundary from the starting reference before any stage-specific formula, trailing movement or prior-loss effects. This is the outer rule, not a recommended amount to risk.
Daily-risk interpretation: A 3% daily boundary on a $100,000 nominal account corresponds to $3,000 as a simple headline calculation. A disciplined trader normally places a personal daily stop far inside the firm boundary. For example, 0.5%–1% personal risk can create room for slippage, correlated positions and ordinary execution error.
Drawdown behavior: Because this program uses a trailing element, the trader must model how new highs affect the future loss floor. A profit cushion is not automatically permanent; the order of wins, withdrawals and later losses can change the available room. The trader should record the current floor before every session rather than relying on memory. If withdrawals change the buffer, the post-withdrawal floor should be recalculated before the next trade.
Time and payout behavior: The minimum-day condition is 3 and current payout timing is First payout 7 days after first funded trade; then every 14 days. These two fields answer different questions. Minimum days control how quickly progression or eligibility can occur, while payout timing controls when eligible profit can be requested. Neither should be used as a reason to force low-quality trades.
Trading permissions: Current permission flags list news trading as restricted, weekend holding as allowed and EA use as restricted. Those flags are only the top-level answer. “Allowed” can still include high-impact-news windows, ownership restrictions, prohibited execution techniques, copied-strategy rules or platform-specific conditions, so the detailed agreement remains authoritative.
Current price context: $10,000 at $59, $25,000 at $149, $50,000 at $249, $100,000 at $399 At the smallest currently stored tier, $59, a 10% BRIDGE calculation equals $5.9 of savings before separate checkout charges. At the largest stored tier shown here, $399, the same percentage would equal $39.9 if that tier is covered by the live code. The coupon changes purchase cost only; it does not make the target smaller, widen drawdown or accelerate a payout clock.
Who this structure fits: A trader should compare this model with the closest alternative at the other firm rather than with the other firm’s cheapest account. The strongest comparison uses target, daily limit, maximum-loss method, minimum days, payout, platform and permissions together. If the strategy must be altered materially to survive the account, the model is not a good structural match regardless of discount.
Program snapshot: Crypto Instant Funding is currently a Crypto Instant Funding route with no conventional profit target, a daily-loss rule of 3%, a maximum-loss rule of 6%, Trailing closed-balance high-watermark, Equity breach drawdown, a listed profit-share structure of 80 and payout timing of Every 14 days from first trade. The current minimum-day field is 0.
Target versus loss buffer: There is no conventional evaluation target, so difficulty moves away from passing a challenge and toward preserving the loss buffer while satisfying payout eligibility. The headline maximum-loss figure is 6%, so a $100,000 nominal account would represent a gross $6,000 boundary from the starting reference before any stage-specific formula, trailing movement or prior-loss effects. This is the outer rule, not a recommended amount to risk.
Daily-risk interpretation: A 3% daily boundary on a $100,000 nominal account corresponds to $3,000 as a simple headline calculation. A disciplined trader normally places a personal daily stop far inside the firm boundary. For example, 0.5%–1% personal risk can create room for slippage, correlated positions and ordinary execution error.
Drawdown behavior: Because this program uses a trailing element, the trader must model how new highs affect the future loss floor. A profit cushion is not automatically permanent; the order of wins, withdrawals and later losses can change the available room. The trader should record the current floor before every session rather than relying on memory. If withdrawals change the buffer, the post-withdrawal floor should be recalculated before the next trade.
Time and payout behavior: The minimum-day condition is 0 and current payout timing is Every 14 days from first trade. These two fields answer different questions. Minimum days control how quickly progression or eligibility can occur, while payout timing controls when eligible profit can be requested. Neither should be used as a reason to force low-quality trades.
Trading permissions: Current permission flags list news trading as restricted, weekend holding as allowed and EA use as restricted. Those flags are only the top-level answer. “Allowed” can still include high-impact-news windows, ownership restrictions, prohibited execution techniques, copied-strategy rules or platform-specific conditions, so the detailed agreement remains authoritative.
Current price context: $5,000 at $125, $10,000 at $250, $25,000 at $525, $50,000 at $999, $100,000 at $1,999 At the smallest currently stored tier, $125, a 10% BRIDGE calculation equals $12.5 of savings before separate checkout charges. At the largest stored tier shown here, $1,999, the same percentage would equal $199.9 if that tier is covered by the live code. The coupon changes purchase cost only; it does not make the target smaller, widen drawdown or accelerate a payout clock.
Who this structure fits: A trader should compare this model with the closest alternative at the other firm rather than with the other firm’s cheapest account. The strongest comparison uses target, daily limit, maximum-loss method, minimum days, payout, platform and permissions together. If the strategy must be altered materially to survive the account, the model is not a good structural match regardless of discount.
Program snapshot: Crypto Standard (1 Step) is currently a Crypto One Step route with 9%, a daily-loss rule of 3%, a maximum-loss rule of 6%, Trailing closed-balance high-watermark, Equity breach drawdown, a listed profit-share structure of 80 and payout timing of 14 days; 100% split option uses monthly payout. The current minimum-day field is 4.
Target versus loss buffer: The target should never be read alone. A target that looks small can still be demanding when the maximum-loss allowance is tight, while a larger target paired with wider static room can give a strategy more recovery capacity. The headline maximum-loss figure is 6%, so a $100,000 nominal account would represent a gross $6,000 boundary from the starting reference before any stage-specific formula, trailing movement or prior-loss effects. This is the outer rule, not a recommended amount to risk.
Daily-risk interpretation: A 3% daily boundary on a $100,000 nominal account corresponds to $3,000 as a simple headline calculation. A disciplined trader normally places a personal daily stop far inside the firm boundary. For example, 0.5%–1% personal risk can create room for slippage, correlated positions and ordinary execution error.
Drawdown behavior: Because this program uses a trailing element, the trader must model how new highs affect the future loss floor. A profit cushion is not automatically permanent; the order of wins, withdrawals and later losses can change the available room. The trader should record the current floor before every session rather than relying on memory. If withdrawals change the buffer, the post-withdrawal floor should be recalculated before the next trade.
Time and payout behavior: The minimum-day condition is 4 and current payout timing is 14 days; 100% split option uses monthly payout. These two fields answer different questions. Minimum days control how quickly progression or eligibility can occur, while payout timing controls when eligible profit can be requested. Neither should be used as a reason to force low-quality trades.
Trading permissions: Current permission flags list news trading as restricted, weekend holding as allowed and EA use as restricted. Those flags are only the top-level answer. “Allowed” can still include high-impact-news windows, ownership restrictions, prohibited execution techniques, copied-strategy rules or platform-specific conditions, so the detailed agreement remains authoritative.
Current price context: $5,000 at $59, $10,000 at $99, $25,000 at $249, $50,000 at $499, $100,000 at $999 At the smallest currently stored tier, $59, a 10% BRIDGE calculation equals $5.9 of savings before separate checkout charges. At the largest stored tier shown here, $999, the same percentage would equal $99.9 if that tier is covered by the live code. The coupon changes purchase cost only; it does not make the target smaller, widen drawdown or accelerate a payout clock.
Who this structure fits: A trader should compare this model with the closest alternative at the other firm rather than with the other firm’s cheapest account. The strongest comparison uses target, daily limit, maximum-loss method, minimum days, payout, platform and permissions together. If the strategy must be altered materially to survive the account, the model is not a good structural match regardless of discount.
At $5,000, a 3% daily rule is $150, 4% is $200, 5% is $250 and 7.5% is $375 as a simple headline calculation. A 6% maximum-loss boundary is $300, 8% is $400, 10% is $500 and 15% is $750.
These figures are not recommended risk. At 0.5% per trade, one loss equals $25; at 0.25%, $12.5. A personal 1% daily stop equals $50 and can leave a meaningful safety margin inside the firm limit.
Choose size from psychological dollar tolerance and strategy capacity. A larger discount in absolute dollars is not a reason to trade a larger nominal account if the dollar swings alter decision quality.
At $10,000, a 3% daily rule is $300, 4% is $400, 5% is $500 and 7.5% is $750 as a simple headline calculation. A 6% maximum-loss boundary is $600, 8% is $800, 10% is $1,000 and 15% is $1,500.
These figures are not recommended risk. At 0.5% per trade, one loss equals $50; at 0.25%, $25. A personal 1% daily stop equals $100 and can leave a meaningful safety margin inside the firm limit.
Choose size from psychological dollar tolerance and strategy capacity. A larger discount in absolute dollars is not a reason to trade a larger nominal account if the dollar swings alter decision quality.
At $25,000, a 3% daily rule is $750, 4% is $1,000, 5% is $1,250 and 7.5% is $1,875 as a simple headline calculation. A 6% maximum-loss boundary is $1,500, 8% is $2,000, 10% is $2,500 and 15% is $3,750.
These figures are not recommended risk. At 0.5% per trade, one loss equals $125; at 0.25%, $62.5. A personal 1% daily stop equals $250 and can leave a meaningful safety margin inside the firm limit.
Choose size from psychological dollar tolerance and strategy capacity. A larger discount in absolute dollars is not a reason to trade a larger nominal account if the dollar swings alter decision quality.
At $50,000, a 3% daily rule is $1,500, 4% is $2,000, 5% is $2,500 and 7.5% is $3,750 as a simple headline calculation. A 6% maximum-loss boundary is $3,000, 8% is $4,000, 10% is $5,000 and 15% is $7,500.
These figures are not recommended risk. At 0.5% per trade, one loss equals $250; at 0.25%, $125. A personal 1% daily stop equals $500 and can leave a meaningful safety margin inside the firm limit.
Choose size from psychological dollar tolerance and strategy capacity. A larger discount in absolute dollars is not a reason to trade a larger nominal account if the dollar swings alter decision quality.
At $100,000, a 3% daily rule is $3,000, 4% is $4,000, 5% is $5,000 and 7.5% is $7,500 as a simple headline calculation. A 6% maximum-loss boundary is $6,000, 8% is $8,000, 10% is $10,000 and 15% is $15,000.
These figures are not recommended risk. At 0.5% per trade, one loss equals $500; at 0.25%, $250. A personal 1% daily stop equals $1,000 and can leave a meaningful safety margin inside the firm limit.
Choose size from psychological dollar tolerance and strategy capacity. A larger discount in absolute dollars is not a reason to trade a larger nominal account if the dollar swings alter decision quality.
At $200,000, a 3% daily rule is $6,000, 4% is $8,000, 5% is $10,000 and 7.5% is $15,000 as a simple headline calculation. A 6% maximum-loss boundary is $12,000, 8% is $16,000, 10% is $20,000 and 15% is $30,000.
These figures are not recommended risk. At 0.5% per trade, one loss equals $1,000; at 0.25%, $500. A personal 1% daily stop equals $2,000 and can leave a meaningful safety margin inside the firm limit.
Choose size from psychological dollar tolerance and strategy capacity. A larger discount in absolute dollars is not a reason to trade a larger nominal account if the dollar swings alter decision quality.
At $400,000, a 3% daily rule is $12,000, 4% is $16,000, 5% is $20,000 and 7.5% is $30,000 as a simple headline calculation. A 6% maximum-loss boundary is $24,000, 8% is $32,000, 10% is $40,000 and 15% is $60,000.
These figures are not recommended risk. At 0.5% per trade, one loss equals $2,000; at 0.25%, $1,000. A personal 1% daily stop equals $4,000 and can leave a meaningful safety margin inside the firm limit.
Choose size from psychological dollar tolerance and strategy capacity. A larger discount in absolute dollars is not a reason to trade a larger nominal account if the dollar swings alter decision quality.
Compare Ability One with FXIFY One Phase. Matching headline percentages make drawdown method, minimum days and payout timing the deciding variables.
The useful decision is made at the exact program level. Record the target, current floor, day requirement, payout rule and permission that affects this strategy. If one rule forces the trader to change the strategy's core edge, remove that model before comparing price.
Stay inside static products. Ability One/Challenge and FXIFY static Two Phase variants are more natural places to compare.
The useful decision is made at the exact program level. Record the target, current floor, day requirement, payout rule and permission that affects this strategy. If one rule forces the trader to change the strategy's core edge, remove that model before comparing price.
Ability Challenge currently offers the widest Phase-1 maximum-loss allowance, but use the later funded limits for personal risk planning.
The useful decision is made at the exact program level. Record the target, current floor, day requirement, payout rule and permission that affects this strategy. If one rule forces the trader to change the strategy's core edge, remove that model before comparing price.
FXIFY Pro can reduce the target while narrowing the risk envelope. Stress-test the historical losing streak before assuming it is easier.
The useful decision is made at the exact program level. Record the target, current floor, day requirement, payout rule and permission that affects this strategy. If one rule forces the trader to change the strategy's core edge, remove that model before comparing price.
Compare FTP's milestone structure with FXIFY Instant's no-evaluation-target trailing structure. Model path dependency and payout eligibility.
The useful decision is made at the exact program level. Record the target, current floor, day requirement, payout rule and permission that affects this strategy. If one rule forces the trader to change the strategy's core edge, remove that model before comparing price.
Check weekend permissions and carrying costs. Relevant evaluation routes can allow holding, but selected instant products differ.
The useful decision is made at the exact program level. Record the target, current floor, day requirement, payout rule and permission that affects this strategy. If one rule forces the trader to change the strategy's core edge, remove that model before comparing price.
Use the exact model. Audacity Ability routes are permissive under current records; FTP and selected FXIFY products have different event restrictions.
The useful decision is made at the exact program level. Record the target, current floor, day requirement, payout rule and permission that affects this strategy. If one rule forces the trader to change the strategy's core edge, remove that model before comparing price.
Ability routes and FXIFY evaluations can allow automation, while selected fast/instant products may restrict it.
The useful decision is made at the exact program level. Record the target, current floor, day requirement, payout rule and permission that affects this strategy. If one rule forces the trader to change the strategy's core edge, remove that model before comparing price.
Compare platform, spread and commission before challenge fee. Recurring costs can exceed the coupon difference.
The useful decision is made at the exact program level. Record the target, current floor, day requirement, payout rule and permission that affects this strategy. If one rule forces the trader to change the strategy's core edge, remove that model before comparing price.
Prefer a static structure with a personal daily stop far inside the official boundary. Understand the rule in dollars before first trade.
The useful decision is made at the exact program level. Record the target, current floor, day requirement, payout rule and permission that affects this strategy. If one rule forces the trader to change the strategy's core edge, remove that model before comparing price.
Compare the realistic number of profitable cycles required to reach meaningful scale rather than the maximum advertised allocation.
The useful decision is made at the exact program level. Record the target, current floor, day requirement, payout rule and permission that affects this strategy. If one rule forces the trader to change the strategy's core edge, remove that model before comparing price.
Compare expected time to a realistic withdrawable amount, not only the shortest formal payout clock.
The useful decision is made at the exact program level. Record the target, current floor, day requirement, payout rule and permission that affects this strategy. If one rule forces the trader to change the strategy's core edge, remove that model before comparing price.
Hide BRIDGE during the first analysis, choose the structurally compatible account, then apply the code at checkout.
The useful decision is made at the exact program level. Record the target, current floor, day requirement, payout rule and permission that affects this strategy. If one rule forces the trader to change the strategy's core edge, remove that model before comparing price.
Calculate dollar volatility at 0.25% and 0.5% risk. If the numbers change behavior, lower percentage risk or account size.
The useful decision is made at the exact program level. Record the target, current floor, day requirement, payout rule and permission that affects this strategy. If one rule forces the trader to change the strategy's core edge, remove that model before comparing price.
On trailing or locking accounts, calculate the post-withdrawal buffer before removing the maximum available profit.
The useful decision is made at the exact program level. Record the target, current floor, day requirement, payout rule and permission that affects this strategy. If one rule forces the trader to change the strategy's core edge, remove that model before comparing price.
Step 1: choose static or trailing drawdown.
Step 2: choose one-step, two-step or instant-style structure.
Step 3: test historical drawdown against the maximum-loss rule at normal risk.
Step 4: verify minimum days and stage changes.
Step 5: verify news, weekend, EA and copy-trading requirements.
Step 6: compare payout timing, share and scaling.
Step 7: compare platform and recurring transaction costs.
Step 8: apply “BRIDGE” and confirm the live checkout total.
Phase 1 currently starts wider at 7.5% daily and 15% maximum loss.
Current products include both static and trailing high-watermark models.
Several current Two Phase variants use static maximum loss.
FTP and FXIFY Instant each have product-specific payout eligibility.
Audacity's larger BRIDGE percentage does not override base price or rule fit.
Trailing or locking structures can become tighter after profit is removed.
The answer changes by product.
Selected FXIFY Instant/Lightning products differ from evaluation routes.
The breach line should be far outside the personal risk plan.
A $100K account with 6% max loss and one with 15% do not provide the same risk resource.
The current Audacity Capital coupon code is “BRIDGE”, verified at 35% off under the stated coverage. Confirm the live checkout total.
The current FXIFY coupon code is “BRIDGE”, listed at 10% off under verified coverage. Confirm the live checkout total.
Ability One and Ability Challenge use static overall maximum loss in current data. FTP has a trailing daily component.
Some current FXIFY Two Phase variants do. Other products use trailing high-watermark structures.
Audacity Ability Challenge Phase 1 currently uses a 15% maximum-loss allowance before later stages tighten.
Ability One and FXIFY One Phase both currently use a 10% target, 3% daily and 6% maximum-loss headline, but their drawdown methods differ.
Current Ability routes allow it; FTP has its own conditions.
Current evaluation routes are generally more permissive than selected Instant/Lightning products. Check the exact account.
Both firms have programs that allow EAs, but selected FXIFY fast/instant products can restrict them.
No. They reduce purchase price only.
Audacity Capital vs FXIFY is best understood as a drawdown-method comparison. Audacity’s Ability Challenge provides unusually wide first-phase static room before tightening; Ability One gives a cleaner static one-step; FTP uses a milestone-based hybrid structure. FXIFY provides much broader program choice and lets traders move between static and trailing architectures without leaving the brand.
The coupon relationship is precise: Audacity Capital “BRIDGE” currently gives 35.00% off under verified coverage, and FXIFY “BRIDGE” currently gives 10.00% off under verified coverage. Those savings should be applied only after the account passes the strategy-fit test.
Choose drawdown type first, then target/buffer geometry, stage rules, permissions, payout structure, platform and recurring cost. Apply BRIDGE last and verify the final checkout total.
Last verified in 2026. Always confirm the final price shown at checkout before payment.
The current Audacity Capital coupon code is “BRIDGE”, verified at 35% off under the account coverage stated on the current Prop Firm Bridge page. Confirm live checkout before payment.
The current FXIFY coupon code is “BRIDGE”, listed at 10% off under verified coverage. Confirm the final checkout price.
Current 2026 rules use 7.5% daily and 15% maximum loss in Phase 1, then tighten to 5% daily and 10% maximum loss in Verification and the funded stage.
Yes. Current data lists Ability One at a 10% target with 3% daily and 6% static maximum loss.
Both. Current FXIFY products include static Two Phase variants and trailing closed-balance high-watermark structures on One Phase, Standard and selected Instant/Lightning accounts.
Audacity Ability One and FXIFY One Phase both currently use a 10% target and 3% daily limit, but Ability One uses static maximum loss while FXIFY One Phase trails closed-balance highs.
Current Ability One and Ability Challenge records allow news trading. FTP has its own current news-window conditions.
Current evaluation routes generally allow news trading, while selected Instant, Lightning and crypto records are more restrictive.
Current evaluation products generally allow EAs, while selected Instant and Lightning records currently restrict them. Check the exact program.
Current Ability One and Ability Challenge data lists the first payout after 14 days and then every 14 days, subject to exact live account terms.
Payout timing varies by model, including on-demand first payouts on selected evaluations, 10-day cycles on Two Phase Pro and 14-day cycles on Instant products.
No. BRIDGE changes purchase price only. Targets, drawdown, minimum days and payout conditions remain tied to the selected program.
Join the discussion
No comments yet
Sign in to leave a comment. Real traders only — one account, one voice.