HyroTrader Swing drawdown explained: Standard trailing vs fixed daily drawdown, all One-Step and Two-Step upgrade prices, examples and BRIDGE checkout logic.
Akash Mane is the Founder and CEO of Prop Firm Bridge, where he leads the company’s vision, platform growth, and long term strategic direction. He oversees operations across research, marketing, content systems, SEO, and product positioning while driving the platform’s mission of becoming a trusted authority in the prop firm industry. At Prop Firm Bridge, Akash plays a direct role in shaping educational frameworks, comparison systems, and trader focused resources designed to help users make informed decisions with transparency and confidence. His work focuses on building scalable organic growth systems, improving platform authority, and strengthening trust through accurate, structured, and search optimized content. In addition to leadership responsibilities, he actively manages growth strategy, social media marketing, search visibility, and brand development to expand the platform’s reach across global trading audiences.
Manoj Gholap is responsible for content accuracy, compliance, and factual integrity at Prop Firm Bridge. He acts as the final verification layer for all published content, ensuring that prop firm reviews, rules, and comparisons are clear, accurate, and aligned with transparency standards. Manoj plays a key role in maintaining trust and credibility across the platform.
Quick answer: HyroTrader Swing replaces Standard intraday trailing daily drawdown with a fixed start-of-day reference for an additional fee.
HyroTrader Swing is a paid daily-drawdown upgrade that changes the daily reference from the default intraday trailing model to a fixed start-of-day equity reference. It is available for both One-Step and Two-Step challenges and must be selected during setup of a new challenge.
The important point is that Swing does not increase the daily drawdown percentage. One-Step stays at 4% daily. Two-Step stays at 5%. Swing changes where that percentage is measured from during the day.
The current Swing upgrade range is $39–$419 for One-Step and $29–$299 for Two-Step depending on size. It cannot currently be added to a challenge that is already active.
| Feature | Standard | Swing |
|---|---|---|
| Daily drawdown reference | Highest intraday equity point | Start-of-day equity |
| Includes unrealized P&L in reference behavior | Yes | Intraday profit does not keep moving the reference upward |
| One-Step daily % | 4% | 4% |
| Two-Step daily % | 5% | 5% |
| Separate upgrade fee | No | Yes |
| Can be added after challenge activation? | Not applicable | No under current guidance |
| Best suited to | Traders with controlled intraday equity swings | Traders whose open profits often retrace before close |
“Swing” refers to the daily-drawdown calculation, not permission to ignore maximum loss, position-loss rules, minimum days or the 40% evaluation Profit Distribution Rule.
Under Standard mode, HyroTrader calculates daily drawdown from the highest equity point reached during the day. Unrealized P&L matters. If a position moves strongly into profit, the daily reference can move upward even before that profit is closed.
Suppose a $100K One-Step account starts the day at $100,000 and rises to $103,000 in open equity. The One-Step daily allowance remains 4% of initial capital, or $4,000, but the trailing reference is now the intraday high. A later retracement is measured from that higher point.
The daily calculation resets according to HyroTrader’s current server-day logic. Traders holding positions across that boundary should understand how the next day’s reference is established rather than assuming the previous day’s floor remains unchanged.
Swing uses start-of-day equity as the daily reference. If equity rises during the session, that intraday profit does not keep pulling the daily floor upward.
On a $100K One-Step account, the daily percentage is 4%, or $4,000. If the day begins at $102,000, the headline Swing daily floor is based around that starting equity and the fixed $4,000 allowance rather than a later intraday high.
On a $100K Two-Step account, 5% equals $5,000. If the session begins at $102,000, Swing uses that start-of-day reference rather than continuously following new intraday equity highs.
It does not change the 6% One-Step maximum loss, 10% Two-Step maximum loss, evaluation target, qualifying-day requirement, single-position realized-loss rule or funded exposure rules.
| Size | One-Step Swing | Two-Step Swing |
|---|---|---|
| $5,000 | $39 | $29 |
| $10,000 | $59 | $49 |
| $25,000 | $119 | $89 |
| $50,000 | $169 | $119 |
| $100,000 | $229 | $179 |
| $200,000 | $419 | $299 |
The upgrade price rises with account size. One-Step Swing is also more expensive than Two-Step Swing at every current size.
The PFB team independently verified coupon code BRIDGE for 10% off the challenge purchase. PFB does not automatically claim the same reduction on the separate Swing add-on unless the live Swing/setup checkout explicitly shows it. That prevents a coupon article from promising a discount HyroTrader did not separately document for the upgrade fee.
| Size | Base challenge | Base after 10% BRIDGE math | Swing add-on | Math if Swing remains full price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $5,000 | $69 | $62.10 | $39 | $101.10 |
| $10,000 | $129 | $116.10 | $59 | $175.10 |
| $25,000 | $299 | $269.10 | $119 | $388.10 |
| $50,000 | $499 | $449.10 | $169 | $618.10 |
| $100,000 | $749 | $674.10 | $229 | $903.10 |
| $200,000 | $1,299 | $1,169.10 | $419 | $1,588.10 |
This table deliberately separates the two charges. The last column is only arithmetic assuming BRIDGE reduces the base challenge and the Swing add-on remains at its published standalone price. Live checkout is the transaction source.
The upgrade can be rational when a strategy’s historical trade path repeatedly produces large unrealized gains followed by retracements. In that situation, the Standard trailing reference may create avoidable daily-drawdown pressure even though the final closed result is acceptable.
| Size | Base challenge | Base after 10% BRIDGE math | Swing add-on | Math if Swing remains full price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $5,000 | $59 | $53.10 | $29 | $82.10 |
| $10,000 | $119 | $107.10 | $49 | $156.10 |
| $25,000 | $249 | $224.10 | $89 | $313.10 |
| $50,000 | $379 | $341.10 | $119 | $460.10 |
| $100,000 | $579 | $521.10 | $179 | $700.10 |
| $200,000 | $969 | $872.10 | $299 | $1,171.10 |
Two-Step Swing costs less than One-Step Swing across the current size range. Because Two-Step also has a wider 5% daily and 10% maximum-loss framework, the total structure can appeal to traders who prioritize room over evaluation speed.
An upgrade is expensive if it does not solve a real strategy problem. It can be inexpensive if the strategy repeatedly fails Standard solely because unrealized intraday profit keeps tightening the daily reference. Historical trade replay is the best way to decide.
At $5K, One-Step Swing costs $39 and Two-Step Swing costs $29. The One-Step daily allowance is $200; the Two-Step daily allowance is $250. Swing keeps those amounts fixed against the day’s starting equity rather than allowing intraday profit to keep shifting the reference.
One percent equals $50, 0.5% equals $25 and 0.25% equals $12.50. These values matter because Swing changes the drawdown reference, not the trader’s chosen position risk.
At $10K, One-Step Swing costs $59 and Two-Step Swing costs $49. The One-Step daily allowance is $400; the Two-Step daily allowance is $500. Swing keeps those amounts fixed against the day’s starting equity rather than allowing intraday profit to keep shifting the reference.
One percent equals $100, 0.5% equals $50 and 0.25% equals $25. These values matter because Swing changes the drawdown reference, not the trader’s chosen position risk.
At $25K, One-Step Swing costs $119 and Two-Step Swing costs $89. The One-Step daily allowance is $1,000; the Two-Step daily allowance is $1,250. Swing keeps those amounts fixed against the day’s starting equity rather than allowing intraday profit to keep shifting the reference.
One percent equals $250, 0.5% equals $125 and 0.25% equals $62.50. These values matter because Swing changes the drawdown reference, not the trader’s chosen position risk.
At $50K, One-Step Swing costs $169 and Two-Step Swing costs $119. The One-Step daily allowance is $2,000; the Two-Step daily allowance is $2,500. Swing keeps those amounts fixed against the day’s starting equity rather than allowing intraday profit to keep shifting the reference.
One percent equals $500, 0.5% equals $250 and 0.25% equals $125. These values matter because Swing changes the drawdown reference, not the trader’s chosen position risk.
At $100K, One-Step Swing costs $229 and Two-Step Swing costs $179. The One-Step daily allowance is $4,000; the Two-Step daily allowance is $5,000. Swing keeps those amounts fixed against the day’s starting equity rather than allowing intraday profit to keep shifting the reference.
One percent equals $1,000, 0.5% equals $500 and 0.25% equals $250. These values matter because Swing changes the drawdown reference, not the trader’s chosen position risk.
At $200K, One-Step Swing costs $419 and Two-Step Swing costs $299. The One-Step daily allowance is $8,000; the Two-Step daily allowance is $10,000. Swing keeps those amounts fixed against the day’s starting equity rather than allowing intraday profit to keep shifting the reference.
One percent equals $2,000, 0.5% equals $1,000 and 0.25% equals $500. These values matter because Swing changes the drawdown reference, not the trader’s chosen position risk.
This is the clearest use case. If a BTC or altcoin position often moves several percent into profit before retracing and closing with a smaller gain, Standard trailing daily drawdown can tighten even when the strategy remains profitable.
Traders who keep positions open for hours may experience larger equity paths than very short-duration scalpers. A fixed daily reference can be easier to model.
Several correlated crypto positions can produce a temporary portfolio equity spike and then retrace together. Swing can prevent that temporary high from becoming the intraday reference.
Traders who close gains quickly, rarely experience meaningful open-profit retracement and already stay far inside daily drawdown may receive little practical benefit from paying for the upgrade.
Swing changes daily drawdown only. It does not remove the evaluation Profit Distribution Rule. A One-Step or Two-Step trader can have the Swing upgrade and still need to keep each trading day at or below 40% of total counted net result.
Drawdown controls loss/equity movement. The 40% rule controls how concentrated evaluation profit is across trading days. A fixed daily reference does not make one large winning day fully count if it exceeds the distribution threshold.
The 40% Profit Distribution Rule does not apply after funding under current guidance, but the funded account retains its drawdown and exposure rules.
At 0.25% risk, four full losses equal 1%. Swing does not change that math; it changes the daily reference used to determine whether the account has crossed the daily limit.
At 0.5%, two full losses equal 1%. A trader can still fail by using too much risk even with Swing, because the maximum-loss rule is unchanged.
One percent can be aggressive on One-Step because only six theoretical 1% losses fit inside 6% maximum loss before costs. Swing is not a substitute for smaller position sizing.
The separate 3% realized-loss-per-position rule remains relevant. Swing does not increase that single-position ceiling.
Both decisions can create more practical room, but in different ways. Swing changes the daily reference. A larger account can make a fixed dollar stop smaller as a percentage.
$250 is 5% of $5K, 2.5% of $10K, 1% of $25K, 0.5% of $50K, 0.25% of $100K and 0.125% of $200K. Moving to a larger account can therefore lower percentage risk even without changing drawdown mode.
If the strategy rarely gives back open profit but the normal cash stop is too large as a percentage on a small account, choosing a larger account may solve more of the problem than Swing.
If percentage risk is already low but intraday unrealized profit repeatedly pulls the Standard daily reference upward, Swing addresses the more relevant issue.
One phase, 4% trailing daily and 6% maximum loss. Lowest structural complexity after purchase, but tightest loss room.
One phase, 4% fixed daily reference and 6% maximum loss, with the highest Swing upgrade price among comparable sizes.
Two phases, 5% trailing daily and 10% maximum loss. Lower base challenge and wider maximum room.
Two phases, 5% fixed daily reference and 10% maximum loss. This is the widest current HyroTrader risk structure but requires two evaluation stages and the paid upgrade.
PFB only states what has been confirmed: HyroTrader coupon code BRIDGE gives 10% off the challenge purchase. The Swing upgrade is a separate paid setup option. Unless the live setup flow applies the code to that fee, do not assume it receives the same reduction.
Buy the challenge first, then select the supported platform and Swing option during new-challenge setup. Current official guidance says the upgrade applies immediately once payment is completed.
No under current guidance. Swing must be selected during setup of a new challenge and cannot be retrofitted to an already active challenge.
Relevant searches include HyroTrader Swing discount, HyroTrader Swing upgrade price, HyroTrader fixed drawdown, HyroTrader trailing drawdown, HyroTrader Swing coupon, and HyroTrader BRIDGE. The main BRIDGE coupon page remains the canonical broad discount authority.
PFB uses the official HyroTrader Swing FAQ and daily drawdown explanation for the mechanics in this article. The live setup/checkout remains the source for the final upgrade payment.
Read the HyroTrader One-Step guide, HyroTrader Two-Step guide, BRIDGE coupon authority and full HyroTrader review for connected research.
Swing has its own distinct search intent and price ladder. Keeping it separate prevents every size article from becoming a duplicate “what is Swing?” page while still allowing exact-size guides to link back to a deeper explanation.
Consider a $5,000 account that rises 1% intraday, equal to $50, before retracing. Under Standard mode, the intraday high becomes relevant to the trailing daily calculation. Under Swing, the daily reference remains the start-of-day equity. The final closed P&L can be identical while the prop-account risk path differs.
This is why Swing should be evaluated from historical equity curves rather than from average monthly return alone. A trader whose system often gives back open profit has more to gain from a fixed reference than a trader whose winners are closed near their intraday highs.
Consider a $10,000 account that rises 2% intraday, equal to $200, before retracing. Under Standard mode, the intraday high becomes relevant to the trailing daily calculation. Under Swing, the daily reference remains the start-of-day equity. The final closed P&L can be identical while the prop-account risk path differs.
This is why Swing should be evaluated from historical equity curves rather than from average monthly return alone. A trader whose system often gives back open profit has more to gain from a fixed reference than a trader whose winners are closed near their intraday highs.
Consider a $25,000 account that rises 3% intraday, equal to $750, before retracing. Under Standard mode, the intraday high becomes relevant to the trailing daily calculation. Under Swing, the daily reference remains the start-of-day equity. The final closed P&L can be identical while the prop-account risk path differs.
This is why Swing should be evaluated from historical equity curves rather than from average monthly return alone. A trader whose system often gives back open profit has more to gain from a fixed reference than a trader whose winners are closed near their intraday highs.
Consider a $50,000 account that rises 4% intraday, equal to $2,000, before retracing. Under Standard mode, the intraday high becomes relevant to the trailing daily calculation. Under Swing, the daily reference remains the start-of-day equity. The final closed P&L can be identical while the prop-account risk path differs.
This is why Swing should be evaluated from historical equity curves rather than from average monthly return alone. A trader whose system often gives back open profit has more to gain from a fixed reference than a trader whose winners are closed near their intraday highs.
Consider a $100,000 account that rises 1% intraday, equal to $1,000, before retracing. Under Standard mode, the intraday high becomes relevant to the trailing daily calculation. Under Swing, the daily reference remains the start-of-day equity. The final closed P&L can be identical while the prop-account risk path differs.
This is why Swing should be evaluated from historical equity curves rather than from average monthly return alone. A trader whose system often gives back open profit has more to gain from a fixed reference than a trader whose winners are closed near their intraday highs.
Consider a $200,000 account that rises 2% intraday, equal to $4,000, before retracing. Under Standard mode, the intraday high becomes relevant to the trailing daily calculation. Under Swing, the daily reference remains the start-of-day equity. The final closed P&L can be identical while the prop-account risk path differs.
This is why Swing should be evaluated from historical equity curves rather than from average monthly return alone. A trader whose system often gives back open profit has more to gain from a fixed reference than a trader whose winners are closed near their intraday highs.
Consider a $5,000 account that rises 3% intraday, equal to $150, before retracing. Under Standard mode, the intraday high becomes relevant to the trailing daily calculation. Under Swing, the daily reference remains the start-of-day equity. The final closed P&L can be identical while the prop-account risk path differs.
This is why Swing should be evaluated from historical equity curves rather than from average monthly return alone. A trader whose system often gives back open profit has more to gain from a fixed reference than a trader whose winners are closed near their intraday highs.
Consider a $10,000 account that rises 4% intraday, equal to $400, before retracing. Under Standard mode, the intraday high becomes relevant to the trailing daily calculation. Under Swing, the daily reference remains the start-of-day equity. The final closed P&L can be identical while the prop-account risk path differs.
This is why Swing should be evaluated from historical equity curves rather than from average monthly return alone. A trader whose system often gives back open profit has more to gain from a fixed reference than a trader whose winners are closed near their intraday highs.
Consider a $25,000 account that rises 1% intraday, equal to $250, before retracing. Under Standard mode, the intraday high becomes relevant to the trailing daily calculation. Under Swing, the daily reference remains the start-of-day equity. The final closed P&L can be identical while the prop-account risk path differs.
This is why Swing should be evaluated from historical equity curves rather than from average monthly return alone. A trader whose system often gives back open profit has more to gain from a fixed reference than a trader whose winners are closed near their intraday highs.
Consider a $50,000 account that rises 2% intraday, equal to $1,000, before retracing. Under Standard mode, the intraday high becomes relevant to the trailing daily calculation. Under Swing, the daily reference remains the start-of-day equity. The final closed P&L can be identical while the prop-account risk path differs.
This is why Swing should be evaluated from historical equity curves rather than from average monthly return alone. A trader whose system often gives back open profit has more to gain from a fixed reference than a trader whose winners are closed near their intraday highs.
Consider a $100,000 account that rises 3% intraday, equal to $3,000, before retracing. Under Standard mode, the intraday high becomes relevant to the trailing daily calculation. Under Swing, the daily reference remains the start-of-day equity. The final closed P&L can be identical while the prop-account risk path differs.
This is why Swing should be evaluated from historical equity curves rather than from average monthly return alone. A trader whose system often gives back open profit has more to gain from a fixed reference than a trader whose winners are closed near their intraday highs.
Consider a $200,000 account that rises 4% intraday, equal to $8,000, before retracing. Under Standard mode, the intraday high becomes relevant to the trailing daily calculation. Under Swing, the daily reference remains the start-of-day equity. The final closed P&L can be identical while the prop-account risk path differs.
This is why Swing should be evaluated from historical equity curves rather than from average monthly return alone. A trader whose system often gives back open profit has more to gain from a fixed reference than a trader whose winners are closed near their intraday highs.
Consider a $5,000 account that rises 1% intraday, equal to $50, before retracing. Under Standard mode, the intraday high becomes relevant to the trailing daily calculation. Under Swing, the daily reference remains the start-of-day equity. The final closed P&L can be identical while the prop-account risk path differs.
This is why Swing should be evaluated from historical equity curves rather than from average monthly return alone. A trader whose system often gives back open profit has more to gain from a fixed reference than a trader whose winners are closed near their intraday highs.
Consider a $10,000 account that rises 2% intraday, equal to $200, before retracing. Under Standard mode, the intraday high becomes relevant to the trailing daily calculation. Under Swing, the daily reference remains the start-of-day equity. The final closed P&L can be identical while the prop-account risk path differs.
This is why Swing should be evaluated from historical equity curves rather than from average monthly return alone. A trader whose system often gives back open profit has more to gain from a fixed reference than a trader whose winners are closed near their intraday highs.
Consider a $25,000 account that rises 3% intraday, equal to $750, before retracing. Under Standard mode, the intraday high becomes relevant to the trailing daily calculation. Under Swing, the daily reference remains the start-of-day equity. The final closed P&L can be identical while the prop-account risk path differs.
This is why Swing should be evaluated from historical equity curves rather than from average monthly return alone. A trader whose system often gives back open profit has more to gain from a fixed reference than a trader whose winners are closed near their intraday highs.
Consider a $50,000 account that rises 4% intraday, equal to $2,000, before retracing. Under Standard mode, the intraday high becomes relevant to the trailing daily calculation. Under Swing, the daily reference remains the start-of-day equity. The final closed P&L can be identical while the prop-account risk path differs.
This is why Swing should be evaluated from historical equity curves rather than from average monthly return alone. A trader whose system often gives back open profit has more to gain from a fixed reference than a trader whose winners are closed near their intraday highs.
Consider a $100,000 account that rises 1% intraday, equal to $1,000, before retracing. Under Standard mode, the intraday high becomes relevant to the trailing daily calculation. Under Swing, the daily reference remains the start-of-day equity. The final closed P&L can be identical while the prop-account risk path differs.
This is why Swing should be evaluated from historical equity curves rather than from average monthly return alone. A trader whose system often gives back open profit has more to gain from a fixed reference than a trader whose winners are closed near their intraday highs.
Consider a $200,000 account that rises 2% intraday, equal to $4,000, before retracing. Under Standard mode, the intraday high becomes relevant to the trailing daily calculation. Under Swing, the daily reference remains the start-of-day equity. The final closed P&L can be identical while the prop-account risk path differs.
This is why Swing should be evaluated from historical equity curves rather than from average monthly return alone. A trader whose system often gives back open profit has more to gain from a fixed reference than a trader whose winners are closed near their intraday highs.
Consider a $5,000 account that rises 3% intraday, equal to $150, before retracing. Under Standard mode, the intraday high becomes relevant to the trailing daily calculation. Under Swing, the daily reference remains the start-of-day equity. The final closed P&L can be identical while the prop-account risk path differs.
This is why Swing should be evaluated from historical equity curves rather than from average monthly return alone. A trader whose system often gives back open profit has more to gain from a fixed reference than a trader whose winners are closed near their intraday highs.
Consider a $10,000 account that rises 4% intraday, equal to $400, before retracing. Under Standard mode, the intraday high becomes relevant to the trailing daily calculation. Under Swing, the daily reference remains the start-of-day equity. The final closed P&L can be identical while the prop-account risk path differs.
This is why Swing should be evaluated from historical equity curves rather than from average monthly return alone. A trader whose system often gives back open profit has more to gain from a fixed reference than a trader whose winners are closed near their intraday highs.
Consider a $25,000 account that rises 1% intraday, equal to $250, before retracing. Under Standard mode, the intraday high becomes relevant to the trailing daily calculation. Under Swing, the daily reference remains the start-of-day equity. The final closed P&L can be identical while the prop-account risk path differs.
This is why Swing should be evaluated from historical equity curves rather than from average monthly return alone. A trader whose system often gives back open profit has more to gain from a fixed reference than a trader whose winners are closed near their intraday highs.
Consider a $50,000 account that rises 2% intraday, equal to $1,000, before retracing. Under Standard mode, the intraday high becomes relevant to the trailing daily calculation. Under Swing, the daily reference remains the start-of-day equity. The final closed P&L can be identical while the prop-account risk path differs.
This is why Swing should be evaluated from historical equity curves rather than from average monthly return alone. A trader whose system often gives back open profit has more to gain from a fixed reference than a trader whose winners are closed near their intraday highs.
Consider a $100,000 account that rises 3% intraday, equal to $3,000, before retracing. Under Standard mode, the intraday high becomes relevant to the trailing daily calculation. Under Swing, the daily reference remains the start-of-day equity. The final closed P&L can be identical while the prop-account risk path differs.
This is why Swing should be evaluated from historical equity curves rather than from average monthly return alone. A trader whose system often gives back open profit has more to gain from a fixed reference than a trader whose winners are closed near their intraday highs.
Consider a $200,000 account that rises 4% intraday, equal to $8,000, before retracing. Under Standard mode, the intraday high becomes relevant to the trailing daily calculation. Under Swing, the daily reference remains the start-of-day equity. The final closed P&L can be identical while the prop-account risk path differs.
This is why Swing should be evaluated from historical equity curves rather than from average monthly return alone. A trader whose system often gives back open profit has more to gain from a fixed reference than a trader whose winners are closed near their intraday highs.
Consider a $5,000 account that rises 1% intraday, equal to $50, before retracing. Under Standard mode, the intraday high becomes relevant to the trailing daily calculation. Under Swing, the daily reference remains the start-of-day equity. The final closed P&L can be identical while the prop-account risk path differs.
This is why Swing should be evaluated from historical equity curves rather than from average monthly return alone. A trader whose system often gives back open profit has more to gain from a fixed reference than a trader whose winners are closed near their intraday highs.
Consider a $10,000 account that rises 2% intraday, equal to $200, before retracing. Under Standard mode, the intraday high becomes relevant to the trailing daily calculation. Under Swing, the daily reference remains the start-of-day equity. The final closed P&L can be identical while the prop-account risk path differs.
This is why Swing should be evaluated from historical equity curves rather than from average monthly return alone. A trader whose system often gives back open profit has more to gain from a fixed reference than a trader whose winners are closed near their intraday highs.
Consider a $25,000 account that rises 3% intraday, equal to $750, before retracing. Under Standard mode, the intraday high becomes relevant to the trailing daily calculation. Under Swing, the daily reference remains the start-of-day equity. The final closed P&L can be identical while the prop-account risk path differs.
This is why Swing should be evaluated from historical equity curves rather than from average monthly return alone. A trader whose system often gives back open profit has more to gain from a fixed reference than a trader whose winners are closed near their intraday highs.
The HyroTrader Swing upgrade can be worth paying for when a profitable strategy frequently creates large intraday equity highs and then gives back part of that open profit before closing. In that situation, the fixed start-of-day reference directly addresses a real failure mechanism in Standard mode.
It is less compelling when the strategy already keeps intraday equity smooth and far from the daily limit. Swing does not increase the daily percentage, maximum loss or position-loss allowance. It changes one important thing: the daily drawdown reference.
For the challenge purchase itself, HyroTrader coupon code “BRIDGE” gives 10% off and has been independently verified by the PFB team. Treat the Swing fee separately unless its live setup checkout explicitly shows the same discount.
A paid upgrade that changes the daily drawdown reference from the default intraday trailing model to a fixed start-of-day equity reference.
No. One-Step remains 4% daily and Two-Step remains 5%; Swing changes the reference calculation.
Current add-on prices range from $39 to $419 for One-Step and $29 to $299 for Two-Step depending on challenge size.
No under current official guidance. It must be selected during setup of a new challenge.
PFB independently verified BRIDGE for 10% off the HyroTrader challenge purchase. The Swing upgrade is a separate add-on, so check its live setup checkout for any discount treatment.
Join the discussion
No comments yet
Sign in to leave a comment. Real traders only — one account, one voice.