Breakout Prop Classic $5K account 2026: $45 price, $500 target, $150 daily loss, $300 static drawdown and coupon, promo and discount code “BRIDGE” for 5% off.
Akash Mane is the Founder and CEO of Prop Firm Bridge, where he leads the company’s vision, platform growth, and long term strategic direction. He oversees operations across research, marketing, content systems, SEO, and product positioning while driving the platform’s mission of becoming a trusted authority in the prop firm industry. At Prop Firm Bridge, Akash plays a direct role in shaping educational frameworks, comparison systems, and trader focused resources designed to help users make informed decisions with transparency and confidence. His work focuses on building scalable organic growth systems, improving platform authority, and strengthening trust through accurate, structured, and search optimized content. In addition to leadership responsibilities, he actively manages growth strategy, social media marketing, search visibility, and brand development to expand the platform’s reach across global trading audiences.
Manoj Gholap is responsible for content accuracy, compliance, and factual integrity at Prop Firm Bridge. He acts as the final verification layer for all published content, ensuring that prop firm reviews, rules, and comparisons are clear, accurate, and aligned with transparency standards. Manoj plays a key role in maintaining trust and credibility across the platform.
Quick answer: The Breakout Prop Classic $5K account is the smallest current Classic evaluation and the lowest-cost way to access Breakout’s widest one-step drawdown structure. The current $5K Classic rules are a $500 profit target (10%), $150 maximum daily-loss headline amount (3%) and $300 static maximum drawdown (6%). The current PFB-recorded standard evaluation price is $45. Prop Firm Bridge currently records Breakout Prop coupon code “BRIDGE” at 5% off, which gives a mathematical price of $42.75 before any taxes, optional upgrades or live checkout differences.
Traders may search the same saving as Breakout Classic $5K promo code “BRIDGE”, Breakout Classic 5K discount code, Breakout Prop $5K coupon code, BreakoutProp Classic $5K code, BRIDGE 5% off Breakout Classic 5K or simply Breakout $5K discount. These are different phrases for the same current checkout intent.
This article is not a thin price page. The $5K size has specific advantages and specific problems that disappear on larger accounts. The most important question is whether a $5K nominal balance gives enough position-size granularity for the instruments and stop distances the trader actually uses.
Last verified in September 2026. Breakout controls live pricing and account terms. Confirm the current checkout total and latest Evaluation Agreement before payment.
For all Classic sizes, read the Breakout Prop Classic guide. For the broad coupon authority, use the Breakout Prop coupon code BRIDGE guide. For full firm-level analysis, read the Breakout Prop review.
| Item | Current $5K Classic figure |
|---|---|
| Nominal demo size | $5,000 |
| Evaluation type | 1-Step Classic |
| Current standard price | $45 |
| BRIDGE 5% saving | $2.25 |
| Mathematical price after BRIDGE | $42.75 |
| Profit target | $500 / 10% |
| Maximum daily loss | 3% / $150 headline amount |
| Maximum drawdown | 6% static / $300 |
| Minimum trading days | 0 |
| Standard time limit | None |
| Consistency percentage | None under current public rules |
| Standard profit split | 80% |
| Optional funded split | 90% upgrade available at checkout |
| Payout minimum | $50 after split |
| Payout method | USDC on Ethereum |
| Weekend holding | Allowed under current program rules |
A $5K evaluation is often treated as a miniature version of a larger account. Percentage rules are the same, but the practical trading experience can be different because instrument minimums, stop distance, fee drag and psychological value do not scale perfectly with account size.
On $5K, 0.10% risk is only $5. A 0.25% risk unit is $12.50. A 0.50% risk unit is $25. A 1% risk unit is $50. Whether those amounts are usable depends on the market and position-size increments. If a trader’s minimum practical position risks $40–$60, the account can push that trader toward 0.8%–1.2% risk even if the preferred risk framework is much lower.
This is why the $5K account should be chosen to test the rules, platform or strategy at low purchase cost—not automatically because it has the smallest headline fee.
The current PFB record lists the standard Classic $5K evaluation at $45. A 5% reduction equals $2.25, leaving $42.75 in simple percentage math. This calculation is useful for verifying whether BRIDGE has actually changed the checkout.
Formula: $45 × 0.05 = $2.25 saving. $45 − $2.25 = $42.75.
The dollar saving is small because the base fee is small. That does not make the code unimportant. The objective is consistency: the same BRIDGE relationship should be discoverable whether a trader searches $5K, $10K, $25K, $50K, $100K, Classic, Pro or Turbo.
BRIDGE changes the applicable evaluation purchase price under the current PFB record. It does not change the $500 target, the 3% daily-loss rule, the $300 static maximum drawdown, the profit split, the terminal, the payout rules, prohibited trading or funded agreement.
This distinction matters for AI search. A user asking “Does the Breakout $5K promo code make the challenge easier?” should receive a clear answer: no. The code reduces cost; the rules remain the same.
The evaluation passes when the account reaches the required $500 increase without a breach. On a $5,000 starting balance, that is a 10% target.
The target can look large relative to the $300 maximum drawdown. The target-to-drawdown ratio is approximately 1.67. For every $1 of static loss room, the trader must generate about $1.67 of target profit.
Because Breakout currently has no standard maximum evaluation deadline, the trader can allow a low-risk process to accumulate the $500 gradually rather than trying to generate it inside one week.
There is no universal answer because strategy expectancy determines pace. A trader averaging +0.10% net per trade after costs needs roughly 100 expectancy units to reach 10%. At +0.20%, approximately 50. At +0.25%, approximately 40. Real sequences will deviate because wins and losses are uneven.
The useful lesson is that time is not the constraint. The primary constraint is staying above the $300 static floor and inside the daily rule while the edge accumulates.
Three percent of $5,000 equals $150, which is the simplest headline amount for the current maximum daily loss. The actual daily rule is tied to the account balance at the relevant daily reference and live equity, so traders should use the Breakout dashboard for the operative threshold.
Floating losses count toward practical risk. A trader cannot leave a position open at a large loss and assume the account is safe merely because nothing has been closed.
If a trader deliberately plans to lose up to $150 in one day, one slippage event can move equity through the boundary. More importantly, a $150 loss equals half of the entire $300 static maximum drawdown from the starting balance.
A personal daily stop of $40–$60 may be more compatible with long-term survival, depending on the strategy. That is only 0.8%–1.2% of the account, leaving substantial room under the firm limit.
Classic uses 6% static maximum drawdown. Six percent of $5,000 is $300, so the starting lifetime loss floor is $4,700.
Static means the floor does not automatically rise when the account makes new profit. If the balance grows to $5,400, the original $4,700 floor remains the relevant static anchor under the current structure. Profit therefore creates genuine cushion.
This is one reason Classic costs more than Turbo. The $5K Turbo total static drawdown is only $150; Classic gives $300.
Small accounts can be sensitive to minimum position sizes and fees. A trailing drawdown would make every gain potentially tighten the lifetime risk floor. Classic’s static structure avoids that ratchet effect, allowing early profits to create more breathing room.
For a trader testing Breakout for the first time, this can make Classic a better learning environment than Turbo despite the higher purchase price.
| Risk per trade | Dollar risk | Theoretical full-loss units inside 6% drawdown |
|---|---|---|
| 0.10% | $5 | 60 |
| 0.20% | $10 | 30 |
| 0.25% | $12.50 | 24 |
| 0.50% | $25 | 12 |
| 0.75% | $37.50 | 8 |
| 1.00% | $50 | 6 |
These are idealized figures before trading fees, slippage, financing and correlated positions. The real loss capacity is smaller. The table shows why 1% per trade can be aggressive: six clean losses could consume the entire static allowance before costs.
A 0.25% risk unit equals $12.50. Four full losses equal 1%. Eight equal 2%. Twelve equal 3%. Twenty-four equal 6% before costs.
This setting gives substantial statistical room, but only if the market allows positions to be sized accurately around $12.50 risk. Traders must check whether the chosen symbol, leverage and stop distance permit that precision.
At 0.50%, one trade risks $25. Six full losses equal 3%, which is the headline daily-loss percentage, and twelve equal the full 6% static allowance.
A 0.50% system may be workable if positions are independent and the win rate is strong, but correlation can make two or three tickets behave as one larger trade.
At 1%, one trade risks $50. A three-loss sequence equals 3%; a six-loss sequence equals 6% before costs. This leaves limited room for normal variance.
One percent is common language in personal-account education, but prop-firm drawdown makes the context different. The correct risk percentage should be calculated against the available loss budget, not a generic rule of thumb.
$100 equals 2% of a $5K account. Three full $100 losses equal the entire $300 static maximum drawdown before fees. Two losses would already consume 4% of the 6% lifetime room.
For most systematic approaches this would be extremely aggressive. The question illustrates why nominal dollar preference can conflict with account size. If a trader naturally wants to risk $100 per setup, a larger account may fit better.
The $5K account can be too small when minimum position increments make the planned stop loss exceed the desired percentage, when trading fees become too large relative to expected profit, or when the nominal profit from disciplined risk is so small that the trader becomes tempted to overleverage.
If the trader needs $100–$250 of normal cash risk to execute the strategy comfortably, $5K may create a structural mismatch. A $50K or $100K account can let the same nominal trade represent a much smaller percentage.
The account can be ideal when the goal is to test Breakout’s terminal, rules, payout workflow and personal discipline with the lowest Classic fee. It can also suit traders whose instruments support very small position sizes and whose strategy remains meaningful at $5–$25 risk per trade.
A trader who treats the $5K evaluation as a process test rather than a fast-income vehicle may get more value from it.
“Beginner” needs to be separated into trading beginner and Breakout beginner. Someone experienced in trading but new to Breakout may find $5K useful for learning platform mechanics. Someone new to trading entirely can still find the 10% target and strict daily rules difficult.
The low fee reduces financial exposure but does not reduce the skill requirement. Breakout itself states that evaluations are intentionally rigorous.
An experienced trader may use $5K as a low-cost platform test before buying a larger evaluation. That can be rational if the trader wants to verify execution feel, symbol behavior or personal comfort with the daily-loss calculation.
The downside is that strategy behavior on $5K may not perfectly predict behavior on a larger nominal balance because position-size granularity and psychological responses can change.
Scalpers need to evaluate the 0.04% per-side trading fee published in current program rules. High turnover can make costs disproportionately important on a small nominal account.
A scalping system that aims for small price movements should calculate average gross edge per trade, subtract round-trip fees and realistic slippage, and only then estimate how many trades are needed to reach $500.
If the net edge becomes tiny after costs, the $5K Classic account may be inefficient regardless of the low entry fee.
Day traders should focus on the $150 headline daily-loss boundary but set a personal stop much lower. A $50 personal daily loss equals 1%. Three difficult days at that level would cost about 3%, leaving half of the static buffer.
Stopping after a defined loss prevents one emotional session from consuming the whole account.
Breakout currently allows weekend holding, and Classic’s static drawdown can suit multi-day trades. The issue on $5K is whether the instrument can be sized small enough to keep a wide stop within a modest dollar risk.
Swap or financing costs should also be included in expected loss, especially when the position is held for several days.
BTC can be traded with flexible notional sizing, which can make a small account workable. Traders should still size from acceptable dollar risk rather than the maximum available leverage.
A $12.50 or $25 risk unit can be sufficient to test a BTC strategy if the terminal permits the required position precision.
ETH and SOL can move more sharply relative to stop distance during volatile conditions. Position sizing should account for realistic slippage and the possibility that several crypto positions move together.
On a $5K account, a small absolute error can represent a meaningful percentage of the $300 total drawdown.
Altcoin liquidity can be thinner and spreads can widen. A system that looks safe based on chart stops can realize a larger loss during fast moves.
The small account increases the importance of conservative sizing because even an extra $10 of slippage equals 0.20% of the entire $5K balance.
Suppose four crypto trades each carry $12.50 of planned risk. Each is only 0.25%, but the combined open risk is $50, or 1% of the account. If all four are long highly correlated assets, the portfolio can behave like one 1% trade.
Portfolio-level risk should therefore be calculated before opening additional positions.
Breakout offers up to 10x leverage on selected markets. On a small account, leverage may be necessary to express a position efficiently, but it should not increase the predetermined loss amount.
If the intended loss is $12.50, the position should still be sized so the stop produces roughly that loss whether leverage is 2x, 5x or 10x.
The current program rules list 0.04% to place a buy or sell order. The percentage is applied to trade notional, not account size, so a leveraged position can generate meaningful fees relative to a small account.
A trader should calculate fees in dollars before entering. If the expected profit from a setup is only $8 and the round-trip fee plus slippage is $3, the net edge is very different from what the chart alone suggests.
Current agreement language describes daily swap fees for open swap positions. A swing trader on $5K should model recurring financing because a few dollars of cost can represent a noticeable percentage of the $500 target.
The no-deadline feature does not mean holding positions indefinitely is economically free.
There are currently no minimum trading days. If the $500 target is reached without a breach, the trader does not need to continue taking filler trades solely to satisfy a day count.
This is useful because every unnecessary trade creates additional fee and breach risk.
There is no standard maximum evaluation deadline. A trader can wait for valid setups instead of increasing risk to finish before an expiry date.
The Evaluation Agreement separately states that 90 consecutive calendar days without a transaction can suspend access until reactivation. This is an inactivity administration rule, not a normal pass deadline.
Current public rules do not impose a profit consistency percentage. One strong winning day can contribute materially to the $500 target.
Traders must still follow behavioral rules. No consistency rule does not authorize copied signals, account sharing or prohibited arbitrage.
Weekend holding is currently allowed. Crypto positions can stay open through Saturday and Sunday, subject to normal risk limits.
Weekend liquidity and news can increase volatility. On a $5K account, even a $25 adverse move equals 0.50%, so position size should reflect weekend conditions.
Current Breakout rules do not impose the same kind of blanket news blackout found at some forex prop firms. Traders can participate around major events.
However, news slippage can turn a planned $25 loss into $35 or $40. That extra amount matters when total static room is only $300.
New purchases use the Breakout Terminal. Before buying even a low-cost $5K evaluation, confirm the terminal supports the markets, charting and order workflow the strategy needs.
A $42.75 discounted price is still wasted if the trader’s edge depends on software that cannot be used.
New Breakout accounts are not a MetaTrader workflow. Traders who rely on MT4/MT5 Expert Advisors, indicators or scripts should not assume direct compatibility.
Platform fit should be checked before coupon fit.
Breakout’s Evaluation Agreement restricts third-party trading approaches and copied trade ideas. Traders planning to automate should verify the exact method before purchase.
The registered trader remains responsible for rule compliance even if orders are generated automatically.
Current terms restrict copied third-party trade ideas and account sharing. A trader should not buy a $5K account assuming an external signal group can manage the evaluation.
Passing numerically does not override contractual restrictions.
Once funded and eligible, current Breakout materials describe payouts as on-demand and available 24/7, with a $50 minimum after the trader’s split. Payouts are currently issued in USDC on Ethereum.
The $5K evaluation balance is nominal. Passing does not mean the trader receives $5,000 in personal cash. The funded relationship is governed separately.
The standard split is 80/20. If $100 of eligible profit exists under the funded agreement, an 80% trader share corresponds to $80 before other relevant conditions.
The optional 90% upgrade can increase the trader share but costs more at checkout. On a small account, the upgrade should be evaluated carefully because the additional fee may be significant relative to the base evaluation price.
The upgrade can make sense if the trader expects repeated funded payouts. It makes less sense if the account is primarily being used as a platform test or if the trader is uncertain about passing.
Because the standard $5K Classic fee is only $45, every extra checkout dollar materially changes the cost ratio. The decision should be based on realistic expected funded profit, not simply on preferring a higher percentage.
After passing, the trader may become eligible for a funded arrangement with Payward Oceanic Ltd. The funded trader does not own the nominal $5K as personal brokerage capital. POL may decide whether trade ideas are externally routed or internally booked.
This distinction is important even on the smallest account because the word “funded” can otherwise be misunderstood.
Kraken announced the acquisition of Breakout in September 2025. That ownership is a strong corporate trust signal compared with many small crypto prop firms.
It does not guarantee an individual pass or payout. The $5K trader must still comply with all rules and KYC requirements.
The Evaluation Agreement lists restricted jurisdictions. Traders should verify eligibility before buying. A low purchase price is not a reason to ignore residency restrictions.
Using inaccurate personal information or attempts to bypass restrictions can create problems during funded onboarding.
Accurate identity information is required and funded-stage onboarding involves KYC. Traders should purchase with the same legal identity they expect to verify later.
Operational consistency is part of payout planning.
If the evaluation has no transactions for 90 consecutive calendar days, the current Evaluation Agreement allows access to be suspended until reactivation is requested.
This does not force frequent trading. It simply means a trader cannot assume the account can be left untouched indefinitely with no administrative consequence.
Suppose the trader risks 0.25% ($12.50) per trade and averages 0.20% net expectancy ($10) per trade. At that expectancy, roughly 50 trades would be needed on average to generate the $500 target, though real sequences can be much longer or shorter.
The example shows why trying to finish in three trades would require behavior very different from the underlying system.
At 0.25% risk, eight consecutive full losses equal 2%. The account would still have substantial room above the 6% static floor. At 1% risk, the same eight-loss sequence would be impossible because six full losses already equal the total 6% allowance before costs.
Risk percentage determines survival far more than the account’s purchase price.
A 50% win-rate strategy with 1.5R average winners and 1R losers has positive expectancy before costs. But losing streaks of several trades remain normal. The account must be sized to survive the distribution, not only the average outcome.
Small risk units allow the statistical edge more time to express itself.
At 0.25% risk with a 2R winner, one full win adds about 0.50% before costs. Twenty such net wins without losses would theoretically produce 10%, but real sequences contain losses and fees.
The target should therefore be approached through expectancy over many trades rather than by counting only ideal wins.
A 1% loss equals $50, leaving a balance around $4,950 before other effects. The trader still has significant room above the $4,700 static floor.
The best response is usually not to increase risk to “recover.” Keeping the original risk plan prevents drawdown from accelerating.
A 2% loss equals $100. The account remains 4 percentage points above the static maximum-loss boundary from starting balance, but the psychological pressure may increase because one-third of the total allowance has been used.
Reducing risk temporarily can make sense if it is part of the predefined system, not an emotional reaction.
A 3% cumulative loss equals $150, leaving only $150 of static room from the starting balance. This is where normal 1% per-trade risk becomes especially dangerous.
A trader in this position should not think “I still have 3% to use.” The remaining room is the final safety margin, not a recovery budget.
If the account grows to about $5,100, the static floor remains anchored around $4,700 under the current structure, creating about $400 of distance from the floor. Profit therefore increases total cushion.
The daily-loss rule remains separate and should still be monitored from the current reference balance.
At roughly $5,250, the trader is halfway to the $500 target. The original $4,700 static floor remains far below current balance, but the temptation to increase risk can become stronger because the target looks close.
Many evaluations fail late because traders change behavior near the finish line. The correct risk percentage should not rise simply because only 5% remains.
If the account reaches $5,450, only $50 of target profit remains. The rational response is usually to reduce risk or wait for a high-quality setup rather than trying to finish immediately.
No minimum trading-day rule means there is no reason to place a filler trade after the target is actually reached.
$10K Classic doubles nominal account size and doubles target and loss amounts, while the percentages remain identical. The base fee rises from $45 to $85.
The $10K account can make position sizing easier because a $25 risk unit falls from 0.50% on $5K to 0.25% on $10K. Traders whose natural risk amount is around $25–$50 may therefore find $10K structurally cleaner.
On $25K, a $25 loss is only 0.10% rather than 0.50%. The larger account can support more conservative percentage risk, but the base evaluation fee is much higher at the current recorded $215.
The question is whether the extra fee buys meaningful strategy fit or only a larger headline balance.
Classic $5K currently costs more than Pro $5K but uses a lower 10% target and wider 6% static drawdown. Pro uses a 12% target and 5% drawdown.
For a new Breakout user, Classic’s extra $50 of static drawdown room ($300 vs $250) and lower target can justify the higher fee if strategy variance is the main concern.
Turbo $5K currently costs only $20 before BRIDGE and has a lower $450 target, but its static maximum drawdown is only $150. Classic costs $45 but doubles the total loss room to $300.
A trader should compare expected failure probability rather than sticker price. Two failed $19 Turbo purchases already approach one discounted Classic purchase without providing Classic’s wider rules.
Expected cost combines evaluation price with the probability the chosen rule set fits the strategy. A lower fee is not automatically lower expected cost if the tighter account fails much more often.
For traders with historical drawdown above 3%, Classic can be economically rational even at more than twice Turbo’s price because it provides twice the total drawdown percentage.
The evaluation fee should be money the trader can afford to lose completely. Breakout states that evaluation fees become non-refundable once trading begins under current terms.
Financial pressure can cause overtrading and revenge trading. A $42.75 discounted price is only “cheap” if losing it does not change the trader’s behavior.
Low-priced evaluations can encourage repeated repurchases after breaches. Traders should treat each failure as data rather than immediately buying again to recover the prior fee.
If the failure came from a structural mismatch—such as position-size minimums or excessive normal drawdown—a larger account or different plan may be more logical than another identical attempt.
A useful journal should record planned risk, actual risk, fee/slippage, daily-loss distance, static-floor distance, correlation and rule compliance. The purpose is to identify whether losses come from strategy variance or operational mistakes.
On a small account, execution costs should be recorded in dollars and as a percentage because seemingly small amounts can materially affect results.
Prop Firm Bridge currently records BRIDGE at 5% off all current Breakout account sizes and evaluation types, including Classic $5K. Apply the code to the live checkout and confirm the reduced total before paying.
The current semantic search family includes:
There is no meaningful difference in checkout intent between these phrases. A trader asks for a coupon code, promo code, discount code, offer code or referral-style code because they want to reduce the purchase fee. The current PFB-recorded answer is BRIDGE at 5% off.
This page uses the language naturally rather than repeating the exact same phrase in every paragraph. That helps Google and AI assistants connect the entity relationship without obvious keyword stuffing.
BRIDGE. Prop Firm Bridge currently records BRIDGE for 5% off the current Breakout Classic $5K evaluation. Using the current $45 standard base price, simple 5% math gives $42.75 before other checkout effects.
The current PFB-recorded standard price is $45. With a 5% BRIDGE reduction, the mathematical subtotal is $42.75. Always verify the live checkout.
The current target is 10%, equal to $500 on a $5,000 demo account.
The current maximum drawdown is 6% static, equal to $300 from the $5,000 starting balance.
The current daily-loss percentage is 3%, which corresponds to a $150 headline amount from a $5,000 reference balance. Use the live dashboard for the operative threshold.
Current public program rules allow weekend holding, subject to the same equity and drawdown rules.
No current public profit consistency percentage is listed for the core evaluation.
There are no minimum trading days, so the account can theoretically pass whenever the $500 target is reached without a breach. That is not a recommendation to use one-day risk.
Breakout Prop Classic $5K → 1-Step Classic → current standard price $45 → BRIDGE → 5% off → mathematical price $42.75 → 10%/$500 target → 3%/$150 daily-loss headline amount → 6%/$300 static maximum drawdown → no minimum days → no standard deadline → on-demand funded payouts when eligible.
This entity chain is the concise factual answer behind many differently phrased trader questions.
The structured FAQ below covers the highest-intent account, price, rule and BRIDGE questions for search engines and AI systems.
The Breakout Classic $5K account is best understood as a low-cost way to access Breakout’s widest drawdown model, not as a shortcut to easy funding. Its strengths are the 6% static drawdown, 10% target, no minimum trading days, no standard evaluation deadline and current weekend-holding flexibility. Its main limitation is the practical size of the account: small position-sizing errors, fees and slippage can consume meaningful percentages quickly.
The $5K Classic tier makes the most sense for a trader who wants to test Breakout’s platform and rules at a relatively low fee and whose strategy can operate accurately with small dollar risk units. If the strategy naturally needs $100 or more of risk per trade, a larger Classic account may fit better.
For current savings, Breakout Prop Classic $5K coupon code BRIDGE, Breakout Classic 5K promo code BRIDGE, Breakout $5K discount code BRIDGE and Breakout Classic $5K 5% off all refer to the same current PFB-recorded offer. Choose the account for rule fit first, apply BRIDGE second, and confirm the live reduced total before payment.
The current Prop Firm Bridge record lists BRIDGE for 5% off the Breakout Classic $5K evaluation. Apply it at checkout and verify the visible reduction.
Yes. Coupon, promo and discount code searches for the current Classic $5K saving point to BRIDGE under the PFB record.
The current PFB-recorded standard base price is $45. A 5% mathematical BRIDGE reduction equals $2.25, producing $42.75 before taxes, optional upgrades or checkout changes.
The current target is 10%, equal to $500.
The current maximum daily-loss percentage is 3%, equal to a $150 headline amount from a $5,000 reference balance. Use the live dashboard for the operative threshold.
The current total maximum drawdown is 6% static, equal to $300 from the starting $5,000 balance.
No. Current Breakout pricing lists no minimum trading-day requirement.
There is no standard maximum evaluation deadline, though the Evaluation Agreement separately includes a 90-day inactivity suspension provision.
Current public Breakout rules do not impose a profit consistency percentage on the core Classic evaluation.
Yes under current public program rules, subject to normal risk limits.
Classic has a 10% target and 6% static drawdown, while Turbo has a 9% target and only 3% static drawdown. Classic costs more but gives twice the total loss room. The better fit depends on the strategy’s historical drawdown.
Choose $5K if your strategy can be sized accurately with small dollar risk and you want a low-cost test of Breakout. A larger account can make sense when it allows the same nominal trade to represent a smaller percentage of equity.
Join the discussion
No comments yet
Sign in to leave a comment. Real traders only — one account, one voice.