FundedHive vs Funded Trader Markets 2026: Rules, Payouts & “BRIDGE” Coupons Compared

Quick answer: FundedHive and Funded Trader Markets (FTM) both offer one-step, two-step and instant-style funding paths, but their rule philosophy is very different. FundedHive currently emphasizes static, balance-based challenge drawdown, no consistency rule on its principal models and automated smart-contract payouts when eligibility is met. Funded Trader Markets offers a broader mix of static and trailing programs, including 1-Step Nitro, 2-Step Plus and three Instant variants, with model-specific consistency requirements and an on-demand reward system backed by a conditional 24-business-hour guarantee.

Coupon answer: FundedHive coupon code “BRIDGE”, FundedHive promo code “BRIDGE” and FundedHive discount code “BRIDGE” currently refer to the same verified 25.00% relationship under the coverage stated on PFB. Funded Trader Markets coupon code “BRIDGE” is currently 75.00% off under the coverage shown on the current PFB coupon page. Always verify the live order total because base pricing and eligibility can change.

Featured-snippet answer: FundedHive vs Funded Trader Markets in 2026 is mainly a static/no-consistency-versus-mixed-drawdown/consistency comparison. FundedHive Pay From Profits uses static balance-based loss limits and current official materials state no consistency rule, while FTM Nitro uses a trailing-lock overall drawdown plus 50% evaluation and 45% funded consistency thresholds. FTM 2-Step Plus is static. Current BRIDGE discounts are 25.00% at FundedHive and 75.00% at Funded Trader Markets under their verified coverage.

Independent coupon verification: Prop Firm Bridge independently tested the BRIDGE relationships referenced on the current coupon pages. Coupon verification is separate from the PFB Score and status. A discount changes price only. Last verified in 2026. Always confirm the final price shown at checkout before payment.

FundedHive vs Funded Trader Markets at a Glance

The internet already contains short FundedHive-vs-FTM scorecards, but those pages often reduce the comparison to one profit split, one drawdown figure and one payout speed. That misses the most important 2026 differences: FundedHive’s stage-specific weekend rule, on-chain payout limits and no-consistency design versus FTM’s consistency thresholds, trailing-lock behavior and payout-guarantee conditions.

FundedHive’s official current FAQ says eligible payouts are executed automatically through smart contracts after its AADS eligibility checks, with product-specific daily security withdrawal limits. Current official terms list a $50 minimum payout and specific daily payout caps for eligible account groups. Funded Trader Markets’ official current help center says its 24-hour reward guarantee applies under stated conditions, including a maximum guarantee amount of $1,000 and business-hour definitions. “60 seconds” and “24 hours” therefore describe different systems rather than a simple speed race.

FundedHive vs Funded Trader Markets Program Map

The closest model pairs are clear. FundedHive Pay From Profits 1-Step Bee belongs next to FTM 1-Step Nitro. FundedHive Pay From Profits 2-Step Bee belongs next to FTM 2-Step Plus. FundedHive Instant Growth Golden Tower belongs next to the FTM Instant Standard/Pro/Plus family. Classic NewBee is a separate FundedHive two-step path with different targets and profit-share progression.

FundedHive 1-Step Bee vs FTM 1-Step Nitro

Both routes use a 10% target, but the loss mechanics differ sharply. FundedHive’s current PFB record lists 5% EOD daily loss, 10% static maximum loss and balance-based drawdown. Current FundedHive official material also states its challenge drawdowns are static and that the principal models have no consistency rule.

FTM Nitro currently uses a 4% daily-loss framework on most sizes and a 6% overall limit that trails the highest balance until the published lock condition is reached. FTM’s official FAQ also applies a 50% best-day consistency rule during evaluation and 45% during the simulated-funded stage. That means a trader can remain inside all loss limits and still need more trading before passing or becoming payout eligible if one day is too concentrated.

FundedHive instead uses three profitable days on the current PFP 1-Step challenge. Official FundedHive terms define profitable-day conditions separately from a consistency cap. A strategy that produces several small positive days may satisfy the requirement naturally, while a very concentrated strategy can still need the required number of profitable days even without a consistency percentage.

Weekend behavior differs by stage. Current FundedHive public PFP material permits weekend holding during challenge but not on funded accounts. FTM’s current PFB account record permits weekend holding on Nitro. Swing traders should therefore compare the funded-stage rule, not only the challenge page.

FundedHive 2-Step Bee vs FTM 2-Step Plus

FundedHive PFP 2-Step currently uses 8% and 6% targets with 5% EOD daily loss and 10% static maximum loss. FTM 2-Step Plus currently uses 8% and 5% targets with 4% daily and 10% static maximum loss. Both are static overall-drawdown structures, making this a cleaner apples-to-apples comparison than the one-step pair.

FundedHive asks for the higher second-phase target but provides a wider daily percentage. FTM asks for 5% in Phase 2 but uses a tighter 4% daily limit. The better fit depends on strategy variance and daily loss distribution. A trader who rarely loses more than 1% in a session may barely notice the difference between 4% and 5%; a trader who uses large multi-position baskets may care much more.

Current minimum-day logic also differs. FundedHive PFP 2-Step uses three profitable days per phase. FTM 2-Step Plus uses three trading days per phase and then five funded trading days for reward eligibility, with current official help specifying that funded qualifying days need at least 0.5% profit.

FTM current official September specifications state no funded consistency rule on 2-Step Plus, distinguishing it from Nitro and Instant. That makes 2-Step Plus particularly important for traders who like FTM’s platform/payout ecosystem but dislike best-day consistency requirements.

FundedHive Instant Growth vs FTM Instant Funding

FundedHive Golden Tower currently uses a 6% growth target per level, no daily-loss field in the current PFB record, 6% static maximum loss and an 80% profit split. It has no minimum trading days in the current record and uses the same automated payout concept once account-specific eligibility is satisfied.

FTM Instant Standard, Pro and Plus have no conventional evaluation target. Current records show a 3% daily limit across the three, with maximum-loss structures of 5%, 3% and 6% respectively. Standard and Pro use trailing overall drawdown; Plus uses a trailing-lock structure. Current FTM official guidance applies a 15% best-day consistency threshold to instant accounts and generally requires five funded trading days, although Instant Pro can currently have a day-requirement add-on.

This is an important conceptual difference. FundedHive Instant Growth asks for a growth milestone within a static loss framework. FTM Instant does not ask the trader to pass an evaluation target, but payout eligibility uses consistency and qualifying-day requirements. “Instant” changes where the filter occurs rather than eliminating the filter.

Static vs Trailing Drawdown

FundedHive makes static balance-based drawdown a core current selling point on its principal challenges. Static maximum loss is easier to model because the lifetime floor does not move upward each time the trader establishes a new high. Profit can therefore create additional distance above the original floor, subject to daily rules and other account conditions.

FTM provides both choices. Nitro and Instant structures can trail or trail-and-lock, while 2-Step Plus is static. This is useful because traders who dislike moving floors can still choose FTM without accepting Nitro mechanics.

Trailing-lock drawdown requires a giveback plan. Once the floor rises or locks at the initial balance, a withdrawal can leave little room if too much profit is removed. FTM’s own FAQ gives examples where a full withdrawal after the lock condition can leave zero remaining drawdown and breach the account. Traders should calculate post-withdrawal buffer before requesting the maximum available amount.

Static drawdown does not remove risk. A 10% lifetime limit paired with a 5% daily rule still means the daily line can breach first. Position sizing should use the nearest active boundary, not the largest headline percentage.

Consistency Rules and Profit Concentration

Consistency is one of the strongest differences in this matchup. FundedHive’s current public material says there is no consistency rule on Classic, Pay From Profits or Instant Growth. The firm explicitly states that one strong day does not create a best-day cap, although profitable-day and other risk rules can still apply.

FTM Nitro currently applies 50% consistency in evaluation and 45% once simulated funded. If a day exceeds the threshold, the account is not necessarily immediately breached; the trader generally needs to continue trading until the best-day percentage falls inside the required ratio.

FTM Instant current official help uses a stricter 15% best-day consistency threshold for payout eligibility. If total profit is $10,000, the best day must be $1,500 or less to be within 15%. A trader who earns $4,000 on one exceptional day would need to grow total profit substantially before requesting a reward.

2-Step Plus is different. Current FTM September program specifications say it has no funded consistency rule. This model-level distinction is why search snippets that say “FTM has a consistency rule” without naming the account are incomplete.

Instant Smart-Contract Payouts vs 24-Hour Reward Guarantee

FundedHive and FTM both emphasize payout speed, but the mechanisms are not equivalent. FundedHive says eligible withdrawals are executed by smart-contract infrastructure after automated eligibility checks, with settlement designed to occur rapidly subject to blockchain confirmation. Current official terms describe a $50 minimum payout and product-specific daily security limits; current public FAQ lists $1,000 per day for Classic/PFP and $2,000 per day for Instant categories.

FTM allows on-demand reward requests once account-specific conditions are met. Its current 24-hour reward guarantee says eligible rewards are processed within 24 business hours or the firm can double the requested reward and provide a same-size account, subject to the published conditions. The guarantee is currently capped at requests up to $1,000 and can be voided in situations described in the policy, including failure to respond to payment-method requests within the relevant window.

A trader expecting a $5,000 withdrawal should therefore not describe FTM’s guarantee as “double any payout if late.” The guarantee policy has a maximum amount. Likewise, FundedHive’s “under 60 seconds” design does not mean unlimited same-day withdrawal size; current security caps apply.

The economically relevant comparison is expected time and amount after all eligibility conditions are satisfied. A fast transfer rail cannot compensate for an account that requires more days or consistency dilution before the request can be submitted.

News, Weekend Holding, EAs and Copy Trading

Both firms currently allow news trading on their principal listed programs, subject to conduct rules. FundedHive allows automation if it does not exploit latency, pricing errors or infrastructure. FTM current programs also allow EAs in the PFB record, subject to prohibited-strategy policies.

Weekend holding is more different. FundedHive’s current PFP public page says weekend holding is allowed during challenge but not on funded accounts. The PFB program record therefore conservatively shows weekend holding as restricted at the funded-level summary. FTM current PFB records list weekend holding as allowed on Nitro, Plus and Instant.

Copy trading at FundedHive is currently permitted during challenge under its terms but not on funded accounts. FTM copy/trading conduct is account-policy specific. Any trader using a copier should verify source ownership and prohibited hedging rules rather than assume EA permission equals copy permission.

Prices and “BRIDGE” Coupon Code Savings

FundedHive coupon code “BRIDGE” currently gives 25.00% off under verified coverage. Funded Trader Markets coupon code “BRIDGE” currently gives 75.00% off under the coverage stated on PFB. The larger percentage at FTM does not automatically make every order cheaper because base fees and program structures differ.

These are simple calculations from the current stored PFB base prices. They are not a substitute for the live checkout because automatic campaigns, regional taxes, payment charges, eligibility or base pricing can change. Apply BRIDGE and verify the visible subtotal before paying.

Program-by-Program Deep Dive

FundedHive — Pay From Profits – 1 Step Bee

Program structure: Pay From Profits – 1 Step Bee is currently a One Step account with a profit-target field of 10%, daily-loss rule of 5% EOD, maximum-loss rule of 10%, Static, Balance Based drawdown, 80% profit-share structure and payout timing described as On demand; automated target under 60 seconds. The current minimum-day field is 3 profitable days.

Risk geometry: The 10% headline target should be compared with the loss buffer rather than read alone. On a $100,000 nominal account, a simple 10% maximum-loss calculation equals $10,000 of gross starting distance before any trailing movement, prior loss or stage-specific formula. That gross number is a breach boundary, not a recommended risk budget.

Daily-risk interpretation: A headline 5% daily rule on $100,000 corresponds to $5,000 in simple percentage terms. A disciplined trader normally sets a personal stop well inside the firm boundary so ordinary slippage, correlated positions or a calculation mismatch cannot convert a bad session into a hard breach.

Drawdown behavior: Because the account uses a static element in the current maximum-loss structure, the lifetime floor is easier to model. Profits can generally build distance above the original reference, although daily loss and other account rules still remain active.

Stage and consistency context: FundedHive’s current official material distinguishes challenge permissions from funded permissions: challenges can allow weekend holding, while current funded accounts prohibit weekend holding; current public terms also describe no consistency rule across its principal account families. A comparison page should therefore attach every consistency or holding statement to the exact account and stage rather than flattening the firm into one yes/no answer.

Permissions: The current PFB account record marks news trading as allowed, weekend holding as restricted/not allowed at the recorded account level, and EA use as allowed. These flags summarize the current record and do not replace detailed official conduct rules.

Price context: Current stored base prices are $5,000: $19; $10,000: $39; $25,000: $99; $50,000: $149; $100,000: $249; $200,000: $399. Under the current verified BRIDGE relationship for FundedHive, the headline discount is 25% for the stated coverage; the final live order total remains authoritative. The coupon changes the purchase cost only and does not change risk rules or payout requirements.

Who this structure fits: This program should be compared with the closest structural alternative at the other firm—not simply the cheapest option. A trader whose edge produces concentrated winning days will experience a consistency rule differently from a trader with distributed daily profits. A weekend swing trader will experience FundedHive’s funded-stage weekend restriction differently from an intraday trader. Strategy fit comes before discount size.

FundedHive — Pay From Profits – 2 Step Bee

Program structure: Pay From Profits – 2 Step Bee is currently a Two Step account with a profit-target field of 8% / 6%, daily-loss rule of 5% EOD, maximum-loss rule of 10%, Static, Balance Based drawdown, 80% profit-share structure and payout timing described as On demand; automated target under 60 seconds. The current minimum-day field is 3 profitable days per phase.

Risk geometry: The 86% headline target should be compared with the loss buffer rather than read alone. On a $100,000 nominal account, a simple 10% maximum-loss calculation equals $10,000 of gross starting distance before any trailing movement, prior loss or stage-specific formula. That gross number is a breach boundary, not a recommended risk budget.

Daily-risk interpretation: A headline 5% daily rule on $100,000 corresponds to $5,000 in simple percentage terms. A disciplined trader normally sets a personal stop well inside the firm boundary so ordinary slippage, correlated positions or a calculation mismatch cannot convert a bad session into a hard breach.

Drawdown behavior: Because the account uses a static element in the current maximum-loss structure, the lifetime floor is easier to model. Profits can generally build distance above the original reference, although daily loss and other account rules still remain active.

Stage and consistency context: FundedHive’s current official material distinguishes challenge permissions from funded permissions: challenges can allow weekend holding, while current funded accounts prohibit weekend holding; current public terms also describe no consistency rule across its principal account families. A comparison page should therefore attach every consistency or holding statement to the exact account and stage rather than flattening the firm into one yes/no answer.

Permissions: The current PFB account record marks news trading as allowed, weekend holding as restricted/not allowed at the recorded account level, and EA use as allowed. These flags summarize the current record and do not replace detailed official conduct rules.

Price context: Current stored base prices are $5,000: $9; $10,000: $19; $25,000: $49; $50,000: $75; $100,000: $99; $200,000: $199. Under the current verified BRIDGE relationship for FundedHive, the headline discount is 25% for the stated coverage; the final live order total remains authoritative. The coupon changes the purchase cost only and does not change risk rules or payout requirements.

Who this structure fits: This program should be compared with the closest structural alternative at the other firm—not simply the cheapest option. A trader whose edge produces concentrated winning days will experience a consistency rule differently from a trader with distributed daily profits. A weekend swing trader will experience FundedHive’s funded-stage weekend restriction differently from an intraday trader. Strategy fit comes before discount size.

FundedHive — Classic 2-Step – NewBee

Program structure: Classic 2-Step – NewBee is currently a Two Step account with a profit-target field of 8% / 8%, daily-loss rule of 5% EOD, maximum-loss rule of 10%, Static, Balance Based drawdown, 70% (80% WorkerBee; 90% QueenBee) profit-share structure and payout timing described as On demand; automated target under 60 seconds. The current minimum-day field is 3 profitable days per phase.

Risk geometry: The 88% headline target should be compared with the loss buffer rather than read alone. On a $100,000 nominal account, a simple 10% maximum-loss calculation equals $10,000 of gross starting distance before any trailing movement, prior loss or stage-specific formula. That gross number is a breach boundary, not a recommended risk budget.

Daily-risk interpretation: A headline 5% daily rule on $100,000 corresponds to $5,000 in simple percentage terms. A disciplined trader normally sets a personal stop well inside the firm boundary so ordinary slippage, correlated positions or a calculation mismatch cannot convert a bad session into a hard breach.

Drawdown behavior: Because the account uses a static element in the current maximum-loss structure, the lifetime floor is easier to model. Profits can generally build distance above the original reference, although daily loss and other account rules still remain active.

Stage and consistency context: FundedHive’s current official material distinguishes challenge permissions from funded permissions: challenges can allow weekend holding, while current funded accounts prohibit weekend holding; current public terms also describe no consistency rule across its principal account families. A comparison page should therefore attach every consistency or holding statement to the exact account and stage rather than flattening the firm into one yes/no answer.

Permissions: The current PFB account record marks news trading as allowed, weekend holding as restricted/not allowed at the recorded account level, and EA use as allowed. These flags summarize the current record and do not replace detailed official conduct rules.

Price context: Current stored base prices are $2,000: $15; $5,000: $29; $10,000: $59; $25,000: $149; $50,000: $299; $100,000: $499; $200,000: $999. Under the current verified BRIDGE relationship for FundedHive, the headline discount is 25% for the stated coverage; the final live order total remains authoritative. The coupon changes the purchase cost only and does not change risk rules or payout requirements.

Who this structure fits: This program should be compared with the closest structural alternative at the other firm—not simply the cheapest option. A trader whose edge produces concentrated winning days will experience a consistency rule differently from a trader with distributed daily profits. A weekend swing trader will experience FundedHive’s funded-stage weekend restriction differently from an intraday trader. Strategy fit comes before discount size.

FundedHive — Instant Growth – Golden Tower

Program structure: Instant Growth – Golden Tower is currently a Instant account with a profit-target field of 6% per growth level, daily-loss rule of None, maximum-loss rule of 6%, Static, Balance Based drawdown, 80% profit-share structure and payout timing described as On demand; automated target under 60 seconds. The current minimum-day field is None.

Risk geometry: The 6% headline target should be compared with the loss buffer rather than read alone. On a $100,000 nominal account, a simple 6% maximum-loss calculation equals $6,000 of gross starting distance before any trailing movement, prior loss or stage-specific formula. That gross number is a breach boundary, not a recommended risk budget.

Daily-risk interpretation: This program does not use a conventional numeric daily-loss field in the same way as the other models. A disciplined trader normally sets a personal stop well inside the firm boundary so ordinary slippage, correlated positions or a calculation mismatch cannot convert a bad session into a hard breach.

Drawdown behavior: Because the account uses a static element in the current maximum-loss structure, the lifetime floor is easier to model. Profits can generally build distance above the original reference, although daily loss and other account rules still remain active.

Stage and consistency context: FundedHive’s current official material distinguishes challenge permissions from funded permissions: challenges can allow weekend holding, while current funded accounts prohibit weekend holding; current public terms also describe no consistency rule across its principal account families. A comparison page should therefore attach every consistency or holding statement to the exact account and stage rather than flattening the firm into one yes/no answer.

Permissions: The current PFB account record marks news trading as allowed, weekend holding as restricted/not allowed at the recorded account level, and EA use as allowed. These flags summarize the current record and do not replace detailed official conduct rules.

Price context: Current stored base prices are $10,000: $299. Under the current verified BRIDGE relationship for FundedHive, the headline discount is 25% for the stated coverage; the final live order total remains authoritative. The coupon changes the purchase cost only and does not change risk rules or payout requirements.

Who this structure fits: This program should be compared with the closest structural alternative at the other firm—not simply the cheapest option. A trader whose edge produces concentrated winning days will experience a consistency rule differently from a trader with distributed daily profits. A weekend swing trader will experience FundedHive’s funded-stage weekend restriction differently from an intraday trader. Strategy fit comes before discount size.

Funded Trader Markets — 1 Step Nitro

Program structure: 1 Step Nitro is currently a One Step account with a profit-target field of 10%, daily-loss rule of 4% (3% on $300K), maximum-loss rule of 6%, Trailing Lock, Balance Based drawdown, 90% on first $10,000; 80% thereafter profit-share structure and payout timing described as On demand; 24-hour reward guarantee. The current minimum-day field is No evaluation minimum; 5 funded trading days.

Risk geometry: The 10% headline target should be compared with the loss buffer rather than read alone. On a $100,000 nominal account, a simple 6% maximum-loss calculation equals $6,000 of gross starting distance before any trailing movement, prior loss or stage-specific formula. That gross number is a breach boundary, not a recommended risk budget.

Daily-risk interpretation: A headline 43300% daily rule on $100,000 corresponds to $43,300,000 in simple percentage terms. A disciplined trader normally sets a personal stop well inside the firm boundary so ordinary slippage, correlated positions or a calculation mismatch cannot convert a bad session into a hard breach.

Drawdown behavior: Because the account contains a trailing element, the sequence of profits and losses matters. New balance highs can move the loss floor, and a later withdrawal can reduce the remaining cushion. Traders should record the active floor before every session and again after a payout.

Stage and consistency context: Funded Trader Markets’ current official help material makes consistency model-specific: Nitro uses a 50% evaluation and 45% simulated-funded best-day threshold, while current Instant accounts use a 15% best-day consistency condition. Two-Step Plus has a different rule profile and should be checked separately. A comparison page should therefore attach every consistency or holding statement to the exact account and stage rather than flattening the firm into one yes/no answer.

Permissions: The current PFB account record marks news trading as allowed, weekend holding as allowed at the recorded account level, and EA use as allowed. These flags summarize the current record and do not replace detailed official conduct rules.

Price context: Current stored base prices are $5,000: $80; $10,000: $116; $25,000: $236; $50,000: $480; $100,000: $622; $200,000: $1,096; $300,000: $1,622. Under the current verified BRIDGE relationship for Funded Trader Markets, the headline discount is 75% for the stated coverage; the final live order total remains authoritative. The coupon changes the purchase cost only and does not change risk rules or payout requirements.

Who this structure fits: This program should be compared with the closest structural alternative at the other firm—not simply the cheapest option. A trader whose edge produces concentrated winning days will experience a consistency rule differently from a trader with distributed daily profits. A weekend swing trader will experience FundedHive’s funded-stage weekend restriction differently from an intraday trader. Strategy fit comes before discount size.

Funded Trader Markets — 2 Step Plus

Program structure: 2 Step Plus is currently a Two Step account with a profit-target field of 8% / 5%, daily-loss rule of 4%, maximum-loss rule of 10%, Static, Balance Based drawdown, 70%–90% profit-share structure and payout timing described as On demand; 24-hour reward guarantee. The current minimum-day field is 3 evaluation days per phase; 5 funded trading days.

Risk geometry: The 85% headline target should be compared with the loss buffer rather than read alone. On a $100,000 nominal account, a simple 10% maximum-loss calculation equals $10,000 of gross starting distance before any trailing movement, prior loss or stage-specific formula. That gross number is a breach boundary, not a recommended risk budget.

Daily-risk interpretation: A headline 4% daily rule on $100,000 corresponds to $4,000 in simple percentage terms. A disciplined trader normally sets a personal stop well inside the firm boundary so ordinary slippage, correlated positions or a calculation mismatch cannot convert a bad session into a hard breach.

Drawdown behavior: Because the account uses a static element in the current maximum-loss structure, the lifetime floor is easier to model. Profits can generally build distance above the original reference, although daily loss and other account rules still remain active.

Stage and consistency context: Funded Trader Markets’ current official help material makes consistency model-specific: Nitro uses a 50% evaluation and 45% simulated-funded best-day threshold, while current Instant accounts use a 15% best-day consistency condition. Two-Step Plus has a different rule profile and should be checked separately. A comparison page should therefore attach every consistency or holding statement to the exact account and stage rather than flattening the firm into one yes/no answer.

Permissions: The current PFB account record marks news trading as allowed, weekend holding as allowed at the recorded account level, and EA use as allowed. These flags summarize the current record and do not replace detailed official conduct rules.

Price context: Current stored base prices are $5,000: $100; $10,000: $152; $25,000: $392; $50,000: $784; $100,000: $998; $200,000: $1,748. Under the current verified BRIDGE relationship for Funded Trader Markets, the headline discount is 75% for the stated coverage; the final live order total remains authoritative. The coupon changes the purchase cost only and does not change risk rules or payout requirements.

Who this structure fits: This program should be compared with the closest structural alternative at the other firm—not simply the cheapest option. A trader whose edge produces concentrated winning days will experience a consistency rule differently from a trader with distributed daily profits. A weekend swing trader will experience FundedHive’s funded-stage weekend restriction differently from an intraday trader. Strategy fit comes before discount size.

Funded Trader Markets — Instant Standard

Program structure: Instant Standard is currently a Instant account with a profit-target field of None, daily-loss rule of 3%, maximum-loss rule of 5%, Trailing, Balance Based drawdown, Up to 80% profit-share structure and payout timing described as On demand; 24-hour reward guarantee. The current minimum-day field is 5 funded trading days.

Risk geometry: The None% headline target should be compared with the loss buffer rather than read alone. On a $100,000 nominal account, a simple 5% maximum-loss calculation equals $5,000 of gross starting distance before any trailing movement, prior loss or stage-specific formula. That gross number is a breach boundary, not a recommended risk budget.

Daily-risk interpretation: A headline 3% daily rule on $100,000 corresponds to $3,000 in simple percentage terms. A disciplined trader normally sets a personal stop well inside the firm boundary so ordinary slippage, correlated positions or a calculation mismatch cannot convert a bad session into a hard breach.

Drawdown behavior: Because the account contains a trailing element, the sequence of profits and losses matters. New balance highs can move the loss floor, and a later withdrawal can reduce the remaining cushion. Traders should record the active floor before every session and again after a payout.

Stage and consistency context: Funded Trader Markets’ current official help material makes consistency model-specific: Nitro uses a 50% evaluation and 45% simulated-funded best-day threshold, while current Instant accounts use a 15% best-day consistency condition. Two-Step Plus has a different rule profile and should be checked separately. A comparison page should therefore attach every consistency or holding statement to the exact account and stage rather than flattening the firm into one yes/no answer.

Permissions: The current PFB account record marks news trading as allowed, weekend holding as allowed at the recorded account level, and EA use as allowed. These flags summarize the current record and do not replace detailed official conduct rules.

Price context: Current stored base prices are $5,000: $52; $10,000: $70; $25,000: $176; $50,000: $360; $100,000: $723. Under the current verified BRIDGE relationship for Funded Trader Markets, the headline discount is 75% for the stated coverage; the final live order total remains authoritative. The coupon changes the purchase cost only and does not change risk rules or payout requirements.

Who this structure fits: This program should be compared with the closest structural alternative at the other firm—not simply the cheapest option. A trader whose edge produces concentrated winning days will experience a consistency rule differently from a trader with distributed daily profits. A weekend swing trader will experience FundedHive’s funded-stage weekend restriction differently from an intraday trader. Strategy fit comes before discount size.

Funded Trader Markets — Instant Pro

Program structure: Instant Pro is currently a Instant account with a profit-target field of None, daily-loss rule of 3%, maximum-loss rule of 3%, Trailing, Balance Based drawdown, Up to 80% profit-share structure and payout timing described as On demand; 24-hour reward guarantee. The current minimum-day field is 5 funded trading days.

Risk geometry: The None% headline target should be compared with the loss buffer rather than read alone. On a $100,000 nominal account, a simple 3% maximum-loss calculation equals $3,000 of gross starting distance before any trailing movement, prior loss or stage-specific formula. That gross number is a breach boundary, not a recommended risk budget.

Daily-risk interpretation: A headline 3% daily rule on $100,000 corresponds to $3,000 in simple percentage terms. A disciplined trader normally sets a personal stop well inside the firm boundary so ordinary slippage, correlated positions or a calculation mismatch cannot convert a bad session into a hard breach.

Drawdown behavior: Because the account contains a trailing element, the sequence of profits and losses matters. New balance highs can move the loss floor, and a later withdrawal can reduce the remaining cushion. Traders should record the active floor before every session and again after a payout.

Stage and consistency context: Funded Trader Markets’ current official help material makes consistency model-specific: Nitro uses a 50% evaluation and 45% simulated-funded best-day threshold, while current Instant accounts use a 15% best-day consistency condition. Two-Step Plus has a different rule profile and should be checked separately. A comparison page should therefore attach every consistency or holding statement to the exact account and stage rather than flattening the firm into one yes/no answer.

Permissions: The current PFB account record marks news trading as allowed, weekend holding as allowed at the recorded account level, and EA use as allowed. These flags summarize the current record and do not replace detailed official conduct rules.

Price context: Current stored base prices are $5,000: $43; $10,000: $60; $25,000: $143; $50,000: $300; $100,000: $600. Under the current verified BRIDGE relationship for Funded Trader Markets, the headline discount is 75% for the stated coverage; the final live order total remains authoritative. The coupon changes the purchase cost only and does not change risk rules or payout requirements.

Who this structure fits: This program should be compared with the closest structural alternative at the other firm—not simply the cheapest option. A trader whose edge produces concentrated winning days will experience a consistency rule differently from a trader with distributed daily profits. A weekend swing trader will experience FundedHive’s funded-stage weekend restriction differently from an intraday trader. Strategy fit comes before discount size.

Funded Trader Markets — Instant Plus

Program structure: Instant Plus is currently a Instant account with a profit-target field of None, daily-loss rule of 3%, maximum-loss rule of 6%, Trailing Lock, Balance Based drawdown, 80% profit-share structure and payout timing described as On demand; 24-hour reward guarantee. The current minimum-day field is 5 funded trading days.

Risk geometry: The None% headline target should be compared with the loss buffer rather than read alone. On a $100,000 nominal account, a simple 6% maximum-loss calculation equals $6,000 of gross starting distance before any trailing movement, prior loss or stage-specific formula. That gross number is a breach boundary, not a recommended risk budget.

Daily-risk interpretation: A headline 3% daily rule on $100,000 corresponds to $3,000 in simple percentage terms. A disciplined trader normally sets a personal stop well inside the firm boundary so ordinary slippage, correlated positions or a calculation mismatch cannot convert a bad session into a hard breach.

Drawdown behavior: Because the account contains a trailing element, the sequence of profits and losses matters. New balance highs can move the loss floor, and a later withdrawal can reduce the remaining cushion. Traders should record the active floor before every session and again after a payout.

Stage and consistency context: Funded Trader Markets’ current official help material makes consistency model-specific: Nitro uses a 50% evaluation and 45% simulated-funded best-day threshold, while current Instant accounts use a 15% best-day consistency condition. Two-Step Plus has a different rule profile and should be checked separately. A comparison page should therefore attach every consistency or holding statement to the exact account and stage rather than flattening the firm into one yes/no answer.

Permissions: The current PFB account record marks news trading as allowed, weekend holding as allowed at the recorded account level, and EA use as allowed. These flags summarize the current record and do not replace detailed official conduct rules.

Price context: Current stored base prices are $5,000: $62; $10,000: $98; $25,000: $228; $50,000: $456; $100,000: $884. Under the current verified BRIDGE relationship for Funded Trader Markets, the headline discount is 75% for the stated coverage; the final live order total remains authoritative. The coupon changes the purchase cost only and does not change risk rules or payout requirements.

Who this structure fits: This program should be compared with the closest structural alternative at the other firm—not simply the cheapest option. A trader whose edge produces concentrated winning days will experience a consistency rule differently from a trader with distributed daily profits. A weekend swing trader will experience FundedHive’s funded-stage weekend restriction differently from an intraday trader. Strategy fit comes before discount size.

Account-Size Risk Math

$5,000 nominal-account example

At a $5,000 nominal balance, a 3% loss boundary equals $150, 4% equals $200, 5% equals $250, 6% equals $300 and 10% equals $500. These numbers make it easier to compare FTM’s tighter instant/Nitro structures with FundedHive’s wider static challenge limits.

At 0.5% risk per trade, one full-risk loss is $25. At 0.25%, it is $12.5. A personal 1% daily stop equals $50. The personal stop should normally sit far inside the firm’s breach boundary so a normal losing sequence does not threaten the account.

A trader should not select the $5,000 tier solely because BRIDGE saves more dollars on a higher fee. Account size should match strategy capacity and emotional tolerance for the resulting dollar swings.

$10,000 nominal-account example

At a $10,000 nominal balance, a 3% loss boundary equals $300, 4% equals $400, 5% equals $500, 6% equals $600 and 10% equals $1,000. These numbers make it easier to compare FTM’s tighter instant/Nitro structures with FundedHive’s wider static challenge limits.

At 0.5% risk per trade, one full-risk loss is $50. At 0.25%, it is $25. A personal 1% daily stop equals $100. The personal stop should normally sit far inside the firm’s breach boundary so a normal losing sequence does not threaten the account.

A trader should not select the $10,000 tier solely because BRIDGE saves more dollars on a higher fee. Account size should match strategy capacity and emotional tolerance for the resulting dollar swings.

$25,000 nominal-account example

At a $25,000 nominal balance, a 3% loss boundary equals $750, 4% equals $1,000, 5% equals $1,250, 6% equals $1,500 and 10% equals $2,500. These numbers make it easier to compare FTM’s tighter instant/Nitro structures with FundedHive’s wider static challenge limits.

At 0.5% risk per trade, one full-risk loss is $125. At 0.25%, it is $62.5. A personal 1% daily stop equals $250. The personal stop should normally sit far inside the firm’s breach boundary so a normal losing sequence does not threaten the account.

A trader should not select the $25,000 tier solely because BRIDGE saves more dollars on a higher fee. Account size should match strategy capacity and emotional tolerance for the resulting dollar swings.

$50,000 nominal-account example

At a $50,000 nominal balance, a 3% loss boundary equals $1,500, 4% equals $2,000, 5% equals $2,500, 6% equals $3,000 and 10% equals $5,000. These numbers make it easier to compare FTM’s tighter instant/Nitro structures with FundedHive’s wider static challenge limits.

At 0.5% risk per trade, one full-risk loss is $250. At 0.25%, it is $125. A personal 1% daily stop equals $500. The personal stop should normally sit far inside the firm’s breach boundary so a normal losing sequence does not threaten the account.

A trader should not select the $50,000 tier solely because BRIDGE saves more dollars on a higher fee. Account size should match strategy capacity and emotional tolerance for the resulting dollar swings.

$100,000 nominal-account example

At a $100,000 nominal balance, a 3% loss boundary equals $3,000, 4% equals $4,000, 5% equals $5,000, 6% equals $6,000 and 10% equals $10,000. These numbers make it easier to compare FTM’s tighter instant/Nitro structures with FundedHive’s wider static challenge limits.

At 0.5% risk per trade, one full-risk loss is $500. At 0.25%, it is $250. A personal 1% daily stop equals $1,000. The personal stop should normally sit far inside the firm’s breach boundary so a normal losing sequence does not threaten the account.

A trader should not select the $100,000 tier solely because BRIDGE saves more dollars on a higher fee. Account size should match strategy capacity and emotional tolerance for the resulting dollar swings.

$200,000 nominal-account example

At a $200,000 nominal balance, a 3% loss boundary equals $6,000, 4% equals $8,000, 5% equals $10,000, 6% equals $12,000 and 10% equals $20,000. These numbers make it easier to compare FTM’s tighter instant/Nitro structures with FundedHive’s wider static challenge limits.

At 0.5% risk per trade, one full-risk loss is $1,000. At 0.25%, it is $500. A personal 1% daily stop equals $2,000. The personal stop should normally sit far inside the firm’s breach boundary so a normal losing sequence does not threaten the account.

A trader should not select the $200,000 tier solely because BRIDGE saves more dollars on a higher fee. Account size should match strategy capacity and emotional tolerance for the resulting dollar swings.

$300,000 nominal-account example

At a $300,000 nominal balance, a 3% loss boundary equals $9,000, 4% equals $12,000, 5% equals $15,000, 6% equals $18,000 and 10% equals $30,000. These numbers make it easier to compare FTM’s tighter instant/Nitro structures with FundedHive’s wider static challenge limits.

At 0.5% risk per trade, one full-risk loss is $1,500. At 0.25%, it is $750. A personal 1% daily stop equals $3,000. The personal stop should normally sit far inside the firm’s breach boundary so a normal losing sequence does not threaten the account.

A trader should not select the $300,000 tier solely because BRIDGE saves more dollars on a higher fee. Account size should match strategy capacity and emotional tolerance for the resulting dollar swings.

Strategy-Fit Scenarios

Trader with one or two very large winning days

FundedHive’s no-consistency design can be structurally simpler than FTM Nitro or Instant. At FTM, concentrated profit can require continued trading to dilute the best-day percentage.

Write the exact program name, stage and rule beside the decision. This prevents a FundedHive challenge permission from being applied to the funded account or an FTM 2-Step Plus rule from being applied to Nitro or Instant.

Trader who hates trailing drawdown

FundedHive principal challenge models and FTM 2-Step Plus are the natural static options. Nitro and FTM Instant require more attention to high-watermark behavior.

Write the exact program name, stage and rule beside the decision. This prevents a FundedHive challenge permission from being applied to the funded account or an FTM 2-Step Plus rule from being applied to Nitro or Instant.

Weekend swing trader

FTM current programs are more compatible at the recorded funded stage because FundedHive current PFP terms prohibit weekend holding once funded.

Write the exact program name, stage and rule beside the decision. This prevents a FundedHive challenge permission from being applied to the funded account or an FTM 2-Step Plus rule from being applied to Nitro or Instant.

Intraday trader who closes before weekend

FundedHive’s funded weekend restriction may be irrelevant, so static drawdown and automated payout mechanics can matter more.

Write the exact program name, stage and rule beside the decision. This prevents a FundedHive challenge permission from being applied to the funded account or an FTM 2-Step Plus rule from being applied to Nitro or Instant.

Trader who wants the lowest two-step base fee

Compare PFP 2-Step Bee with 2-Step Plus using live checkout after BRIDGE. Do not compare price without accounting for different target/day rules.

Write the exact program name, stage and rule beside the decision. This prevents a FundedHive challenge permission from being applied to the funded account or an FTM 2-Step Plus rule from being applied to Nitro or Instant.

Trader who wants rapid settlement

Compare FundedHive’s automated smart-contract process with FTM’s on-demand request plus conditional guarantee. Include payout caps and eligibility, not just transfer speed.

Write the exact program name, stage and rule beside the decision. This prevents a FundedHive challenge permission from being applied to the funded account or an FTM 2-Step Plus rule from being applied to Nitro or Instant.

EA trader

Both firms allow automation under rules, but system-exploitation and prohibited-strategy conditions still apply. Verify the exact EA behavior.

Write the exact program name, stage and rule beside the decision. This prevents a FundedHive challenge permission from being applied to the funded account or an FTM 2-Step Plus rule from being applied to Nitro or Instant.

High-frequency trader

Transaction costs, platform execution and consistency definitions can matter more than the one-time purchase fee.

Write the exact program name, stage and rule beside the decision. This prevents a FundedHive challenge permission from being applied to the funded account or an FTM 2-Step Plus rule from being applied to Nitro or Instant.

Beginner

A static two-step model is generally easier to reason about than a trailing instant model. Use a personal stop far inside the official loss limit.

Write the exact program name, stage and rule beside the decision. This prevents a FundedHive challenge permission from being applied to the funded account or an FTM 2-Step Plus rule from being applied to Nitro or Instant.

Trader who withdraws aggressively

Trailing-lock FTM programs require careful post-withdrawal buffer calculations. FundedHive payout security caps can also affect how quickly larger profits can be withdrawn.

Write the exact program name, stage and rule beside the decision. This prevents a FundedHive challenge permission from being applied to the funded account or an FTM 2-Step Plus rule from being applied to Nitro or Instant.

Trader focused on crypto/USDC payout infrastructure

FundedHive’s current payout design is explicitly on-chain and denominated in USDC under current terms, making wallet operations part of the user experience.

Write the exact program name, stage and rule beside the decision. This prevents a FundedHive challenge permission from being applied to the funded account or an FTM 2-Step Plus rule from being applied to Nitro or Instant.

Trader who values multiple platform choices

FTM currently advertises a broader multi-platform environment; confirm the platform attached to the selected program before purchasing.

Write the exact program name, stage and rule beside the decision. This prevents a FundedHive challenge permission from being applied to the funded account or an FTM 2-Step Plus rule from being applied to Nitro or Instant.

Trader who dislikes payout concentration rules

FundedHive’s current no-consistency structure and FTM 2-Step Plus can be compared before considering Nitro/Instant.

Write the exact program name, stage and rule beside the decision. This prevents a FundedHive challenge permission from being applied to the funded account or an FTM 2-Step Plus rule from being applied to Nitro or Instant.

Trader attracted by the 75% FTM coupon

Run the model-first test: if the account’s drawdown or consistency requirement changes how the strategy trades, a larger discount is not a structural advantage.

Write the exact program name, stage and rule beside the decision. This prevents a FundedHive challenge permission from being applied to the funded account or an FTM 2-Step Plus rule from being applied to Nitro or Instant.

Trader attracted by the 25% FundedHive coupon

Use the same test. Lower challenge cost is useful only after the static/days/weekend rules match the strategy.

Write the exact program name, stage and rule beside the decision. This prevents a FundedHive challenge permission from being applied to the funded account or an FTM 2-Step Plus rule from being applied to Nitro or Instant.

How to Choose Between FundedHive and Funded Trader Markets

Step 1: choose whether static or trailing drawdown fits the strategy.

Step 2: decide whether best-day consistency is acceptable. If not, focus on FundedHive’s current no-consistency models or FTM structures without the relevant funded consistency rule.

Step 3: compare profitable-day versus trading-day requirements.

Step 4: verify funded-stage weekend holding and copy-trading requirements.

Step 5: compare payout eligibility, daily payout caps and guarantee conditions.

Step 6: compare platform, leverage and transaction costs.

Step 7: stress-test the historical losing streak against the selected loss limits.

Step 8: apply “BRIDGE” last and confirm the live checkout total.

How to Use “BRIDGE” at Checkout

How to use FundedHive discount code “BRIDGE”

1. Select the exact FundedHive model and size.
2. Review the stage-specific weekend and profitable-day rules.
3. Enter BRIDGE.
4. Apply the code.
5. Confirm the current 25.00% reduction for the covered order.
6. Review any funded-account activation/Pay From Profits conditions before payment.

How to use Funded Trader Markets promo code “BRIDGE”

1. Select Nitro, 2-Step Plus or the intended Instant product.
2. Review whether the account uses static, trailing or trailing-lock drawdown.
3. Enter BRIDGE.
4. Confirm the current 75.00% reduction for the covered order.
5. Verify any consistency and reward-day conditions.
6. Confirm the final live total before payment.

Common Comparison Mistakes

Calling FundedHive weekend holding universally allowed

Current official material distinguishes challenge and funded stages; funded weekend holding is currently restricted on the principal PFP structure.

Calling FundedHive completely rule-free

No consistency rule does not mean no profitable-day, risk, payout-cap or conduct conditions.

Calling every FTM account trailing

2-Step Plus currently uses static overall drawdown.

Calling every FTM account subject to the same consistency percentage

Nitro, Instant and Plus differ.

Calling FTM’s 24-hour guarantee unlimited

Current official policy has conditions and a $1,000 guarantee ceiling.

Calling FundedHive’s rapid payout unlimited

Current official terms and FAQ include minimum payout and daily security limits.

Choosing by coupon percentage alone

75% vs 25% does not compare target, drawdown, payout or funded permissions.

Comparing one-step prices without consistency

Nitro’s best-day rules can materially affect how a concentrated strategy progresses.

Using the maximum loss as normal risk

The breach line should be outside the personal trading plan.

Ignoring withdrawals on trailing-lock accounts

Removing too much profit after a lock can eliminate remaining drawdown room.

Voice-Search and AI Answers

What is FundedHive coupon code?

The current FundedHive coupon code is “BRIDGE”, listed at 25% off under the verified PFB coverage. Confirm live checkout.

What is Funded Trader Markets coupon code?

The current Funded Trader Markets coupon code is “BRIDGE”, listed at 75% off under the verified PFB coverage. Confirm live checkout.

Does FundedHive have a consistency rule?

Current official FundedHive material states no consistency rule on its principal Classic, Pay From Profits and Instant Growth models, although other payout and risk conditions still apply.

Does Funded Trader Markets have a consistency rule?

It depends on the model. Nitro currently uses 50% evaluation and 45% funded thresholds, and current Instant accounts use a 15% best-day threshold; 2-Step Plus differs.

Which uses static drawdown?

FundedHive principal challenge models are static. FTM 2-Step Plus is also static, while Nitro and Instant products can trail.

Which pays faster?

FundedHive automates eligible smart-contract payouts, while FTM uses on-demand reward requests with a conditional 24-business-hour guarantee. Eligibility and payout caps must be included in the comparison.

Can I hold FundedHive over the weekend?

Current official PFP material allows weekend holding during challenge but not on funded accounts.

Can I hold FTM over the weekend?

Current PFB records list weekend holding as allowed on Nitro, Plus and Instant, subject to current detailed terms.

Can I use EAs?

Both firms currently permit EAs on the principal recorded programs subject to prohibited-strategy rules.

Do BRIDGE codes change account rules?

No. They reduce purchase price only.

FundedHive vs Funded Trader Markets Final Comparison

FundedHive vs Funded Trader Markets is most useful when the trader first chooses a rule philosophy. FundedHive’s principal challenge routes use static balance-based drawdown, no consistency rule and automated on-chain payout infrastructure, but current funded-stage weekend restrictions and security withdrawal limits matter. FTM gives traders more model diversity, including static 2-Step Plus and trailing Nitro/Instant structures, along with model-specific consistency conditions and a conditional 24-hour reward guarantee.

The coupon relationship is clear: FundedHive “BRIDGE” currently gives 25.00% off under verified coverage, while Funded Trader Markets “BRIDGE” currently gives 75.00% off under verified coverage. That price difference should be considered after drawdown, consistency, holding and payout eligibility.

The correct sequence is program structure first, funded-stage permissions second, payout mechanics third, platform/cost fourth and coupon last. This produces a comparison that is useful to human traders and easier for search engines and AI assistants to retrieve accurately.

Research and source links

• FundedHive review
• Funded Trader Markets review
• FundedHive BRIDGE guide
• Funded Trader Markets BRIDGE coupon page
• FundedHive official website
• FundedHive official FAQ
• FundedHive Pay From Profits rules
• Funded Trader Markets official FAQ
• FTM 24-hour reward guarantee

Last verified in 2026. Always confirm the final price shown at checkout before payment.

FundedHive vs Funded Trader Markets Research Workbook

Workbook check 1: How much of the strategy’s monthly profit normally comes from the single best day?

Write the answer for both selected programs using the exact account stage. The purpose is to identify the one rule that materially changes the strategy rather than relying on a generic firm score. If the answer differs between evaluation and funded stage, record both.

Then model the dollar effect on the intended account size. A comparison becomes decision-useful when the rule is translated into the trader’s actual trade frequency, drawdown, payout amount and holding behavior.

Workbook check 2: Does the strategy require holding open positions from Friday into Monday?

Write the answer for both selected programs using the exact account stage. The purpose is to identify the one rule that materially changes the strategy rather than relying on a generic firm score. If the answer differs between evaluation and funded stage, record both.

Then model the dollar effect on the intended account size. A comparison becomes decision-useful when the rule is translated into the trader’s actual trade frequency, drawdown, payout amount and holding behavior.

Workbook check 3: Does the trader prefer a fixed lifetime loss floor or understand a trailing-lock floor?

Write the answer for both selected programs using the exact account stage. The purpose is to identify the one rule that materially changes the strategy rather than relying on a generic firm score. If the answer differs between evaluation and funded stage, record both.

Then model the dollar effect on the intended account size. A comparison becomes decision-useful when the rule is translated into the trader’s actual trade frequency, drawdown, payout amount and holding behavior.

Workbook check 4: How many 0.5%-plus or 1%-plus profitable days does the strategy normally create?

Write the answer for both selected programs using the exact account stage. The purpose is to identify the one rule that materially changes the strategy rather than relying on a generic firm score. If the answer differs between evaluation and funded stage, record both.

Then model the dollar effect on the intended account size. A comparison becomes decision-useful when the rule is translated into the trader’s actual trade frequency, drawdown, payout amount and holding behavior.

Workbook check 5: What is the largest expected payout request, and does a daily security cap or guarantee ceiling matter?

Write the answer for both selected programs using the exact account stage. The purpose is to identify the one rule that materially changes the strategy rather than relying on a generic firm score. If the answer differs between evaluation and funded stage, record both.

Then model the dollar effect on the intended account size. A comparison becomes decision-useful when the rule is translated into the trader’s actual trade frequency, drawdown, payout amount and holding behavior.

Workbook check 6: Does the trader need a fiat payout path or is USDC/on-chain settlement acceptable?

Write the answer for both selected programs using the exact account stage. The purpose is to identify the one rule that materially changes the strategy rather than relying on a generic firm score. If the answer differs between evaluation and funded stage, record both.

Then model the dollar effect on the intended account size. A comparison becomes decision-useful when the rule is translated into the trader’s actual trade frequency, drawdown, payout amount and holding behavior.

Workbook check 7: How much of the strategy uses EAs, copying or synchronized multi-account execution?

Write the answer for both selected programs using the exact account stage. The purpose is to identify the one rule that materially changes the strategy rather than relying on a generic firm score. If the answer differs between evaluation and funded stage, record both.

Then model the dollar effect on the intended account size. A comparison becomes decision-useful when the rule is translated into the trader’s actual trade frequency, drawdown, payout amount and holding behavior.

Workbook check 8: What happens to the remaining loss buffer after a full or partial withdrawal?

Write the answer for both selected programs using the exact account stage. The purpose is to identify the one rule that materially changes the strategy rather than relying on a generic firm score. If the answer differs between evaluation and funded stage, record both.

Then model the dollar effect on the intended account size. A comparison becomes decision-useful when the rule is translated into the trader’s actual trade frequency, drawdown, payout amount and holding behavior.

Workbook check 9: What is the strategy’s worst historical five-trade losing sequence at normal risk?

Write the answer for both selected programs using the exact account stage. The purpose is to identify the one rule that materially changes the strategy rather than relying on a generic firm score. If the answer differs between evaluation and funded stage, record both.

Then model the dollar effect on the intended account size. A comparison becomes decision-useful when the rule is translated into the trader’s actual trade frequency, drawdown, payout amount and holding behavior.

Workbook check 10: What is the final base fee and BRIDGE-adjusted total for the exact equivalent program?

Write the answer for both selected programs using the exact account stage. The purpose is to identify the one rule that materially changes the strategy rather than relying on a generic firm score. If the answer differs between evaluation and funded stage, record both.

Then model the dollar effect on the intended account size. A comparison becomes decision-useful when the rule is translated into the trader’s actual trade frequency, drawdown, payout amount and holding behavior.