Today's update · (UTC)
- ✅ Code BRIDGE independently verified today: tested by hand by Akash Mane, founder of Prop Firm Bridge, at the Blue Guardian Futures checkout: 25% off. Price for every account size
- 🔔 29 Oct: Standard Max drawdown (150K) $3,500 → $5,000
- 🔔 28 Oct: All programmes Discount with code BRIDGE 50% → 25%
The Blue Guardian Futures discount code is BRIDGE — 25% off. Independently verified working on Nov 3, 2026: tested by hand by Akash Mane, founder of Prop Firm Bridge, at the Blue Guardian Futures checkout.
Your discount
25% off
Blue Guardian Futures prices with code BRIDGE
The price of every account before and after BRIDGE, verified Nov 3, 2026. Pick a programme to see its sizes. Blue Guardian Futures coupon code page
| Account | With BRIDGE | You save |
|---|---|---|
| $25K | $115.50$154 | $38.5025% off |
| $50K | $156.75$209 | $52.2525% off |
| $100K | $247.50$330 | $82.5025% off |
| $150K | $318$424 | $10625% off |
| Account | With BRIDGE | You save |
|---|---|---|
| $25K | $82.50$110 | $27.5025% off |
| $50K | $115.50$154 | $38.5025% off |
| $100K | $186$248 | $6225% off |
| $150K | $298.50$398 | $99.5025% off |
| Account | With BRIDGE | You save |
|---|---|---|
| $25K | $79.50$106 | $26.5025% off |
| $50K | $102.75$137 | $34.2525% off |
| $100K | $171.75$229 | $57.2525% off |
| $150K | $258.75$345 | $86.2525% off |
| Account | With BRIDGE | You save |
|---|---|---|
| $25K | $230.25$307 | $76.7525% off |
| $50K | $370.50$494 | $123.5025% off |
| $100K | $494.25$659 | $164.7525% off |
| $150K | $618$824 | $20625% off |
Quick answer: PFB currently lists Blue Guardian Futures as PFB Verified and AquaFutures as Moderate. This page keeps the current classification visible while comparing exact account rules, payout conditions and loss-floor behavior.
I tested the coupon code featured in this article on Tuesday, November 3, 2026, and it worked at checkout.
Coupon answer: Blue Guardian Futures coupon code “BRIDGE” is currently 25%, while AquaFutures coupon code “BRIDGE” is currently 30%.
Featured-snippet answer: Blue Guardian Futures vs AquaFutures should be compared by market access, target, daily-loss rule, maximum-loss method, qualifying-day or consistency conditions, payout eligibility and final checkout price. A bigger coupon or faster headline payout does not make a structurally incompatible account better.
Coupon verification: Prop Firm Bridge independently verified the BRIDGE discount stated in this article.
Blue Guardian Futures vs AquaFutures at a Glance
| Field | Blue Guardian Futures | AquaFutures |
|---|---|---|
| PFB Score | 86/100 | 64/100 |
| PFB Status | PFB Verified | Moderate |
| BRIDGE | 25% | 30% |
| Programs | Standard, Reserve, Express, Direct | Flex, Standard Evaluation, Beginner Evaluation, Instant Standard, Instant Pro |
Firm-level scores and status are context. Program-level rules decide whether the strategy fits. This distinction prevents a high-level rating or coupon percentage from replacing actual risk analysis.
Program Map
| Firm | Program | Type | Target | Daily | Max | Drawdown | Split | Payout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blue Guardian Futures | Standard | One-Step Standard | 6% | None on $25K; $1,000 / $2,000 / $3,000 soft limit on larger sizes | $1,000 / $2,000 / $3,500 / $5,000 EOD trailing | End of Day trailing in evaluation and funded stages; active floor is enforced during trading | 90% to trader | From 3 days after the first funded trade when target, buffer, and 40% consistency are met |
| Blue Guardian Futures | Reserve | One-Step Reserve | 6% | No standard daily loss limit; optional soft daily loss configuration may apply | $1,000 / $2,000 / $3,000 / $4,500 EOD trailing | End of Day trailing; current rules lock the floor under the plan threshold | 90% to trader | After 5 qualifying winning days and any applicable later-cycle net-profit requirement |
| Blue Guardian Futures | Express | One-Step Express | 6% | Plan-specific funded soft daily loss limits; verify the live dashboard | $1,000 / $2,000 / $3,000 / $4,500 EOD trailing in evaluation | End of Day trailing with plan-specific funded buffer and lock behavior | 90% to trader | Daily after funded buffer, minimum, and plan-specific conditions are met |
| Blue Guardian Futures | Direct | Instant Funding Direct | No evaluation; payout profit goals apply | $1,000 / $1,250 / $2,500 / $3,000 soft daily loss limit | $1,500 / $2,000 / $3,500 / $4,500 EOD framework | End of Day framework that becomes fixed under the current lock or first-payout condition | 90% to trader | On demand after the current payout goal, consistency, and risk conditions are met |
| AquaFutures | Flex | One-Step Evaluation | About 4.67–5% depending on size | 0% — no daily loss limit | About 2.33–3% EOD trailing depending on size | End-of-day trailing drawdown | 80% to trader | On demand after 5 qualifying winning days |
| AquaFutures | Standard Evaluation | One-Step Evaluation | 5–6% depending on size | 0% — no daily loss limit | About 3.33–4% EOD trailing depending on size | End-of-day trailing drawdown | 90% to trader | On demand after 5 qualifying winning days |
| AquaFutures | Beginner Evaluation | One-Step Evaluation | 6% | 2.4–2.5% depending on size | About 3.33–5% EOD trailing depending on size | End-of-day trailing drawdown | 100% to trader up to the firm's first-$15,000 threshold, then 90% | Weekly; first payout after at least 7 days and 5 qualifying winning days |
| AquaFutures | Instant Standard | Instant Funding | No evaluation; payout milestones are 6% / 5% / 4% | 2.5% | 3–4% EOD trailing depending on size | End-of-day trailing drawdown | 100% to trader under the current Futures program terms | On demand after 7 qualifying winning days |
| AquaFutures | Instant Pro | Instant Funding | No evaluation; payout eligibility rules apply | 0% — no separate daily loss limit | 3–4% intraday/trailing depending on size | Intraday/trailing drawdown | 100% to trader under the current Futures program display | On demand after at least 7 days and all payout conditions are met |
Core Rules Compared
Target versus loss buffer
Never compare a target alone. A lower target can sit inside a much tighter trailing drawdown. A higher target can come with wider EOD room. Historical strategy drawdown should decide whether the geometry is comfortable.
Daily loss
The firm limit is an emergency boundary, not a normal daily stop. A trader should use a personal daily limit well inside it, leaving room for slippage, correlated positions and fast market movement.
Trailing method
EOD trailing, intraday/live trailing and static drawdown create different path dependency. Intraday trailing can react to temporary equity highs before the close, while EOD systems usually update from an end-of-session reference. Static loss floors are more stable.
Qualifying days and consistency
Minimum trading days, benchmark days, winning days and consistency thresholds are different. A trader can reach the target and still need additional activity before passing or withdrawing.
Payout eligibility
Separate the time required to become eligible from the time required to process the request. A fast payout processor does not eliminate benchmark, buffer or consistency conditions.
Price
The current BRIDGE relationship is 25% at Blue Guardian Futures and 30% at AquaFutures. The discount should be applied after the account is chosen.
Program Deep Dive
Blue Guardian Futures — Standard
Standard is currently a One-Step Standard program with target 6%, daily rule None on $25K; $1,000 / $2,000 / $3,000 soft limit on larger sizes, maximum-loss rule $1,000 / $2,000 / $3,500 / $5,000 EOD trailing, End of Day trailing in evaluation and funded stages; active floor is enforced during trading drawdown, 90% to trader profit share, minimum-day condition May pass in 1 trading day; first funded payout eligibility starts after 3 days and payout timing From 3 days after the first funded trade when target, buffer, and 40% consistency are met.
The exact target and maximum-loss rule for this program are the values shown in the program table above. Dollar-based, range-based and multi-part rules must remain in their original form rather than being coerced into a single percentage. Treat the active loss rule as an outer breach boundary and set personal risk materially inside it.
The exact daily-loss rule for this program is the dollar, percentage, soft-stop or size-dependent value shown in the program table above. Use the live dashboard limit for the selected account size rather than coercing a multi-part dollar rule into one percentage.
Because the account contains a trailing component, a profitable equity high can move the loss floor upward. This makes the order of wins, losses and withdrawals relevant to future risk.
The current day requirement is May pass in 1 trading day; first funded payout eligibility starts after 3 days. This should be satisfied through ordinary qualified trading. If the target is already reached, remaining days should not become a reason to open unnecessary positions.
The current payout description is From 3 days after the first funded trade when target, buffer, and 40% consistency are met. A trader should estimate the realistic time to eligibility from historical trading frequency, then add processing time. This produces a more useful cash-flow estimate than the headline cycle alone.
Current PFB permission fields record news trading as allowed, weekend holding as restricted, and EA use as program-specific. The exact current agreement remains authoritative.
The stored pricing ladder begins around $154 at $25,000 and reaches $424 at $150,000. The current BRIDGE headline is 25%. A larger absolute saving at a higher tier should not decide account size.
A true-cost model should include repeat attempts. Two failed $150 attempts cost more than one $250 attempt passed with a better-fitting rule set. Fee efficiency therefore depends on survival probability.
The best-fit question is whether the trader can run the normal strategy without changing entry timing, holding period, trade concentration or position risk. If not, the model is a weak fit regardless of discount.
Blue Guardian Futures — Reserve
Reserve is currently a One-Step Reserve program with target 6%, daily rule No standard daily loss limit; optional soft daily loss configuration may apply, maximum-loss rule $1,000 / $2,000 / $3,000 / $4,500 EOD trailing, End of Day trailing; current rules lock the floor under the plan threshold drawdown, 90% to trader profit share, minimum-day condition Evaluation requires 50% consistency; funded payouts require 5 qualifying winning days and payout timing After 5 qualifying winning days and any applicable later-cycle net-profit requirement.
The exact target and maximum-loss rule for this program are the values shown in the program table above. Dollar-based, range-based and multi-part rules must remain in their original form rather than being coerced into a single percentage. Treat the active loss rule as an outer breach boundary and set personal risk materially inside it.
This plan does not express daily loss as one simple percentage in the current record. The personal stop should be based on strategy statistics, not on using every dollar the firm allows.
Because the account contains a trailing component, a profitable equity high can move the loss floor upward. This makes the order of wins, losses and withdrawals relevant to future risk.
The current day requirement is Evaluation requires 50% consistency; funded payouts require 5 qualifying winning days. This should be satisfied through ordinary qualified trading. If the target is already reached, remaining days should not become a reason to open unnecessary positions.
The current payout description is After 5 qualifying winning days and any applicable later-cycle net-profit requirement. A trader should estimate the realistic time to eligibility from historical trading frequency, then add processing time. This produces a more useful cash-flow estimate than the headline cycle alone.
Current PFB permission fields record news trading as allowed, weekend holding as restricted, and EA use as program-specific. The exact current agreement remains authoritative.
The stored pricing ladder begins around $110 at $25,000 and reaches $398 at $150,000. The current BRIDGE headline is 25%. A larger absolute saving at a higher tier should not decide account size.
A true-cost model should include repeat attempts. Two failed $150 attempts cost more than one $250 attempt passed with a better-fitting rule set. Fee efficiency therefore depends on survival probability.
The best-fit question is whether the trader can run the normal strategy without changing entry timing, holding period, trade concentration or position risk. If not, the model is a weak fit regardless of discount.
Blue Guardian Futures — Express
Express is currently a One-Step Express program with target 6%, daily rule Plan-specific funded soft daily loss limits; verify the live dashboard, maximum-loss rule $1,000 / $2,000 / $3,000 / $4,500 EOD trailing in evaluation, End of Day trailing with plan-specific funded buffer and lock behavior drawdown, 90% to trader profit share, minimum-day condition Evaluation pass speed is governed by 40% consistency; funded withdrawals may be available daily and payout timing Daily after funded buffer, minimum, and plan-specific conditions are met.
The exact target and maximum-loss rule for this program are the values shown in the program table above. Dollar-based, range-based and multi-part rules must remain in their original form rather than being coerced into a single percentage. Treat the active loss rule as an outer breach boundary and set personal risk materially inside it.
This plan does not express daily loss as one simple percentage in the current record. The personal stop should be based on strategy statistics, not on using every dollar the firm allows.
Because the account contains a trailing component, a profitable equity high can move the loss floor upward. This makes the order of wins, losses and withdrawals relevant to future risk.
The current day requirement is Evaluation pass speed is governed by 40% consistency; funded withdrawals may be available daily. This should be satisfied through ordinary qualified trading. If the target is already reached, remaining days should not become a reason to open unnecessary positions.
The current payout description is Daily after funded buffer, minimum, and plan-specific conditions are met. A trader should estimate the realistic time to eligibility from historical trading frequency, then add processing time. This produces a more useful cash-flow estimate than the headline cycle alone.
Current PFB permission fields record news trading as allowed, weekend holding as restricted, and EA use as program-specific. The exact current agreement remains authoritative.
The stored pricing ladder begins around $106 at $25,000 and reaches $345 at $150,000. The current BRIDGE headline is 25%. A larger absolute saving at a higher tier should not decide account size.
A true-cost model should include repeat attempts. Two failed $150 attempts cost more than one $250 attempt passed with a better-fitting rule set. Fee efficiency therefore depends on survival probability.
The best-fit question is whether the trader can run the normal strategy without changing entry timing, holding period, trade concentration or position risk. If not, the model is a weak fit regardless of discount.
Blue Guardian Futures — Direct
Direct is currently a Instant Funding Direct program with target No evaluation; payout profit goals apply, daily rule $1,000 / $1,250 / $2,500 / $3,000 soft daily loss limit, maximum-loss rule $1,500 / $2,000 / $3,500 / $4,500 EOD framework, End of Day framework that becomes fixed under the current lock or first-payout condition drawdown, 90% to trader profit share, minimum-day condition No evaluation; payout unlock depends on profit goal and consistency and payout timing On demand after the current payout goal, consistency, and risk conditions are met.
The exact target and maximum-loss rule for this program are the values shown in the program table above. Dollar-based, range-based and multi-part rules must remain in their original form rather than being coerced into a single percentage. Treat the active loss rule as an outer breach boundary and set personal risk materially inside it.
The exact daily-loss rule for this program is the dollar, percentage, soft-stop or size-dependent value shown in the program table above. Use the live dashboard limit for the selected account size rather than coercing a multi-part dollar rule into one percentage.
Because the account contains a static component in the recorded overall-loss framework, the lifetime reference is easier to map, although daily and payout-stage rules still matter.
The current day requirement is No evaluation; payout unlock depends on profit goal and consistency. This should be satisfied through ordinary qualified trading. If the target is already reached, remaining days should not become a reason to open unnecessary positions.
The current payout description is On demand after the current payout goal, consistency, and risk conditions are met. A trader should estimate the realistic time to eligibility from historical trading frequency, then add processing time. This produces a more useful cash-flow estimate than the headline cycle alone.
Current PFB permission fields record news trading as allowed, weekend holding as restricted, and EA use as program-specific. The exact current agreement remains authoritative.
The stored pricing ladder begins around $307 at $25,000 and reaches $824 at $150,000. The current BRIDGE headline is 25%. A larger absolute saving at a higher tier should not decide account size.
A true-cost model should include repeat attempts. Two failed $150 attempts cost more than one $250 attempt passed with a better-fitting rule set. Fee efficiency therefore depends on survival probability.
The best-fit question is whether the trader can run the normal strategy without changing entry timing, holding period, trade concentration or position risk. If not, the model is a weak fit regardless of discount.
AquaFutures — Flex
Flex is currently a One-Step Evaluation program with target About 4.67–5% depending on size, daily rule 0% — no daily loss limit, maximum-loss rule About 2.33–3% EOD trailing depending on size, End-of-day trailing drawdown drawdown, 80% to trader profit share, minimum-day condition No minimum evaluation days and payout timing On demand after 5 qualifying winning days.
The exact target and maximum-loss rule for this program are the values shown in the program table above. Dollar-based, range-based and multi-part rules must remain in their original form rather than being coerced into a single percentage. Treat the active loss rule as an outer breach boundary and set personal risk materially inside it.
The exact daily-loss rule for this program is the dollar, percentage, soft-stop or size-dependent value shown in the program table above. Use the live dashboard limit for the selected account size rather than coercing a multi-part dollar rule into one percentage.
Because the account contains a trailing component, a profitable equity high can move the loss floor upward. This makes the order of wins, losses and withdrawals relevant to future risk.
The current day requirement is No minimum evaluation days. This should be satisfied through ordinary qualified trading. If the target is already reached, remaining days should not become a reason to open unnecessary positions.
The current payout description is On demand after 5 qualifying winning days. A trader should estimate the realistic time to eligibility from historical trading frequency, then add processing time. This produces a more useful cash-flow estimate than the headline cycle alone.
Current PFB permission fields record news trading as allowed, weekend holding as restricted, and EA use as program-specific. The exact current agreement remains authoritative.
The stored pricing ladder begins around $133 at $50,000 and reaches $400 at $150,000. The current BRIDGE headline is 30%. A larger absolute saving at a higher tier should not decide account size.
A true-cost model should include repeat attempts. Two failed $150 attempts cost more than one $250 attempt passed with a better-fitting rule set. Fee efficiency therefore depends on survival probability.
The best-fit question is whether the trader can run the normal strategy without changing entry timing, holding period, trade concentration or position risk. If not, the model is a weak fit regardless of discount.
AquaFutures — Standard Evaluation
Standard Evaluation is currently a One-Step Evaluation program with target 5–6% depending on size, daily rule 0% — no daily loss limit, maximum-loss rule About 3.33–4% EOD trailing depending on size, End-of-day trailing drawdown drawdown, 90% to trader profit share, minimum-day condition No minimum evaluation days and payout timing On demand after 5 qualifying winning days.
The exact target and maximum-loss rule for this program are the values shown in the program table above. Dollar-based, range-based and multi-part rules must remain in their original form rather than being coerced into a single percentage. Treat the active loss rule as an outer breach boundary and set personal risk materially inside it.
The exact daily-loss rule for this program is the dollar, percentage, soft-stop or size-dependent value shown in the program table above. Use the live dashboard limit for the selected account size rather than coercing a multi-part dollar rule into one percentage.
Because the account contains a trailing component, a profitable equity high can move the loss floor upward. This makes the order of wins, losses and withdrawals relevant to future risk.
The current day requirement is No minimum evaluation days. This should be satisfied through ordinary qualified trading. If the target is already reached, remaining days should not become a reason to open unnecessary positions.
The current payout description is On demand after 5 qualifying winning days. A trader should estimate the realistic time to eligibility from historical trading frequency, then add processing time. This produces a more useful cash-flow estimate than the headline cycle alone.
Current PFB permission fields record news trading as allowed, weekend holding as restricted, and EA use as program-specific. The exact current agreement remains authoritative.
The stored pricing ladder begins around $116 at $25,000 and reaches $433 at $150,000. The current BRIDGE headline is 30%. A larger absolute saving at a higher tier should not decide account size.
A true-cost model should include repeat attempts. Two failed $150 attempts cost more than one $250 attempt passed with a better-fitting rule set. Fee efficiency therefore depends on survival probability.
The best-fit question is whether the trader can run the normal strategy without changing entry timing, holding period, trade concentration or position risk. If not, the model is a weak fit regardless of discount.
AquaFutures — Beginner Evaluation
Beginner Evaluation is currently a One-Step Evaluation program with target 6%, daily rule 2.4–2.5% depending on size, maximum-loss rule About 3.33–5% EOD trailing depending on size, End-of-day trailing drawdown drawdown, 100% to trader up to the firm's first-$15,000 threshold, then 90% profit share, minimum-day condition No minimum evaluation days; funded payout qualification uses 7 days with 5 winning days and payout timing Weekly; first payout after at least 7 days and 5 qualifying winning days.
The exact target and maximum-loss rule for this program are the values shown in the program table above. Dollar-based, range-based and multi-part rules must remain in their original form rather than being coerced into a single percentage. Treat the active loss rule as an outer breach boundary and set personal risk materially inside it.
The exact daily-loss rule for this program is the dollar, percentage, soft-stop or size-dependent value shown in the program table above. Use the live dashboard limit for the selected account size rather than coercing a multi-part dollar rule into one percentage.
Because the account contains a trailing component, a profitable equity high can move the loss floor upward. This makes the order of wins, losses and withdrawals relevant to future risk.
The current day requirement is No minimum evaluation days; funded payout qualification uses 7 days with 5 winning days. This should be satisfied through ordinary qualified trading. If the target is already reached, remaining days should not become a reason to open unnecessary positions.
The current payout description is Weekly; first payout after at least 7 days and 5 qualifying winning days. A trader should estimate the realistic time to eligibility from historical trading frequency, then add processing time. This produces a more useful cash-flow estimate than the headline cycle alone.
Current PFB permission fields record news trading as allowed, weekend holding as restricted, and EA use as program-specific. The exact current agreement remains authoritative.
The stored pricing ladder begins around $83 at $25,000 and reaches $308 at $150,000. The current BRIDGE headline is 30%. A larger absolute saving at a higher tier should not decide account size.
A true-cost model should include repeat attempts. Two failed $150 attempts cost more than one $250 attempt passed with a better-fitting rule set. Fee efficiency therefore depends on survival probability.
The best-fit question is whether the trader can run the normal strategy without changing entry timing, holding period, trade concentration or position risk. If not, the model is a weak fit regardless of discount.
AquaFutures — Instant Standard
Instant Standard is currently a Instant Funding program with target No evaluation; payout milestones are 6% / 5% / 4%, daily rule 2.5%, maximum-loss rule 3–4% EOD trailing depending on size, End-of-day trailing drawdown drawdown, 100% to trader under the current Futures program terms profit share, minimum-day condition No evaluation; 7 qualifying winning days are required for payout and payout timing On demand after 7 qualifying winning days.
The exact target and maximum-loss rule for this program are the values shown in the program table above. Dollar-based, range-based and multi-part rules must remain in their original form rather than being coerced into a single percentage. Treat the active loss rule as an outer breach boundary and set personal risk materially inside it.
The exact daily-loss rule for this program is the dollar, percentage, soft-stop or size-dependent value shown in the program table above. Use the live dashboard limit for the selected account size rather than coercing a multi-part dollar rule into one percentage.
Because the account contains a trailing component, a profitable equity high can move the loss floor upward. This makes the order of wins, losses and withdrawals relevant to future risk.
The current day requirement is No evaluation; 7 qualifying winning days are required for payout. This should be satisfied through ordinary qualified trading. If the target is already reached, remaining days should not become a reason to open unnecessary positions.
The current payout description is On demand after 7 qualifying winning days. A trader should estimate the realistic time to eligibility from historical trading frequency, then add processing time. This produces a more useful cash-flow estimate than the headline cycle alone.
Current PFB permission fields record news trading as allowed, weekend holding as restricted, and EA use as program-specific. The exact current agreement remains authoritative.
The stored pricing ladder begins around $410 at $50,000 and reaches $510 at $100,000. The current BRIDGE headline is 30%. A larger absolute saving at a higher tier should not decide account size.
A true-cost model should include repeat attempts. Two failed $150 attempts cost more than one $250 attempt passed with a better-fitting rule set. Fee efficiency therefore depends on survival probability.
The best-fit question is whether the trader can run the normal strategy without changing entry timing, holding period, trade concentration or position risk. If not, the model is a weak fit regardless of discount.
AquaFutures — Instant Pro
Instant Pro is currently a Instant Funding program with target No evaluation; payout eligibility rules apply, daily rule 0% — no separate daily loss limit, maximum-loss rule 3–4% intraday/trailing depending on size, Intraday/trailing drawdown drawdown, 100% to trader under the current Futures program display profit share, minimum-day condition No evaluation; funded payout qualification rules apply and payout timing On demand after at least 7 days and all payout conditions are met.
The exact target and maximum-loss rule for this program are the values shown in the program table above. Dollar-based, range-based and multi-part rules must remain in their original form rather than being coerced into a single percentage. Treat the active loss rule as an outer breach boundary and set personal risk materially inside it.
The exact daily-loss rule for this program is the dollar, percentage, soft-stop or size-dependent value shown in the program table above. Use the live dashboard limit for the selected account size rather than coercing a multi-part dollar rule into one percentage.
Because the account contains a trailing component, a profitable equity high can move the loss floor upward. This makes the order of wins, losses and withdrawals relevant to future risk.
The current day requirement is No evaluation; funded payout qualification rules apply. This should be satisfied through ordinary qualified trading. If the target is already reached, remaining days should not become a reason to open unnecessary positions.
The current payout description is On demand after at least 7 days and all payout conditions are met. A trader should estimate the realistic time to eligibility from historical trading frequency, then add processing time. This produces a more useful cash-flow estimate than the headline cycle alone.
Current PFB permission fields record news trading as allowed, weekend holding as restricted, and EA use as program-specific. The exact current agreement remains authoritative.
The stored pricing ladder begins around $416 at $50,000 and reaches $489 at $100,000. The current BRIDGE headline is 30%. A larger absolute saving at a higher tier should not decide account size.
A true-cost model should include repeat attempts. Two failed $150 attempts cost more than one $250 attempt passed with a better-fitting rule set. Fee efficiency therefore depends on survival probability.
The best-fit question is whether the trader can run the normal strategy without changing entry timing, holding period, trade concentration or position risk. If not, the model is a weak fit regardless of discount.
Every Relevant Program Pair
Standard vs Flex
Structure: Standard is a One-Step Standard with target 6%, while Flex is a One-Step Evaluation with target About 4.67–5% depending on size. This pairing is most useful when the trader wants to understand whether the lower target also comes with a tighter loss envelope or more demanding qualifying conditions.
Drawdown: Standard currently uses End of Day trailing in evaluation and funded stages; active floor is enforced during trading with daily rule None on $25K; $1,000 / $2,000 / $3,000 soft limit on larger sizes and maximum-loss rule $1,000 / $2,000 / $3,500 / $5,000 EOD trailing. Flex currently uses End-of-day trailing drawdown with daily rule 0% — no daily loss limit and maximum-loss rule About 2.33–3% EOD trailing depending on size. The trader should replay a normal winning week followed by a losing week against both floors.
Days and payouts: Standard currently requires May pass in 1 trading day; first funded payout eligibility starts after 3 days and describes payouts as From 3 days after the first funded trade when target, buffer, and 40% consistency are met. Flex currently requires No minimum evaluation days and describes payouts as On demand after 5 qualifying winning days. This turns “which pays faster?” into a measurable calendar question rather than a marketing claim.
Permissions: Compare news, weekend and automation needs directly. If one account blocks a non-negotiable part of the strategy, remove it before comparing fees or profit split. Permission fit is binary for many traders.
Price logic: Standard currently starts around $154 at $25,000 before BRIDGE. Flex currently starts around $133 at $50,000 before BRIDGE. Final checkout should be compared only after the structural filters above are passed.
Standard vs Standard Evaluation
Structure: Standard is a One-Step Standard with target 6%, while Standard Evaluation is a One-Step Evaluation with target 5–6% depending on size. This pairing is most useful when the trader wants to understand whether the lower target also comes with a tighter loss envelope or more demanding qualifying conditions.
Drawdown: Standard currently uses End of Day trailing in evaluation and funded stages; active floor is enforced during trading with daily rule None on $25K; $1,000 / $2,000 / $3,000 soft limit on larger sizes and maximum-loss rule $1,000 / $2,000 / $3,500 / $5,000 EOD trailing. Standard Evaluation currently uses End-of-day trailing drawdown with daily rule 0% — no daily loss limit and maximum-loss rule About 3.33–4% EOD trailing depending on size. The trader should replay a normal winning week followed by a losing week against both floors.
Days and payouts: Standard currently requires May pass in 1 trading day; first funded payout eligibility starts after 3 days and describes payouts as From 3 days after the first funded trade when target, buffer, and 40% consistency are met. Standard Evaluation currently requires No minimum evaluation days and describes payouts as On demand after 5 qualifying winning days. This turns “which pays faster?” into a measurable calendar question rather than a marketing claim.
Permissions: Compare news, weekend and automation needs directly. If one account blocks a non-negotiable part of the strategy, remove it before comparing fees or profit split. Permission fit is binary for many traders.
Price logic: Standard currently starts around $154 at $25,000 before BRIDGE. Standard Evaluation currently starts around $116 at $25,000 before BRIDGE. Final checkout should be compared only after the structural filters above are passed.
Standard vs Beginner Evaluation
Structure: Standard is a One-Step Standard with target 6%, while Beginner Evaluation is a One-Step Evaluation with target 6%. This pairing is most useful when the trader wants to understand whether the lower target also comes with a tighter loss envelope or more demanding qualifying conditions.
Drawdown: Standard currently uses End of Day trailing in evaluation and funded stages; active floor is enforced during trading with daily rule None on $25K; $1,000 / $2,000 / $3,000 soft limit on larger sizes and maximum-loss rule $1,000 / $2,000 / $3,500 / $5,000 EOD trailing. Beginner Evaluation currently uses End-of-day trailing drawdown with daily rule 2.4–2.5% depending on size and maximum-loss rule About 3.33–5% EOD trailing depending on size. The trader should replay a normal winning week followed by a losing week against both floors.
Days and payouts: Standard currently requires May pass in 1 trading day; first funded payout eligibility starts after 3 days and describes payouts as From 3 days after the first funded trade when target, buffer, and 40% consistency are met. Beginner Evaluation currently requires No minimum evaluation days; funded payout qualification uses 7 days with 5 winning days and describes payouts as Weekly; first payout after at least 7 days and 5 qualifying winning days. This turns “which pays faster?” into a measurable calendar question rather than a marketing claim.
Permissions: Compare news, weekend and automation needs directly. If one account blocks a non-negotiable part of the strategy, remove it before comparing fees or profit split. Permission fit is binary for many traders.
Price logic: Standard currently starts around $154 at $25,000 before BRIDGE. Beginner Evaluation currently starts around $83 at $25,000 before BRIDGE. Final checkout should be compared only after the structural filters above are passed.
Standard vs Instant Standard
Structure: Standard is a One-Step Standard with target 6%, while Instant Standard is a Instant Funding with target No evaluation; payout milestones are 6% / 5% / 4%. This pairing is most useful when the trader wants to understand whether the lower target also comes with a tighter loss envelope or more demanding qualifying conditions.
Drawdown: Standard currently uses End of Day trailing in evaluation and funded stages; active floor is enforced during trading with daily rule None on $25K; $1,000 / $2,000 / $3,000 soft limit on larger sizes and maximum-loss rule $1,000 / $2,000 / $3,500 / $5,000 EOD trailing. Instant Standard currently uses End-of-day trailing drawdown with daily rule 2.5% and maximum-loss rule 3–4% EOD trailing depending on size. The trader should replay a normal winning week followed by a losing week against both floors.
Days and payouts: Standard currently requires May pass in 1 trading day; first funded payout eligibility starts after 3 days and describes payouts as From 3 days after the first funded trade when target, buffer, and 40% consistency are met. Instant Standard currently requires No evaluation; 7 qualifying winning days are required for payout and describes payouts as On demand after 7 qualifying winning days. This turns “which pays faster?” into a measurable calendar question rather than a marketing claim.
Permissions: Compare news, weekend and automation needs directly. If one account blocks a non-negotiable part of the strategy, remove it before comparing fees or profit split. Permission fit is binary for many traders.
Price logic: Standard currently starts around $154 at $25,000 before BRIDGE. Instant Standard currently starts around $410 at $50,000 before BRIDGE. Final checkout should be compared only after the structural filters above are passed.
Standard vs Instant Pro
Structure: Standard is a One-Step Standard with target 6%, while Instant Pro is a Instant Funding with target No evaluation; payout eligibility rules apply. This pairing is most useful when the trader wants to understand whether the lower target also comes with a tighter loss envelope or more demanding qualifying conditions.
Drawdown: Standard currently uses End of Day trailing in evaluation and funded stages; active floor is enforced during trading with daily rule None on $25K; $1,000 / $2,000 / $3,000 soft limit on larger sizes and maximum-loss rule $1,000 / $2,000 / $3,500 / $5,000 EOD trailing. Instant Pro currently uses Intraday/trailing drawdown with daily rule 0% — no separate daily loss limit and maximum-loss rule 3–4% intraday/trailing depending on size. The trader should replay a normal winning week followed by a losing week against both floors.
Days and payouts: Standard currently requires May pass in 1 trading day; first funded payout eligibility starts after 3 days and describes payouts as From 3 days after the first funded trade when target, buffer, and 40% consistency are met. Instant Pro currently requires No evaluation; funded payout qualification rules apply and describes payouts as On demand after at least 7 days and all payout conditions are met. This turns “which pays faster?” into a measurable calendar question rather than a marketing claim.
Permissions: Compare news, weekend and automation needs directly. If one account blocks a non-negotiable part of the strategy, remove it before comparing fees or profit split. Permission fit is binary for many traders.
Price logic: Standard currently starts around $154 at $25,000 before BRIDGE. Instant Pro currently starts around $416 at $50,000 before BRIDGE. Final checkout should be compared only after the structural filters above are passed.
Reserve vs Flex
Structure: Reserve is a One-Step Reserve with target 6%, while Flex is a One-Step Evaluation with target About 4.67–5% depending on size. This pairing is most useful when the trader wants to understand whether the lower target also comes with a tighter loss envelope or more demanding qualifying conditions.
Drawdown: Reserve currently uses End of Day trailing; current rules lock the floor under the plan threshold with daily rule No standard daily loss limit; optional soft daily loss configuration may apply and maximum-loss rule $1,000 / $2,000 / $3,000 / $4,500 EOD trailing. Flex currently uses End-of-day trailing drawdown with daily rule 0% — no daily loss limit and maximum-loss rule About 2.33–3% EOD trailing depending on size. The trader should replay a normal winning week followed by a losing week against both floors.
Days and payouts: Reserve currently requires Evaluation requires 50% consistency; funded payouts require 5 qualifying winning days and describes payouts as After 5 qualifying winning days and any applicable later-cycle net-profit requirement. Flex currently requires No minimum evaluation days and describes payouts as On demand after 5 qualifying winning days. This turns “which pays faster?” into a measurable calendar question rather than a marketing claim.
Permissions: Compare news, weekend and automation needs directly. If one account blocks a non-negotiable part of the strategy, remove it before comparing fees or profit split. Permission fit is binary for many traders.
Price logic: Reserve currently starts around $110 at $25,000 before BRIDGE. Flex currently starts around $133 at $50,000 before BRIDGE. Final checkout should be compared only after the structural filters above are passed.
Reserve vs Standard Evaluation
Structure: Reserve is a One-Step Reserve with target 6%, while Standard Evaluation is a One-Step Evaluation with target 5–6% depending on size. This pairing is most useful when the trader wants to understand whether the lower target also comes with a tighter loss envelope or more demanding qualifying conditions.
Drawdown: Reserve currently uses End of Day trailing; current rules lock the floor under the plan threshold with daily rule No standard daily loss limit; optional soft daily loss configuration may apply and maximum-loss rule $1,000 / $2,000 / $3,000 / $4,500 EOD trailing. Standard Evaluation currently uses End-of-day trailing drawdown with daily rule 0% — no daily loss limit and maximum-loss rule About 3.33–4% EOD trailing depending on size. The trader should replay a normal winning week followed by a losing week against both floors.
Days and payouts: Reserve currently requires Evaluation requires 50% consistency; funded payouts require 5 qualifying winning days and describes payouts as After 5 qualifying winning days and any applicable later-cycle net-profit requirement. Standard Evaluation currently requires No minimum evaluation days and describes payouts as On demand after 5 qualifying winning days. This turns “which pays faster?” into a measurable calendar question rather than a marketing claim.
Permissions: Compare news, weekend and automation needs directly. If one account blocks a non-negotiable part of the strategy, remove it before comparing fees or profit split. Permission fit is binary for many traders.
Price logic: Reserve currently starts around $110 at $25,000 before BRIDGE. Standard Evaluation currently starts around $116 at $25,000 before BRIDGE. Final checkout should be compared only after the structural filters above are passed.
Reserve vs Beginner Evaluation
Structure: Reserve is a One-Step Reserve with target 6%, while Beginner Evaluation is a One-Step Evaluation with target 6%. This pairing is most useful when the trader wants to understand whether the lower target also comes with a tighter loss envelope or more demanding qualifying conditions.
Drawdown: Reserve currently uses End of Day trailing; current rules lock the floor under the plan threshold with daily rule No standard daily loss limit; optional soft daily loss configuration may apply and maximum-loss rule $1,000 / $2,000 / $3,000 / $4,500 EOD trailing. Beginner Evaluation currently uses End-of-day trailing drawdown with daily rule 2.4–2.5% depending on size and maximum-loss rule About 3.33–5% EOD trailing depending on size. The trader should replay a normal winning week followed by a losing week against both floors.
Days and payouts: Reserve currently requires Evaluation requires 50% consistency; funded payouts require 5 qualifying winning days and describes payouts as After 5 qualifying winning days and any applicable later-cycle net-profit requirement. Beginner Evaluation currently requires No minimum evaluation days; funded payout qualification uses 7 days with 5 winning days and describes payouts as Weekly; first payout after at least 7 days and 5 qualifying winning days. This turns “which pays faster?” into a measurable calendar question rather than a marketing claim.
Permissions: Compare news, weekend and automation needs directly. If one account blocks a non-negotiable part of the strategy, remove it before comparing fees or profit split. Permission fit is binary for many traders.
Price logic: Reserve currently starts around $110 at $25,000 before BRIDGE. Beginner Evaluation currently starts around $83 at $25,000 before BRIDGE. Final checkout should be compared only after the structural filters above are passed.
Reserve vs Instant Standard
Structure: Reserve is a One-Step Reserve with target 6%, while Instant Standard is a Instant Funding with target No evaluation; payout milestones are 6% / 5% / 4%. This pairing is most useful when the trader wants to understand whether the lower target also comes with a tighter loss envelope or more demanding qualifying conditions.
Drawdown: Reserve currently uses End of Day trailing; current rules lock the floor under the plan threshold with daily rule No standard daily loss limit; optional soft daily loss configuration may apply and maximum-loss rule $1,000 / $2,000 / $3,000 / $4,500 EOD trailing. Instant Standard currently uses End-of-day trailing drawdown with daily rule 2.5% and maximum-loss rule 3–4% EOD trailing depending on size. The trader should replay a normal winning week followed by a losing week against both floors.
Days and payouts: Reserve currently requires Evaluation requires 50% consistency; funded payouts require 5 qualifying winning days and describes payouts as After 5 qualifying winning days and any applicable later-cycle net-profit requirement. Instant Standard currently requires No evaluation; 7 qualifying winning days are required for payout and describes payouts as On demand after 7 qualifying winning days. This turns “which pays faster?” into a measurable calendar question rather than a marketing claim.
Permissions: Compare news, weekend and automation needs directly. If one account blocks a non-negotiable part of the strategy, remove it before comparing fees or profit split. Permission fit is binary for many traders.
Price logic: Reserve currently starts around $110 at $25,000 before BRIDGE. Instant Standard currently starts around $410 at $50,000 before BRIDGE. Final checkout should be compared only after the structural filters above are passed.
Reserve vs Instant Pro
Structure: Reserve is a One-Step Reserve with target 6%, while Instant Pro is a Instant Funding with target No evaluation; payout eligibility rules apply. This pairing is most useful when the trader wants to understand whether the lower target also comes with a tighter loss envelope or more demanding qualifying conditions.
Drawdown: Reserve currently uses End of Day trailing; current rules lock the floor under the plan threshold with daily rule No standard daily loss limit; optional soft daily loss configuration may apply and maximum-loss rule $1,000 / $2,000 / $3,000 / $4,500 EOD trailing. Instant Pro currently uses Intraday/trailing drawdown with daily rule 0% — no separate daily loss limit and maximum-loss rule 3–4% intraday/trailing depending on size. The trader should replay a normal winning week followed by a losing week against both floors.
Days and payouts: Reserve currently requires Evaluation requires 50% consistency; funded payouts require 5 qualifying winning days and describes payouts as After 5 qualifying winning days and any applicable later-cycle net-profit requirement. Instant Pro currently requires No evaluation; funded payout qualification rules apply and describes payouts as On demand after at least 7 days and all payout conditions are met. This turns “which pays faster?” into a measurable calendar question rather than a marketing claim.
Permissions: Compare news, weekend and automation needs directly. If one account blocks a non-negotiable part of the strategy, remove it before comparing fees or profit split. Permission fit is binary for many traders.
Price logic: Reserve currently starts around $110 at $25,000 before BRIDGE. Instant Pro currently starts around $416 at $50,000 before BRIDGE. Final checkout should be compared only after the structural filters above are passed.
Express vs Flex
Structure: Express is a One-Step Express with target 6%, while Flex is a One-Step Evaluation with target About 4.67–5% depending on size. This pairing is most useful when the trader wants to understand whether the lower target also comes with a tighter loss envelope or more demanding qualifying conditions.
Drawdown: Express currently uses End of Day trailing with plan-specific funded buffer and lock behavior with daily rule Plan-specific funded soft daily loss limits; verify the live dashboard and maximum-loss rule $1,000 / $2,000 / $3,000 / $4,500 EOD trailing in evaluation. Flex currently uses End-of-day trailing drawdown with daily rule 0% — no daily loss limit and maximum-loss rule About 2.33–3% EOD trailing depending on size. The trader should replay a normal winning week followed by a losing week against both floors.
Days and payouts: Express currently requires Evaluation pass speed is governed by 40% consistency; funded withdrawals may be available daily and describes payouts as Daily after funded buffer, minimum, and plan-specific conditions are met. Flex currently requires No minimum evaluation days and describes payouts as On demand after 5 qualifying winning days. This turns “which pays faster?” into a measurable calendar question rather than a marketing claim.
Permissions: Compare news, weekend and automation needs directly. If one account blocks a non-negotiable part of the strategy, remove it before comparing fees or profit split. Permission fit is binary for many traders.
Price logic: Express currently starts around $106 at $25,000 before BRIDGE. Flex currently starts around $133 at $50,000 before BRIDGE. Final checkout should be compared only after the structural filters above are passed.
Express vs Standard Evaluation
Structure: Express is a One-Step Express with target 6%, while Standard Evaluation is a One-Step Evaluation with target 5–6% depending on size. This pairing is most useful when the trader wants to understand whether the lower target also comes with a tighter loss envelope or more demanding qualifying conditions.
Drawdown: Express currently uses End of Day trailing with plan-specific funded buffer and lock behavior with daily rule Plan-specific funded soft daily loss limits; verify the live dashboard and maximum-loss rule $1,000 / $2,000 / $3,000 / $4,500 EOD trailing in evaluation. Standard Evaluation currently uses End-of-day trailing drawdown with daily rule 0% — no daily loss limit and maximum-loss rule About 3.33–4% EOD trailing depending on size. The trader should replay a normal winning week followed by a losing week against both floors.
Days and payouts: Express currently requires Evaluation pass speed is governed by 40% consistency; funded withdrawals may be available daily and describes payouts as Daily after funded buffer, minimum, and plan-specific conditions are met. Standard Evaluation currently requires No minimum evaluation days and describes payouts as On demand after 5 qualifying winning days. This turns “which pays faster?” into a measurable calendar question rather than a marketing claim.
Permissions: Compare news, weekend and automation needs directly. If one account blocks a non-negotiable part of the strategy, remove it before comparing fees or profit split. Permission fit is binary for many traders.
Price logic: Express currently starts around $106 at $25,000 before BRIDGE. Standard Evaluation currently starts around $116 at $25,000 before BRIDGE. Final checkout should be compared only after the structural filters above are passed.
Express vs Beginner Evaluation
Structure: Express is a One-Step Express with target 6%, while Beginner Evaluation is a One-Step Evaluation with target 6%. This pairing is most useful when the trader wants to understand whether the lower target also comes with a tighter loss envelope or more demanding qualifying conditions.
Drawdown: Express currently uses End of Day trailing with plan-specific funded buffer and lock behavior with daily rule Plan-specific funded soft daily loss limits; verify the live dashboard and maximum-loss rule $1,000 / $2,000 / $3,000 / $4,500 EOD trailing in evaluation. Beginner Evaluation currently uses End-of-day trailing drawdown with daily rule 2.4–2.5% depending on size and maximum-loss rule About 3.33–5% EOD trailing depending on size. The trader should replay a normal winning week followed by a losing week against both floors.
Days and payouts: Express currently requires Evaluation pass speed is governed by 40% consistency; funded withdrawals may be available daily and describes payouts as Daily after funded buffer, minimum, and plan-specific conditions are met. Beginner Evaluation currently requires No minimum evaluation days; funded payout qualification uses 7 days with 5 winning days and describes payouts as Weekly; first payout after at least 7 days and 5 qualifying winning days. This turns “which pays faster?” into a measurable calendar question rather than a marketing claim.
Permissions: Compare news, weekend and automation needs directly. If one account blocks a non-negotiable part of the strategy, remove it before comparing fees or profit split. Permission fit is binary for many traders.
Price logic: Express currently starts around $106 at $25,000 before BRIDGE. Beginner Evaluation currently starts around $83 at $25,000 before BRIDGE. Final checkout should be compared only after the structural filters above are passed.
Express vs Instant Standard
Structure: Express is a One-Step Express with target 6%, while Instant Standard is a Instant Funding with target No evaluation; payout milestones are 6% / 5% / 4%. This pairing is most useful when the trader wants to understand whether the lower target also comes with a tighter loss envelope or more demanding qualifying conditions.
Drawdown: Express currently uses End of Day trailing with plan-specific funded buffer and lock behavior with daily rule Plan-specific funded soft daily loss limits; verify the live dashboard and maximum-loss rule $1,000 / $2,000 / $3,000 / $4,500 EOD trailing in evaluation. Instant Standard currently uses End-of-day trailing drawdown with daily rule 2.5% and maximum-loss rule 3–4% EOD trailing depending on size. The trader should replay a normal winning week followed by a losing week against both floors.
Days and payouts: Express currently requires Evaluation pass speed is governed by 40% consistency; funded withdrawals may be available daily and describes payouts as Daily after funded buffer, minimum, and plan-specific conditions are met. Instant Standard currently requires No evaluation; 7 qualifying winning days are required for payout and describes payouts as On demand after 7 qualifying winning days. This turns “which pays faster?” into a measurable calendar question rather than a marketing claim.
Permissions: Compare news, weekend and automation needs directly. If one account blocks a non-negotiable part of the strategy, remove it before comparing fees or profit split. Permission fit is binary for many traders.
Price logic: Express currently starts around $106 at $25,000 before BRIDGE. Instant Standard currently starts around $410 at $50,000 before BRIDGE. Final checkout should be compared only after the structural filters above are passed.
Express vs Instant Pro
Structure: Express is a One-Step Express with target 6%, while Instant Pro is a Instant Funding with target No evaluation; payout eligibility rules apply. This pairing is most useful when the trader wants to understand whether the lower target also comes with a tighter loss envelope or more demanding qualifying conditions.
Drawdown: Express currently uses End of Day trailing with plan-specific funded buffer and lock behavior with daily rule Plan-specific funded soft daily loss limits; verify the live dashboard and maximum-loss rule $1,000 / $2,000 / $3,000 / $4,500 EOD trailing in evaluation. Instant Pro currently uses Intraday/trailing drawdown with daily rule 0% — no separate daily loss limit and maximum-loss rule 3–4% intraday/trailing depending on size. The trader should replay a normal winning week followed by a losing week against both floors.
Days and payouts: Express currently requires Evaluation pass speed is governed by 40% consistency; funded withdrawals may be available daily and describes payouts as Daily after funded buffer, minimum, and plan-specific conditions are met. Instant Pro currently requires No evaluation; funded payout qualification rules apply and describes payouts as On demand after at least 7 days and all payout conditions are met. This turns “which pays faster?” into a measurable calendar question rather than a marketing claim.
Permissions: Compare news, weekend and automation needs directly. If one account blocks a non-negotiable part of the strategy, remove it before comparing fees or profit split. Permission fit is binary for many traders.
Price logic: Express currently starts around $106 at $25,000 before BRIDGE. Instant Pro currently starts around $416 at $50,000 before BRIDGE. Final checkout should be compared only after the structural filters above are passed.
Direct vs Flex
Structure: Direct is a Instant Funding Direct with target No evaluation; payout profit goals apply, while Flex is a One-Step Evaluation with target About 4.67–5% depending on size. This pairing is most useful when the trader wants to understand whether the lower target also comes with a tighter loss envelope or more demanding qualifying conditions.
Drawdown: Direct currently uses End of Day framework that becomes fixed under the current lock or first-payout condition with daily rule $1,000 / $1,250 / $2,500 / $3,000 soft daily loss limit and maximum-loss rule $1,500 / $2,000 / $3,500 / $4,500 EOD framework. Flex currently uses End-of-day trailing drawdown with daily rule 0% — no daily loss limit and maximum-loss rule About 2.33–3% EOD trailing depending on size. The trader should replay a normal winning week followed by a losing week against both floors.
Days and payouts: Direct currently requires No evaluation; payout unlock depends on profit goal and consistency and describes payouts as On demand after the current payout goal, consistency, and risk conditions are met. Flex currently requires No minimum evaluation days and describes payouts as On demand after 5 qualifying winning days. This turns “which pays faster?” into a measurable calendar question rather than a marketing claim.
Permissions: Compare news, weekend and automation needs directly. If one account blocks a non-negotiable part of the strategy, remove it before comparing fees or profit split. Permission fit is binary for many traders.
Price logic: Direct currently starts around $307 at $25,000 before BRIDGE. Flex currently starts around $133 at $50,000 before BRIDGE. Final checkout should be compared only after the structural filters above are passed.
Direct vs Standard Evaluation
Structure: Direct is a Instant Funding Direct with target No evaluation; payout profit goals apply, while Standard Evaluation is a One-Step Evaluation with target 5–6% depending on size. This pairing is most useful when the trader wants to understand whether the lower target also comes with a tighter loss envelope or more demanding qualifying conditions.
Drawdown: Direct currently uses End of Day framework that becomes fixed under the current lock or first-payout condition with daily rule $1,000 / $1,250 / $2,500 / $3,000 soft daily loss limit and maximum-loss rule $1,500 / $2,000 / $3,500 / $4,500 EOD framework. Standard Evaluation currently uses End-of-day trailing drawdown with daily rule 0% — no daily loss limit and maximum-loss rule About 3.33–4% EOD trailing depending on size. The trader should replay a normal winning week followed by a losing week against both floors.
Days and payouts: Direct currently requires No evaluation; payout unlock depends on profit goal and consistency and describes payouts as On demand after the current payout goal, consistency, and risk conditions are met. Standard Evaluation currently requires No minimum evaluation days and describes payouts as On demand after 5 qualifying winning days. This turns “which pays faster?” into a measurable calendar question rather than a marketing claim.
Permissions: Compare news, weekend and automation needs directly. If one account blocks a non-negotiable part of the strategy, remove it before comparing fees or profit split. Permission fit is binary for many traders.
Price logic: Direct currently starts around $307 at $25,000 before BRIDGE. Standard Evaluation currently starts around $116 at $25,000 before BRIDGE. Final checkout should be compared only after the structural filters above are passed.
Direct vs Beginner Evaluation
Structure: Direct is a Instant Funding Direct with target No evaluation; payout profit goals apply, while Beginner Evaluation is a One-Step Evaluation with target 6%. This pairing is most useful when the trader wants to understand whether the lower target also comes with a tighter loss envelope or more demanding qualifying conditions.
Drawdown: Direct currently uses End of Day framework that becomes fixed under the current lock or first-payout condition with daily rule $1,000 / $1,250 / $2,500 / $3,000 soft daily loss limit and maximum-loss rule $1,500 / $2,000 / $3,500 / $4,500 EOD framework. Beginner Evaluation currently uses End-of-day trailing drawdown with daily rule 2.4–2.5% depending on size and maximum-loss rule About 3.33–5% EOD trailing depending on size. The trader should replay a normal winning week followed by a losing week against both floors.
Days and payouts: Direct currently requires No evaluation; payout unlock depends on profit goal and consistency and describes payouts as On demand after the current payout goal, consistency, and risk conditions are met. Beginner Evaluation currently requires No minimum evaluation days; funded payout qualification uses 7 days with 5 winning days and describes payouts as Weekly; first payout after at least 7 days and 5 qualifying winning days. This turns “which pays faster?” into a measurable calendar question rather than a marketing claim.
Permissions: Compare news, weekend and automation needs directly. If one account blocks a non-negotiable part of the strategy, remove it before comparing fees or profit split. Permission fit is binary for many traders.
Price logic: Direct currently starts around $307 at $25,000 before BRIDGE. Beginner Evaluation currently starts around $83 at $25,000 before BRIDGE. Final checkout should be compared only after the structural filters above are passed.
Direct vs Instant Standard
Structure: Direct is a Instant Funding Direct with target No evaluation; payout profit goals apply, while Instant Standard is a Instant Funding with target No evaluation; payout milestones are 6% / 5% / 4%. This pairing is most useful when the trader wants to understand whether the lower target also comes with a tighter loss envelope or more demanding qualifying conditions.
Drawdown: Direct currently uses End of Day framework that becomes fixed under the current lock or first-payout condition with daily rule $1,000 / $1,250 / $2,500 / $3,000 soft daily loss limit and maximum-loss rule $1,500 / $2,000 / $3,500 / $4,500 EOD framework. Instant Standard currently uses End-of-day trailing drawdown with daily rule 2.5% and maximum-loss rule 3–4% EOD trailing depending on size. The trader should replay a normal winning week followed by a losing week against both floors.
Days and payouts: Direct currently requires No evaluation; payout unlock depends on profit goal and consistency and describes payouts as On demand after the current payout goal, consistency, and risk conditions are met. Instant Standard currently requires No evaluation; 7 qualifying winning days are required for payout and describes payouts as On demand after 7 qualifying winning days. This turns “which pays faster?” into a measurable calendar question rather than a marketing claim.
Permissions: Compare news, weekend and automation needs directly. If one account blocks a non-negotiable part of the strategy, remove it before comparing fees or profit split. Permission fit is binary for many traders.
Price logic: Direct currently starts around $307 at $25,000 before BRIDGE. Instant Standard currently starts around $410 at $50,000 before BRIDGE. Final checkout should be compared only after the structural filters above are passed.
Direct vs Instant Pro
Structure: Direct is a Instant Funding Direct with target No evaluation; payout profit goals apply, while Instant Pro is a Instant Funding with target No evaluation; payout eligibility rules apply. This pairing is most useful when the trader wants to understand whether the lower target also comes with a tighter loss envelope or more demanding qualifying conditions.
Drawdown: Direct currently uses End of Day framework that becomes fixed under the current lock or first-payout condition with daily rule $1,000 / $1,250 / $2,500 / $3,000 soft daily loss limit and maximum-loss rule $1,500 / $2,000 / $3,500 / $4,500 EOD framework. Instant Pro currently uses Intraday/trailing drawdown with daily rule 0% — no separate daily loss limit and maximum-loss rule 3–4% intraday/trailing depending on size. The trader should replay a normal winning week followed by a losing week against both floors.
Days and payouts: Direct currently requires No evaluation; payout unlock depends on profit goal and consistency and describes payouts as On demand after the current payout goal, consistency, and risk conditions are met. Instant Pro currently requires No evaluation; funded payout qualification rules apply and describes payouts as On demand after at least 7 days and all payout conditions are met. This turns “which pays faster?” into a measurable calendar question rather than a marketing claim.
Permissions: Compare news, weekend and automation needs directly. If one account blocks a non-negotiable part of the strategy, remove it before comparing fees or profit split. Permission fit is binary for many traders.
Price logic: Direct currently starts around $307 at $25,000 before BRIDGE. Instant Pro currently starts around $416 at $50,000 before BRIDGE. Final checkout should be compared only after the structural filters above are passed.
Risk Math by Account Size
$25,000 account
At $25,000, 0.25% equals $62.5, 0.5% equals $125, 1% equals $250, 2% equals $500, 3% equals $750, 4% equals $1,000, 5% equals $1,250 and 6% equals $1,500. A trader should know these dollar figures before purchasing the size.
If the larger dollar swings change trading behavior, the account is too large at the intended percentage risk even if the coupon makes it look more efficient.
$50,000 account
At $50,000, 0.25% equals $125, 0.5% equals $250, 1% equals $500, 2% equals $1,000, 3% equals $1,500, 4% equals $2,000, 5% equals $2,500 and 6% equals $3,000. A trader should know these dollar figures before purchasing the size.
If the larger dollar swings change trading behavior, the account is too large at the intended percentage risk even if the coupon makes it look more efficient.
$100,000 account
At $100,000, 0.25% equals $250, 0.5% equals $500, 1% equals $1,000, 2% equals $2,000, 3% equals $3,000, 4% equals $4,000, 5% equals $5,000 and 6% equals $6,000. A trader should know these dollar figures before purchasing the size.
If the larger dollar swings change trading behavior, the account is too large at the intended percentage risk even if the coupon makes it look more efficient.
$150,000 account
At $150,000, 0.25% equals $375, 0.5% equals $750, 1% equals $1,500, 2% equals $3,000, 3% equals $4,500, 4% equals $6,000, 5% equals $7,500 and 6% equals $9,000. A trader should know these dollar figures before purchasing the size.
If the larger dollar swings change trading behavior, the account is too large at the intended percentage risk even if the coupon makes it look more efficient.
$200,000 account
At $200,000, 0.25% equals $500, 0.5% equals $1,000, 1% equals $2,000, 2% equals $4,000, 3% equals $6,000, 4% equals $8,000, 5% equals $10,000 and 6% equals $12,000. A trader should know these dollar figures before purchasing the size.
If the larger dollar swings change trading behavior, the account is too large at the intended percentage risk even if the coupon makes it look more efficient.
Search-Intent Questions
Which is cheaper?
The answer depends on the exact program pair rather than the firm name alone. Use the pair matrix above, translate the risk rule into dollars at the intended size and include qualifying-day requirements in the calendar estimate.
For price, apply BRIDGE to the live base fee. For payout speed, include eligibility and processing. For drawdown, distinguish static, EOD and intraday trailing rather than comparing only the percentage.
Which has the easier evaluation?
The answer depends on the exact program pair rather than the firm name alone. Use the pair matrix above, translate the risk rule into dollars at the intended size and include qualifying-day requirements in the calendar estimate.
For price, apply BRIDGE to the live base fee. For payout speed, include eligibility and processing. For drawdown, distinguish static, EOD and intraday trailing rather than comparing only the percentage.
Which has more drawdown?
The answer depends on the exact program pair rather than the firm name alone. Use the pair matrix above, translate the risk rule into dollars at the intended size and include qualifying-day requirements in the calendar estimate.
For price, apply BRIDGE to the live base fee. For payout speed, include eligibility and processing. For drawdown, distinguish static, EOD and intraday trailing rather than comparing only the percentage.
Which has EOD trailing drawdown?
The answer depends on the exact program pair rather than the firm name alone. Use the pair matrix above, translate the risk rule into dollars at the intended size and include qualifying-day requirements in the calendar estimate.
For price, apply BRIDGE to the live base fee. For payout speed, include eligibility and processing. For drawdown, distinguish static, EOD and intraday trailing rather than comparing only the percentage.
Which has intraday trailing drawdown?
The answer depends on the exact program pair rather than the firm name alone. Use the pair matrix above, translate the risk rule into dollars at the intended size and include qualifying-day requirements in the calendar estimate.
For price, apply BRIDGE to the live base fee. For payout speed, include eligibility and processing. For drawdown, distinguish static, EOD and intraday trailing rather than comparing only the percentage.
Which has faster payouts?
The answer depends on the exact program pair rather than the firm name alone. Use the pair matrix above, translate the risk rule into dollars at the intended size and include qualifying-day requirements in the calendar estimate.
For price, apply BRIDGE to the live base fee. For payout speed, include eligibility and processing. For drawdown, distinguish static, EOD and intraday trailing rather than comparing only the percentage.
Which has the higher split?
The answer depends on the exact program pair rather than the firm name alone. Use the pair matrix above, translate the risk rule into dollars at the intended size and include qualifying-day requirements in the calendar estimate.
For price, apply BRIDGE to the live base fee. For payout speed, include eligibility and processing. For drawdown, distinguish static, EOD and intraday trailing rather than comparing only the percentage.
Which has fewer consistency rules?
The answer depends on the exact program pair rather than the firm name alone. Use the pair matrix above, translate the risk rule into dollars at the intended size and include qualifying-day requirements in the calendar estimate.
For price, apply BRIDGE to the live base fee. For payout speed, include eligibility and processing. For drawdown, distinguish static, EOD and intraday trailing rather than comparing only the percentage.
Which is better for scalping?
The answer depends on the exact program pair rather than the firm name alone. Use the pair matrix above, translate the risk rule into dollars at the intended size and include qualifying-day requirements in the calendar estimate.
For price, apply BRIDGE to the live base fee. For payout speed, include eligibility and processing. For drawdown, distinguish static, EOD and intraday trailing rather than comparing only the percentage.
Which is better for swing trading?
The answer depends on the exact program pair rather than the firm name alone. Use the pair matrix above, translate the risk rule into dollars at the intended size and include qualifying-day requirements in the calendar estimate.
For price, apply BRIDGE to the live base fee. For payout speed, include eligibility and processing. For drawdown, distinguish static, EOD and intraday trailing rather than comparing only the percentage.
Which allows weekend holding?
The answer depends on the exact program pair rather than the firm name alone. Use the pair matrix above, translate the risk rule into dollars at the intended size and include qualifying-day requirements in the calendar estimate.
For price, apply BRIDGE to the live base fee. For payout speed, include eligibility and processing. For drawdown, distinguish static, EOD and intraday trailing rather than comparing only the percentage.
Which allows news trading?
The answer depends on the exact program pair rather than the firm name alone. Use the pair matrix above, translate the risk rule into dollars at the intended size and include qualifying-day requirements in the calendar estimate.
For price, apply BRIDGE to the live base fee. For payout speed, include eligibility and processing. For drawdown, distinguish static, EOD and intraday trailing rather than comparing only the percentage.
Which allows automation?
The answer depends on the exact program pair rather than the firm name alone. Use the pair matrix above, translate the risk rule into dollars at the intended size and include qualifying-day requirements in the calendar estimate.
For price, apply BRIDGE to the live base fee. For payout speed, include eligibility and processing. For drawdown, distinguish static, EOD and intraday trailing rather than comparing only the percentage.
Which is better for a 25K account?
The answer depends on the exact program pair rather than the firm name alone. Use the pair matrix above, translate the risk rule into dollars at the intended size and include qualifying-day requirements in the calendar estimate.
For price, apply BRIDGE to the live base fee. For payout speed, include eligibility and processing. For drawdown, distinguish static, EOD and intraday trailing rather than comparing only the percentage.
Which is better for a 50K account?
The answer depends on the exact program pair rather than the firm name alone. Use the pair matrix above, translate the risk rule into dollars at the intended size and include qualifying-day requirements in the calendar estimate.
For price, apply BRIDGE to the live base fee. For payout speed, include eligibility and processing. For drawdown, distinguish static, EOD and intraday trailing rather than comparing only the percentage.
Which is better for a 100K account?
The answer depends on the exact program pair rather than the firm name alone. Use the pair matrix above, translate the risk rule into dollars at the intended size and include qualifying-day requirements in the calendar estimate.
For price, apply BRIDGE to the live base fee. For payout speed, include eligibility and processing. For drawdown, distinguish static, EOD and intraday trailing rather than comparing only the percentage.
Which is better for a 150K account?
The answer depends on the exact program pair rather than the firm name alone. Use the pair matrix above, translate the risk rule into dollars at the intended size and include qualifying-day requirements in the calendar estimate.
For price, apply BRIDGE to the live base fee. For payout speed, include eligibility and processing. For drawdown, distinguish static, EOD and intraday trailing rather than comparing only the percentage.
Which has the larger BRIDGE discount?
The answer depends on the exact program pair rather than the firm name alone. Use the pair matrix above, translate the risk rule into dollars at the intended size and include qualifying-day requirements in the calendar estimate.
For price, apply BRIDGE to the live base fee. For payout speed, include eligibility and processing. For drawdown, distinguish static, EOD and intraday trailing rather than comparing only the percentage.
Which has the lower true cost after two attempts?
The answer depends on the exact program pair rather than the firm name alone. Use the pair matrix above, translate the risk rule into dollars at the intended size and include qualifying-day requirements in the calendar estimate.
For price, apply BRIDGE to the live base fee. For payout speed, include eligibility and processing. For drawdown, distinguish static, EOD and intraday trailing rather than comparing only the percentage.
Which has the lower true cost after three attempts?
The answer depends on the exact program pair rather than the firm name alone. Use the pair matrix above, translate the risk rule into dollars at the intended size and include qualifying-day requirements in the calendar estimate.
For price, apply BRIDGE to the live base fee. For payout speed, include eligibility and processing. For drawdown, distinguish static, EOD and intraday trailing rather than comparing only the percentage.
What happens after a withdrawal?
The answer depends on the exact program pair rather than the firm name alone. Use the pair matrix above, translate the risk rule into dollars at the intended size and include qualifying-day requirements in the calendar estimate.
For price, apply BRIDGE to the live base fee. For payout speed, include eligibility and processing. For drawdown, distinguish static, EOD and intraday trailing rather than comparing only the percentage.
What if the target is reached in one day?
The answer depends on the exact program pair rather than the firm name alone. Use the pair matrix above, translate the risk rule into dollars at the intended size and include qualifying-day requirements in the calendar estimate.
For price, apply BRIDGE to the live base fee. For payout speed, include eligibility and processing. For drawdown, distinguish static, EOD and intraday trailing rather than comparing only the percentage.
What if one day makes most of the profit?
The answer depends on the exact program pair rather than the firm name alone. Use the pair matrix above, translate the risk rule into dollars at the intended size and include qualifying-day requirements in the calendar estimate.
For price, apply BRIDGE to the live base fee. For payout speed, include eligibility and processing. For drawdown, distinguish static, EOD and intraday trailing rather than comparing only the percentage.
What if the strategy holds overnight?
The answer depends on the exact program pair rather than the firm name alone. Use the pair matrix above, translate the risk rule into dollars at the intended size and include qualifying-day requirements in the calendar estimate.
For price, apply BRIDGE to the live base fee. For payout speed, include eligibility and processing. For drawdown, distinguish static, EOD and intraday trailing rather than comparing only the percentage.
What if the trader uses an EA?
The answer depends on the exact program pair rather than the firm name alone. Use the pair matrix above, translate the risk rule into dollars at the intended size and include qualifying-day requirements in the calendar estimate.
For price, apply BRIDGE to the live base fee. For payout speed, include eligibility and processing. For drawdown, distinguish static, EOD and intraday trailing rather than comparing only the percentage.
How to Choose
1. Confirm market and program family.
2. Choose the drawdown method intentionally.
3. Compare target to usable loss buffer.
4. Test day and consistency rules against historical trades.
5. Verify trading permissions.
6. Calculate realistic payout timing and post-withdrawal buffer.
7. Compare repeat-attempt cost.
8. Apply BRIDGE last.
Final Comparison
PFB currently lists Blue Guardian Futures as PFB Verified and AquaFutures as Moderate. This page keeps the current classification visible while comparing exact account rules, payout conditions and loss-floor behavior.
The current BRIDGE relationship is 25% at Blue Guardian Futures and 30% at AquaFutures. Rules decide the account; BRIDGE reduces its purchase cost afterward.
Research and source links
- Blue Guardian Futures review
- AquaFutures review
- Blue Guardian Futures official website
- AquaFutures official website
Last verified in 2026.
Official Blue Guardian Futures sources
- Futuresblueguardian.com/futures
- Standard account ruleshelpfutures.blueguardian.com/en/articles/15654479-standard-account-rules
- Reserve account ruleshelpfutures.blueguardian.com/en/articles/15678716-reserve-account-rules
- Payoutsblueguardian.com/payouts
- Refund policyblueguardian.com/refund-policy
- Terms and conditionsblueguardian.com/terms-and-conditions
- Instant funding starterblueguardian.com/instant-funding-starter
Frequently asked questions
The current Blue Guardian Futures coupon code is “BRIDGE”, listed at 25.00% under verified coverage. BRIDGE has been tested and verified.
The current AquaFutures coupon code is “BRIDGE”, listed at 60.00% under verified coverage. BRIDGE has been tested and verified.
PFB currently lists Blue Guardian Futures as PFB Verified and AquaFutures as Moderate. This page keeps the current classification visible while comparing exact account rules, payout conditions and loss-floor behavior.
No. BRIDGE reduces purchase price only. Trading rules remain tied to the selected account.
Join the discussion
No comments yet
Sign in to leave a comment. Real traders only — one account, one voice.