TTT Markets Subscription review covering monthly prices, 8%/5% targets, drawdown, reissues, payouts, every size and BRIDGE savings.
Akash Mane is the Founder and CEO of Prop Firm Bridge, where he leads the company’s vision, platform growth, and long term strategic direction. He oversees operations across research, marketing, content systems, SEO, and product positioning while driving the platform’s mission of becoming a trusted authority in the prop firm industry. At Prop Firm Bridge, Akash plays a direct role in shaping educational frameworks, comparison systems, and trader focused resources designed to help users make informed decisions with transparency and confidence. His work focuses on building scalable organic growth systems, improving platform authority, and strengthening trust through accurate, structured, and search optimized content. In addition to leadership responsibilities, he actively manages growth strategy, social media marketing, search visibility, and brand development to expand the platform’s reach across global trading audiences.
Manoj Gholap is responsible for content accuracy, compliance, and factual integrity at Prop Firm Bridge. He acts as the final verification layer for all published content, ensuring that prop firm reviews, rules, and comparisons are clear, accurate, and aligned with transparency standards. Manoj plays a key role in maintaining trust and credibility across the platform.
Quick answer: The TTT Markets Subscription Account is a monthly two-step evaluation with an 8% Phase 1 target, 5% Phase 2 target, 4% daily loss limit and 8% static maximum loss. If an evaluation is breached while the subscription remains active, a fresh evaluation is issued on the next billing cycle without a separate reset fee. Funded payouts begin after 30 days and 10 funded trading days, while the split starts at 70% and can rise to 90%. Try coupon code BRIDGE for 12.5% off an eligible checkout and confirm whether it affects only the initial payment.
Fact-checked 25 August 2026 using the dedicated TTT Markets Subscription page, official help-centre articles and the current Prop Firm Bridge firm record. Program terms, prices and promotions can change. This article does not guarantee funding, payouts, coupon acceptance or search placement.
The TTT Markets Subscription Account combines a conventional two-stage evaluation with recurring monthly access. Instead of paying one larger one-time fee and purchasing a new challenge after failure, the trader pays a subscription and receives a fresh evaluation on the next billing date after an evaluation breach, provided the subscription remains active. That structure can reduce restart friction, but it also creates an ongoing cost that must be managed like a business expense.
Its trading objectives are recognizable: eight percent in Phase 1, five percent in Phase 2, four percent daily loss and eight percent static total loss. The funded proposition is slower than weekly-payout models. The first request requires 30 days after funded activation and ten funded trading days; later cycles occur every 30 days. In exchange, the trader starts at a 70% profit split and can gain five percentage points after each successful payout until reaching 90%.
Our honest verdict is that Subscription can suit patient traders who value lower initial cost and automatic next-cycle reissues. It is not automatically cheaper. A trader who takes many months can pay more than a one-time evaluation, while a trader who forces trades before renewal can damage both performance and budget. The program is strongest when the monthly cost is planned for several cycles and weakest when billing becomes a psychological deadline.
| Feature | Current Subscription detail |
|---|---|
| Model | Monthly two-step evaluation |
| Phase 1 target | 8% |
| Phase 2 target | 5% |
| Daily loss limit | 4% |
| Maximum loss | 8% static, based on initial account balance |
| Evaluation time limit | Unlimited under the current program description; monthly billing continues |
| After evaluation breach | New evaluation on next billing cycle while subscription remains active |
| Reset cost | No separate reset fee or manual retry purchase under the reissue system |
| First funded payout | 30 days after funded activation and 10 funded trading days |
| Later payouts | Every 30 days |
| Profit split | Starts 70%; +5 percentage points after each successful payout; maximum 90% |
| Account sizes | $5K, $10K, $25K, $50K, $100K and $200K |
| Account capacity | Up to 10 active Subscription Accounts and $1,000,000 total allocation |
| Platforms | MT5 and TTT WebTrader under current general platform information |
| News / overnight | Current record says allowed |
| Weekend holding | Current base Subscription record says no; verify add-on eligibility |
| Coupon | BRIDGE for 12.5% off eligible purchases; checkout confirmation required |
The user subscribes to a selected evaluation size and receives a two-step account. Phase 1 requires an eight-percent gain without breaching the daily or overall loss rules. After approval, Phase 2 requires five percent under the same headline risk limits. Passing both stages qualifies the trader for a funded analyst account, subject to verification and current terms.
If the trader breaches during evaluation, the current model does not sell an immediate manual reset. Instead, a new evaluation arrives on the next scheduled billing cycle as long as the subscription is still active. The official page calls these reissues unlimited, meaning the mechanism can repeat across billing cycles. It does not mean unlimited simultaneous accounts, instant retries or immunity from cancellation and compliance provisions.
The subscription can continue after funding as a safety net according to the program page. That feature requires careful reading because billing, funded-account continuity and reissue rights are connected. Before cancelling, a funded trader should verify how cancellation affects the existing funded relationship and future replacement eligibility. Never assume that passing makes the subscription irrelevant.
These are the current monthly USD prices in the Prop Firm Bridge record. The BRIDGE column calculates 12.5% for an eligible checkout. It does not promise the same discount on every renewal. Taxes, currency conversion and temporary offers can alter the total.
| Size | Monthly base price | BRIDGE saving | Estimated eligible checkout | Phase 1: 8% | Phase 2: 5% | Daily limit: 4% | Maximum loss: 8% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $5,000 | $29/month | $3.63 | $25.38 | $400 | $250 | $200 | $400 |
| $10,000 | $59/month | $7.38 | $51.63 | $800 | $500 | $400 | $800 |
| $25,000 | $99/month | $12.38 | $86.63 | $2,000 | $1,250 | $1,000 | $2,000 |
| $50,000 | $199/month | $24.88 | $174.13 | $4,000 | $2,500 | $2,000 | $4,000 |
| $100,000 | $299/month | $37.38 | $261.63 | $8,000 | $5,000 | $4,000 | $8,000 |
| $200,000 | $399/month | $49.88 | $349.13 | $16,000 | $10,000 | $8,000 | $16,000 |
TTT Markets is currently advertising a separate seasonal code on some public pages. A temporary 25% promotion can produce a lower eligible initial total than BRIDGE’s evergreen 12.5%. Do not stack codes unless checkout explicitly permits it. Compare both legitimate totals and use the better valid option. Prop Firm Bridge promotes BRIDGE, but honest comparison must come before commission.
A monthly price looks cheap in isolation. The correct comparison multiplies the fee by the expected number of billing cycles. A $100K Subscription at $299 costs $897 over three months and $1,794 over six months before discounts or taxes. By comparison, a one-time evaluation has a larger single payment but does not automatically renew. Which is cheaper depends on pass time, breach probability, reissue value and cancellation behavior.
The subscription model transfers part of the restart decision into a schedule. That can help a trader avoid impulsive repurchases immediately after a breach. It can also hide cumulative spending because each charge feels smaller. Create a total-budget ceiling and review invoices monthly. A $29 plan repeated without purpose is not automatically better value than a larger one-time fee used with discipline.
BRIDGE should be treated as a reduction in eligible acquisition cost, not as a permanent assumption. If the code lowers only the initial invoice, use the undiscounted base fee for future-month budgeting. Conservative forecasts prevent unpleasant surprises and make the comparison with 1-Step or 2-Step fair.
Phase 1 asks the trader to make eight percent while respecting both loss limits. On a $100K account, the objective is $8,000, daily loss is capped at $4,000 and the static overall floor is $92,000. The target is not a deadline under the current description, but the monthly fee means time has a financial cost.
A trader risking 0.25% per idea needs 32 net R to reach eight percent. With a 0.3R average expectancy, the mathematical mean is roughly 107 trades, though actual sequences vary widely. This illustrates why forcing an eight-percent gain in a few days is disconnected from many normal systems. Faster is not necessarily better if the speed comes from tail risk.
Use checkpoints rather than daily profit quotas. At +2%, review rule adherence. At +4%, confirm that risk has not increased. At +6%, reduce exposure if target proximity is creating pressure. The last two percent should be earned through the same setups as the first six.
Phase 2 reduces the objective to five percent but does not reward overconfidence. The account begins a new assessment stage and remains subject to the daily and maximum loss boundaries. On $50K, five percent equals $2,500, while four-percent daily loss equals $2,000 and eight-percent overall loss equals $4,000.
Many traders fail Phase 2 because they interpret Phase 1 success as proof that risk should increase. In reality, a short profitable sequence may contain luck. Preserve the strategy version, risk unit and session controls that produced the pass. If the market regime changes, use the absence of a time limit and wait.
The subscription’s next invoice should not decide whether a trade is valid. If the only reason for entering is “I need two percent before renewal,” the position fails the process test. Pay for access only while the method remains rational; never make the market responsible for the billing date.
The daily loss limit is four percent. The related standard two-step framework calculates daily loss from the higher of balance or equity at the start of the day, but traders should confirm the exact Subscription reset time and formula in the live agreement. Floating profit can influence a higher reference and floating loss can count toward a breach.
On $25K, four percent is $1,000. That is an outer boundary, not a recommended daily risk budget. A personal 0.5% stop would be $125, leaving material room for spreads and slippage. Two 0.25% losses could end the session without approaching the contract limit.
Daily controls should include all open exposure. If three positions each risk 0.25% and depend on the same economic event, the combined thesis risks 0.75%. Treating them as unrelated because they use different symbols creates false diversification.
Static maximum loss is fixed to the initial account balance. On a $200K account, eight percent is $16,000 and the floor begins at $184,000. If the account rises to $210,000, the static floor remains tied to the original balance under the current description. This is easier to plan than a trailing floor.
Static does not eliminate equity risk. Open losses, spread widening and gaps can still push equity through the threshold. A trader who uses the full eight percent as planned risk has no operational buffer. Normal trading should occur far above the breach line.
Build a reduction ladder. Normal risk might apply near the starting balance, half risk after a two-percent drawdown and a full strategy audit after three percent. The exact numbers depend on tested performance, but the concept prevents the final loss allowance from becoming the first intervention point.
When an evaluation is breached, a new evaluation is issued on the next billing cycle if the subscription remains active. There is no manual retry purchase and no separate reset fee according to the official Subscription help page. The reissue returns the trader to the start of evaluation; it does not preserve progress from the breached account.
The next billing cycle can create a useful cooling-off window. Review the breach, replay the decisions and decide whether the failure came from normal variance or broken discipline. If it was variance within a validated method, continuing may be rational. If it was recurring oversizing, a new account without a changed process is likely to produce the same result.
“Unlimited reissues” is a marketing description of repeated future eligibility, not unlimited free capital. The monthly fee continues, and the trader remains bound by program and compliance rules. Use the feature as a controlled safety net rather than an excuse for aggressive evaluation trading.
The official Subscription payout page states that the first payout becomes available 30 days after funded-account activation and after completing 10 minimum trading days. Both conditions matter. Completing ten days in two weeks does not remove the 30-day wait, and simply waiting 30 days does not replace the required funded trading days.
Use genuine strategy activity. Do not assume a tiny token trade will count as a valid day. If the definition is not explicit in the dashboard, ask support before planning. The objective is to demonstrate repeatable trading, not to manufacture calendar entries.
Future payouts are every 30 days. The general payout policy currently states a $100 minimum and no maximum payout, while program-specific conditions should be checked before relying on those figures. Payouts remain subject to split, compliance, available methods and processing review.
| Stage | Trader split | Trader share of $5,000 eligible gross profit |
|---|---|---|
| Initial funded stage | 70% | $3,500 |
| After first successful payout | 75% | $3,750 |
| After second successful payout | 80% | $4,000 |
| After third successful payout | 85% | $4,250 |
| At stated maximum | 90% | $4,500 |
The headline “up to 90%” is true only as a progression ceiling, not the starting arrangement. When comparing Subscription with another product, use 70% for the first funded cycle and model later splits only if the account survives qualifying payouts.
Five-point progression rewards continuity. A clean smaller payout can improve the next cycle’s economics. That makes protecting eligibility more valuable than squeezing extra return from the final days of a cycle.
The official help centre says a trader may hold up to ten active Subscription Accounts with maximum total allocation of $1 million. Those are ceilings. A trader should not purchase ten accounts merely because the program permits them.
Multiple accounts multiply billing, platform monitoring and correlated exposure. If the same trade is placed across five $100K accounts, the trader is operating a $500K combined thesis even when each dashboard looks separate. Confirm all rules governing multiple accounts and execution before attempting portfolio-scale activity.
Scale account count after operational proof: several clean months, accurate invoices, stable platform access, reliable journals and no confusion about payout dates. Complexity can destroy an edge that works perfectly on one account.
The current Subscription record allows news trading, overnight holding and permitted EAs. Weekend holding is listed as unavailable on the base product. TTT offers a Weekend Holding add-on on eligible evaluations, but eligibility must be confirmed for the exact Subscription selection rather than assumed from another program.
Prohibited behavior includes arbitrage, tick scalping, cross-account hedging, account sharing, copy or signal services, martingale and grid EAs, HFT-style automation and gambling-like exposure. The official general policy also prohibits exploitation of infrastructure, execution systems or simulated environments.
An EA is not automatically compliant because it is called a risk manager. Behavior controls the assessment. Understand maximum exposure, recovery logic and order frequency. Keep source or configuration records and test changes away from the live evaluation.
Both use a two-stage structure with comparable headline targets and loss limits, but the payment and restart economics differ. Subscription uses a smaller recurring fee and next-cycle reissue after an evaluation breach. Standard uses a one-time purchase and currently includes fee-refund eligibility after the first approved payout. Subscription fees are not refunded under the general program information.
A trader expecting a fast, controlled pass may prefer a one-time fee. A trader valuing predictable automatic reissues and a lower first payment may prefer Subscription. The correct comparison multiplies monthly fees by realistic pass time and breach rate.
Instant Funding removes evaluation phases, while Subscription requires 8% and 5% stages. Instant has a higher purchase price, a six-percent static boundary and a lower starting split of 50% under the current record. Subscription starts at 70% after funding but requires time and successful qualification.
Instant suits a proven trader paying for immediate access. Subscription suits a patient trader paying monthly to demonstrate skill. Read the complete TTT Markets Instant Funding review for every-size mathematics and scaling rules.
The 1-Step route reduces the evaluation to one phase but has program-specific price, payout and consistency conditions. Subscription requires two stages but supplies next-cycle reissues while active. Traders who can reach one target without oversizing may value speed; those preferring staged proof and a lower monthly entry may prefer Subscription.
Use our TTT Markets 1-Step Standard, Lite and Pro review to compare every available 1-Step size and rule set.
The following analysis converts percentages into dollars, models recurring costs and explains who each size fits. Account size does not improve expectancy. It only changes nominal targets, loss thresholds, fees and emotional pressure.
Best suited to: first-time subscription users testing rule fit at the lowest monthly cost. Its main value is cheap access to the subscription mechanism, not a large income expectation. The current base price is $29 per month. If BRIDGE is eligible for the initial payment, 12.5% equals $3.63 and the estimated checkout amount becomes $25.38 before taxes or currency effects. Confirm whether any discount applies only to the first invoice or also to renewals; this review does not assume a recurring coupon benefit.
The fee is recurring, so cost must be modeled across time rather than treated like a one-time challenge price. Twelve uninterrupted payments at the current base rate equal $348. A simple twelve-month multiplication of a 12.5% reduction would equal $304.50, but that is not a valid promise because BRIDGE may apply only to an eligible initial order. Use the actual subscription invoice and renewal terms as the authority.
Recurring cost changes trader psychology. A deadline can appear even when the evaluation itself offers unlimited time: the billing date keeps arriving. Do not increase risk merely to pass before renewal. Compare the cost of one additional month with the expected damage from forcing marginal trades. A controlled extra month can be cheaper than repeatedly restarting the statistical process.
Phase 1 requires $400 under the current eight-percent target. At 0.20% risk, one full loss is $10 and forty net risk units of profit equal the target before considering transaction costs. That does not mean forty trades; a two-R winner contributes two units and a loser subtracts one. Build the schedule from expectancy, not from a fixed number of days.
A practical Phase 1 operating cap could stop the day at two normal losses, far below the $200 contractual daily boundary. If the account falls two percent below its start, reduce risk and audit the setup sample. The goal is to preserve enough runway that the subscription’s automatic reissue remains a safety net rather than the primary plan.
Phase 2 falls to $250, but the loss rules remain important. Traders commonly become aggressive after passing Phase 1 because qualification feels close. Keep the same percentage risk and setup criteria. A smaller target should reduce pressure, not justify more exposure.
Reset the mental balance when Phase 2 begins. Do not carry the emotional urgency, winning streak confidence or frustration from Phase 1 into the new stage. Review the current credentials, platform conditions and exact breach levels. A fresh stage deserves a fresh checklist even when the strategy remains unchanged.
If an evaluation account is breached while the subscription stays active, the current official description says a fresh evaluation is issued on the next billing cycle. There is no manual retry purchase and no separate reset fee under that model. The trader still waits for the billing date; “unlimited reissues” does not mean instant replacement on demand.
For this $5,000 plan, the next $29 renewal is therefore both a continuing access fee and the mechanism supporting a new evaluation after breach. Track the billing date and cancellation rules. If the strategy is structurally incompatible with the limits, automatic reissue simply repeats the same problem. Use the waiting period to diagnose cause rather than plan a faster recovery attempt.
The first funded payout becomes available after 30 days from funded activation and at least 10 funded trading days under the current help-centre rule. Later payouts are every 30 days. A hypothetical three-percent gross funded profit on $5,000 is $150; at the 70% starting split the trader portion illustrates $105, while at the 90% ceiling it illustrates $135 before deductions or payment effects.
These illustrations are not payout guarantees. Profit must be valid, the account must remain compliant and the request must meet current operational conditions. The starting 70% split rises by five percentage points after each successful payout, so the path is 70%, 75%, 80%, 85% and 90%. Clean cycles can improve economics more reliably than one oversized month.
A starting unit of 0.10% to 0.25% means $5 to $12.50 per independent thesis. Two trades driven by the same currency, index or macro factor should share one combined cap. Four separate tickets are not four separate risks if the same event can stop them together.
At 0.50%, each planned loss is $25 and eight such losses would equal the daily boundary arithmetically. That is far too close for a normal session because spread, slippage and floating equity can alter the result. Personal limits must leave room for execution noise. A trader should never plan to use the entire daily allowance.
This size is reasonable for first-time subscription users testing rule fit at the lowest monthly cost when the monthly fee is affordable for several cycles and the strategy already has relevant evidence. It is unsuitable if renewal creates urgency, if the trader depends on prohibited copy or signal services, or if dollar fluctuations at this balance change decision-making.
Verdict for $5,000: choose it only after mapping the $400 Phase 1 objective, $250 Phase 2 objective, $200 daily boundary and $400 total boundary. Test BRIDGE at checkout, compare any legitimate temporary offer and verify renewal pricing. The best tier is the one you can trade consistently for long enough to complete both stages—not the biggest balance displayed.
Best suited to: developing traders wanting modest nominal room without a large recurring commitment. The balance is still small enough for precise process testing but large enough to make percentage mistakes noticeable. The current base price is $59 per month. If BRIDGE is eligible for the initial payment, 12.5% equals $7.38 and the estimated checkout amount becomes $51.63 before taxes or currency effects. Confirm whether any discount applies only to the first invoice or also to renewals; this review does not assume a recurring coupon benefit.
The fee is recurring, so cost must be modeled across time rather than treated like a one-time challenge price. Twelve uninterrupted payments at the current base rate equal $708. A simple twelve-month multiplication of a 12.5% reduction would equal $619.50, but that is not a valid promise because BRIDGE may apply only to an eligible initial order. Use the actual subscription invoice and renewal terms as the authority.
Recurring cost changes trader psychology. A deadline can appear even when the evaluation itself offers unlimited time: the billing date keeps arriving. Do not increase risk merely to pass before renewal. Compare the cost of one additional month with the expected damage from forcing marginal trades. A controlled extra month can be cheaper than repeatedly restarting the statistical process.
Phase 1 requires $800 under the current eight-percent target. At 0.20% risk, one full loss is $20 and forty net risk units of profit equal the target before considering transaction costs. That does not mean forty trades; a two-R winner contributes two units and a loser subtracts one. Build the schedule from expectancy, not from a fixed number of days.
A practical Phase 1 operating cap could stop the day at two normal losses, far below the $400 contractual daily boundary. If the account falls two percent below its start, reduce risk and audit the setup sample. The goal is to preserve enough runway that the subscription’s automatic reissue remains a safety net rather than the primary plan.
Phase 2 falls to $500, but the loss rules remain important. Traders commonly become aggressive after passing Phase 1 because qualification feels close. Keep the same percentage risk and setup criteria. A smaller target should reduce pressure, not justify more exposure.
Reset the mental balance when Phase 2 begins. Do not carry the emotional urgency, winning streak confidence or frustration from Phase 1 into the new stage. Review the current credentials, platform conditions and exact breach levels. A fresh stage deserves a fresh checklist even when the strategy remains unchanged.
If an evaluation account is breached while the subscription stays active, the current official description says a fresh evaluation is issued on the next billing cycle. There is no manual retry purchase and no separate reset fee under that model. The trader still waits for the billing date; “unlimited reissues” does not mean instant replacement on demand.
For this $10,000 plan, the next $59 renewal is therefore both a continuing access fee and the mechanism supporting a new evaluation after breach. Track the billing date and cancellation rules. If the strategy is structurally incompatible with the limits, automatic reissue simply repeats the same problem. Use the waiting period to diagnose cause rather than plan a faster recovery attempt.
The first funded payout becomes available after 30 days from funded activation and at least 10 funded trading days under the current help-centre rule. Later payouts are every 30 days. A hypothetical three-percent gross funded profit on $10,000 is $300; at the 70% starting split the trader portion illustrates $210, while at the 90% ceiling it illustrates $270 before deductions or payment effects.
These illustrations are not payout guarantees. Profit must be valid, the account must remain compliant and the request must meet current operational conditions. The starting 70% split rises by five percentage points after each successful payout, so the path is 70%, 75%, 80%, 85% and 90%. Clean cycles can improve economics more reliably than one oversized month.
A starting unit of 0.10% to 0.25% means $10 to $25 per independent thesis. Two trades driven by the same currency, index or macro factor should share one combined cap. Four separate tickets are not four separate risks if the same event can stop them together.
At 0.50%, each planned loss is $50 and eight such losses would equal the daily boundary arithmetically. That is far too close for a normal session because spread, slippage and floating equity can alter the result. Personal limits must leave room for execution noise. A trader should never plan to use the entire daily allowance.
This size is reasonable for developing traders wanting modest nominal room without a large recurring commitment when the monthly fee is affordable for several cycles and the strategy already has relevant evidence. It is unsuitable if renewal creates urgency, if the trader depends on prohibited copy or signal services, or if dollar fluctuations at this balance change decision-making.
Verdict for $10,000: choose it only after mapping the $800 Phase 1 objective, $500 Phase 2 objective, $400 daily boundary and $800 total boundary. Test BRIDGE at checkout, compare any legitimate temporary offer and verify renewal pricing. The best tier is the one you can trade consistently for long enough to complete both stages—not the biggest balance displayed.
Best suited to: part-time traders with a tested two-step process and controlled monthly budget. This tier is often the practical bridge between experimentation and meaningful funded economics. The current base price is $99 per month. If BRIDGE is eligible for the initial payment, 12.5% equals $12.38 and the estimated checkout amount becomes $86.63 before taxes or currency effects. Confirm whether any discount applies only to the first invoice or also to renewals; this review does not assume a recurring coupon benefit.
The fee is recurring, so cost must be modeled across time rather than treated like a one-time challenge price. Twelve uninterrupted payments at the current base rate equal $1,188. A simple twelve-month multiplication of a 12.5% reduction would equal $1,039.50, but that is not a valid promise because BRIDGE may apply only to an eligible initial order. Use the actual subscription invoice and renewal terms as the authority.
Recurring cost changes trader psychology. A deadline can appear even when the evaluation itself offers unlimited time: the billing date keeps arriving. Do not increase risk merely to pass before renewal. Compare the cost of one additional month with the expected damage from forcing marginal trades. A controlled extra month can be cheaper than repeatedly restarting the statistical process.
Phase 1 requires $2,000 under the current eight-percent target. At 0.20% risk, one full loss is $50 and forty net risk units of profit equal the target before considering transaction costs. That does not mean forty trades; a two-R winner contributes two units and a loser subtracts one. Build the schedule from expectancy, not from a fixed number of days.
A practical Phase 1 operating cap could stop the day at two normal losses, far below the $1,000 contractual daily boundary. If the account falls two percent below its start, reduce risk and audit the setup sample. The goal is to preserve enough runway that the subscription’s automatic reissue remains a safety net rather than the primary plan.
Phase 2 falls to $1,250, but the loss rules remain important. Traders commonly become aggressive after passing Phase 1 because qualification feels close. Keep the same percentage risk and setup criteria. A smaller target should reduce pressure, not justify more exposure.
Reset the mental balance when Phase 2 begins. Do not carry the emotional urgency, winning streak confidence or frustration from Phase 1 into the new stage. Review the current credentials, platform conditions and exact breach levels. A fresh stage deserves a fresh checklist even when the strategy remains unchanged.
If an evaluation account is breached while the subscription stays active, the current official description says a fresh evaluation is issued on the next billing cycle. There is no manual retry purchase and no separate reset fee under that model. The trader still waits for the billing date; “unlimited reissues” does not mean instant replacement on demand.
For this $25,000 plan, the next $99 renewal is therefore both a continuing access fee and the mechanism supporting a new evaluation after breach. Track the billing date and cancellation rules. If the strategy is structurally incompatible with the limits, automatic reissue simply repeats the same problem. Use the waiting period to diagnose cause rather than plan a faster recovery attempt.
The first funded payout becomes available after 30 days from funded activation and at least 10 funded trading days under the current help-centre rule. Later payouts are every 30 days. A hypothetical three-percent gross funded profit on $25,000 is $750; at the 70% starting split the trader portion illustrates $525, while at the 90% ceiling it illustrates $675 before deductions or payment effects.
These illustrations are not payout guarantees. Profit must be valid, the account must remain compliant and the request must meet current operational conditions. The starting 70% split rises by five percentage points after each successful payout, so the path is 70%, 75%, 80%, 85% and 90%. Clean cycles can improve economics more reliably than one oversized month.
A starting unit of 0.10% to 0.25% means $25 to $62.50 per independent thesis. Two trades driven by the same currency, index or macro factor should share one combined cap. Four separate tickets are not four separate risks if the same event can stop them together.
At 0.50%, each planned loss is $125 and eight such losses would equal the daily boundary arithmetically. That is far too close for a normal session because spread, slippage and floating equity can alter the result. Personal limits must leave room for execution noise. A trader should never plan to use the entire daily allowance.
This size is reasonable for part-time traders with a tested two-step process and controlled monthly budget when the monthly fee is affordable for several cycles and the strategy already has relevant evidence. It is unsuitable if renewal creates urgency, if the trader depends on prohibited copy or signal services, or if dollar fluctuations at this balance change decision-making.
Verdict for $25,000: choose it only after mapping the $2,000 Phase 1 objective, $1,250 Phase 2 objective, $1,000 daily boundary and $2,000 total boundary. Test BRIDGE at checkout, compare any legitimate temporary offer and verify renewal pricing. The best tier is the one you can trade consistently for long enough to complete both stages—not the biggest balance displayed.
Best suited to: experienced traders seeking a balanced relationship between fee and funded potential. Nominal targets become significant here, so a written operating plan matters more than enthusiasm. The current base price is $199 per month. If BRIDGE is eligible for the initial payment, 12.5% equals $24.88 and the estimated checkout amount becomes $174.13 before taxes or currency effects. Confirm whether any discount applies only to the first invoice or also to renewals; this review does not assume a recurring coupon benefit.
The fee is recurring, so cost must be modeled across time rather than treated like a one-time challenge price. Twelve uninterrupted payments at the current base rate equal $2,388. A simple twelve-month multiplication of a 12.5% reduction would equal $2,089.50, but that is not a valid promise because BRIDGE may apply only to an eligible initial order. Use the actual subscription invoice and renewal terms as the authority.
Recurring cost changes trader psychology. A deadline can appear even when the evaluation itself offers unlimited time: the billing date keeps arriving. Do not increase risk merely to pass before renewal. Compare the cost of one additional month with the expected damage from forcing marginal trades. A controlled extra month can be cheaper than repeatedly restarting the statistical process.
Phase 1 requires $4,000 under the current eight-percent target. At 0.20% risk, one full loss is $100 and forty net risk units of profit equal the target before considering transaction costs. That does not mean forty trades; a two-R winner contributes two units and a loser subtracts one. Build the schedule from expectancy, not from a fixed number of days.
A practical Phase 1 operating cap could stop the day at two normal losses, far below the $2,000 contractual daily boundary. If the account falls two percent below its start, reduce risk and audit the setup sample. The goal is to preserve enough runway that the subscription’s automatic reissue remains a safety net rather than the primary plan.
Phase 2 falls to $2,500, but the loss rules remain important. Traders commonly become aggressive after passing Phase 1 because qualification feels close. Keep the same percentage risk and setup criteria. A smaller target should reduce pressure, not justify more exposure.
Reset the mental balance when Phase 2 begins. Do not carry the emotional urgency, winning streak confidence or frustration from Phase 1 into the new stage. Review the current credentials, platform conditions and exact breach levels. A fresh stage deserves a fresh checklist even when the strategy remains unchanged.
If an evaluation account is breached while the subscription stays active, the current official description says a fresh evaluation is issued on the next billing cycle. There is no manual retry purchase and no separate reset fee under that model. The trader still waits for the billing date; “unlimited reissues” does not mean instant replacement on demand.
For this $50,000 plan, the next $199 renewal is therefore both a continuing access fee and the mechanism supporting a new evaluation after breach. Track the billing date and cancellation rules. If the strategy is structurally incompatible with the limits, automatic reissue simply repeats the same problem. Use the waiting period to diagnose cause rather than plan a faster recovery attempt.
The first funded payout becomes available after 30 days from funded activation and at least 10 funded trading days under the current help-centre rule. Later payouts are every 30 days. A hypothetical three-percent gross funded profit on $50,000 is $1,500; at the 70% starting split the trader portion illustrates $1,050, while at the 90% ceiling it illustrates $1,350 before deductions or payment effects.
These illustrations are not payout guarantees. Profit must be valid, the account must remain compliant and the request must meet current operational conditions. The starting 70% split rises by five percentage points after each successful payout, so the path is 70%, 75%, 80%, 85% and 90%. Clean cycles can improve economics more reliably than one oversized month.
A starting unit of 0.10% to 0.25% means $50 to $125 per independent thesis. Two trades driven by the same currency, index or macro factor should share one combined cap. Four separate tickets are not four separate risks if the same event can stop them together.
At 0.50%, each planned loss is $250 and eight such losses would equal the daily boundary arithmetically. That is far too close for a normal session because spread, slippage and floating equity can alter the result. Personal limits must leave room for execution noise. A trader should never plan to use the entire daily allowance.
This size is reasonable for experienced traders seeking a balanced relationship between fee and funded potential when the monthly fee is affordable for several cycles and the strategy already has relevant evidence. It is unsuitable if renewal creates urgency, if the trader depends on prohibited copy or signal services, or if dollar fluctuations at this balance change decision-making.
Verdict for $50,000: choose it only after mapping the $4,000 Phase 1 objective, $2,500 Phase 2 objective, $2,000 daily boundary and $4,000 total boundary. Test BRIDGE at checkout, compare any legitimate temporary offer and verify renewal pricing. The best tier is the one you can trade consistently for long enough to complete both stages—not the biggest balance displayed.
Best suited to: consistent traders who can manage meaningful dollar drawdown without changing behavior. A six-figure label can create false confidence; the trader must keep thinking in risk units. The current base price is $299 per month. If BRIDGE is eligible for the initial payment, 12.5% equals $37.38 and the estimated checkout amount becomes $261.63 before taxes or currency effects. Confirm whether any discount applies only to the first invoice or also to renewals; this review does not assume a recurring coupon benefit.
The fee is recurring, so cost must be modeled across time rather than treated like a one-time challenge price. Twelve uninterrupted payments at the current base rate equal $3,588. A simple twelve-month multiplication of a 12.5% reduction would equal $3,139.50, but that is not a valid promise because BRIDGE may apply only to an eligible initial order. Use the actual subscription invoice and renewal terms as the authority.
Recurring cost changes trader psychology. A deadline can appear even when the evaluation itself offers unlimited time: the billing date keeps arriving. Do not increase risk merely to pass before renewal. Compare the cost of one additional month with the expected damage from forcing marginal trades. A controlled extra month can be cheaper than repeatedly restarting the statistical process.
Phase 1 requires $8,000 under the current eight-percent target. At 0.20% risk, one full loss is $200 and forty net risk units of profit equal the target before considering transaction costs. That does not mean forty trades; a two-R winner contributes two units and a loser subtracts one. Build the schedule from expectancy, not from a fixed number of days.
A practical Phase 1 operating cap could stop the day at two normal losses, far below the $4,000 contractual daily boundary. If the account falls two percent below its start, reduce risk and audit the setup sample. The goal is to preserve enough runway that the subscription’s automatic reissue remains a safety net rather than the primary plan.
Phase 2 falls to $5,000, but the loss rules remain important. Traders commonly become aggressive after passing Phase 1 because qualification feels close. Keep the same percentage risk and setup criteria. A smaller target should reduce pressure, not justify more exposure.
Reset the mental balance when Phase 2 begins. Do not carry the emotional urgency, winning streak confidence or frustration from Phase 1 into the new stage. Review the current credentials, platform conditions and exact breach levels. A fresh stage deserves a fresh checklist even when the strategy remains unchanged.
If an evaluation account is breached while the subscription stays active, the current official description says a fresh evaluation is issued on the next billing cycle. There is no manual retry purchase and no separate reset fee under that model. The trader still waits for the billing date; “unlimited reissues” does not mean instant replacement on demand.
For this $100,000 plan, the next $299 renewal is therefore both a continuing access fee and the mechanism supporting a new evaluation after breach. Track the billing date and cancellation rules. If the strategy is structurally incompatible with the limits, automatic reissue simply repeats the same problem. Use the waiting period to diagnose cause rather than plan a faster recovery attempt.
The first funded payout becomes available after 30 days from funded activation and at least 10 funded trading days under the current help-centre rule. Later payouts are every 30 days. A hypothetical three-percent gross funded profit on $100,000 is $3,000; at the 70% starting split the trader portion illustrates $2,100, while at the 90% ceiling it illustrates $2,700 before deductions or payment effects.
These illustrations are not payout guarantees. Profit must be valid, the account must remain compliant and the request must meet current operational conditions. The starting 70% split rises by five percentage points after each successful payout, so the path is 70%, 75%, 80%, 85% and 90%. Clean cycles can improve economics more reliably than one oversized month.
A starting unit of 0.10% to 0.25% means $100 to $250 per independent thesis. Two trades driven by the same currency, index or macro factor should share one combined cap. Four separate tickets are not four separate risks if the same event can stop them together.
At 0.50%, each planned loss is $500 and eight such losses would equal the daily boundary arithmetically. That is far too close for a normal session because spread, slippage and floating equity can alter the result. Personal limits must leave room for execution noise. A trader should never plan to use the entire daily allowance.
This size is reasonable for consistent traders who can manage meaningful dollar drawdown without changing behavior when the monthly fee is affordable for several cycles and the strategy already has relevant evidence. It is unsuitable if renewal creates urgency, if the trader depends on prohibited copy or signal services, or if dollar fluctuations at this balance change decision-making.
Verdict for $100,000: choose it only after mapping the $8,000 Phase 1 objective, $5,000 Phase 2 objective, $4,000 daily boundary and $8,000 total boundary. Test BRIDGE at checkout, compare any legitimate temporary offer and verify renewal pricing. The best tier is the one you can trade consistently for long enough to complete both stages—not the biggest balance displayed.
Best suited to: proven operators who understand recurring-cost and large-allocation risk. The largest listed subscription tier magnifies both opportunity and behavioral error. The current base price is $399 per month. If BRIDGE is eligible for the initial payment, 12.5% equals $49.88 and the estimated checkout amount becomes $349.13 before taxes or currency effects. Confirm whether any discount applies only to the first invoice or also to renewals; this review does not assume a recurring coupon benefit.
The fee is recurring, so cost must be modeled across time rather than treated like a one-time challenge price. Twelve uninterrupted payments at the current base rate equal $4,788. A simple twelve-month multiplication of a 12.5% reduction would equal $4,189.50, but that is not a valid promise because BRIDGE may apply only to an eligible initial order. Use the actual subscription invoice and renewal terms as the authority.
Recurring cost changes trader psychology. A deadline can appear even when the evaluation itself offers unlimited time: the billing date keeps arriving. Do not increase risk merely to pass before renewal. Compare the cost of one additional month with the expected damage from forcing marginal trades. A controlled extra month can be cheaper than repeatedly restarting the statistical process.
Phase 1 requires $16,000 under the current eight-percent target. At 0.20% risk, one full loss is $400 and forty net risk units of profit equal the target before considering transaction costs. That does not mean forty trades; a two-R winner contributes two units and a loser subtracts one. Build the schedule from expectancy, not from a fixed number of days.
A practical Phase 1 operating cap could stop the day at two normal losses, far below the $8,000 contractual daily boundary. If the account falls two percent below its start, reduce risk and audit the setup sample. The goal is to preserve enough runway that the subscription’s automatic reissue remains a safety net rather than the primary plan.
Phase 2 falls to $10,000, but the loss rules remain important. Traders commonly become aggressive after passing Phase 1 because qualification feels close. Keep the same percentage risk and setup criteria. A smaller target should reduce pressure, not justify more exposure.
Reset the mental balance when Phase 2 begins. Do not carry the emotional urgency, winning streak confidence or frustration from Phase 1 into the new stage. Review the current credentials, platform conditions and exact breach levels. A fresh stage deserves a fresh checklist even when the strategy remains unchanged.
If an evaluation account is breached while the subscription stays active, the current official description says a fresh evaluation is issued on the next billing cycle. There is no manual retry purchase and no separate reset fee under that model. The trader still waits for the billing date; “unlimited reissues” does not mean instant replacement on demand.
For this $200,000 plan, the next $399 renewal is therefore both a continuing access fee and the mechanism supporting a new evaluation after breach. Track the billing date and cancellation rules. If the strategy is structurally incompatible with the limits, automatic reissue simply repeats the same problem. Use the waiting period to diagnose cause rather than plan a faster recovery attempt.
The first funded payout becomes available after 30 days from funded activation and at least 10 funded trading days under the current help-centre rule. Later payouts are every 30 days. A hypothetical three-percent gross funded profit on $200,000 is $6,000; at the 70% starting split the trader portion illustrates $4,200, while at the 90% ceiling it illustrates $5,400 before deductions or payment effects.
These illustrations are not payout guarantees. Profit must be valid, the account must remain compliant and the request must meet current operational conditions. The starting 70% split rises by five percentage points after each successful payout, so the path is 70%, 75%, 80%, 85% and 90%. Clean cycles can improve economics more reliably than one oversized month.
A starting unit of 0.10% to 0.25% means $200 to $500 per independent thesis. Two trades driven by the same currency, index or macro factor should share one combined cap. Four separate tickets are not four separate risks if the same event can stop them together.
At 0.50%, each planned loss is $1,000 and eight such losses would equal the daily boundary arithmetically. That is far too close for a normal session because spread, slippage and floating equity can alter the result. Personal limits must leave room for execution noise. A trader should never plan to use the entire daily allowance.
This size is reasonable for proven operators who understand recurring-cost and large-allocation risk when the monthly fee is affordable for several cycles and the strategy already has relevant evidence. It is unsuitable if renewal creates urgency, if the trader depends on prohibited copy or signal services, or if dollar fluctuations at this balance change decision-making.
Verdict for $200,000: choose it only after mapping the $16,000 Phase 1 objective, $10,000 Phase 2 objective, $8,000 daily boundary and $16,000 total boundary. Test BRIDGE at checkout, compare any legitimate temporary offer and verify renewal pricing. The best tier is the one you can trade consistently for long enough to complete both stages—not the biggest balance displayed.
These controls translate the marketing summary into a practical routine. Apply them to the selected account before the first order and revisit them before every renewal.
Record the purchase date, next billing date, renewal amount, cancellation deadline and likely account-reissue date. A subscription is operationally different from a one-time challenge because the payment cycle continues whether the trader is active, paused or close to a target.
Set reminders several days before renewal. Review whether the account remains usable, whether a breach occurred and whether continuing is rational. Do not rely on memory or assume cancellation is automatic after funding.
Implementation checkpoint: Convert this principle into one written rule with a dollar threshold for the selected account size. Review it before the next order and again before the next billing date.
The evaluation may not impose a countdown, yet every month has an economic cost. That does not create a trading deadline. It creates a business decision: continue only while the expected value of access exceeds the fee and the strategy remains compatible.
Measure progress through rule-compliant trades and expectancy. Passing slowly can be sensible; paying indefinitely without improving the process is not. Establish a maximum subscription budget before starting.
Implementation checkpoint: Convert this principle into one written rule with a dollar threshold for the selected account size. Review it before the next order and again before the next billing date.
The next-cycle reissue can reduce the need for a separate reset purchase after an evaluation breach. Its best function is psychological insurance that discourages revenge trading, because the trader knows another evaluation can arrive if the subscription remains active.
Insurance should not become the plan. If breaches repeat for the same reason, pause before the next account. Modify sizing, instrument selection or session rules based on evidence.
Implementation checkpoint: Convert this principle into one written rule with a dollar threshold for the selected account size. Review it before the next order and again before the next billing date.
The subscription uses a four-percent daily loss limit. Confirm the precise reset time and whether the system uses balance, equity or the higher reference at the beginning of the day. Floating positions can materially change remaining capacity.
Display the live dollar threshold next to the platform. Keep a private daily stop far inside it. Once that stop is hit, no new order is allowed regardless of how attractive the next setup appears.
Implementation checkpoint: Convert this principle into one written rule with a dollar threshold for the selected account size. Review it before the next order and again before the next billing date.
Eight-percent static maximum loss is fixed from the starting balance. Profit may create extra distance above the floor, but that cushion is not a reason to enlarge risk. It represents earned protection.
Track both account equity and distance to the hard floor. If the strategy enters drawdown, reduce risk before the contractual limit becomes relevant. Recovery should be slower than normal trading, not faster.
Implementation checkpoint: Convert this principle into one written rule with a dollar threshold for the selected account size. Review it before the next order and again before the next billing date.
An eight-percent target can require many ordinary trades. Estimate the number of risk units from historical expectancy and build a confidence range. Do not convert the target into a weekly income quota.
A strategy with 0.3R expectancy needs approximately 27 trades on average to make eight R, but actual sequences vary. If risk is 0.25%, eight percent equals 32R. This demonstrates why patience and positive expectancy matter.
Implementation checkpoint: Convert this principle into one written rule with a dollar threshold for the selected account size. Review it before the next order and again before the next billing date.
The five-percent second-stage target is smaller, but the account can still breach. Traders often change what worked because funding feels close. Lock the strategy version and normal risk before beginning Phase 2.
Use the same journal and stop policies. If market conditions change, pause rather than forcing the remaining percentage. Qualification is valuable only if the process can survive funded trading.
Implementation checkpoint: Convert this principle into one written rule with a dollar threshold for the selected account size. Review it before the next order and again before the next billing date.
The first payout is available after 30 days from funded activation and ten funded trading days. Build a calendar from activation rather than from evaluation purchase. A day with a token trade should not be assumed valid without meeting the live trading-day definition.
Spread legitimate strategy activity naturally. Never open meaningless orders merely to manufacture days. The funded period should demonstrate the same repeatable method used in evaluation.
Implementation checkpoint: Convert this principle into one written rule with a dollar threshold for the selected account size. Review it before the next order and again before the next billing date.
The split starts at 70% and grows by five points after each successful payout until 90%. Model the economic value of progression. Protecting the account across four qualifying cycles can be worth more than maximizing the first request.
Confirm when the new split takes effect and retain payout records. Do not forecast the 90% ceiling as if it applied from day one. Compare programs using the split actually expected at each stage.
Implementation checkpoint: Convert this principle into one written rule with a dollar threshold for the selected account size. Review it before the next order and again before the next billing date.
Correlation turns multiple small trades into one large economic bet. GBPUSD and EURUSD may both depend on the dollar; several equity indices can react together to a rate decision.
Create exposure baskets and cap the combined risk. If the basket is full, a new signal is rejected or existing positions are reduced. This is especially important near the four-percent daily boundary.
Implementation checkpoint: Convert this principle into one written rule with a dollar threshold for the selected account size. Review it before the next order and again before the next billing date.
Current records say news trading is allowed, but volatile events can create spreads and fills that exceed the planned loss. Permission is not price protection.
Classify scheduled events before the session. Stay flat, reduce risk or use a separately tested news strategy. Improvisation during a release is not a strategy.
Implementation checkpoint: Convert this principle into one written rule with a dollar threshold for the selected account size. Review it before the next order and again before the next billing date.
Current records allow overnight holding but not weekend holding for the base Subscription model. Verify this at purchase because add-ons and permissions can be program-specific.
Before each market close, check every position, financing cost and weekend boundary. A losing intraday order should never become an accidental overnight trade just to avoid realizing a loss.
Implementation checkpoint: Convert this principle into one written rule with a dollar threshold for the selected account size. Review it before the next order and again before the next billing date.
EAs are allowed when their behavior is not prohibited. The account holder must understand entries, exits, maximum exposure, recovery logic and update history.
Do not use copy or signal bots, martingale, grid or HFT-style systems where prohibited. Keep logs and test new versions away from the subscription account before deployment.
Implementation checkpoint: Convert this principle into one written rule with a dollar threshold for the selected account size. Review it before the next order and again before the next billing date.
Copy trading, account sharing and trade-management services can create compliance problems. Slightly changing lot size or entry timing does not necessarily turn outsourced decisions into an independent strategy.
Document your own decision rules. If multiple accounts or tools are involved, request written clarification before trading. A payout review is too late to discover that the operating model was not permitted.
Implementation checkpoint: Convert this principle into one written rule with a dollar threshold for the selected account size. Review it before the next order and again before the next billing date.
At each billing checkpoint, score rule adherence, strategy expectancy, emotional stability, remaining stage progress and fee affordability. Continue only if the combined picture is rational.
A green P&L with poor behavior is not automatic approval. A temporary loss with perfect execution may justify continuation. The scorecard separates process from short-term outcome.
Implementation checkpoint: Convert this principle into one written rule with a dollar threshold for the selected account size. Review it before the next order and again before the next billing date.
BRIDGE is listed for 12.5% off eligible TTT Markets purchases, but subscription billing needs special care. Confirm whether the code changes only the initial checkout or future renewals.
Compare the live BRIDGE total with any temporary official promotion and do not assume stacking. A discount reduces cost; it does not transform an unsuitable subscription into a good decision.
Implementation checkpoint: Convert this principle into one written rule with a dollar threshold for the selected account size. Review it before the next order and again before the next billing date.
Complete KYC accurately and keep payout method details current. Store confirmation numbers, invoices and relevant support responses. Administrative mistakes can delay an otherwise eligible request.
The general payout policy currently states a $100 minimum and no maximum, but always confirm the Subscription-specific dashboard before relying on that threshold. Program terms control.
Implementation checkpoint: Convert this principle into one written rule with a dollar threshold for the selected account size. Review it before the next order and again before the next billing date.
The official Subscription rule allows up to ten active accounts and a maximum total allocation of $1 million. More accounts create operational complexity and correlated-risk concerns.
Scale account count only after proving you can monitor rules, billing and exposure across the portfolio. Ten accounts are a ceiling, not a target.
Implementation checkpoint: Convert this principle into one written rule with a dollar threshold for the selected account size. Review it before the next order and again before the next billing date.
Cancellation can be rational when the strategy no longer fits, recurring fees exceed the budget, platform conditions change or repeated breaches reveal a structural issue.
Review how cancellation affects an existing funded account or safety net before acting. Obtain current written terms. Do not keep paying solely because previous fees create sunk-cost pressure.
Implementation checkpoint: Convert this principle into one written rule with a dollar threshold for the selected account size. Review it before the next order and again before the next billing date.
After each phase, breach, reissue or payout, audit every trade. Separate good losses, bad losses, lucky wins, execution errors and compliance risks.
Change only one or two variables at a time. Stable learning is more valuable than redesigning the entire system after one difficult month.
Implementation checkpoint: Convert this principle into one written rule with a dollar threshold for the selected account size. Review it before the next order and again before the next billing date.
The $5K plan minimizes monthly outlay and can teach the subscription workflow. It is appropriate only when the trader already has a strategy to test; the account should not become paid entertainment.
Stress-test this profile with five consecutive planned losses, one slipped stop and a quiet week with no valid setup. If renewal pressure changes the intended response, choose a smaller tier, improve the operating plan or avoid the subscription model.
This trader accepts that eight percent plus five percent may take several months. Risk remains stable and the subscription is budgeted in advance. The model can fit because automatic reissues reduce pressure after an honest breach.
Stress-test this profile with five consecutive planned losses, one slipped stop and a quiet week with no valid setup. If renewal pressure changes the intended response, choose a smaller tier, improve the operating plan or avoid the subscription model.
The next renewal date makes this trader force trades. Subscription is a poor fit unless the trader can separate billing from market opportunity and establish a hard personal daily stop.
Stress-test this profile with five consecutive planned losses, one slipped stop and a quiet week with no valid setup. If renewal pressure changes the intended response, choose a smaller tier, improve the operating plan or avoid the subscription model.
A defined session, independent setup criteria and low correlated exposure can align with the 4%/8% framework. The trader should still plan for the 30-day payout cycle and ten funded trading days.
Stress-test this profile with five consecutive planned losses, one slipped stop and a quiet week with no valid setup. If renewal pressure changes the intended response, choose a smaller tier, improve the operating plan or avoid the subscription model.
Overnight permission may help, but the current base record says weekend holding is not allowed. The trader needs a Friday-close routine and must confirm whether an eligible add-on exists for the chosen subscription product.
Stress-test this profile with five consecutive planned losses, one slipped stop and a quiet week with no valid setup. If renewal pressure changes the intended response, choose a smaller tier, improve the operating plan or avoid the subscription model.
Transparent original automation may fit when prohibited behaviors are excluded. The operator needs logs, exposure caps and version control; purchasing a black-box signal robot does not satisfy these requirements.
Stress-test this profile with five consecutive planned losses, one slipped stop and a quiet week with no valid setup. If renewal pressure changes the intended response, choose a smaller tier, improve the operating plan or avoid the subscription model.
Up to ten active subscription accounts and $1 million total allocation can support scale, but only after exposure, billing and platform operations are mature. Correlated trades across accounts magnify both risk and scrutiny.
Stress-test this profile with five consecutive planned losses, one slipped stop and a quiet week with no valid setup. If renewal pressure changes the intended response, choose a smaller tier, improve the operating plan or avoid the subscription model.
This profile understands the first payout is after 30 days and ten funded trading days, then every 30 days. It prioritizes clean cycles and split progression instead of attempting to maximize one payout.
Stress-test this profile with five consecutive planned losses, one slipped stop and a quiet week with no valid setup. If renewal pressure changes the intended response, choose a smaller tier, improve the operating plan or avoid the subscription model.
This buyer selects by discount rather than rules. Even if BRIDGE lowers an eligible initial payment, the recurring commitment and program fit matter more. This profile should compare all TTT account types before purchasing.
Stress-test this profile with five consecutive planned losses, one slipped stop and a quiet week with no valid setup. If renewal pressure changes the intended response, choose a smaller tier, improve the operating plan or avoid the subscription model.
Automatic reissue may seem attractive but can enable repeated poor behavior. A mandatory pause, journal audit and reduced risk must come before activating the next evaluation.
Stress-test this profile with five consecutive planned losses, one slipped stop and a quiet week with no valid setup. If renewal pressure changes the intended response, choose a smaller tier, improve the operating plan or avoid the subscription model.
For troubleshooting and all TTT Markets discount information, read the TTT Markets coupon code BRIDGE guide. BRIDGE is an evergreen Prop Firm Bridge code in the current database, but checkout is the final authority for eligibility.
We prioritized the dedicated official Subscription Account page and Subscription help-centre articles. These sources confirm the 8% and 5% evaluation targets, 4% daily and 8% maximum loss, next-cycle reissue after an evaluation breach, absence of a separate reset fee, first payout after 30 days and ten funded trading days, 30-day later payouts, and split progression from 70% to 90%.
The current Prop Firm Bridge firm record supplies the six USD sizes and monthly prices used in the tables. Public product pages can display temporary promotions and alternative currencies, so the live checkout must be checked. Broad TTT marketing statements were not used to override more specific Subscription rules.
We also distinguish facts from planning suggestions. Personal risk caps, example expectancy and payout-share calculations are educational illustrations. They are not official requirements or promised financial outcomes.
Use the drill matching your intended size to convert monthly cost, loss limits, targets and payout timing into a written operating plan.
Apply this drill to the $5,000 plan before purchase. Write the $29 monthly base fee, next renewal date, $200 daily contractual boundary and $400 static maximum-loss amount on one page. Then add a private daily stop no greater than one-quarter of the contractual daily figure. The purpose is to make the operating limit visible before emotion appears.
Model a difficult month containing five full planned losses, two missed trades and one winner that closes early. Do not change lot size to force the $400 Phase 1 target. Decide whether the strategy still has positive evidence and whether another monthly payment fits the pre-set business budget. Renewal should follow a review, not hope.
Now model success. After Phase 1, keep the same risk for the $250 Phase 2 objective. After funding, record the activation date, ten valid trading days and the first 30-day payout date. Calculate the first share at 70%, not the eventual 90% ceiling. This removes marketing optimism from cash-flow planning.
Finally test BRIDGE. A 12.5% eligible reduction on the initial $29 fee equals $3.63, producing an estimated $25.38 checkout before other adjustments. Use the undiscounted $29 amount for future renewals unless the checkout and written terms clearly confirm recurring application.
Apply this drill to the $10,000 plan before purchase. Write the $59 monthly base fee, next renewal date, $400 daily contractual boundary and $800 static maximum-loss amount on one page. Then add a private daily stop no greater than one-quarter of the contractual daily figure. The purpose is to make the operating limit visible before emotion appears.
Model a difficult month containing five full planned losses, two missed trades and one winner that closes early. Do not change lot size to force the $800 Phase 1 target. Decide whether the strategy still has positive evidence and whether another monthly payment fits the pre-set business budget. Renewal should follow a review, not hope.
Now model success. After Phase 1, keep the same risk for the $500 Phase 2 objective. After funding, record the activation date, ten valid trading days and the first 30-day payout date. Calculate the first share at 70%, not the eventual 90% ceiling. This removes marketing optimism from cash-flow planning.
Finally test BRIDGE. A 12.5% eligible reduction on the initial $59 fee equals $7.38, producing an estimated $51.63 checkout before other adjustments. Use the undiscounted $59 amount for future renewals unless the checkout and written terms clearly confirm recurring application.
Apply this drill to the $25,000 plan before purchase. Write the $99 monthly base fee, next renewal date, $1,000 daily contractual boundary and $2,000 static maximum-loss amount on one page. Then add a private daily stop no greater than one-quarter of the contractual daily figure. The purpose is to make the operating limit visible before emotion appears.
Model a difficult month containing five full planned losses, two missed trades and one winner that closes early. Do not change lot size to force the $2,000 Phase 1 target. Decide whether the strategy still has positive evidence and whether another monthly payment fits the pre-set business budget. Renewal should follow a review, not hope.
Now model success. After Phase 1, keep the same risk for the $1,250 Phase 2 objective. After funding, record the activation date, ten valid trading days and the first 30-day payout date. Calculate the first share at 70%, not the eventual 90% ceiling. This removes marketing optimism from cash-flow planning.
Finally test BRIDGE. A 12.5% eligible reduction on the initial $99 fee equals $12.38, producing an estimated $86.63 checkout before other adjustments. Use the undiscounted $99 amount for future renewals unless the checkout and written terms clearly confirm recurring application.
Apply this drill to the $50,000 plan before purchase. Write the $199 monthly base fee, next renewal date, $2,000 daily contractual boundary and $4,000 static maximum-loss amount on one page. Then add a private daily stop no greater than one-quarter of the contractual daily figure. The purpose is to make the operating limit visible before emotion appears.
Model a difficult month containing five full planned losses, two missed trades and one winner that closes early. Do not change lot size to force the $4,000 Phase 1 target. Decide whether the strategy still has positive evidence and whether another monthly payment fits the pre-set business budget. Renewal should follow a review, not hope.
Now model success. After Phase 1, keep the same risk for the $2,500 Phase 2 objective. After funding, record the activation date, ten valid trading days and the first 30-day payout date. Calculate the first share at 70%, not the eventual 90% ceiling. This removes marketing optimism from cash-flow planning.
Finally test BRIDGE. A 12.5% eligible reduction on the initial $199 fee equals $24.88, producing an estimated $174.13 checkout before other adjustments. Use the undiscounted $199 amount for future renewals unless the checkout and written terms clearly confirm recurring application.
Apply this drill to the $100,000 plan before purchase. Write the $299 monthly base fee, next renewal date, $4,000 daily contractual boundary and $8,000 static maximum-loss amount on one page. Then add a private daily stop no greater than one-quarter of the contractual daily figure. The purpose is to make the operating limit visible before emotion appears.
Model a difficult month containing five full planned losses, two missed trades and one winner that closes early. Do not change lot size to force the $8,000 Phase 1 target. Decide whether the strategy still has positive evidence and whether another monthly payment fits the pre-set business budget. Renewal should follow a review, not hope.
Now model success. After Phase 1, keep the same risk for the $5,000 Phase 2 objective. After funding, record the activation date, ten valid trading days and the first 30-day payout date. Calculate the first share at 70%, not the eventual 90% ceiling. This removes marketing optimism from cash-flow planning.
Finally test BRIDGE. A 12.5% eligible reduction on the initial $299 fee equals $37.38, producing an estimated $261.63 checkout before other adjustments. Use the undiscounted $299 amount for future renewals unless the checkout and written terms clearly confirm recurring application.
Apply this drill to the $200,000 plan before purchase. Write the $399 monthly base fee, next renewal date, $8,000 daily contractual boundary and $16,000 static maximum-loss amount on one page. Then add a private daily stop no greater than one-quarter of the contractual daily figure. The purpose is to make the operating limit visible before emotion appears.
Model a difficult month containing five full planned losses, two missed trades and one winner that closes early. Do not change lot size to force the $16,000 Phase 1 target. Decide whether the strategy still has positive evidence and whether another monthly payment fits the pre-set business budget. Renewal should follow a review, not hope.
Now model success. After Phase 1, keep the same risk for the $10,000 Phase 2 objective. After funding, record the activation date, ten valid trading days and the first 30-day payout date. Calculate the first share at 70%, not the eventual 90% ceiling. This removes marketing optimism from cash-flow planning.
Finally test BRIDGE. A 12.5% eligible reduction on the initial $399 fee equals $49.88, producing an estimated $349.13 checkout before other adjustments. Use the undiscounted $399 amount for future renewals unless the checkout and written terms clearly confirm recurring application.
Apply this drill to the $5,000 plan before purchase. Write the $29 monthly base fee, next renewal date, $200 daily contractual boundary and $400 static maximum-loss amount on one page. Then add a private daily stop no greater than one-quarter of the contractual daily figure. The purpose is to make the operating limit visible before emotion appears.
Model a difficult month containing five full planned losses, two missed trades and one winner that closes early. Do not change lot size to force the $400 Phase 1 target. Decide whether the strategy still has positive evidence and whether another monthly payment fits the pre-set business budget. Renewal should follow a review, not hope.
Now model success. After Phase 1, keep the same risk for the $250 Phase 2 objective. After funding, record the activation date, ten valid trading days and the first 30-day payout date. Calculate the first share at 70%, not the eventual 90% ceiling. This removes marketing optimism from cash-flow planning.
Finally test BRIDGE. A 12.5% eligible reduction on the initial $29 fee equals $3.63, producing an estimated $25.38 checkout before other adjustments. Use the undiscounted $29 amount for future renewals unless the checkout and written terms clearly confirm recurring application.
Apply this drill to the $10,000 plan before purchase. Write the $59 monthly base fee, next renewal date, $400 daily contractual boundary and $800 static maximum-loss amount on one page. Then add a private daily stop no greater than one-quarter of the contractual daily figure. The purpose is to make the operating limit visible before emotion appears.
Model a difficult month containing five full planned losses, two missed trades and one winner that closes early. Do not change lot size to force the $800 Phase 1 target. Decide whether the strategy still has positive evidence and whether another monthly payment fits the pre-set business budget. Renewal should follow a review, not hope.
Now model success. After Phase 1, keep the same risk for the $500 Phase 2 objective. After funding, record the activation date, ten valid trading days and the first 30-day payout date. Calculate the first share at 70%, not the eventual 90% ceiling. This removes marketing optimism from cash-flow planning.
Finally test BRIDGE. A 12.5% eligible reduction on the initial $59 fee equals $7.38, producing an estimated $51.63 checkout before other adjustments. Use the undiscounted $59 amount for future renewals unless the checkout and written terms clearly confirm recurring application.
Apply this drill to the $25,000 plan before purchase. Write the $99 monthly base fee, next renewal date, $1,000 daily contractual boundary and $2,000 static maximum-loss amount on one page. Then add a private daily stop no greater than one-quarter of the contractual daily figure. The purpose is to make the operating limit visible before emotion appears.
Model a difficult month containing five full planned losses, two missed trades and one winner that closes early. Do not change lot size to force the $2,000 Phase 1 target. Decide whether the strategy still has positive evidence and whether another monthly payment fits the pre-set business budget. Renewal should follow a review, not hope.
Now model success. After Phase 1, keep the same risk for the $1,250 Phase 2 objective. After funding, record the activation date, ten valid trading days and the first 30-day payout date. Calculate the first share at 70%, not the eventual 90% ceiling. This removes marketing optimism from cash-flow planning.
Finally test BRIDGE. A 12.5% eligible reduction on the initial $99 fee equals $12.38, producing an estimated $86.63 checkout before other adjustments. Use the undiscounted $99 amount for future renewals unless the checkout and written terms clearly confirm recurring application.
Apply this drill to the $50,000 plan before purchase. Write the $199 monthly base fee, next renewal date, $2,000 daily contractual boundary and $4,000 static maximum-loss amount on one page. Then add a private daily stop no greater than one-quarter of the contractual daily figure. The purpose is to make the operating limit visible before emotion appears.
Model a difficult month containing five full planned losses, two missed trades and one winner that closes early. Do not change lot size to force the $4,000 Phase 1 target. Decide whether the strategy still has positive evidence and whether another monthly payment fits the pre-set business budget. Renewal should follow a review, not hope.
Now model success. After Phase 1, keep the same risk for the $2,500 Phase 2 objective. After funding, record the activation date, ten valid trading days and the first 30-day payout date. Calculate the first share at 70%, not the eventual 90% ceiling. This removes marketing optimism from cash-flow planning.
Finally test BRIDGE. A 12.5% eligible reduction on the initial $199 fee equals $24.88, producing an estimated $174.13 checkout before other adjustments. Use the undiscounted $199 amount for future renewals unless the checkout and written terms clearly confirm recurring application.
Apply this drill to the $100,000 plan before purchase. Write the $299 monthly base fee, next renewal date, $4,000 daily contractual boundary and $8,000 static maximum-loss amount on one page. Then add a private daily stop no greater than one-quarter of the contractual daily figure. The purpose is to make the operating limit visible before emotion appears.
Model a difficult month containing five full planned losses, two missed trades and one winner that closes early. Do not change lot size to force the $8,000 Phase 1 target. Decide whether the strategy still has positive evidence and whether another monthly payment fits the pre-set business budget. Renewal should follow a review, not hope.
Now model success. After Phase 1, keep the same risk for the $5,000 Phase 2 objective. After funding, record the activation date, ten valid trading days and the first 30-day payout date. Calculate the first share at 70%, not the eventual 90% ceiling. This removes marketing optimism from cash-flow planning.
Finally test BRIDGE. A 12.5% eligible reduction on the initial $299 fee equals $37.38, producing an estimated $261.63 checkout before other adjustments. Use the undiscounted $299 amount for future renewals unless the checkout and written terms clearly confirm recurring application.
Apply this drill to the $200,000 plan before purchase. Write the $399 monthly base fee, next renewal date, $8,000 daily contractual boundary and $16,000 static maximum-loss amount on one page. Then add a private daily stop no greater than one-quarter of the contractual daily figure. The purpose is to make the operating limit visible before emotion appears.
Model a difficult month containing five full planned losses, two missed trades and one winner that closes early. Do not change lot size to force the $16,000 Phase 1 target. Decide whether the strategy still has positive evidence and whether another monthly payment fits the pre-set business budget. Renewal should follow a review, not hope.
Now model success. After Phase 1, keep the same risk for the $10,000 Phase 2 objective. After funding, record the activation date, ten valid trading days and the first 30-day payout date. Calculate the first share at 70%, not the eventual 90% ceiling. This removes marketing optimism from cash-flow planning.
Finally test BRIDGE. A 12.5% eligible reduction on the initial $399 fee equals $49.88, producing an estimated $349.13 checkout before other adjustments. Use the undiscounted $399 amount for future renewals unless the checkout and written terms clearly confirm recurring application.
Apply this drill to the $5,000 plan before purchase. Write the $29 monthly base fee, next renewal date, $200 daily contractual boundary and $400 static maximum-loss amount on one page. Then add a private daily stop no greater than one-quarter of the contractual daily figure. The purpose is to make the operating limit visible before emotion appears.
Model a difficult month containing five full planned losses, two missed trades and one winner that closes early. Do not change lot size to force the $400 Phase 1 target. Decide whether the strategy still has positive evidence and whether another monthly payment fits the pre-set business budget. Renewal should follow a review, not hope.
Now model success. After Phase 1, keep the same risk for the $250 Phase 2 objective. After funding, record the activation date, ten valid trading days and the first 30-day payout date. Calculate the first share at 70%, not the eventual 90% ceiling. This removes marketing optimism from cash-flow planning.
Finally test BRIDGE. A 12.5% eligible reduction on the initial $29 fee equals $3.63, producing an estimated $25.38 checkout before other adjustments. Use the undiscounted $29 amount for future renewals unless the checkout and written terms clearly confirm recurring application.
Apply this drill to the $10,000 plan before purchase. Write the $59 monthly base fee, next renewal date, $400 daily contractual boundary and $800 static maximum-loss amount on one page. Then add a private daily stop no greater than one-quarter of the contractual daily figure. The purpose is to make the operating limit visible before emotion appears.
Model a difficult month containing five full planned losses, two missed trades and one winner that closes early. Do not change lot size to force the $800 Phase 1 target. Decide whether the strategy still has positive evidence and whether another monthly payment fits the pre-set business budget. Renewal should follow a review, not hope.
Now model success. After Phase 1, keep the same risk for the $500 Phase 2 objective. After funding, record the activation date, ten valid trading days and the first 30-day payout date. Calculate the first share at 70%, not the eventual 90% ceiling. This removes marketing optimism from cash-flow planning.
Finally test BRIDGE. A 12.5% eligible reduction on the initial $59 fee equals $7.38, producing an estimated $51.63 checkout before other adjustments. Use the undiscounted $59 amount for future renewals unless the checkout and written terms clearly confirm recurring application.
Apply this drill to the $25,000 plan before purchase. Write the $99 monthly base fee, next renewal date, $1,000 daily contractual boundary and $2,000 static maximum-loss amount on one page. Then add a private daily stop no greater than one-quarter of the contractual daily figure. The purpose is to make the operating limit visible before emotion appears.
Model a difficult month containing five full planned losses, two missed trades and one winner that closes early. Do not change lot size to force the $2,000 Phase 1 target. Decide whether the strategy still has positive evidence and whether another monthly payment fits the pre-set business budget. Renewal should follow a review, not hope.
Now model success. After Phase 1, keep the same risk for the $1,250 Phase 2 objective. After funding, record the activation date, ten valid trading days and the first 30-day payout date. Calculate the first share at 70%, not the eventual 90% ceiling. This removes marketing optimism from cash-flow planning.
Finally test BRIDGE. A 12.5% eligible reduction on the initial $99 fee equals $12.38, producing an estimated $86.63 checkout before other adjustments. Use the undiscounted $99 amount for future renewals unless the checkout and written terms clearly confirm recurring application.
Apply this drill to the $50,000 plan before purchase. Write the $199 monthly base fee, next renewal date, $2,000 daily contractual boundary and $4,000 static maximum-loss amount on one page. Then add a private daily stop no greater than one-quarter of the contractual daily figure. The purpose is to make the operating limit visible before emotion appears.
Model a difficult month containing five full planned losses, two missed trades and one winner that closes early. Do not change lot size to force the $4,000 Phase 1 target. Decide whether the strategy still has positive evidence and whether another monthly payment fits the pre-set business budget. Renewal should follow a review, not hope.
Now model success. After Phase 1, keep the same risk for the $2,500 Phase 2 objective. After funding, record the activation date, ten valid trading days and the first 30-day payout date. Calculate the first share at 70%, not the eventual 90% ceiling. This removes marketing optimism from cash-flow planning.
Finally test BRIDGE. A 12.5% eligible reduction on the initial $199 fee equals $24.88, producing an estimated $174.13 checkout before other adjustments. Use the undiscounted $199 amount for future renewals unless the checkout and written terms clearly confirm recurring application.
TTT Markets Subscription is a coherent alternative for patient traders who want a lower initial fee, a conventional two-step evaluation and automatic evaluation reissues on future billing dates. Its strongest advantages are predictable restart structure, static maximum loss, a 70% starting funded split and progression to 90% after successful payouts.
Its weaknesses are equally clear: recurring fees accumulate, the first payout is slower than weekly models, passing still requires 8% plus 5%, and billing can create artificial urgency. A trader who expects a rapid pass may find the one-time 2-Step more economical. A trader who wants to skip evaluation entirely should compare Instant Funding.
If Subscription fits, choose the smallest tier that supports correct execution, budget several months at the undiscounted renewal price and treat reissue as insurance. Try BRIDGE for 12.5% off an eligible checkout, but compare temporary promotions and confirm whether the saving is initial or recurring. The best decision is the one that remains sensible even without the coupon.
Prop-firm accounts use program-defined simulated capital and strict contractual rules. Traders can lose fees, breach accounts or become ineligible for payouts. Examples in this review are calculations, not earnings forecasts. Verify the current agreement, checkout, billing policy, cancellation process, country eligibility and payout terms before purchase. This content is educational and is not financial, legal or tax advice.
It is a monthly two-step evaluation. Traders target 8% in Phase 1 and 5% in Phase 2 while following a 4% daily and 8% static maximum-loss limit.
Current monthly USD prices are $29 for $5K, $59 for $10K, $99 for $25K, $199 for $50K, $299 for $100K and $399 for $200K. Verify the live checkout.
A fresh evaluation is issued on the next billing cycle while the subscription remains active. Current official guidance states there is no separate reset fee or manual retry purchase.
No. The official description says the new evaluation is issued on the next billing cycle, not immediately after breach.
Phase 1 requires 8% and Phase 2 requires 5% under the current program rules.
The Subscription Account currently uses a 4% daily loss limit and an 8% static maximum loss based on the initial balance.
The first payout becomes available 30 days after funded-account activation and after completing at least 10 funded trading days. Later payouts are every 30 days.
The funded split starts at 70% to the trader and rises by five percentage points after each successful payout, up to 90%.
The official help centre currently states up to 10 active Subscription Accounts and up to $1,000,000 in total allocation.
BRIDGE is listed for 12.5% off eligible TTT Markets purchases. Test it at checkout and confirm whether it applies only to the initial subscription payment or to renewals; do not assume it stacks with seasonal promotions.
