If you pass an evaluation and wait for optimal market conditions, why should sitting on your hands cost you your account? Is the 30-day inactivity rule a legitimate risk control measure to clean up dead accounts, or just a way to force traders to take low-quality setups out of fear of losing their challenge fee?
Edited
Best answer, chosen by Earl Christian
Prageeth Dilshan · 2h ago
It's definitely more about forcing low-quality trades than risk management. Real risk control is knowing when not to trade. Forcing a trader to enter the market every 30 days just to keep an account active defeats the purpose of waiting for high-probability setups.
A stupid rule
Prageeth DilshanBest answer
It's definitely more about forcing low-quality trades than risk management. Real risk control is knowing when not to trade. Forcing a trader to enter the market every 30 days just to keep an account active defeats the purpose of waiting for high-probability setups.
