FundedHive Pay From Profits 2026 explained: 1-Step vs 2-Step prices, 10% vs 8%/6% targets, static drawdown, funded fees, risk categories, payouts and BRIDGE 25%.
Akash Mane is the Founder and CEO of Prop Firm Bridge, where he leads the company’s vision, platform growth, and long term strategic direction. He oversees operations across research, marketing, content systems, SEO, and product positioning while driving the platform’s mission of becoming a trusted authority in the prop firm industry. At Prop Firm Bridge, Akash plays a direct role in shaping educational frameworks, comparison systems, and trader focused resources designed to help users make informed decisions with transparency and confidence. His work focuses on building scalable organic growth systems, improving platform authority, and strengthening trust through accurate, structured, and search optimized content. In addition to leadership responsibilities, he actively manages growth strategy, social media marketing, search visibility, and brand development to expand the platform’s reach across global trading audiences.
Manoj Gholap is responsible for content accuracy, compliance, and factual integrity at Prop Firm Bridge. He acts as the final verification layer for all published content, ensuring that prop firm reviews, rules, and comparisons are clear, accurate, and aligned with transparency standards. Manoj plays a key role in maintaining trust and credibility across the platform.
Quick answer: FundedHive Pay From Profits is a low-upfront evaluation model where traders pay a smaller access fee to start and, after passing, move into a funded-account fee structure based on the risk category demonstrated during evaluation. The current 1-Step route uses a 10% profit target; the current detailed 2-Step route uses 8% in Phase One and 6% in Phase Two. Both currently use 5% daily loss, 10% static balance-based maximum loss, a 3% maximum loss-per-trade rule and three profitable days.
For price savings, Prop Firm Bridge currently records FundedHive coupon code BRIDGE at 25% off all current account types and sizes. Use the main FundedHive BRIDGE coupon guide for the complete current savings tables. This article is about the Pay From Profits structure itself: how much each phase costs, what happens after passing, why the funded fee can differ by trader, and how the rules affect the real cost of reaching a payout.
Last verified in September 2026. FundedHive can update pricing and account terms, so confirm the live checkout and current dashboard objectives before paying or trading.
Pay From Profits changes the timing of the cost rather than removing the funded-account cost altogether. Instead of paying a large conventional challenge fee upfront, the trader pays a comparatively small evaluation access fee. If the trader passes, FundedHive assesses the evaluation behavior and assigns a risk category that affects the funded-account fee and how much of that fee can be paid from future profits.
That distinction is the key to understanding the product. A $9 or $19 starting price is not the total economic cost of every successful account. It is the cost of entering a particular evaluation phase. The eventual funded-account cost can be materially higher and depends on the account size and risk classification.
This structure can make sense for traders who prefer to risk less cash before proving they can pass. It can also be misunderstood by traders who compare only the first payment against the full upfront price of another prop-firm challenge. A fair comparison should include the entire path: access fees, number of phases, funded activation cost, trading rules and payout conditions.
The current official 1-Step Pay From Profits lineup runs from $5,000 to $200,000. The access fee is paid to start the one-phase evaluation. The figures below are the current published access prices, followed by simple 25% BRIDGE math.
| Account size | Current 1-Step access fee | 25% saving | Price math after BRIDGE |
|---|---|---|---|
| $5K | $19 | $4.75 | $14.25 |
| $10K | $39 | $9.75 | $29.25 |
| $25K | $99 | $24.75 | $74.25 |
| $50K | $149 | $37.25 | $111.75 |
| $100K | $249 | $62.25 | $186.75 |
| $200K | $399 | $99.75 | $299.25 |
These are percentage calculations against the published access fee. They do not mean the later funded-account fee is identical or automatically discounted in the same way. At Pay From Profits checkout, always identify which fee stage you are paying.
The 2-Step version has a lower access price per phase. That makes the initial payment smaller, but the evaluation has two phases and the access fee is paid for each phase. A trader who passes Phase One therefore activates Phase Two separately under the current structure.
| Account size | Current 2-Step fee per phase | 25% saving | Price math after BRIDGE |
|---|---|---|---|
| $5K | $9 | $2.25 | $6.75 |
| $10K | $19 | $4.75 | $14.25 |
| $25K | $49 | $12.25 | $36.75 |
| $50K | $75 | $18.75 | $56.25 |
| $100K | $99 | $24.75 | $74.25 |
| $200K | $199 | $49.75 | $149.25 |
The phrase “per phase” matters. On a $100K 2-Step account, for example, the current base access fee is $99 for Phase One. If Phase One is passed and Phase Two is activated at the same published fee, there is a second phase payment. The funded-account fee is a separate post-pass layer after both evaluation phases are complete.
| Rule | 1-Step Pay From Profits | 2-Step Pay From Profits |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluation phases | 1 | 2 |
| Profit target | 10% | 8% then 6% |
| Daily loss | 5% | 5% |
| Overall loss | 10% static | 10% static |
| Maximum loss per trade | 3% | 3% |
| Profitable days | 3 | 3 per phase |
| Consistency rule | None in current published model | None in current published model |
| Time limit | No current time limit | No current time limit |
| Current funded profit split | 80% | 80% |
The one-step route has fewer gates but a larger single target. The two-step route breaks the required progress into 8% and 6%, but the trader has to produce qualifying profitable days in both phases and pay for both evaluation stages. Neither structure is automatically easier. The better fit depends on the strategy’s average monthly return, drawdown profile and tolerance for multiple evaluation stages.
FundedHive’s public marketing cards can use simplified labels, so traders may encounter a generic “8% profit target/phase” presentation. The current detailed Pay From Profits terms and FundedHive’s August 2026 1-Step-versus-2-Step comparison material specify 8% for Phase One and 6% for Phase Two. Prop Firm Bridge uses those more detailed rule sources for this guide.
Whenever the public card, detailed terms and dashboard do not use identical wording, the safest practice is to follow the rule displayed on the active account and obtain support confirmation before trading if the difference changes your plan. This is especially important around phase targets, holding permissions and copy-trading rules.
Both Pay From Profits routes currently use a 10% static, balance-based maximum loss. Static drawdown means the lifetime breach floor does not continuously move higher simply because the account makes a new profit high.
On a $100,000 account, a 10% static maximum loss creates a $90,000 lifetime floor. If the account balance later reaches $105,000, the static floor remains $90,000. That gives the trader more absolute distance above the breach level after building profit.
The 5% daily limit is separate. On the same $100,000 account, the trader cannot treat the entire $10,000 lifetime allowance as a one-day risk budget. The current daily rule creates a much closer boundary. The 3% maximum-loss-per-trade rule creates an additional ceiling again.
A useful risk hierarchy is therefore: personal trade risk first, 3% official per-trade ceiling second, 5% daily boundary third and 10% static lifetime floor last. Traders who use the official maximums as normal position-sizing targets leave almost no margin for execution error.
FundedHive’s current Pay From Profits rules require three profitable days. A trader should not interpret that as “three days that finish slightly green.” The current detailed product material defines the profitable-day requirement more meaningfully: a qualifying day needs sufficient profit relative to the initial balance, with the account remaining at or above the initial balance for the day to count under the stated conditions.
That matters because a trader who reaches the profit target in one or two large sessions can still need additional qualifying days before passing. The requirement discourages a one-trade lottery approach and makes timing part of the evaluation plan.
Before trying to engineer a qualifying day, check the dashboard definition attached to the exact account. Product wording can evolve, and the dashboard is where the trader’s actual pass conditions are calculated.
Passing Pay From Profits does not lead to one universal funded-account fee. FundedHive uses evaluation behavior to classify traders into risk groups. The current terms describe categories including Low, Moderate, Medium and High risk, with different funded-account pricing and payment arrangements.
The practical advantage for qualifying Low and Moderate risk traders is that the funded-account fee can be paid from future profits rather than requiring the entire amount upfront. Medium and High risk classifications can require an upfront component or a less favorable payment split.
This creates an incentive to pass with controlled behavior rather than simply reaching the target as fast as possible. Two traders can pass the same nominal account size and arrive at different post-pass economics because one used stable risk and the other produced a more aggressive evaluation profile.
For that reason, the true Pay From Profits question is not “Can I reach 10% or 8%/6%?” It is “Can I reach the target while showing a risk profile that keeps the funded stage economically sensible?”
Prop Firm Bridge currently records BRIDGE at 25% off FundedHive account types and sizes, but Pay From Profits has multiple fee stages. The safest way to use the code is to verify the reduction at each live checkout rather than assume one successful application guarantees identical treatment on every later fee.
The main FundedHive coupon authority contains the current access-fee math. The FundedHive checkout verification guide explains how to distinguish an evaluation access payment from a later funded-account fee.
FundedHive’s funded model uses its Automated A-Book Dealing System, or AADS. The system is important because Pay From Profits is not simply “pass, receive an account, withdraw any displayed demo profit.” FundedHive’s current terms tie payout eligibility to verified positive A-Book PnL.
If the funded-account fee remains outstanding, the system can automatically realize eligible profits to cover that fee. If A-Book PnL becomes negative, subsequent positive A-Book PnL can first need to recover the negative amount before a payout becomes available.
The current terms also distinguish B-Book profits from withdrawable A-Book profits. B-Book profits are treated as demo profits and are not automatically eligible for withdrawal. When account state changes under the AADS logic, the trader should understand how prior B-Book and A-Book performance affects the displayed and withdrawable amount.
This architecture is more complex than a conventional prop-firm payout schedule, but it is also one of the defining features of FundedHive. Traders considering Pay From Profits should understand AADS before they buy, not after they request the first payout.
Current eligible funded payouts are processed in USDC on ERC-20. FundedHive describes the payout mechanism as automated and designed to complete rapidly once eligibility is confirmed, subject to blockchain confirmation and network conditions.
The current minimum payout is $50. Pay From Profits currently has a $1,000 daily withdrawal cap. The daily cap resets at UTC 00:00, and the current terms indicate that accounts using the same payout address can be treated collectively for the daily cap.
A payout request is not permitted while positions are open under the current terms. Eligible payout also depends on positive verified A-Book PnL, outstanding fee status and previous A-Book loss recovery where applicable.
For the full withdrawal mechanics, read the dedicated FundedHive payouts and AADS guide once it appears in the Savings Hub cluster.
Current product material permits news trading on the main Pay From Profits challenge structures. EAs are also permitted subject to prohibited-strategy rules. Automation is not a permission to use latency exploitation, toxic execution patterns or other behavior excluded by the agreement.
Weekend holding and copy trading require more careful reading because FundedHive’s current documents do not use perfectly consistent wording. The detailed product annexes and FundedHive’s August 2026 comparison material support weekend holding during challenge phases while prohibiting funded-stage weekend holding. A broader general Terms clause uses stricter wording. If weekend exposure is central to your strategy, obtain confirmation for the exact account and stage.
Copy trading has a similar inconsistency. The detailed annex permits challenge-stage copying under its stated conditions and prohibits it at funded stage, while the public funding-model page uses broader language saying copy trading is disallowed. The conservative practical approach is not to rely on copy trading unless FundedHive confirms that your exact setup is permitted.
The 1-Step route can suit traders who value fewer evaluation stages and are comfortable producing a 10% net target without forcing risk. It can also suit traders who place a high value on time and operational simplicity: one set of profitable-day requirements, one target and one evaluation phase.
The trade-off is the higher entry fee and larger one-phase objective. A trader whose strategy naturally produces 2% to 4% per month with low drawdown might find a 10% single-phase target slower than expected, even though there is no formal time limit.
The absence of a time limit is important. There is no reason to transform a controlled strategy into an aggressive one merely because the target is larger. If the trader’s goal is to reach the funded stage with a favorable risk category, slow and stable can be economically more valuable than fast and volatile.
The 2-Step route can suit traders who prefer smaller phase objectives and lower cash outlay at each stage. An 8% Phase One target followed by 6% in Phase Two may align better with a strategy that performs consistently but does not generate 10% quickly.
The trade-off is the additional phase. A trader must repeat the profitable-day process, maintain discipline for longer and pay to activate the second evaluation phase under the current model.
The low starting fee should therefore not be confused with a guaranteed low total cost. The trader’s pass rate, number of attempts, second-phase activation and later funded-account fee all influence the real cost per successful funded account.
Suppose Trader A buys a $100K 1-Step evaluation at the current $249 base access fee. Trader B buys a $100K 2-Step Phase One at $99, then later pays for Phase Two. Trader B has spent less cash at the beginning, but the total successful-path cost is not simply $99. Both traders can then face different post-pass funded fees depending on their risk categories.
The most useful comparison is therefore expected cost per funded account, not cost per attempt. A trader with a high pass probability may benefit from a more expensive one-step route because it removes a phase. A trader who values limiting upfront cash at risk may prefer the two-step route even if the successful path contains more transactions.
BRIDGE improves either path by lowering applicable checkout costs, but the coupon does not change the probability of passing or the risk classification earned during evaluation.
The first mistake is treating the tiny entry fee as the full funded-account cost. The second is chasing the target with oversized positions and then being surprised by an unfavorable post-pass risk category. The third is using the 3% maximum-loss-per-trade rule as a suggested trade size instead of an emergency ceiling.
Another mistake is ignoring the profitable-day requirement after hitting the main target. Traders should track target completion and qualifying-day completion separately. A final mistake is planning the funded strategy around a rule permission—especially weekend holding or copying—without checking the exact stage-specific current terms.
Classic and Pay From Profits can both lead to a funded FundedHive account, but their payment logic differs. Classic is closer to a conventional upfront challenge model. Pay From Profits lowers the evaluation entry cost and shifts more of the funded-account economics to the post-pass stage.
Classic also uses the NewBee, WorkerBee and QueenBee progression, with changing daily-loss limits, leverage and profit split. Pay From Profits uses the risk-category fee framework and currently an 80% funded profit split.
If your priority is minimizing the initial amount at risk, Pay From Profits is the more obvious comparison. If your priority is knowing more of the challenge cost upfront and following a staged Classic progression, Classic deserves separate consideration.
FundedHive Pay From Profits is not simply a cheap challenge. It is a two-part economic model: low-cost access to evaluation, followed by a funded-account fee structure that rewards lower-risk evaluation behavior. That makes it most attractive to traders who understand both stages and are willing to pass without abusing the risk limits.
The current 1-Step route offers simplicity with a 10% target. The current 2-Step route offers smaller phase objectives of 8% and 6% with lower per-phase access prices. Both use static overall drawdown, 5% daily loss, a 3% per-trade maximum and three profitable days under the current detailed rules.
For price verification, use BRIDGE and check the live checkout. For a firm-wide assessment, read the FundedHive review. The best account is the one whose risk and payment structure fits the trader before any discount is applied.
The structured FAQ below gives concise answers to the highest-intent questions about FundedHive Pay From Profits, 1-Step versus 2-Step, phase pricing, risk categories, funded fees and payouts.
Pay From Profits is FundedHive’s low-upfront evaluation model. Traders pay a smaller access fee to attempt the evaluation, then the funded-account fee after passing depends on the risk category demonstrated during evaluation.
The current Pay From Profits 1-Step target is 10%, with 5% daily loss, 10% static overall loss, a 3% maximum loss-per-trade rule and three profitable days.
The current detailed Pay From Profits rules specify 8% for Phase One and 6% for Phase Two, with three profitable days required per phase.
Yes. Under the current model the displayed 2-Step access fee applies per phase, so Phase Two is activated separately after Phase One is passed.
Current published Pay From Profits material states that there is no consistency rule. All other risk, drawdown, profitable-day and payout requirements still apply.
Yes. The current model uses a 10% static, balance-based overall maximum loss. The lifetime floor does not continuously trail upward with new profit highs.
The current maximum loss-per-trade rule is 3% on the Pay From Profits 1-Step and 2-Step structures.
FundedHive assesses the evaluation behavior and assigns a risk category. That category affects the funded-account fee and whether qualifying traders can pay the fee from future profits instead of paying it fully upfront.
Current terms set a $1,000 daily withdrawal cap for Pay From Profits, with a $50 minimum payout and USDC on ERC-20 as the current payout asset.
No. Current FundedHive terms state that payout requests are not permitted while positions are open.
Prop Firm Bridge currently records BRIDGE at 25% off FundedHive account types and sizes. Because Pay From Profits has multiple fee stages, verify the discount on the exact live checkout you are paying.
The 1-Step route has one 10% target and fewer stages, while the 2-Step route uses 8% and 6% targets with lower per-phase entry prices. The better fit depends on the trader’s strategy, pass probability, cash-flow preference and tolerance for multiple phases.
Join the discussion
No comments yet
Sign in to leave a comment. Real traders only — one account, one voice.