Blue Guardian Futures vs AquaFutures 2026: compare futures challenge rules, EOD drawdown, payouts, PFB status, prices and verified BRIDGE coupon savings.
Akash Mane is the Founder and CEO of Prop Firm Bridge, where he leads the company’s vision, platform growth, and long term strategic direction. He oversees operations across research, marketing, content systems, SEO, and product positioning while driving the platform’s mission of becoming a trusted authority in the prop firm industry. At Prop Firm Bridge, Akash plays a direct role in shaping educational frameworks, comparison systems, and trader focused resources designed to help users make informed decisions with transparency and confidence. His work focuses on building scalable organic growth systems, improving platform authority, and strengthening trust through accurate, structured, and search optimized content. In addition to leadership responsibilities, he actively manages growth strategy, social media marketing, search visibility, and brand development to expand the platform’s reach across global trading audiences.
Manoj Gholap is responsible for content accuracy, compliance, and factual integrity at Prop Firm Bridge. He acts as the final verification layer for all published content, ensuring that prop firm reviews, rules, and comparisons are clear, accurate, and aligned with transparency standards. Manoj plays a key role in maintaining trust and credibility across the platform.
Quick answer: PFB currently lists Blue Guardian Futures as PFB Verified and AquaFutures as Moderate. This page keeps the current classification visible while comparing exact account rules, payout conditions and loss-floor behavior.
Coupon answer: Blue Guardian Futures coupon code “BRIDGE” is currently 25%, while AquaFutures coupon code “BRIDGE” is currently 60%.
Featured-snippet answer: Blue Guardian Futures vs AquaFutures should be compared by market access, target, daily-loss rule, maximum-loss method, qualifying-day or consistency conditions, payout eligibility and final checkout price. A bigger coupon or faster headline payout does not make a structurally incompatible account better.
Coupon verification: Prop Firm Bridge independently verified the BRIDGE discount stated in this article.
| Field | Blue Guardian Futures | AquaFutures |
|---|---|---|
| PFB Score | 86/100 | 64/100 |
| PFB Status | PFB Verified | Moderate |
| BRIDGE | 25% | 60% |
| Programs | Standard, Reserve, Express, Direct | Flex, Standard Evaluation, Beginner Evaluation, Instant Standard, Instant Pro |
Firm-level scores and status are context. Program-level rules decide whether the strategy fits. This distinction prevents a high-level rating or coupon percentage from replacing actual risk analysis.
| Firm | Program | Type | Target | Daily | Max | Drawdown | Split | Payout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blue Guardian Futures | Standard | One-Step Standard | 6% | None on $25K; $1,000 / $2,000 / $3,000 soft limit on larger sizes | $1,000 / $2,000 / $3,500 / $5,000 EOD trailing | End of Day trailing in evaluation and funded stages; active floor is enforced during trading | 90% to trader | From 3 days after the first funded trade when target, buffer, and 40% consistency are met |
| Blue Guardian Futures | Reserve | One-Step Reserve | 6% | No standard daily loss limit; optional soft daily loss configuration may apply | $1,000 / $2,000 / $3,000 / $4,500 EOD trailing | End of Day trailing; current rules lock the floor under the plan threshold | 90% to trader | After 5 qualifying winning days and any applicable later-cycle net-profit requirement |
| Blue Guardian Futures | Express | One-Step Express | 6% | Plan-specific funded soft daily loss limits; verify the live dashboard | $1,000 / $2,000 / $3,000 / $4,500 EOD trailing in evaluation | End of Day trailing with plan-specific funded buffer and lock behavior | 90% to trader | Daily after funded buffer, minimum, and plan-specific conditions are met |
| Blue Guardian Futures | Direct | Instant Funding Direct | No evaluation; payout profit goals apply | $1,000 / $1,250 / $2,500 / $3,000 soft daily loss limit | $1,500 / $2,000 / $3,500 / $4,500 EOD framework | End of Day framework that becomes fixed under the current lock or first-payout condition | 90% to trader | On demand after the current payout goal, consistency, and risk conditions are met |
| AquaFutures | Flex | One-Step Evaluation | About 4.67–5% depending on size | 0% — no daily loss limit | About 2.33–3% EOD trailing depending on size | End-of-day trailing drawdown | 80% to trader | On demand after 5 qualifying winning days |
| AquaFutures | Standard Evaluation | One-Step Evaluation | 5–6% depending on size | 0% — no daily loss limit | About 3.33–4% EOD trailing depending on size | End-of-day trailing drawdown | 90% to trader | On demand after 5 qualifying winning days |
| AquaFutures | Beginner Evaluation | One-Step Evaluation | 6% | 2.4–2.5% depending on size | About 3.33–5% EOD trailing depending on size | End-of-day trailing drawdown | 100% to trader up to the firm's first-$15,000 threshold, then 90% | Weekly; first payout after at least 7 days and 5 qualifying winning days |
| AquaFutures | Instant Standard | Instant Funding | No evaluation; payout milestones are 6% / 5% / 4% | 2.5% | 3–4% EOD trailing depending on size | End-of-day trailing drawdown | 100% to trader under the current Futures program terms | On demand after 7 qualifying winning days |
| AquaFutures | Instant Pro | Instant Funding | No evaluation; payout eligibility rules apply | 0% — no separate daily loss limit | 3–4% intraday/trailing depending on size | Intraday/trailing drawdown | 100% to trader under the current Futures program display | On demand after at least 7 days and all payout conditions are met |
Never compare a target alone. A lower target can sit inside a much tighter trailing drawdown. A higher target can come with wider EOD room. Historical strategy drawdown should decide whether the geometry is comfortable.
The firm limit is an emergency boundary, not a normal daily stop. A trader should use a personal daily limit well inside it, leaving room for slippage, correlated positions and fast market movement.
EOD trailing, intraday/live trailing and static drawdown create different path dependency. Intraday trailing can react to temporary equity highs before the close, while EOD systems usually update from an end-of-session reference. Static loss floors are more stable.
Minimum trading days, benchmark days, winning days and consistency thresholds are different. A trader can reach the target and still need additional activity before passing or withdrawing.
Separate the time required to become eligible from the time required to process the request. A fast payout processor does not eliminate benchmark, buffer or consistency conditions.
The current BRIDGE relationship is 25% at Blue Guardian Futures and 60% at AquaFutures. The discount should be applied after the account is chosen.
Standard is currently a One-Step Standard program with target 6%, daily rule None on $25K; $1,000 / $2,000 / $3,000 soft limit on larger sizes, maximum-loss rule $1,000 / $2,000 / $3,500 / $5,000 EOD trailing, End of Day trailing in evaluation and funded stages; active floor is enforced during trading drawdown, 90% to trader profit share, minimum-day condition May pass in 1 trading day; first funded payout eligibility starts after 3 days and payout timing From 3 days after the first funded trade when target, buffer, and 40% consistency are met.
The exact target and maximum-loss rule for this program are the values shown in the program table above. Dollar-based, range-based and multi-part rules must remain in their original form rather than being coerced into a single percentage. Treat the active loss rule as an outer breach boundary and set personal risk materially inside it.
The exact daily-loss rule for this program is the dollar, percentage, soft-stop or size-dependent value shown in the program table above. Use the live dashboard limit for the selected account size rather than coercing a multi-part dollar rule into one percentage.
Because the account contains a trailing component, a profitable equity high can move the loss floor upward. This makes the order of wins, losses and withdrawals relevant to future risk.
The current day requirement is May pass in 1 trading day; first funded payout eligibility starts after 3 days. This should be satisfied through ordinary qualified trading. If the target is already reached, remaining days should not become a reason to open unnecessary positions.
The current payout description is From 3 days after the first funded trade when target, buffer, and 40% consistency are met. A trader should estimate the realistic time to eligibility from historical trading frequency, then add processing time. This produces a more useful cash-flow estimate than the headline cycle alone.
Current PFB permission fields record news trading as allowed, weekend holding as restricted, and EA use as program-specific. The exact current agreement remains authoritative.
The stored pricing ladder begins around $154 at $25,000 and reaches $424 at $150,000. The current BRIDGE headline is 25%. A larger absolute saving at a higher tier should not decide account size.
A true-cost model should include repeat attempts. Two failed $150 attempts cost more than one $250 attempt passed with a better-fitting rule set. Fee efficiency therefore depends on survival probability.
The best-fit question is whether the trader can run the normal strategy without changing entry timing, holding period, trade concentration or position risk. If not, the model is a weak fit regardless of discount.
Reserve is currently a One-Step Reserve program with target 6%, daily rule No standard daily loss limit; optional soft daily loss configuration may apply, maximum-loss rule $1,000 / $2,000 / $3,000 / $4,500 EOD trailing, End of Day trailing; current rules lock the floor under the plan threshold drawdown, 90% to trader profit share, minimum-day condition Evaluation requires 50% consistency; funded payouts require 5 qualifying winning days and payout timing After 5 qualifying winning days and any applicable later-cycle net-profit requirement.
The exact target and maximum-loss rule for this program are the values shown in the program table above. Dollar-based, range-based and multi-part rules must remain in their original form rather than being coerced into a single percentage. Treat the active loss rule as an outer breach boundary and set personal risk materially inside it.
This plan does not express daily loss as one simple percentage in the current record. The personal stop should be based on strategy statistics, not on using every dollar the firm allows.
Because the account contains a trailing component, a profitable equity high can move the loss floor upward. This makes the order of wins, losses and withdrawals relevant to future risk.
The current day requirement is Evaluation requires 50% consistency; funded payouts require 5 qualifying winning days. This should be satisfied through ordinary qualified trading. If the target is already reached, remaining days should not become a reason to open unnecessary positions.
The current payout description is After 5 qualifying winning days and any applicable later-cycle net-profit requirement. A trader should estimate the realistic time to eligibility from historical trading frequency, then add processing time. This produces a more useful cash-flow estimate than the headline cycle alone.
Current PFB permission fields record news trading as allowed, weekend holding as restricted, and EA use as program-specific. The exact current agreement remains authoritative.
The stored pricing ladder begins around $110 at $25,000 and reaches $398 at $150,000. The current BRIDGE headline is 25%. A larger absolute saving at a higher tier should not decide account size.
A true-cost model should include repeat attempts. Two failed $150 attempts cost more than one $250 attempt passed with a better-fitting rule set. Fee efficiency therefore depends on survival probability.
The best-fit question is whether the trader can run the normal strategy without changing entry timing, holding period, trade concentration or position risk. If not, the model is a weak fit regardless of discount.
Express is currently a One-Step Express program with target 6%, daily rule Plan-specific funded soft daily loss limits; verify the live dashboard, maximum-loss rule $1,000 / $2,000 / $3,000 / $4,500 EOD trailing in evaluation, End of Day trailing with plan-specific funded buffer and lock behavior drawdown, 90% to trader profit share, minimum-day condition Evaluation pass speed is governed by 40% consistency; funded withdrawals may be available daily and payout timing Daily after funded buffer, minimum, and plan-specific conditions are met.
The exact target and maximum-loss rule for this program are the values shown in the program table above. Dollar-based, range-based and multi-part rules must remain in their original form rather than being coerced into a single percentage. Treat the active loss rule as an outer breach boundary and set personal risk materially inside it.
This plan does not express daily loss as one simple percentage in the current record. The personal stop should be based on strategy statistics, not on using every dollar the firm allows.
Because the account contains a trailing component, a profitable equity high can move the loss floor upward. This makes the order of wins, losses and withdrawals relevant to future risk.
The current day requirement is Evaluation pass speed is governed by 40% consistency; funded withdrawals may be available daily. This should be satisfied through ordinary qualified trading. If the target is already reached, remaining days should not become a reason to open unnecessary positions.
The current payout description is Daily after funded buffer, minimum, and plan-specific conditions are met. A trader should estimate the realistic time to eligibility from historical trading frequency, then add processing time. This produces a more useful cash-flow estimate than the headline cycle alone.
Current PFB permission fields record news trading as allowed, weekend holding as restricted, and EA use as program-specific. The exact current agreement remains authoritative.
The stored pricing ladder begins around $106 at $25,000 and reaches $345 at $150,000. The current BRIDGE headline is 25%. A larger absolute saving at a higher tier should not decide account size.
A true-cost model should include repeat attempts. Two failed $150 attempts cost more than one $250 attempt passed with a better-fitting rule set. Fee efficiency therefore depends on survival probability.
The best-fit question is whether the trader can run the normal strategy without changing entry timing, holding period, trade concentration or position risk. If not, the model is a weak fit regardless of discount.
Direct is currently a Instant Funding Direct program with target No evaluation; payout profit goals apply, daily rule $1,000 / $1,250 / $2,500 / $3,000 soft daily loss limit, maximum-loss rule $1,500 / $2,000 / $3,500 / $4,500 EOD framework, End of Day framework that becomes fixed under the current lock or first-payout condition drawdown, 90% to trader profit share, minimum-day condition No evaluation; payout unlock depends on profit goal and consistency and payout timing On demand after the current payout goal, consistency, and risk conditions are met.
The exact target and maximum-loss rule for this program are the values shown in the program table above. Dollar-based, range-based and multi-part rules must remain in their original form rather than being coerced into a single percentage. Treat the active loss rule as an outer breach boundary and set personal risk materially inside it.
The exact daily-loss rule for this program is the dollar, percentage, soft-stop or size-dependent value shown in the program table above. Use the live dashboard limit for the selected account size rather than coercing a multi-part dollar rule into one percentage.
Because the account contains a static component in the recorded overall-loss framework, the lifetime reference is easier to map, although daily and payout-stage rules still matter.
The current day requirement is No evaluation; payout unlock depends on profit goal and consistency. This should be satisfied through ordinary qualified trading. If the target is already reached, remaining days should not become a reason to open unnecessary positions.
The current payout description is On demand after the current payout goal, consistency, and risk conditions are met. A trader should estimate the realistic time to eligibility from historical trading frequency, then add processing time. This produces a more useful cash-flow estimate than the headline cycle alone.
Current PFB permission fields record news trading as allowed, weekend holding as restricted, and EA use as program-specific. The exact current agreement remains authoritative.
The stored pricing ladder begins around $307 at $25,000 and reaches $824 at $150,000. The current BRIDGE headline is 25%. A larger absolute saving at a higher tier should not decide account size.
A true-cost model should include repeat attempts. Two failed $150 attempts cost more than one $250 attempt passed with a better-fitting rule set. Fee efficiency therefore depends on survival probability.
The best-fit question is whether the trader can run the normal strategy without changing entry timing, holding period, trade concentration or position risk. If not, the model is a weak fit regardless of discount.
Flex is currently a One-Step Evaluation program with target About 4.67–5% depending on size, daily rule 0% — no daily loss limit, maximum-loss rule About 2.33–3% EOD trailing depending on size, End-of-day trailing drawdown drawdown, 80% to trader profit share, minimum-day condition No minimum evaluation days and payout timing On demand after 5 qualifying winning days.
The exact target and maximum-loss rule for this program are the values shown in the program table above. Dollar-based, range-based and multi-part rules must remain in their original form rather than being coerced into a single percentage. Treat the active loss rule as an outer breach boundary and set personal risk materially inside it.
The exact daily-loss rule for this program is the dollar, percentage, soft-stop or size-dependent value shown in the program table above. Use the live dashboard limit for the selected account size rather than coercing a multi-part dollar rule into one percentage.
Because the account contains a trailing component, a profitable equity high can move the loss floor upward. This makes the order of wins, losses and withdrawals relevant to future risk.
The current day requirement is No minimum evaluation days. This should be satisfied through ordinary qualified trading. If the target is already reached, remaining days should not become a reason to open unnecessary positions.
The current payout description is On demand after 5 qualifying winning days. A trader should estimate the realistic time to eligibility from historical trading frequency, then add processing time. This produces a more useful cash-flow estimate than the headline cycle alone.
Current PFB permission fields record news trading as allowed, weekend holding as restricted, and EA use as program-specific. The exact current agreement remains authoritative.
The stored pricing ladder begins around $133 at $50,000 and reaches $400 at $150,000. The current BRIDGE headline is 60%. A larger absolute saving at a higher tier should not decide account size.
A true-cost model should include repeat attempts. Two failed $150 attempts cost more than one $250 attempt passed with a better-fitting rule set. Fee efficiency therefore depends on survival probability.
The best-fit question is whether the trader can run the normal strategy without changing entry timing, holding period, trade concentration or position risk. If not, the model is a weak fit regardless of discount.
Standard Evaluation is currently a One-Step Evaluation program with target 5–6% depending on size, daily rule 0% — no daily loss limit, maximum-loss rule About 3.33–4% EOD trailing depending on size, End-of-day trailing drawdown drawdown, 90% to trader profit share, minimum-day condition No minimum evaluation days and payout timing On demand after 5 qualifying winning days.
The exact target and maximum-loss rule for this program are the values shown in the program table above. Dollar-based, range-based and multi-part rules must remain in their original form rather than being coerced into a single percentage. Treat the active loss rule as an outer breach boundary and set personal risk materially inside it.
The exact daily-loss rule for this program is the dollar, percentage, soft-stop or size-dependent value shown in the program table above. Use the live dashboard limit for the selected account size rather than coercing a multi-part dollar rule into one percentage.
Because the account contains a trailing component, a profitable equity high can move the loss floor upward. This makes the order of wins, losses and withdrawals relevant to future risk.
The current day requirement is No minimum evaluation days. This should be satisfied through ordinary qualified trading. If the target is already reached, remaining days should not become a reason to open unnecessary positions.
The current payout description is On demand after 5 qualifying winning days. A trader should estimate the realistic time to eligibility from historical trading frequency, then add processing time. This produces a more useful cash-flow estimate than the headline cycle alone.
Current PFB permission fields record news trading as allowed, weekend holding as restricted, and EA use as program-specific. The exact current agreement remains authoritative.
The stored pricing ladder begins around $116 at $25,000 and reaches $433 at $150,000. The current BRIDGE headline is 60%. A larger absolute saving at a higher tier should not decide account size.
A true-cost model should include repeat attempts. Two failed $150 attempts cost more than one $250 attempt passed with a better-fitting rule set. Fee efficiency therefore depends on survival probability.
The best-fit question is whether the trader can run the normal strategy without changing entry timing, holding period, trade concentration or position risk. If not, the model is a weak fit regardless of discount.
Beginner Evaluation is currently a One-Step Evaluation program with target 6%, daily rule 2.4–2.5% depending on size, maximum-loss rule About 3.33–5% EOD trailing depending on size, End-of-day trailing drawdown drawdown, 100% to trader up to the firm's first-$15,000 threshold, then 90% profit share, minimum-day condition No minimum evaluation days; funded payout qualification uses 7 days with 5 winning days and payout timing Weekly; first payout after at least 7 days and 5 qualifying winning days.
The exact target and maximum-loss rule for this program are the values shown in the program table above. Dollar-based, range-based and multi-part rules must remain in their original form rather than being coerced into a single percentage. Treat the active loss rule as an outer breach boundary and set personal risk materially inside it.
The exact daily-loss rule for this program is the dollar, percentage, soft-stop or size-dependent value shown in the program table above. Use the live dashboard limit for the selected account size rather than coercing a multi-part dollar rule into one percentage.
Because the account contains a trailing component, a profitable equity high can move the loss floor upward. This makes the order of wins, losses and withdrawals relevant to future risk.
The current day requirement is No minimum evaluation days; funded payout qualification uses 7 days with 5 winning days. This should be satisfied through ordinary qualified trading. If the target is already reached, remaining days should not become a reason to open unnecessary positions.
The current payout description is Weekly; first payout after at least 7 days and 5 qualifying winning days. A trader should estimate the realistic time to eligibility from historical trading frequency, then add processing time. This produces a more useful cash-flow estimate than the headline cycle alone.
Current PFB permission fields record news trading as allowed, weekend holding as restricted, and EA use as program-specific. The exact current agreement remains authoritative.
The stored pricing ladder begins around $83 at $25,000 and reaches $308 at $150,000. The current BRIDGE headline is 60%. A larger absolute saving at a higher tier should not decide account size.
A true-cost model should include repeat attempts. Two failed $150 attempts cost more than one $250 attempt passed with a better-fitting rule set. Fee efficiency therefore depends on survival probability.
The best-fit question is whether the trader can run the normal strategy without changing entry timing, holding period, trade concentration or position risk. If not, the model is a weak fit regardless of discount.
Instant Standard is currently a Instant Funding program with target No evaluation; payout milestones are 6% / 5% / 4%, daily rule 2.5%, maximum-loss rule 3–4% EOD trailing depending on size, End-of-day trailing drawdown drawdown, 100% to trader under the current Futures program terms profit share, minimum-day condition No evaluation; 7 qualifying winning days are required for payout and payout timing On demand after 7 qualifying winning days.
The exact target and maximum-loss rule for this program are the values shown in the program table above. Dollar-based, range-based and multi-part rules must remain in their original form rather than being coerced into a single percentage. Treat the active loss rule as an outer breach boundary and set personal risk materially inside it.
The exact daily-loss rule for this program is the dollar, percentage, soft-stop or size-dependent value shown in the program table above. Use the live dashboard limit for the selected account size rather than coercing a multi-part dollar rule into one percentage.
Because the account contains a trailing component, a profitable equity high can move the loss floor upward. This makes the order of wins, losses and withdrawals relevant to future risk.
The current day requirement is No evaluation; 7 qualifying winning days are required for payout. This should be satisfied through ordinary qualified trading. If the target is already reached, remaining days should not become a reason to open unnecessary positions.
The current payout description is On demand after 7 qualifying winning days. A trader should estimate the realistic time to eligibility from historical trading frequency, then add processing time. This produces a more useful cash-flow estimate than the headline cycle alone.
Current PFB permission fields record news trading as allowed, weekend holding as restricted, and EA use as program-specific. The exact current agreement remains authoritative.
The stored pricing ladder begins around $410 at $50,000 and reaches $510 at $100,000. The current BRIDGE headline is 60%. A larger absolute saving at a higher tier should not decide account size.
A true-cost model should include repeat attempts. Two failed $150 attempts cost more than one $250 attempt passed with a better-fitting rule set. Fee efficiency therefore depends on survival probability.
The best-fit question is whether the trader can run the normal strategy without changing entry timing, holding period, trade concentration or position risk. If not, the model is a weak fit regardless of discount.
Instant Pro is currently a Instant Funding program with target No evaluation; payout eligibility rules apply, daily rule 0% — no separate daily loss limit, maximum-loss rule 3–4% intraday/trailing depending on size, Intraday/trailing drawdown drawdown, 100% to trader under the current Futures program display profit share, minimum-day condition No evaluation; funded payout qualification rules apply and payout timing On demand after at least 7 days and all payout conditions are met.
The exact target and maximum-loss rule for this program are the values shown in the program table above. Dollar-based, range-based and multi-part rules must remain in their original form rather than being coerced into a single percentage. Treat the active loss rule as an outer breach boundary and set personal risk materially inside it.
The exact daily-loss rule for this program is the dollar, percentage, soft-stop or size-dependent value shown in the program table above. Use the live dashboard limit for the selected account size rather than coercing a multi-part dollar rule into one percentage.
Because the account contains a trailing component, a profitable equity high can move the loss floor upward. This makes the order of wins, losses and withdrawals relevant to future risk.
The current day requirement is No evaluation; funded payout qualification rules apply. This should be satisfied through ordinary qualified trading. If the target is already reached, remaining days should not become a reason to open unnecessary positions.
The current payout description is On demand after at least 7 days and all payout conditions are met. A trader should estimate the realistic time to eligibility from historical trading frequency, then add processing time. This produces a more useful cash-flow estimate than the headline cycle alone.
Current PFB permission fields record news trading as allowed, weekend holding as restricted, and EA use as program-specific. The exact current agreement remains authoritative.
The stored pricing ladder begins around $416 at $50,000 and reaches $489 at $100,000. The current BRIDGE headline is 60%. A larger absolute saving at a higher tier should not decide account size.
A true-cost model should include repeat attempts. Two failed $150 attempts cost more than one $250 attempt passed with a better-fitting rule set. Fee efficiency therefore depends on survival probability.
The best-fit question is whether the trader can run the normal strategy without changing entry timing, holding period, trade concentration or position risk. If not, the model is a weak fit regardless of discount.
Structure: Standard is a One-Step Standard with target 6%, while Flex is a One-Step Evaluation with target About 4.67–5% depending on size. This pairing is most useful when the trader wants to understand whether the lower target also comes with a tighter loss envelope or more demanding qualifying conditions.
Drawdown: Standard currently uses End of Day trailing in evaluation and funded stages; active floor is enforced during trading with daily rule None on $25K; $1,000 / $2,000 / $3,000 soft limit on larger sizes and maximum-loss rule $1,000 / $2,000 / $3,500 / $5,000 EOD trailing. Flex currently uses End-of-day trailing drawdown with daily rule 0% — no daily loss limit and maximum-loss rule About 2.33–3% EOD trailing depending on size. The trader should replay a normal winning week followed by a losing week against both floors.
Days and payouts: Standard currently requires May pass in 1 trading day; first funded payout eligibility starts after 3 days and describes payouts as From 3 days after the first funded trade when target, buffer, and 40% consistency are met. Flex currently requires No minimum evaluation days and describes payouts as On demand after 5 qualifying winning days. This turns “which pays faster?” into a measurable calendar question rather than a marketing claim.
Permissions: Compare news, weekend and automation needs directly. If one account blocks a non-negotiable part of the strategy, remove it before comparing fees or profit split. Permission fit is binary for many traders.
Price logic: Standard currently starts around $154 at $25,000 before BRIDGE. Flex currently starts around $133 at $50,000 before BRIDGE. Final checkout should be compared only after the structural filters above are passed.
Structure: Standard is a One-Step Standard with target 6%, while Standard Evaluation is a One-Step Evaluation with target 5–6% depending on size. This pairing is most useful when the trader wants to understand whether the lower target also comes with a tighter loss envelope or more demanding qualifying conditions.
Drawdown: Standard currently uses End of Day trailing in evaluation and funded stages; active floor is enforced during trading with daily rule None on $25K; $1,000 / $2,000 / $3,000 soft limit on larger sizes and maximum-loss rule $1,000 / $2,000 / $3,500 / $5,000 EOD trailing. Standard Evaluation currently uses End-of-day trailing drawdown with daily rule 0% — no daily loss limit and maximum-loss rule About 3.33–4% EOD trailing depending on size. The trader should replay a normal winning week followed by a losing week against both floors.
Days and payouts: Standard currently requires May pass in 1 trading day; first funded payout eligibility starts after 3 days and describes payouts as From 3 days after the first funded trade when target, buffer, and 40% consistency are met. Standard Evaluation currently requires No minimum evaluation days and describes payouts as On demand after 5 qualifying winning days. This turns “which pays faster?” into a measurable calendar question rather than a marketing claim.
Permissions: Compare news, weekend and automation needs directly. If one account blocks a non-negotiable part of the strategy, remove it before comparing fees or profit split. Permission fit is binary for many traders.
Price logic: Standard currently starts around $154 at $25,000 before BRIDGE. Standard Evaluation currently starts around $116 at $25,000 before BRIDGE. Final checkout should be compared only after the structural filters above are passed.
Structure: Standard is a One-Step Standard with target 6%, while Beginner Evaluation is a One-Step Evaluation with target 6%. This pairing is most useful when the trader wants to understand whether the lower target also comes with a tighter loss envelope or more demanding qualifying conditions.
Drawdown: Standard currently uses End of Day trailing in evaluation and funded stages; active floor is enforced during trading with daily rule None on $25K; $1,000 / $2,000 / $3,000 soft limit on larger sizes and maximum-loss rule $1,000 / $2,000 / $3,500 / $5,000 EOD trailing. Beginner Evaluation currently uses End-of-day trailing drawdown with daily rule 2.4–2.5% depending on size and maximum-loss rule About 3.33–5% EOD trailing depending on size. The trader should replay a normal winning week followed by a losing week against both floors.
Days and payouts: Standard currently requires May pass in 1 trading day; first funded payout eligibility starts after 3 days and describes payouts as From 3 days after the first funded trade when target, buffer, and 40% consistency are met. Beginner Evaluation currently requires No minimum evaluation days; funded payout qualification uses 7 days with 5 winning days and describes payouts as Weekly; first payout after at least 7 days and 5 qualifying winning days. This turns “which pays faster?” into a measurable calendar question rather than a marketing claim.
Permissions: Compare news, weekend and automation needs directly. If one account blocks a non-negotiable part of the strategy, remove it before comparing fees or profit split. Permission fit is binary for many traders.
Price logic: Standard currently starts around $154 at $25,000 before BRIDGE. Beginner Evaluation currently starts around $83 at $25,000 before BRIDGE. Final checkout should be compared only after the structural filters above are passed.
Structure: Standard is a One-Step Standard with target 6%, while Instant Standard is a Instant Funding with target No evaluation; payout milestones are 6% / 5% / 4%. This pairing is most useful when the trader wants to understand whether the lower target also comes with a tighter loss envelope or more demanding qualifying conditions.
Drawdown: Standard currently uses End of Day trailing in evaluation and funded stages; active floor is enforced during trading with daily rule None on $25K; $1,000 / $2,000 / $3,000 soft limit on larger sizes and maximum-loss rule $1,000 / $2,000 / $3,500 / $5,000 EOD trailing. Instant Standard currently uses End-of-day trailing drawdown with daily rule 2.5% and maximum-loss rule 3–4% EOD trailing depending on size. The trader should replay a normal winning week followed by a losing week against both floors.
Days and payouts: Standard currently requires May pass in 1 trading day; first funded payout eligibility starts after 3 days and describes payouts as From 3 days after the first funded trade when target, buffer, and 40% consistency are met. Instant Standard currently requires No evaluation; 7 qualifying winning days are required for payout and describes payouts as On demand after 7 qualifying winning days. This turns “which pays faster?” into a measurable calendar question rather than a marketing claim.
Permissions: Compare news, weekend and automation needs directly. If one account blocks a non-negotiable part of the strategy, remove it before comparing fees or profit split. Permission fit is binary for many traders.
Price logic: Standard currently starts around $154 at $25,000 before BRIDGE. Instant Standard currently starts around $410 at $50,000 before BRIDGE. Final checkout should be compared only after the structural filters above are passed.
Structure: Standard is a One-Step Standard with target 6%, while Instant Pro is a Instant Funding with target No evaluation; payout eligibility rules apply. This pairing is most useful when the trader wants to understand whether the lower target also comes with a tighter loss envelope or more demanding qualifying conditions.
Drawdown: Standard currently uses End of Day trailing in evaluation and funded stages; active floor is enforced during trading with daily rule None on $25K; $1,000 / $2,000 / $3,000 soft limit on larger sizes and maximum-loss rule $1,000 / $2,000 / $3,500 / $5,000 EOD trailing. Instant Pro currently uses Intraday/trailing drawdown with daily rule 0% — no separate daily loss limit and maximum-loss rule 3–4% intraday/trailing depending on size. The trader should replay a normal winning week followed by a losing week against both floors.
Days and payouts: Standard currently requires May pass in 1 trading day; first funded payout eligibility starts after 3 days and describes payouts as From 3 days after the first funded trade when target, buffer, and 40% consistency are met. Instant Pro currently requires No evaluation; funded payout qualification rules apply and describes payouts as On demand after at least 7 days and all payout conditions are met. This turns “which pays faster?” into a measurable calendar question rather than a marketing claim.
Permissions: Compare news, weekend and automation needs directly. If one account blocks a non-negotiable part of the strategy, remove it before comparing fees or profit split. Permission fit is binary for many traders.
Price logic: Standard currently starts around $154 at $25,000 before BRIDGE. Instant Pro currently starts around $416 at $50,000 before BRIDGE. Final checkout should be compared only after the structural filters above are passed.
Structure: Reserve is a One-Step Reserve with target 6%, while Flex is a One-Step Evaluation with target About 4.67–5% depending on size. This pairing is most useful when the trader wants to understand whether the lower target also comes with a tighter loss envelope or more demanding qualifying conditions.
Drawdown: Reserve currently uses End of Day trailing; current rules lock the floor under the plan threshold with daily rule No standard daily loss limit; optional soft daily loss configuration may apply and maximum-loss rule $1,000 / $2,000 / $3,000 / $4,500 EOD trailing. Flex currently uses End-of-day trailing drawdown with daily rule 0% — no daily loss limit and maximum-loss rule About 2.33–3% EOD trailing depending on size. The trader should replay a normal winning week followed by a losing week against both floors.
Days and payouts: Reserve currently requires Evaluation requires 50% consistency; funded payouts require 5 qualifying winning days and describes payouts as After 5 qualifying winning days and any applicable later-cycle net-profit requirement. Flex currently requires No minimum evaluation days and describes payouts as On demand after 5 qualifying winning days. This turns “which pays faster?” into a measurable calendar question rather than a marketing claim.
Permissions: Compare news, weekend and automation needs directly. If one account blocks a non-negotiable part of the strategy, remove it before comparing fees or profit split. Permission fit is binary for many traders.
Price logic: Reserve currently starts around $110 at $25,000 before BRIDGE. Flex currently starts around $133 at $50,000 before BRIDGE. Final checkout should be compared only after the structural filters above are passed.
Structure: Reserve is a One-Step Reserve with target 6%, while Standard Evaluation is a One-Step Evaluation with target 5–6% depending on size. This pairing is most useful when the trader wants to understand whether the lower target also comes with a tighter loss envelope or more demanding qualifying conditions.
Drawdown: Reserve currently uses End of Day trailing; current rules lock the floor under the plan threshold with daily rule No standard daily loss limit; optional soft daily loss configuration may apply and maximum-loss rule $1,000 / $2,000 / $3,000 / $4,500 EOD trailing. Standard Evaluation currently uses End-of-day trailing drawdown with daily rule 0% — no daily loss limit and maximum-loss rule About 3.33–4% EOD trailing depending on size. The trader should replay a normal winning week followed by a losing week against both floors.
Days and payouts: Reserve currently requires Evaluation requires 50% consistency; funded payouts require 5 qualifying winning days and describes payouts as After 5 qualifying winning days and any applicable later-cycle net-profit requirement. Standard Evaluation currently requires No minimum evaluation days and describes payouts as On demand after 5 qualifying winning days. This turns “which pays faster?” into a measurable calendar question rather than a marketing claim.
Permissions: Compare news, weekend and automation needs directly. If one account blocks a non-negotiable part of the strategy, remove it before comparing fees or profit split. Permission fit is binary for many traders.
Price logic: Reserve currently starts around $110 at $25,000 before BRIDGE. Standard Evaluation currently starts around $116 at $25,000 before BRIDGE. Final checkout should be compared only after the structural filters above are passed.
Structure: Reserve is a One-Step Reserve with target 6%, while Beginner Evaluation is a One-Step Evaluation with target 6%. This pairing is most useful when the trader wants to understand whether the lower target also comes with a tighter loss envelope or more demanding qualifying conditions.
Drawdown: Reserve currently uses End of Day trailing; current rules lock the floor under the plan threshold with daily rule No standard daily loss limit; optional soft daily loss configuration may apply and maximum-loss rule $1,000 / $2,000 / $3,000 / $4,500 EOD trailing. Beginner Evaluation currently uses End-of-day trailing drawdown with daily rule 2.4–2.5% depending on size and maximum-loss rule About 3.33–5% EOD trailing depending on size. The trader should replay a normal winning week followed by a losing week against both floors.
Days and payouts: Reserve currently requires Evaluation requires 50% consistency; funded payouts require 5 qualifying winning days and describes payouts as After 5 qualifying winning days and any applicable later-cycle net-profit requirement. Beginner Evaluation currently requires No minimum evaluation days; funded payout qualification uses 7 days with 5 winning days and describes payouts as Weekly; first payout after at least 7 days and 5 qualifying winning days. This turns “which pays faster?” into a measurable calendar question rather than a marketing claim.
Permissions: Compare news, weekend and automation needs directly. If one account blocks a non-negotiable part of the strategy, remove it before comparing fees or profit split. Permission fit is binary for many traders.
Price logic: Reserve currently starts around $110 at $25,000 before BRIDGE. Beginner Evaluation currently starts around $83 at $25,000 before BRIDGE. Final checkout should be compared only after the structural filters above are passed.
Structure: Reserve is a One-Step Reserve with target 6%, while Instant Standard is a Instant Funding with target No evaluation; payout milestones are 6% / 5% / 4%. This pairing is most useful when the trader wants to understand whether the lower target also comes with a tighter loss envelope or more demanding qualifying conditions.
Drawdown: Reserve currently uses End of Day trailing; current rules lock the floor under the plan threshold with daily rule No standard daily loss limit; optional soft daily loss configuration may apply and maximum-loss rule $1,000 / $2,000 / $3,000 / $4,500 EOD trailing. Instant Standard currently uses End-of-day trailing drawdown with daily rule 2.5% and maximum-loss rule 3–4% EOD trailing depending on size. The trader should replay a normal winning week followed by a losing week against both floors.
Days and payouts: Reserve currently requires Evaluation requires 50% consistency; funded payouts require 5 qualifying winning days and describes payouts as After 5 qualifying winning days and any applicable later-cycle net-profit requirement. Instant Standard currently requires No evaluation; 7 qualifying winning days are required for payout and describes payouts as On demand after 7 qualifying winning days. This turns “which pays faster?” into a measurable calendar question rather than a marketing claim.
Permissions: Compare news, weekend and automation needs directly. If one account blocks a non-negotiable part of the strategy, remove it before comparing fees or profit split. Permission fit is binary for many traders.
Price logic: Reserve currently starts around $110 at $25,000 before BRIDGE. Instant Standard currently starts around $410 at $50,000 before BRIDGE. Final checkout should be compared only after the structural filters above are passed.
Structure: Reserve is a One-Step Reserve with target 6%, while Instant Pro is a Instant Funding with target No evaluation; payout eligibility rules apply. This pairing is most useful when the trader wants to understand whether the lower target also comes with a tighter loss envelope or more demanding qualifying conditions.
Drawdown: Reserve currently uses End of Day trailing; current rules lock the floor under the plan threshold with daily rule No standard daily loss limit; optional soft daily loss configuration may apply and maximum-loss rule $1,000 / $2,000 / $3,000 / $4,500 EOD trailing. Instant Pro currently uses Intraday/trailing drawdown with daily rule 0% — no separate daily loss limit and maximum-loss rule 3–4% intraday/trailing depending on size. The trader should replay a normal winning week followed by a losing week against both floors.
Days and payouts: Reserve currently requires Evaluation requires 50% consistency; funded payouts require 5 qualifying winning days and describes payouts as After 5 qualifying winning days and any applicable later-cycle net-profit requirement. Instant Pro currently requires No evaluation; funded payout qualification rules apply and describes payouts as On demand after at least 7 days and all payout conditions are met. This turns “which pays faster?” into a measurable calendar question rather than a marketing claim.
Permissions: Compare news, weekend and automation needs directly. If one account blocks a non-negotiable part of the strategy, remove it before comparing fees or profit split. Permission fit is binary for many traders.
Price logic: Reserve currently starts around $110 at $25,000 before BRIDGE. Instant Pro currently starts around $416 at $50,000 before BRIDGE. Final checkout should be compared only after the structural filters above are passed.
Structure: Express is a One-Step Express with target 6%, while Flex is a One-Step Evaluation with target About 4.67–5% depending on size. This pairing is most useful when the trader wants to understand whether the lower target also comes with a tighter loss envelope or more demanding qualifying conditions.
Drawdown: Express currently uses End of Day trailing with plan-specific funded buffer and lock behavior with daily rule Plan-specific funded soft daily loss limits; verify the live dashboard and maximum-loss rule $1,000 / $2,000 / $3,000 / $4,500 EOD trailing in evaluation. Flex currently uses End-of-day trailing drawdown with daily rule 0% — no daily loss limit and maximum-loss rule About 2.33–3% EOD trailing depending on size. The trader should replay a normal winning week followed by a losing week against both floors.
Days and payouts: Express currently requires Evaluation pass speed is governed by 40% consistency; funded withdrawals may be available daily and describes payouts as Daily after funded buffer, minimum, and plan-specific conditions are met. Flex currently requires No minimum evaluation days and describes payouts as On demand after 5 qualifying winning days. This turns “which pays faster?” into a measurable calendar question rather than a marketing claim.
Permissions: Compare news, weekend and automation needs directly. If one account blocks a non-negotiable part of the strategy, remove it before comparing fees or profit split. Permission fit is binary for many traders.
Price logic: Express currently starts around $106 at $25,000 before BRIDGE. Flex currently starts around $133 at $50,000 before BRIDGE. Final checkout should be compared only after the structural filters above are passed.
Structure: Express is a One-Step Express with target 6%, while Standard Evaluation is a One-Step Evaluation with target 5–6% depending on size. This pairing is most useful when the trader wants to understand whether the lower target also comes with a tighter loss envelope or more demanding qualifying conditions.
Drawdown: Express currently uses End of Day trailing with plan-specific funded buffer and lock behavior with daily rule Plan-specific funded soft daily loss limits; verify the live dashboard and maximum-loss rule $1,000 / $2,000 / $3,000 / $4,500 EOD trailing in evaluation. Standard Evaluation currently uses End-of-day trailing drawdown with daily rule 0% — no daily loss limit and maximum-loss rule About 3.33–4% EOD trailing depending on size. The trader should replay a normal winning week followed by a losing week against both floors.
Days and payouts: Express currently requires Evaluation pass speed is governed by 40% consistency; funded withdrawals may be available daily and describes payouts as Daily after funded buffer, minimum, and plan-specific conditions are met. Standard Evaluation currently requires No minimum evaluation days and describes payouts as On demand after 5 qualifying winning days. This turns “which pays faster?” into a measurable calendar question rather than a marketing claim.
Permissions: Compare news, weekend and automation needs directly. If one account blocks a non-negotiable part of the strategy, remove it before comparing fees or profit split. Permission fit is binary for many traders.
Price logic: Express currently starts around $106 at $25,000 before BRIDGE. Standard Evaluation currently starts around $116 at $25,000 before BRIDGE. Final checkout should be compared only after the structural filters above are passed.
Structure: Express is a One-Step Express with target 6%, while Beginner Evaluation is a One-Step Evaluation with target 6%. This pairing is most useful when the trader wants to understand whether the lower target also comes with a tighter loss envelope or more demanding qualifying conditions.
Drawdown: Express currently uses End of Day trailing with plan-specific funded buffer and lock behavior with daily rule Plan-specific funded soft daily loss limits; verify the live dashboard and maximum-loss rule $1,000 / $2,000 / $3,000 / $4,500 EOD trailing in evaluation. Beginner Evaluation currently uses End-of-day trailing drawdown with daily rule 2.4–2.5% depending on size and maximum-loss rule About 3.33–5% EOD trailing depending on size. The trader should replay a normal winning week followed by a losing week against both floors.
Days and payouts: Express currently requires Evaluation pass speed is governed by 40% consistency; funded withdrawals may be available daily and describes payouts as Daily after funded buffer, minimum, and plan-specific conditions are met. Beginner Evaluation currently requires No minimum evaluation days; funded payout qualification uses 7 days with 5 winning days and describes payouts as Weekly; first payout after at least 7 days and 5 qualifying winning days. This turns “which pays faster?” into a measurable calendar question rather than a marketing claim.
Permissions: Compare news, weekend and automation needs directly. If one account blocks a non-negotiable part of the strategy, remove it before comparing fees or profit split. Permission fit is binary for many traders.
Price logic: Express currently starts around $106 at $25,000 before BRIDGE. Beginner Evaluation currently starts around $83 at $25,000 before BRIDGE. Final checkout should be compared only after the structural filters above are passed.
Structure: Express is a One-Step Express with target 6%, while Instant Standard is a Instant Funding with target No evaluation; payout milestones are 6% / 5% / 4%. This pairing is most useful when the trader wants to understand whether the lower target also comes with a tighter loss envelope or more demanding qualifying conditions.
Drawdown: Express currently uses End of Day trailing with plan-specific funded buffer and lock behavior with daily rule Plan-specific funded soft daily loss limits; verify the live dashboard and maximum-loss rule $1,000 / $2,000 / $3,000 / $4,500 EOD trailing in evaluation. Instant Standard currently uses End-of-day trailing drawdown with daily rule 2.5% and maximum-loss rule 3–4% EOD trailing depending on size. The trader should replay a normal winning week followed by a losing week against both floors.
Days and payouts: Express currently requires Evaluation pass speed is governed by 40% consistency; funded withdrawals may be available daily and describes payouts as Daily after funded buffer, minimum, and plan-specific conditions are met. Instant Standard currently requires No evaluation; 7 qualifying winning days are required for payout and describes payouts as On demand after 7 qualifying winning days. This turns “which pays faster?” into a measurable calendar question rather than a marketing claim.
Permissions: Compare news, weekend and automation needs directly. If one account blocks a non-negotiable part of the strategy, remove it before comparing fees or profit split. Permission fit is binary for many traders.
Price logic: Express currently starts around $106 at $25,000 before BRIDGE. Instant Standard currently starts around $410 at $50,000 before BRIDGE. Final checkout should be compared only after the structural filters above are passed.
Structure: Express is a One-Step Express with target 6%, while Instant Pro is a Instant Funding with target No evaluation; payout eligibility rules apply. This pairing is most useful when the trader wants to understand whether the lower target also comes with a tighter loss envelope or more demanding qualifying conditions.
Drawdown: Express currently uses End of Day trailing with plan-specific funded buffer and lock behavior with daily rule Plan-specific funded soft daily loss limits; verify the live dashboard and maximum-loss rule $1,000 / $2,000 / $3,000 / $4,500 EOD trailing in evaluation. Instant Pro currently uses Intraday/trailing drawdown with daily rule 0% — no separate daily loss limit and maximum-loss rule 3–4% intraday/trailing depending on size. The trader should replay a normal winning week followed by a losing week against both floors.
Days and payouts: Express currently requires Evaluation pass speed is governed by 40% consistency; funded withdrawals may be available daily and describes payouts as Daily after funded buffer, minimum, and plan-specific conditions are met. Instant Pro currently requires No evaluation; funded payout qualification rules apply and describes payouts as On demand after at least 7 days and all payout conditions are met. This turns “which pays faster?” into a measurable calendar question rather than a marketing claim.
Permissions: Compare news, weekend and automation needs directly. If one account blocks a non-negotiable part of the strategy, remove it before comparing fees or profit split. Permission fit is binary for many traders.
Price logic: Express currently starts around $106 at $25,000 before BRIDGE. Instant Pro currently starts around $416 at $50,000 before BRIDGE. Final checkout should be compared only after the structural filters above are passed.
Structure: Direct is a Instant Funding Direct with target No evaluation; payout profit goals apply, while Flex is a One-Step Evaluation with target About 4.67–5% depending on size. This pairing is most useful when the trader wants to understand whether the lower target also comes with a tighter loss envelope or more demanding qualifying conditions.
Drawdown: Direct currently uses End of Day framework that becomes fixed under the current lock or first-payout condition with daily rule $1,000 / $1,250 / $2,500 / $3,000 soft daily loss limit and maximum-loss rule $1,500 / $2,000 / $3,500 / $4,500 EOD framework. Flex currently uses End-of-day trailing drawdown with daily rule 0% — no daily loss limit and maximum-loss rule About 2.33–3% EOD trailing depending on size. The trader should replay a normal winning week followed by a losing week against both floors.
Days and payouts: Direct currently requires No evaluation; payout unlock depends on profit goal and consistency and describes payouts as On demand after the current payout goal, consistency, and risk conditions are met. Flex currently requires No minimum evaluation days and describes payouts as On demand after 5 qualifying winning days. This turns “which pays faster?” into a measurable calendar question rather than a marketing claim.
Permissions: Compare news, weekend and automation needs directly. If one account blocks a non-negotiable part of the strategy, remove it before comparing fees or profit split. Permission fit is binary for many traders.
Price logic: Direct currently starts around $307 at $25,000 before BRIDGE. Flex currently starts around $133 at $50,000 before BRIDGE. Final checkout should be compared only after the structural filters above are passed.
Structure: Direct is a Instant Funding Direct with target No evaluation; payout profit goals apply, while Standard Evaluation is a One-Step Evaluation with target 5–6% depending on size. This pairing is most useful when the trader wants to understand whether the lower target also comes with a tighter loss envelope or more demanding qualifying conditions.
Drawdown: Direct currently uses End of Day framework that becomes fixed under the current lock or first-payout condition with daily rule $1,000 / $1,250 / $2,500 / $3,000 soft daily loss limit and maximum-loss rule $1,500 / $2,000 / $3,500 / $4,500 EOD framework. Standard Evaluation currently uses End-of-day trailing drawdown with daily rule 0% — no daily loss limit and maximum-loss rule About 3.33–4% EOD trailing depending on size. The trader should replay a normal winning week followed by a losing week against both floors.
Days and payouts: Direct currently requires No evaluation; payout unlock depends on profit goal and consistency and describes payouts as On demand after the current payout goal, consistency, and risk conditions are met. Standard Evaluation currently requires No minimum evaluation days and describes payouts as On demand after 5 qualifying winning days. This turns “which pays faster?” into a measurable calendar question rather than a marketing claim.
Permissions: Compare news, weekend and automation needs directly. If one account blocks a non-negotiable part of the strategy, remove it before comparing fees or profit split. Permission fit is binary for many traders.
Price logic: Direct currently starts around $307 at $25,000 before BRIDGE. Standard Evaluation currently starts around $116 at $25,000 before BRIDGE. Final checkout should be compared only after the structural filters above are passed.
Structure: Direct is a Instant Funding Direct with target No evaluation; payout profit goals apply, while Beginner Evaluation is a One-Step Evaluation with target 6%. This pairing is most useful when the trader wants to understand whether the lower target also comes with a tighter loss envelope or more demanding qualifying conditions.
Drawdown: Direct currently uses End of Day framework that becomes fixed under the current lock or first-payout condition with daily rule $1,000 / $1,250 / $2,500 / $3,000 soft daily loss limit and maximum-loss rule $1,500 / $2,000 / $3,500 / $4,500 EOD framework. Beginner Evaluation currently uses End-of-day trailing drawdown with daily rule 2.4–2.5% depending on size and maximum-loss rule About 3.33–5% EOD trailing depending on size. The trader should replay a normal winning week followed by a losing week against both floors.
Days and payouts: Direct currently requires No evaluation; payout unlock depends on profit goal and consistency and describes payouts as On demand after the current payout goal, consistency, and risk conditions are met. Beginner Evaluation currently requires No minimum evaluation days; funded payout qualification uses 7 days with 5 winning days and describes payouts as Weekly; first payout after at least 7 days and 5 qualifying winning days. This turns “which pays faster?” into a measurable calendar question rather than a marketing claim.
Permissions: Compare news, weekend and automation needs directly. If one account blocks a non-negotiable part of the strategy, remove it before comparing fees or profit split. Permission fit is binary for many traders.
Price logic: Direct currently starts around $307 at $25,000 before BRIDGE. Beginner Evaluation currently starts around $83 at $25,000 before BRIDGE. Final checkout should be compared only after the structural filters above are passed.
Structure: Direct is a Instant Funding Direct with target No evaluation; payout profit goals apply, while Instant Standard is a Instant Funding with target No evaluation; payout milestones are 6% / 5% / 4%. This pairing is most useful when the trader wants to understand whether the lower target also comes with a tighter loss envelope or more demanding qualifying conditions.
Drawdown: Direct currently uses End of Day framework that becomes fixed under the current lock or first-payout condition with daily rule $1,000 / $1,250 / $2,500 / $3,000 soft daily loss limit and maximum-loss rule $1,500 / $2,000 / $3,500 / $4,500 EOD framework. Instant Standard currently uses End-of-day trailing drawdown with daily rule 2.5% and maximum-loss rule 3–4% EOD trailing depending on size. The trader should replay a normal winning week followed by a losing week against both floors.
Days and payouts: Direct currently requires No evaluation; payout unlock depends on profit goal and consistency and describes payouts as On demand after the current payout goal, consistency, and risk conditions are met. Instant Standard currently requires No evaluation; 7 qualifying winning days are required for payout and describes payouts as On demand after 7 qualifying winning days. This turns “which pays faster?” into a measurable calendar question rather than a marketing claim.
Permissions: Compare news, weekend and automation needs directly. If one account blocks a non-negotiable part of the strategy, remove it before comparing fees or profit split. Permission fit is binary for many traders.
Price logic: Direct currently starts around $307 at $25,000 before BRIDGE. Instant Standard currently starts around $410 at $50,000 before BRIDGE. Final checkout should be compared only after the structural filters above are passed.
Structure: Direct is a Instant Funding Direct with target No evaluation; payout profit goals apply, while Instant Pro is a Instant Funding with target No evaluation; payout eligibility rules apply. This pairing is most useful when the trader wants to understand whether the lower target also comes with a tighter loss envelope or more demanding qualifying conditions.
Drawdown: Direct currently uses End of Day framework that becomes fixed under the current lock or first-payout condition with daily rule $1,000 / $1,250 / $2,500 / $3,000 soft daily loss limit and maximum-loss rule $1,500 / $2,000 / $3,500 / $4,500 EOD framework. Instant Pro currently uses Intraday/trailing drawdown with daily rule 0% — no separate daily loss limit and maximum-loss rule 3–4% intraday/trailing depending on size. The trader should replay a normal winning week followed by a losing week against both floors.
Days and payouts: Direct currently requires No evaluation; payout unlock depends on profit goal and consistency and describes payouts as On demand after the current payout goal, consistency, and risk conditions are met. Instant Pro currently requires No evaluation; funded payout qualification rules apply and describes payouts as On demand after at least 7 days and all payout conditions are met. This turns “which pays faster?” into a measurable calendar question rather than a marketing claim.
Permissions: Compare news, weekend and automation needs directly. If one account blocks a non-negotiable part of the strategy, remove it before comparing fees or profit split. Permission fit is binary for many traders.
Price logic: Direct currently starts around $307 at $25,000 before BRIDGE. Instant Pro currently starts around $416 at $50,000 before BRIDGE. Final checkout should be compared only after the structural filters above are passed.
At $25,000, 0.25% equals $62.5, 0.5% equals $125, 1% equals $250, 2% equals $500, 3% equals $750, 4% equals $1,000, 5% equals $1,250 and 6% equals $1,500. A trader should know these dollar figures before purchasing the size.
If the larger dollar swings change trading behavior, the account is too large at the intended percentage risk even if the coupon makes it look more efficient.
At $50,000, 0.25% equals $125, 0.5% equals $250, 1% equals $500, 2% equals $1,000, 3% equals $1,500, 4% equals $2,000, 5% equals $2,500 and 6% equals $3,000. A trader should know these dollar figures before purchasing the size.
If the larger dollar swings change trading behavior, the account is too large at the intended percentage risk even if the coupon makes it look more efficient.
At $100,000, 0.25% equals $250, 0.5% equals $500, 1% equals $1,000, 2% equals $2,000, 3% equals $3,000, 4% equals $4,000, 5% equals $5,000 and 6% equals $6,000. A trader should know these dollar figures before purchasing the size.
If the larger dollar swings change trading behavior, the account is too large at the intended percentage risk even if the coupon makes it look more efficient.
At $150,000, 0.25% equals $375, 0.5% equals $750, 1% equals $1,500, 2% equals $3,000, 3% equals $4,500, 4% equals $6,000, 5% equals $7,500 and 6% equals $9,000. A trader should know these dollar figures before purchasing the size.
If the larger dollar swings change trading behavior, the account is too large at the intended percentage risk even if the coupon makes it look more efficient.
At $200,000, 0.25% equals $500, 0.5% equals $1,000, 1% equals $2,000, 2% equals $4,000, 3% equals $6,000, 4% equals $8,000, 5% equals $10,000 and 6% equals $12,000. A trader should know these dollar figures before purchasing the size.
If the larger dollar swings change trading behavior, the account is too large at the intended percentage risk even if the coupon makes it look more efficient.
The answer depends on the exact program pair rather than the firm name alone. Use the pair matrix above, translate the risk rule into dollars at the intended size and include qualifying-day requirements in the calendar estimate.
For price, apply BRIDGE to the live base fee. For payout speed, include eligibility and processing. For drawdown, distinguish static, EOD and intraday trailing rather than comparing only the percentage.
The answer depends on the exact program pair rather than the firm name alone. Use the pair matrix above, translate the risk rule into dollars at the intended size and include qualifying-day requirements in the calendar estimate.
For price, apply BRIDGE to the live base fee. For payout speed, include eligibility and processing. For drawdown, distinguish static, EOD and intraday trailing rather than comparing only the percentage.
The answer depends on the exact program pair rather than the firm name alone. Use the pair matrix above, translate the risk rule into dollars at the intended size and include qualifying-day requirements in the calendar estimate.
For price, apply BRIDGE to the live base fee. For payout speed, include eligibility and processing. For drawdown, distinguish static, EOD and intraday trailing rather than comparing only the percentage.
The answer depends on the exact program pair rather than the firm name alone. Use the pair matrix above, translate the risk rule into dollars at the intended size and include qualifying-day requirements in the calendar estimate.
For price, apply BRIDGE to the live base fee. For payout speed, include eligibility and processing. For drawdown, distinguish static, EOD and intraday trailing rather than comparing only the percentage.
The answer depends on the exact program pair rather than the firm name alone. Use the pair matrix above, translate the risk rule into dollars at the intended size and include qualifying-day requirements in the calendar estimate.
For price, apply BRIDGE to the live base fee. For payout speed, include eligibility and processing. For drawdown, distinguish static, EOD and intraday trailing rather than comparing only the percentage.
The answer depends on the exact program pair rather than the firm name alone. Use the pair matrix above, translate the risk rule into dollars at the intended size and include qualifying-day requirements in the calendar estimate.
For price, apply BRIDGE to the live base fee. For payout speed, include eligibility and processing. For drawdown, distinguish static, EOD and intraday trailing rather than comparing only the percentage.
The answer depends on the exact program pair rather than the firm name alone. Use the pair matrix above, translate the risk rule into dollars at the intended size and include qualifying-day requirements in the calendar estimate.
For price, apply BRIDGE to the live base fee. For payout speed, include eligibility and processing. For drawdown, distinguish static, EOD and intraday trailing rather than comparing only the percentage.
The answer depends on the exact program pair rather than the firm name alone. Use the pair matrix above, translate the risk rule into dollars at the intended size and include qualifying-day requirements in the calendar estimate.
For price, apply BRIDGE to the live base fee. For payout speed, include eligibility and processing. For drawdown, distinguish static, EOD and intraday trailing rather than comparing only the percentage.
The answer depends on the exact program pair rather than the firm name alone. Use the pair matrix above, translate the risk rule into dollars at the intended size and include qualifying-day requirements in the calendar estimate.
For price, apply BRIDGE to the live base fee. For payout speed, include eligibility and processing. For drawdown, distinguish static, EOD and intraday trailing rather than comparing only the percentage.
The answer depends on the exact program pair rather than the firm name alone. Use the pair matrix above, translate the risk rule into dollars at the intended size and include qualifying-day requirements in the calendar estimate.
For price, apply BRIDGE to the live base fee. For payout speed, include eligibility and processing. For drawdown, distinguish static, EOD and intraday trailing rather than comparing only the percentage.
The answer depends on the exact program pair rather than the firm name alone. Use the pair matrix above, translate the risk rule into dollars at the intended size and include qualifying-day requirements in the calendar estimate.
For price, apply BRIDGE to the live base fee. For payout speed, include eligibility and processing. For drawdown, distinguish static, EOD and intraday trailing rather than comparing only the percentage.
The answer depends on the exact program pair rather than the firm name alone. Use the pair matrix above, translate the risk rule into dollars at the intended size and include qualifying-day requirements in the calendar estimate.
For price, apply BRIDGE to the live base fee. For payout speed, include eligibility and processing. For drawdown, distinguish static, EOD and intraday trailing rather than comparing only the percentage.
The answer depends on the exact program pair rather than the firm name alone. Use the pair matrix above, translate the risk rule into dollars at the intended size and include qualifying-day requirements in the calendar estimate.
For price, apply BRIDGE to the live base fee. For payout speed, include eligibility and processing. For drawdown, distinguish static, EOD and intraday trailing rather than comparing only the percentage.
The answer depends on the exact program pair rather than the firm name alone. Use the pair matrix above, translate the risk rule into dollars at the intended size and include qualifying-day requirements in the calendar estimate.
For price, apply BRIDGE to the live base fee. For payout speed, include eligibility and processing. For drawdown, distinguish static, EOD and intraday trailing rather than comparing only the percentage.
The answer depends on the exact program pair rather than the firm name alone. Use the pair matrix above, translate the risk rule into dollars at the intended size and include qualifying-day requirements in the calendar estimate.
For price, apply BRIDGE to the live base fee. For payout speed, include eligibility and processing. For drawdown, distinguish static, EOD and intraday trailing rather than comparing only the percentage.
The answer depends on the exact program pair rather than the firm name alone. Use the pair matrix above, translate the risk rule into dollars at the intended size and include qualifying-day requirements in the calendar estimate.
For price, apply BRIDGE to the live base fee. For payout speed, include eligibility and processing. For drawdown, distinguish static, EOD and intraday trailing rather than comparing only the percentage.
The answer depends on the exact program pair rather than the firm name alone. Use the pair matrix above, translate the risk rule into dollars at the intended size and include qualifying-day requirements in the calendar estimate.
For price, apply BRIDGE to the live base fee. For payout speed, include eligibility and processing. For drawdown, distinguish static, EOD and intraday trailing rather than comparing only the percentage.
The answer depends on the exact program pair rather than the firm name alone. Use the pair matrix above, translate the risk rule into dollars at the intended size and include qualifying-day requirements in the calendar estimate.
For price, apply BRIDGE to the live base fee. For payout speed, include eligibility and processing. For drawdown, distinguish static, EOD and intraday trailing rather than comparing only the percentage.
The answer depends on the exact program pair rather than the firm name alone. Use the pair matrix above, translate the risk rule into dollars at the intended size and include qualifying-day requirements in the calendar estimate.
For price, apply BRIDGE to the live base fee. For payout speed, include eligibility and processing. For drawdown, distinguish static, EOD and intraday trailing rather than comparing only the percentage.
The answer depends on the exact program pair rather than the firm name alone. Use the pair matrix above, translate the risk rule into dollars at the intended size and include qualifying-day requirements in the calendar estimate.
For price, apply BRIDGE to the live base fee. For payout speed, include eligibility and processing. For drawdown, distinguish static, EOD and intraday trailing rather than comparing only the percentage.
The answer depends on the exact program pair rather than the firm name alone. Use the pair matrix above, translate the risk rule into dollars at the intended size and include qualifying-day requirements in the calendar estimate.
For price, apply BRIDGE to the live base fee. For payout speed, include eligibility and processing. For drawdown, distinguish static, EOD and intraday trailing rather than comparing only the percentage.
The answer depends on the exact program pair rather than the firm name alone. Use the pair matrix above, translate the risk rule into dollars at the intended size and include qualifying-day requirements in the calendar estimate.
For price, apply BRIDGE to the live base fee. For payout speed, include eligibility and processing. For drawdown, distinguish static, EOD and intraday trailing rather than comparing only the percentage.
The answer depends on the exact program pair rather than the firm name alone. Use the pair matrix above, translate the risk rule into dollars at the intended size and include qualifying-day requirements in the calendar estimate.
For price, apply BRIDGE to the live base fee. For payout speed, include eligibility and processing. For drawdown, distinguish static, EOD and intraday trailing rather than comparing only the percentage.
The answer depends on the exact program pair rather than the firm name alone. Use the pair matrix above, translate the risk rule into dollars at the intended size and include qualifying-day requirements in the calendar estimate.
For price, apply BRIDGE to the live base fee. For payout speed, include eligibility and processing. For drawdown, distinguish static, EOD and intraday trailing rather than comparing only the percentage.
The answer depends on the exact program pair rather than the firm name alone. Use the pair matrix above, translate the risk rule into dollars at the intended size and include qualifying-day requirements in the calendar estimate.
For price, apply BRIDGE to the live base fee. For payout speed, include eligibility and processing. For drawdown, distinguish static, EOD and intraday trailing rather than comparing only the percentage.
1. Confirm market and program family.
2. Choose the drawdown method intentionally.
3. Compare target to usable loss buffer.
4. Test day and consistency rules against historical trades.
5. Verify trading permissions.
6. Calculate realistic payout timing and post-withdrawal buffer.
7. Compare repeat-attempt cost.
8. Apply BRIDGE last.
PFB currently lists Blue Guardian Futures as PFB Verified and AquaFutures as Moderate. This page keeps the current classification visible while comparing exact account rules, payout conditions and loss-floor behavior.
The current BRIDGE relationship is 25% at Blue Guardian Futures and 60% at AquaFutures. Rules decide the account; BRIDGE reduces its purchase cost afterward.
Last verified in 2026.
The current Blue Guardian Futures coupon code is “BRIDGE”, listed at 25.00% under verified coverage. Confirm live checkout.
The current AquaFutures coupon code is “BRIDGE”, listed at 60.00% under verified coverage. Confirm live checkout.
PFB currently lists Blue Guardian Futures as PFB Verified and AquaFutures as Moderate. This page keeps the current classification visible while comparing exact account rules, payout conditions and loss-floor behavior.
No. BRIDGE reduces purchase price only. Trading rules remain tied to the selected account.
Join the discussion
No comments yet
Sign in to leave a comment. Real traders only — one account, one voice.