Blue Guardian $100K Account Review 2026: Models, Prices, Rules and BRIDGE Code

Featured answer: Blue Guardian currently lists seven routes at $100K: Instant Standard, 1 Step Standard, 1 Step Nano, 2 Step Standard, 2 Step Nano, Buy Now Pay Later and Fast Track Ticket. They do not offer the same risk bargain. Recorded prices range from a $10 BNPL entry payment to $635 for the highest recorded upfront route. For eligible purchases, Prop Firm Bridge records coupon code BRIDGE for 40% off; apply it at checkout and confirm the live total before paying.

Published: August 26, 2026. Last checked: August 26, 2026 against current Blue Guardian model pages and the Prop Firm Bridge structured account record. Prices in the PFB record were verified August 23, 2026 and remain subject to checkout confirmation.

This guide owns the search intent “Blue Guardian $100K account review.” It compares what the same notional balance actually means under each available model. For the broader firm verdict, use the Blue Guardian review. For discount-only intent, use the dedicated Blue Guardian coupon guide.

Table of contents

• $100K quick facts
• $100K prices by model
• How to choose the right model
• Instant Standard analysis
• 1 Step Standard analysis
• 1 Step Nano analysis
• 2 Step Standard analysis
• 2 Step Nano analysis
• Buy Now Pay Later analysis
• Fast Track analysis
• Drawdown mathematics
• Payout and fee mathematics
• Practical risk plan
• Platforms and permissions
• How to use BRIDGE
• Who this size fits
• Decision checklist
• $100K complete decision workbook
• Operational controls
• Verdict
• Sources and verification
• Frequently asked questions

$100K Blue Guardian account: quick facts

The headline account size is identical, but the route to a payout is not. A trader choosing only by price can accidentally select a model whose consistency rule, trailing drawdown or payout cap conflicts with the way that trader produces returns. The best $100K account is therefore the one whose constraints fit the strategy, not the one with the most attractive marketing label.

A useful comparison starts with effective risk. On $100K, a 3% daily loss is $3,000, a 4% daily loss is $4,000, a 6% trailing maximum loss starts $6,000 below the initial balance, an 8% static limit is $8,000, and a 10% static limit is $10,000. Those dollar distances determine how many ordinary losing trades a plan can absorb.

Blue Guardian $100K prices by model

How to read the table: “Recorded price” is the current PFB value verified August 23, 2026. “Recorded base price” is the non-discounted reference stored with that plan. These are not a promise that two promotions stack. Enter BRIDGE on the eligible checkout, review the selected model and add-ons, and use the final displayed total as the amount payable.

BNPL is structurally different from a conventional $696 purchase: the trader pays $10 to begin and the remaining activation fee becomes payable after passing. That changes the timing of cash outflow, not the model’s total economic cost. Fast Track is also not a normal challenge fee because it skips the evaluation; its value depends on whether the trader can operate inside funded rules immediately.

The price gap should be evaluated against failure probability. Paying less for a model with a restrictive consistency or payout-cap rule can be expensive if it clashes with a strategy. Paying more for instant access can also be wasteful if the trader has not demonstrated stable execution under a daily-loss ceiling.

How to choose the right $100K model

Use four filters in order. First, decide whether you need an evaluation or immediate access. Second, choose static versus trailing drawdown. Third, check whether the strategy’s best day naturally fits the consistency limit. Fourth, compare payout timing and caps. Only after those decisions should price and the BRIDGE saving influence the final choice.

No row is a universal winner. A swing trader who produces uneven monthly returns may dislike consistency gates even if the drawdown is generous. A steady intraday trader may accept a 20% rule in exchange for immediate access. A trader who wants simple failure math may prefer static drawdown even with two phases.

Instant Standard on $100K: immediate access with trailing risk

The recorded Instant Standard price is $467, against a stored base price of $623. There is no evaluation profit target. The absence of a target removes the “pass fast” objective, but it does not create unrestricted capital: the 3% daily loss equals $3,000, and the 6% trailing maximum drawdown begins at $94,000.

The trailing limit follows the highest closed balance. If the account closes at $104,000, the trailing floor becomes $98,000. Once closed profit reaches 6%, the drawdown locks at the starting balance. A fixed 1% withdrawal buffer then applies, meaning $1,000 should remain above the locked floor when calculating an eligible withdrawal.

Payout eligibility requires five profitable days, with at least 0.5% on each qualifying day. On $100K, one qualifying day therefore means at least $500. The 20% consistency rule means a best day of $1,000 requires total period profit greater than $5,000 before the payout button becomes available. The rule delays eligibility rather than automatically breaching the account.

The base split is 80%, with a recorded paid upgrade to 90%. Instant Standard suits traders who already know their average daily return distribution. It is a poor place to discover whether the strategy works because every experimental loss consumes funded drawdown immediately. Read the full Instant Standard account guide before choosing the size.

1 Step Standard on $100K: the current 9% route

For new accounts purchased from August 20, 2026, the target is 9%, equal to $9,000. Accounts bought before the cutoff retain the former 10% target. The current rule also requires three profitable days, each producing at least 0.5%, or $500 on this size.

The daily loss is 4% ($4,000), while the 6% maximum drawdown trails the highest closed balance and starts at $94,000. At 6% closed profit it locks at the initial balance, after which the 1% withdrawal buffer equals $1,000. This is a materially different experience from an 8% or 10% static floor.

The advantage is no consistency rule in the recorded model. A trader can complete the target with an uneven sequence, provided every risk and minimum-day condition is respected. Funded payouts are normally every 14 days, with an optional seven-day add-on, and the base profit split is 85% with an optional 90% upgrade.

At a recorded $298, 1 Step Standard is the clearest fit for a trader who wants one phase and does not want best-day mathematics. The cost is a tighter trailing framework. Compare all account sizes in the 1 Step Standard review.

1 Step Nano on $100K: lower price, different constraints

1 Step Nano is recorded at $240, with a $320 base reference. The evaluation target is 10%, or $10,000. There is no evaluation minimum-day requirement in the PFB record, while the funded payout stage requires five qualifying profitable days.

The daily and trailing percentages match 1 Step Standard—4% daily and 6% trailing—but the consistency rule does not. Nano uses 50% consistency in the evaluation and funded stages. If the best day earns $2,000, total profit must exceed $4,000 for that day to fall below half of total profit.

Base profit split is 85%, with an optional 100% add-on recorded. Payout frequency is seven days after funded eligibility. The model can suit a trader who wants a lower upfront fee and can distribute gains across multiple sessions. It is less suitable for event-driven or low-frequency strategies that rely on one exceptional day.

The choice between Standard and Nano should not be reduced to price. Standard asks for a lower target under the current rule and has no consistency gate; Nano costs less and offers a faster standard cycle but asks the trader to shape the profit distribution. The 1 Step Nano guide explains that trade-off in model-level detail.

2 Step Standard on $100K: static drawdown and no consistency

2 Step Standard costs $347 in the recorded price table. Current targets are 8% in Phase 1 ($8,000) and 4% in Phase 2 ($4,000). Current post-August-20 purchases require three profitable days per phase, each at least 0.5%.

Its risk framework is 4% daily loss and 8% static maximum loss. The initial account fails if equity reaches or passes the model’s breach threshold around $92,000 under the official wording. Because the overall floor is static, profitable closed days do not drag it upward. That predictability is valuable for strategies that need room to fluctuate after banking gains.

No consistency rule is recorded. The base split is 85%, an optional 90% add-on is available, and the standard payout cycle is 14 days with an optional seven-day upgrade. The route takes two phases but can be easier to plan than a one-step trailing model.

For a method with a stable 0.25% risk unit, Phase 1 requires 32 net risk units and Phase 2 requires 16. That is not a suggested trade count; it is a way to translate percentage targets into the trader’s own performance statistics. See the 2 Step Standard guide for full rule handling.

2 Step Nano on $100K: the widest static buffer with payout limits

At $179, 2 Step Nano is the lowest recorded conventional evaluation price on this size. Its targets are 8% ($8,000) and 5% ($5,000). It records no minimum evaluation trading days, a 3% daily limit and a 10% static overall limit.

The larger $10,000 overall allowance looks generous, but the daily ceiling is only $3,000. More importantly, funded withdrawals use 50% consistency and a 2% initial-balance payout cap per cycle. On $100K, the maximum cycle amount is $2,000. Excess profit remains in the account rather than becoming withdrawable in the same cycle.

The base split is 80%. If a $2,000 eligible profit amount is split 80/20, the trader share is $1,600 before the 2% processing fee. If that fee is charged on the trader reward, the illustrative net is $1,568. Confirm the actual fee calculation in the payout interface.

This model is strongest for traders prioritizing evaluation affordability and static room, who are comfortable building payouts over multiple cycles. It is weaker for someone buying $100K specifically to withdraw a large percentage quickly. Read the dedicated 2 Step Nano review before assuming the largest drawdown equals the largest practical payout.

Buy Now Pay Later on $100K: $10 now is not the total cost

The BNPL record shows a $10 entry payment and a $686 activation fee after passing, for a total recorded economic price of $696. The 4% target equals $4,000, with no evaluation minimum days recorded. Daily loss is 4%, while maximum drawdown is 8% trailing and locks at the starting balance after 8% closed profit; a 1% withdrawal buffer then applies.

The official BNPL page currently conflicts on base profit split: its quick overview says 85%, while the detailed rewards section says 80%; the PFB structured record stores 80%. This guide does not silently select the more attractive number. Confirm the selected checkout and dashboard agreement before treating either percentage as binding.

The official drawdown page overwhelmingly describes 8% trailing drawdown and a lock after 8% profit. One isolated sentence says the lock happens after 6%, which appears inconsistent with the rest of that model page. We use 8% as the model rule while flagging the source typo so readers can ask support if their contract differs.

BNPL can reduce the cost of testing the evaluation, but passing creates a large activation obligation. A rational trader should reserve the activation amount before starting. Do not build a plan that depends on BRIDGE applying to both payment stages unless the checkout expressly shows that treatment.

Fast Track Ticket on $100K: immediate access with a public split conflict

The PFB record lists Fast Track at $635, against a $845 base reference, verified August 23, 2026. It skips the evaluation, records a 4% daily loss and 10% static funded loss, and uses a 14-day payout schedule. The public landing page may display an Instant-style price table without cleanly distinguishing every ticket configuration, so verify the exact product name at checkout.

There is also a genuine profit-split conflict: promotional copy says traders “keep 100%,” the plan card says “up to 90%,” and the PFB structured record stores 85%. This article does not claim one definitive split. The selected checkout, trader agreement and dashboard terms should match before payment.

The economics are very different from an evaluation. You pay more to remove the pass/fail target, but your first live decision happens inside funded rules. Fast Track therefore fits a verified, low-variance strategy better than a trader trying to save time after repeated challenge failures.

If the live page accepts BRIDGE, compare the discounted checkout total with Instant Standard and with the total cost of the evaluation route you are realistically likely to pass. The right comparison is expected cost per funded account, not the sticker price of one attempt.

$100K drawdown mathematics traders should calculate first

These limits are not position-size recommendations. A risk plan should operate far below the breach line because spreads, commission, slippage, correlated positions and floating losses consume the same equity cushion. Treating the whole daily limit as a trading budget leaves no room for execution error.

Reset mechanics matter. The official Standard and Instant pages describe a 5 p.m. EST reset using the higher of balance or equity, then subtracting the fixed percentage of initial balance. A floating profit held through reset can therefore lift the next day’s threshold. Closing, reducing or holding a position through that moment should be a deliberate risk choice.

$100K profit split, payout cap and processing-fee examples

The table separates gross account profit from the trader’s contractual share. It does not assume every amount is immediately withdrawable. Consistency, minimum profitable days, buffer requirements, open-position closure, minimum withdrawal and model-specific caps all come before the split.

A common mistake is to treat “up to 90%” or an optional 100% add-on as the base case. Price the account using the base split and include the cost of any upgrade. For Fast Track and BNPL, use the conflict notes above and insist that the checkout and agreement state the same percentage.

A practical $100K risk plan

A professional plan might use 0.25% ($250) as the initial maximum risk per independent idea, with a lower combined cap for correlated exposure. Two USD pairs moving on the same macro release are not two independent bets merely because they have different symbols.

Set a personal daily stop below the firm’s rule—for example 0.75% to 1%—and a weekly stop that triggers review rather than revenge trading. Under a 9% or 10% target, this pace can feel slow, but preserving attempts usually matters more than compressing the calendar.

For trailing models, measure distance to the current trailing floor before every order, not only distance from the starting balance. For static models, do not mistake an unchanged overall floor for permission to increase size after a winning streak. For consistency models, estimate the denominator required before taking a trade whose potential profit could become the best day.

A payout plan should be drafted before the first trade. Decide the minimum cushion to retain, expected split, processing fee, withdrawal method and model cap. This prevents a trader from reaching eligibility and then discovering that the requested amount would violate a buffer or consistency condition.

Platforms, trading permissions and operational rules

Across the recorded models in this comparison, Blue Guardian supports forex, indices, metals, commodities and cryptocurrency. The PFB record lists MetaTrader 5, Match-Trader and TradeLocker, with EAs permitted. Copy trading is limited to accounts legally owned by the same trader; copying another person's activity or letting a third party operate the account is not the same permission.

The model pages also state a two-minute minimum trade duration. Overnight and weekend holding are allowed, but funded-stage news restrictions matter: opening or closing within five minutes before or after applicable high-impact releases or FOMC events is restricted on the relevant funded accounts. Evaluation-stage permission does not erase the later funded restriction.

Every model in this guide is a simulated trading environment. The displayed account balance is therefore a rules framework, not cash deposited into the trader's bank or brokerage account. The economically meaningful figures are the loss limits, targets, consistency threshold, payout eligibility and fee paid to access the program.

How to use BRIDGE on a Blue Guardian $100K purchase

1. Open the Blue Guardian checkout through the Prop Firm Bridge referral link.
2. Select the $100K size and confirm the exact model name.
3. Review the target, daily loss, overall drawdown, consistency and payout terms shown for that product.
4. Enter coupon code BRIDGE where the checkout accepts a code.
5. Check that the final price changed before completing payment.
6. Save the order confirmation and applicable trader agreement.

Prop Firm Bridge records BRIDGE as a 40% discount for eligible purchases. Current displayed campaigns can differ by model, geography or timing, and a checkout may not stack one promotion on another. The clean SEO answer and the practical buyer instruction are the same: use BRIDGE, then confirm the live checkout total.

The code should influence price, not model selection. Choose the account whose rules fit first; then use the coupon. The dedicated coupon page tracks discount intent, while this article remains focused on the economics and rules of the $100K account.

Who should choose—or avoid—the $100K size

This size can fit a trader with a documented strategy, enough personal cash flow to treat the fee as expendable, and position sizing already expressed as a percentage of rule-based equity. It can also suit someone comparing multiple models who wants a balance large enough for flexible sizing without moving directly to the largest Instant tiers.

Avoid this size if the larger nominal balance creates pressure to earn a specific dollar amount. The safest way to trade $100K is to think in basis points and rule distance. If $500 feels like “too little” for a qualifying day, the account may increase emotional risk rather than improve opportunity.

The $100K tier is the broadest comparison point because every current Blue Guardian model is represented and the fees remain below the corresponding $200K routes. It is often the cleaner place to learn model behavior before doubling notional size.

Remember the firm-wide maximum active funded allocation recorded by PFB is $400,000. Buying or combining accounts should be planned against that allocation rule, not treated as unlimited parallel capacity.

$100K account decision checklist

• Can the strategy satisfy the chosen consistency rule without changing its natural trade selection?
• Does it perform better under a static or trailing overall floor?
• Can you complete each required 0.5% profitable day without oversizing?
• Have you budgeted the full BNPL activation amount, not only the $10 entry?
• For Fast Track, do checkout and agreement resolve the public split conflict?
• Have you modeled the base profit split, 2% processing fee and minimum withdrawal?
• Can you avoid funded-stage high-impact-news windows?
• Does the platform support your actual execution workflow?
• Is the total affordable even if the account never produces a payout?
• Did BRIDGE visibly change the eligible checkout total?

If any answer is uncertain, pause at checkout and compare the model-specific guide. A discount can reduce acquisition cost; it cannot repair a mismatch between strategy and rules.

$100K model-by-model risk, price and payout workbook

This audit expands each available $100K route across eight separate decisions. Repeated calculations are avoided by evaluating the interaction among price, target, drawdown, payout, platform and strategy fit rather than ranking isolated percentages.

Instant Standard: eight-part decision audit

price evidence

For Instant Standard, the price evidence analysis starts from the recorded $467 displayed price, target none, daily limit $3,000, overall rule $6,000 trailing, distribution rule 20%; five $500 days, 80% split and on demand payout timing. The critical source note is closed-profit high-watermark. For decision quality, simulate a losing start, smooth progress and profit followed by retracement. Then calculate gross account profit, eligible request, trader share and the 2% processing fee in that order. Optional add-ons need a break-even calculation. Apply BRIDGE where eligible and rely on the final checkout total rather than assumed stacking.

target pathway

A $100K trader reviewing Instant Standard should treat target pathway as a measurable operating constraint. Current facts are: target none; daily loss $3,000; maximum loss $6,000 trailing; consistency or qualifying condition 20%; five $500 days; split 80%; payout on demand; recorded price $467. Execution must transfer from evaluation to funded trading. Test MT5, Match-Trader or TradeLocker specifications, the two-minute holding rule, self-owned copy limits, overnight exposure and funded news restrictions. If the method must change after passing, the evaluation did not validate the funded strategy. Keep the fee fully affordable even if no payout occurs.

daily-loss control

Instant Standard is designed around immediate access. In the daily-loss control test, the buyer must reconcile $3,000 daily risk with $6,000 trailing overall risk, none target structure, 20%; five $500 days distribution and on demand cash-flow timing. The recorded checkout reference is $467. The useful verdict is based on expected cost per successful funded account, not fee divided by headline balance. immediate access is a legitimate reason to investigate this model; urgency to earn back the payment is not. Save checkout evidence, agreement terms and dashboard screenshots so later rule or price changes do not overwrite the purchase record.

overall drawdown

The practical overall drawdown question for Instant Standard is whether the trader's real history fits the complete package—not one attractive percentage. That package is none target, $3,000 daily loss, $6,000 trailing overall drawdown, 20%; five $500 days, 80% split, on demand payout timing and a $467 recorded displayed cost. Before purchase, translate every percentage into risk units. At $250 per independent idea, calculate the number of ordinary losses to the personal stop, not to the breach line. Preserve spread, commission and correlation room. Record balance, equity, the daily threshold and the current overall floor before every session. A promotion should be applied only after this risk map is acceptable.

consistency and days

For Instant Standard, the consistency and days analysis starts from the recorded $467 displayed price, target none, daily limit $3,000, overall rule $6,000 trailing, distribution rule 20%; five $500 days, 80% split and on demand payout timing. The critical source note is closed-profit high-watermark. For decision quality, simulate a losing start, smooth progress and profit followed by retracement. Then calculate gross account profit, eligible request, trader share and the 2% processing fee in that order. Optional add-ons need a break-even calculation. Apply BRIDGE where eligible and rely on the final checkout total rather than assumed stacking.

payout economics

A $100K trader reviewing Instant Standard should treat payout economics as a measurable operating constraint. Current facts are: target none; daily loss $3,000; maximum loss $6,000 trailing; consistency or qualifying condition 20%; five $500 days; split 80%; payout on demand; recorded price $467. Execution must transfer from evaluation to funded trading. Test MT5, Match-Trader or TradeLocker specifications, the two-minute holding rule, self-owned copy limits, overnight exposure and funded news restrictions. If the method must change after passing, the evaluation did not validate the funded strategy. Keep the fee fully affordable even if no payout occurs.

platform execution

Instant Standard is designed around immediate access. In the platform execution test, the buyer must reconcile $3,000 daily risk with $6,000 trailing overall risk, none target structure, 20%; five $500 days distribution and on demand cash-flow timing. The recorded checkout reference is $467. The useful verdict is based on expected cost per successful funded account, not fee divided by headline balance. immediate access is a legitimate reason to investigate this model; urgency to earn back the payment is not. Save checkout evidence, agreement terms and dashboard screenshots so later rule or price changes do not overwrite the purchase record.

buyer-fit decision

The practical buyer-fit decision question for Instant Standard is whether the trader's real history fits the complete package—not one attractive percentage. That package is none target, $3,000 daily loss, $6,000 trailing overall drawdown, 20%; five $500 days, 80% split, on demand payout timing and a $467 recorded displayed cost. Before purchase, translate every percentage into risk units. At $250 per independent idea, calculate the number of ordinary losses to the personal stop, not to the breach line. Preserve spread, commission and correlation room. Record balance, equity, the daily threshold and the current overall floor before every session. A promotion should be applied only after this risk map is acceptable.

1 Step Standard: eight-part decision audit

price evidence

For 1 Step Standard, the price evidence analysis starts from the recorded $298 displayed price, target $9,000 current, daily limit $4,000, overall rule $6,000 trailing, distribution rule none; three $500 days, 85% split and 14 days payout timing. The critical source note is August 20 cutoff. For decision quality, simulate a losing start, smooth progress and profit followed by retracement. Then calculate gross account profit, eligible request, trader share and the 2% processing fee in that order. Optional add-ons need a break-even calculation. Apply BRIDGE where eligible and rely on the final checkout total rather than assumed stacking.

target pathway

A $100K trader reviewing 1 Step Standard should treat target pathway as a measurable operating constraint. Current facts are: target $9,000 current; daily loss $4,000; maximum loss $6,000 trailing; consistency or qualifying condition none; three $500 days; split 85%; payout 14 days; recorded price $298. Execution must transfer from evaluation to funded trading. Test MT5, Match-Trader or TradeLocker specifications, the two-minute holding rule, self-owned copy limits, overnight exposure and funded news restrictions. If the method must change after passing, the evaluation did not validate the funded strategy. Keep the fee fully affordable even if no payout occurs.

daily-loss control

1 Step Standard is designed around one phase. In the daily-loss control test, the buyer must reconcile $4,000 daily risk with $6,000 trailing overall risk, $9,000 current target structure, none; three $500 days distribution and 14 days cash-flow timing. The recorded checkout reference is $298. The useful verdict is based on expected cost per successful funded account, not fee divided by headline balance. one phase is a legitimate reason to investigate this model; urgency to earn back the payment is not. Save checkout evidence, agreement terms and dashboard screenshots so later rule or price changes do not overwrite the purchase record.

overall drawdown

The practical overall drawdown question for 1 Step Standard is whether the trader's real history fits the complete package—not one attractive percentage. That package is $9,000 current target, $4,000 daily loss, $6,000 trailing overall drawdown, none; three $500 days, 85% split, 14 days payout timing and a $298 recorded displayed cost. Before purchase, translate every percentage into risk units. At $250 to $500 per independent idea, calculate the number of ordinary losses to the personal stop, not to the breach line. Preserve spread, commission and correlation room. Record balance, equity, the daily threshold and the current overall floor before every session. A promotion should be applied only after this risk map is acceptable.

consistency and days

For 1 Step Standard, the consistency and days analysis starts from the recorded $298 displayed price, target $9,000 current, daily limit $4,000, overall rule $6,000 trailing, distribution rule none; three $500 days, 85% split and 14 days payout timing. The critical source note is August 20 cutoff. For decision quality, simulate a losing start, smooth progress and profit followed by retracement. Then calculate gross account profit, eligible request, trader share and the 2% processing fee in that order. Optional add-ons need a break-even calculation. Apply BRIDGE where eligible and rely on the final checkout total rather than assumed stacking.

payout economics

A $100K trader reviewing 1 Step Standard should treat payout economics as a measurable operating constraint. Current facts are: target $9,000 current; daily loss $4,000; maximum loss $6,000 trailing; consistency or qualifying condition none; three $500 days; split 85%; payout 14 days; recorded price $298. Execution must transfer from evaluation to funded trading. Test MT5, Match-Trader or TradeLocker specifications, the two-minute holding rule, self-owned copy limits, overnight exposure and funded news restrictions. If the method must change after passing, the evaluation did not validate the funded strategy. Keep the fee fully affordable even if no payout occurs.

platform execution

1 Step Standard is designed around one phase. In the platform execution test, the buyer must reconcile $4,000 daily risk with $6,000 trailing overall risk, $9,000 current target structure, none; three $500 days distribution and 14 days cash-flow timing. The recorded checkout reference is $298. The useful verdict is based on expected cost per successful funded account, not fee divided by headline balance. one phase is a legitimate reason to investigate this model; urgency to earn back the payment is not. Save checkout evidence, agreement terms and dashboard screenshots so later rule or price changes do not overwrite the purchase record.

buyer-fit decision

The practical buyer-fit decision question for 1 Step Standard is whether the trader's real history fits the complete package—not one attractive percentage. That package is $9,000 current target, $4,000 daily loss, $6,000 trailing overall drawdown, none; three $500 days, 85% split, 14 days payout timing and a $298 recorded displayed cost. Before purchase, translate every percentage into risk units. At $250 to $500 per independent idea, calculate the number of ordinary losses to the personal stop, not to the breach line. Preserve spread, commission and correlation room. Record balance, equity, the daily threshold and the current overall floor before every session. A promotion should be applied only after this risk map is acceptable.

1 Step Nano: eight-part decision audit

price evidence

For 1 Step Nano, the price evidence analysis starts from the recorded $240 displayed price, target $10,000, daily limit $4,000, overall rule $6,000 trailing, distribution rule 50%; five funded $500 days, 85% split and 7 days payout timing. The critical source note is official isolated 3% example is a typo. For decision quality, simulate a losing start, smooth progress and profit followed by retracement. Then calculate gross account profit, eligible request, trader share and the 2% processing fee in that order. Optional add-ons need a break-even calculation. Apply BRIDGE where eligible and rely on the final checkout total rather than assumed stacking.

target pathway

A $100K trader reviewing 1 Step Nano should treat target pathway as a measurable operating constraint. Current facts are: target $10,000; daily loss $4,000; maximum loss $6,000 trailing; consistency or qualifying condition 50%; five funded $500 days; split 85%; payout 7 days; recorded price $240. Execution must transfer from evaluation to funded trading. Test MT5, Match-Trader or TradeLocker specifications, the two-minute holding rule, self-owned copy limits, overnight exposure and funded news restrictions. If the method must change after passing, the evaluation did not validate the funded strategy. Keep the fee fully affordable even if no payout occurs.

daily-loss control

1 Step Nano is designed around lower fee. In the daily-loss control test, the buyer must reconcile $4,000 daily risk with $6,000 trailing overall risk, $10,000 target structure, 50%; five funded $500 days distribution and 7 days cash-flow timing. The recorded checkout reference is $240. The useful verdict is based on expected cost per successful funded account, not fee divided by headline balance. lower fee is a legitimate reason to investigate this model; urgency to earn back the payment is not. Save checkout evidence, agreement terms and dashboard screenshots so later rule or price changes do not overwrite the purchase record.

overall drawdown

The practical overall drawdown question for 1 Step Nano is whether the trader's real history fits the complete package—not one attractive percentage. That package is $10,000 target, $4,000 daily loss, $6,000 trailing overall drawdown, 50%; five funded $500 days, 85% split, 7 days payout timing and a $240 recorded displayed cost. Before purchase, translate every percentage into risk units. At $250 per independent idea, calculate the number of ordinary losses to the personal stop, not to the breach line. Preserve spread, commission and correlation room. Record balance, equity, the daily threshold and the current overall floor before every session. A promotion should be applied only after this risk map is acceptable.

consistency and days

For 1 Step Nano, the consistency and days analysis starts from the recorded $240 displayed price, target $10,000, daily limit $4,000, overall rule $6,000 trailing, distribution rule 50%; five funded $500 days, 85% split and 7 days payout timing. The critical source note is official isolated 3% example is a typo. For decision quality, simulate a losing start, smooth progress and profit followed by retracement. Then calculate gross account profit, eligible request, trader share and the 2% processing fee in that order. Optional add-ons need a break-even calculation. Apply BRIDGE where eligible and rely on the final checkout total rather than assumed stacking.

payout economics

A $100K trader reviewing 1 Step Nano should treat payout economics as a measurable operating constraint. Current facts are: target $10,000; daily loss $4,000; maximum loss $6,000 trailing; consistency or qualifying condition 50%; five funded $500 days; split 85%; payout 7 days; recorded price $240. Execution must transfer from evaluation to funded trading. Test MT5, Match-Trader or TradeLocker specifications, the two-minute holding rule, self-owned copy limits, overnight exposure and funded news restrictions. If the method must change after passing, the evaluation did not validate the funded strategy. Keep the fee fully affordable even if no payout occurs.

platform execution

1 Step Nano is designed around lower fee. In the platform execution test, the buyer must reconcile $4,000 daily risk with $6,000 trailing overall risk, $10,000 target structure, 50%; five funded $500 days distribution and 7 days cash-flow timing. The recorded checkout reference is $240. The useful verdict is based on expected cost per successful funded account, not fee divided by headline balance. lower fee is a legitimate reason to investigate this model; urgency to earn back the payment is not. Save checkout evidence, agreement terms and dashboard screenshots so later rule or price changes do not overwrite the purchase record.

buyer-fit decision

The practical buyer-fit decision question for 1 Step Nano is whether the trader's real history fits the complete package—not one attractive percentage. That package is $10,000 target, $4,000 daily loss, $6,000 trailing overall drawdown, 50%; five funded $500 days, 85% split, 7 days payout timing and a $240 recorded displayed cost. Before purchase, translate every percentage into risk units. At $250 per independent idea, calculate the number of ordinary losses to the personal stop, not to the breach line. Preserve spread, commission and correlation room. Record balance, equity, the daily threshold and the current overall floor before every session. A promotion should be applied only after this risk map is acceptable.

2 Step Standard: eight-part decision audit

price evidence

For 2 Step Standard, the price evidence analysis starts from the recorded $347 displayed price, target $8,000 then $4,000, daily limit $4,000, overall rule $8,000 static, distribution rule none; three $500 days per phase, 85% split and 14 days payout timing. The critical source note is equity includes floating loss. For decision quality, simulate a losing start, smooth progress and profit followed by retracement. Then calculate gross account profit, eligible request, trader share and the 2% processing fee in that order. Optional add-ons need a break-even calculation. Apply BRIDGE where eligible and rely on the final checkout total rather than assumed stacking.

target pathway

A $100K trader reviewing 2 Step Standard should treat target pathway as a measurable operating constraint. Current facts are: target $8,000 then $4,000; daily loss $4,000; maximum loss $8,000 static; consistency or qualifying condition none; three $500 days per phase; split 85%; payout 14 days; recorded price $347. Execution must transfer from evaluation to funded trading. Test MT5, Match-Trader or TradeLocker specifications, the two-minute holding rule, self-owned copy limits, overnight exposure and funded news restrictions. If the method must change after passing, the evaluation did not validate the funded strategy. Keep the fee fully affordable even if no payout occurs.

daily-loss control

2 Step Standard is designed around fixed floor. In the daily-loss control test, the buyer must reconcile $4,000 daily risk with $8,000 static overall risk, $8,000 then $4,000 target structure, none; three $500 days per phase distribution and 14 days cash-flow timing. The recorded checkout reference is $347. The useful verdict is based on expected cost per successful funded account, not fee divided by headline balance. fixed floor is a legitimate reason to investigate this model; urgency to earn back the payment is not. Save checkout evidence, agreement terms and dashboard screenshots so later rule or price changes do not overwrite the purchase record.

overall drawdown

The practical overall drawdown question for 2 Step Standard is whether the trader's real history fits the complete package—not one attractive percentage. That package is $8,000 then $4,000 target, $4,000 daily loss, $8,000 static overall drawdown, none; three $500 days per phase, 85% split, 14 days payout timing and a $347 recorded displayed cost. Before purchase, translate every percentage into risk units. At $250 to $500 per independent idea, calculate the number of ordinary losses to the personal stop, not to the breach line. Preserve spread, commission and correlation room. Record balance, equity, the daily threshold and the current overall floor before every session. A promotion should be applied only after this risk map is acceptable.

consistency and days

For 2 Step Standard, the consistency and days analysis starts from the recorded $347 displayed price, target $8,000 then $4,000, daily limit $4,000, overall rule $8,000 static, distribution rule none; three $500 days per phase, 85% split and 14 days payout timing. The critical source note is equity includes floating loss. For decision quality, simulate a losing start, smooth progress and profit followed by retracement. Then calculate gross account profit, eligible request, trader share and the 2% processing fee in that order. Optional add-ons need a break-even calculation. Apply BRIDGE where eligible and rely on the final checkout total rather than assumed stacking.

payout economics

A $100K trader reviewing 2 Step Standard should treat payout economics as a measurable operating constraint. Current facts are: target $8,000 then $4,000; daily loss $4,000; maximum loss $8,000 static; consistency or qualifying condition none; three $500 days per phase; split 85%; payout 14 days; recorded price $347. Execution must transfer from evaluation to funded trading. Test MT5, Match-Trader or TradeLocker specifications, the two-minute holding rule, self-owned copy limits, overnight exposure and funded news restrictions. If the method must change after passing, the evaluation did not validate the funded strategy. Keep the fee fully affordable even if no payout occurs.

platform execution

2 Step Standard is designed around fixed floor. In the platform execution test, the buyer must reconcile $4,000 daily risk with $8,000 static overall risk, $8,000 then $4,000 target structure, none; three $500 days per phase distribution and 14 days cash-flow timing. The recorded checkout reference is $347. The useful verdict is based on expected cost per successful funded account, not fee divided by headline balance. fixed floor is a legitimate reason to investigate this model; urgency to earn back the payment is not. Save checkout evidence, agreement terms and dashboard screenshots so later rule or price changes do not overwrite the purchase record.

buyer-fit decision

The practical buyer-fit decision question for 2 Step Standard is whether the trader's real history fits the complete package—not one attractive percentage. That package is $8,000 then $4,000 target, $4,000 daily loss, $8,000 static overall drawdown, none; three $500 days per phase, 85% split, 14 days payout timing and a $347 recorded displayed cost. Before purchase, translate every percentage into risk units. At $250 to $500 per independent idea, calculate the number of ordinary losses to the personal stop, not to the breach line. Preserve spread, commission and correlation room. Record balance, equity, the daily threshold and the current overall floor before every session. A promotion should be applied only after this risk map is acceptable.

2 Step Nano: eight-part decision audit

price evidence

For 2 Step Nano, the price evidence analysis starts from the recorded $179 displayed price, target $8,000 then $5,000, daily limit $3,000, overall rule $10,000 static, distribution rule 50% funded, 80% split and 14 days; $2,000 cap payout timing. The critical source note is payout capacity differs from drawdown. For decision quality, simulate a losing start, smooth progress and profit followed by retracement. Then calculate gross account profit, eligible request, trader share and the 2% processing fee in that order. Optional add-ons need a break-even calculation. Apply BRIDGE where eligible and rely on the final checkout total rather than assumed stacking.

target pathway

A $100K trader reviewing 2 Step Nano should treat target pathway as a measurable operating constraint. Current facts are: target $8,000 then $5,000; daily loss $3,000; maximum loss $10,000 static; consistency or qualifying condition 50% funded; split 80%; payout 14 days; $2,000 cap; recorded price $179. Execution must transfer from evaluation to funded trading. Test MT5, Match-Trader or TradeLocker specifications, the two-minute holding rule, self-owned copy limits, overnight exposure and funded news restrictions. If the method must change after passing, the evaluation did not validate the funded strategy. Keep the fee fully affordable even if no payout occurs.

daily-loss control

2 Step Nano is designed around lowest evaluation price. In the daily-loss control test, the buyer must reconcile $3,000 daily risk with $10,000 static overall risk, $8,000 then $5,000 target structure, 50% funded distribution and 14 days; $2,000 cap cash-flow timing. The recorded checkout reference is $179. The useful verdict is based on expected cost per successful funded account, not fee divided by headline balance. lowest evaluation price is a legitimate reason to investigate this model; urgency to earn back the payment is not. Save checkout evidence, agreement terms and dashboard screenshots so later rule or price changes do not overwrite the purchase record.

overall drawdown

The practical overall drawdown question for 2 Step Nano is whether the trader's real history fits the complete package—not one attractive percentage. That package is $8,000 then $5,000 target, $3,000 daily loss, $10,000 static overall drawdown, 50% funded, 80% split, 14 days; $2,000 cap payout timing and a $179 recorded displayed cost. Before purchase, translate every percentage into risk units. At $250 per independent idea, calculate the number of ordinary losses to the personal stop, not to the breach line. Preserve spread, commission and correlation room. Record balance, equity, the daily threshold and the current overall floor before every session. A promotion should be applied only after this risk map is acceptable.

consistency and days

For 2 Step Nano, the consistency and days analysis starts from the recorded $179 displayed price, target $8,000 then $5,000, daily limit $3,000, overall rule $10,000 static, distribution rule 50% funded, 80% split and 14 days; $2,000 cap payout timing. The critical source note is payout capacity differs from drawdown. For decision quality, simulate a losing start, smooth progress and profit followed by retracement. Then calculate gross account profit, eligible request, trader share and the 2% processing fee in that order. Optional add-ons need a break-even calculation. Apply BRIDGE where eligible and rely on the final checkout total rather than assumed stacking.

payout economics

A $100K trader reviewing 2 Step Nano should treat payout economics as a measurable operating constraint. Current facts are: target $8,000 then $5,000; daily loss $3,000; maximum loss $10,000 static; consistency or qualifying condition 50% funded; split 80%; payout 14 days; $2,000 cap; recorded price $179. Execution must transfer from evaluation to funded trading. Test MT5, Match-Trader or TradeLocker specifications, the two-minute holding rule, self-owned copy limits, overnight exposure and funded news restrictions. If the method must change after passing, the evaluation did not validate the funded strategy. Keep the fee fully affordable even if no payout occurs.

platform execution

2 Step Nano is designed around lowest evaluation price. In the platform execution test, the buyer must reconcile $3,000 daily risk with $10,000 static overall risk, $8,000 then $5,000 target structure, 50% funded distribution and 14 days; $2,000 cap cash-flow timing. The recorded checkout reference is $179. The useful verdict is based on expected cost per successful funded account, not fee divided by headline balance. lowest evaluation price is a legitimate reason to investigate this model; urgency to earn back the payment is not. Save checkout evidence, agreement terms and dashboard screenshots so later rule or price changes do not overwrite the purchase record.

buyer-fit decision

The practical buyer-fit decision question for 2 Step Nano is whether the trader's real history fits the complete package—not one attractive percentage. That package is $8,000 then $5,000 target, $3,000 daily loss, $10,000 static overall drawdown, 50% funded, 80% split, 14 days; $2,000 cap payout timing and a $179 recorded displayed cost. Before purchase, translate every percentage into risk units. At $250 per independent idea, calculate the number of ordinary losses to the personal stop, not to the breach line. Preserve spread, commission and correlation room. Record balance, equity, the daily threshold and the current overall floor before every session. A promotion should be applied only after this risk map is acceptable.

BNPL: eight-part decision audit

price evidence

For BNPL, the price evidence analysis starts from the recorded $10 displayed price, target $4,000, daily limit $4,000, overall rule $8,000 trailing, distribution rule 20% funded, 80% PFB; official 80/85 conflict split and on demand payout timing. The critical source note is dominant rule locks after 8%; isolated 6% sentence conflicts. For decision quality, simulate a losing start, smooth progress and profit followed by retracement. Then calculate gross account profit, eligible request, trader share and the 2% processing fee in that order. Optional add-ons need a break-even calculation. Apply BRIDGE where eligible and rely on the final checkout total rather than assumed stacking.

target pathway

A $100K trader reviewing BNPL should treat target pathway as a measurable operating constraint. Current facts are: target $4,000; daily loss $4,000; maximum loss $8,000 trailing; consistency or qualifying condition 20% funded; split 80% PFB; official 80/85 conflict; payout on demand; recorded price $10. Execution must transfer from evaluation to funded trading. Test MT5, Match-Trader or TradeLocker specifications, the two-minute holding rule, self-owned copy limits, overnight exposure and funded news restrictions. If the method must change after passing, the evaluation did not validate the funded strategy. Keep the fee fully affordable even if no payout occurs.

daily-loss control

BNPL is designed around $10 now plus $686 activation. In the daily-loss control test, the buyer must reconcile $4,000 daily risk with $8,000 trailing overall risk, $4,000 target structure, 20% funded distribution and on demand cash-flow timing. The recorded checkout reference is $10. The useful verdict is based on expected cost per successful funded account, not fee divided by headline balance. $10 now plus $686 activation is a legitimate reason to investigate this model; urgency to earn back the payment is not. Save checkout evidence, agreement terms and dashboard screenshots so later rule or price changes do not overwrite the purchase record.

overall drawdown

The practical overall drawdown question for BNPL is whether the trader's real history fits the complete package—not one attractive percentage. That package is $4,000 target, $4,000 daily loss, $8,000 trailing overall drawdown, 20% funded, 80% PFB; official 80/85 conflict split, on demand payout timing and a $10 recorded displayed cost. Before purchase, translate every percentage into risk units. At $250 to $500 per independent idea, calculate the number of ordinary losses to the personal stop, not to the breach line. Preserve spread, commission and correlation room. Record balance, equity, the daily threshold and the current overall floor before every session. A promotion should be applied only after this risk map is acceptable.

consistency and days

For BNPL, the consistency and days analysis starts from the recorded $10 displayed price, target $4,000, daily limit $4,000, overall rule $8,000 trailing, distribution rule 20% funded, 80% PFB; official 80/85 conflict split and on demand payout timing. The critical source note is dominant rule locks after 8%; isolated 6% sentence conflicts. For decision quality, simulate a losing start, smooth progress and profit followed by retracement. Then calculate gross account profit, eligible request, trader share and the 2% processing fee in that order. Optional add-ons need a break-even calculation. Apply BRIDGE where eligible and rely on the final checkout total rather than assumed stacking.

payout economics

A $100K trader reviewing BNPL should treat payout economics as a measurable operating constraint. Current facts are: target $4,000; daily loss $4,000; maximum loss $8,000 trailing; consistency or qualifying condition 20% funded; split 80% PFB; official 80/85 conflict; payout on demand; recorded price $10. Execution must transfer from evaluation to funded trading. Test MT5, Match-Trader or TradeLocker specifications, the two-minute holding rule, self-owned copy limits, overnight exposure and funded news restrictions. If the method must change after passing, the evaluation did not validate the funded strategy. Keep the fee fully affordable even if no payout occurs.

platform execution

BNPL is designed around $10 now plus $686 activation. In the platform execution test, the buyer must reconcile $4,000 daily risk with $8,000 trailing overall risk, $4,000 target structure, 20% funded distribution and on demand cash-flow timing. The recorded checkout reference is $10. The useful verdict is based on expected cost per successful funded account, not fee divided by headline balance. $10 now plus $686 activation is a legitimate reason to investigate this model; urgency to earn back the payment is not. Save checkout evidence, agreement terms and dashboard screenshots so later rule or price changes do not overwrite the purchase record.

buyer-fit decision

The practical buyer-fit decision question for BNPL is whether the trader's real history fits the complete package—not one attractive percentage. That package is $4,000 target, $4,000 daily loss, $8,000 trailing overall drawdown, 20% funded, 80% PFB; official 80/85 conflict split, on demand payout timing and a $10 recorded displayed cost. Before purchase, translate every percentage into risk units. At $250 to $500 per independent idea, calculate the number of ordinary losses to the personal stop, not to the breach line. Preserve spread, commission and correlation room. Record balance, equity, the daily threshold and the current overall floor before every session. A promotion should be applied only after this risk map is acceptable.

Fast Track: eight-part decision audit

price evidence

For Fast Track, the price evidence analysis starts from the recorded $635 displayed price, target none, daily limit $4,000, overall rule $10,000 static, distribution rule confirm ticket, 85% PFB; public 100/up-to-90 conflict split and 14 days payout timing. The critical source note is checkout must identify configuration. For decision quality, simulate a losing start, smooth progress and profit followed by retracement. Then calculate gross account profit, eligible request, trader share and the 2% processing fee in that order. Optional add-ons need a break-even calculation. Apply BRIDGE where eligible and rely on the final checkout total rather than assumed stacking.

target pathway

A $100K trader reviewing Fast Track should treat target pathway as a measurable operating constraint. Current facts are: target none; daily loss $4,000; maximum loss $10,000 static; consistency or qualifying condition confirm ticket; split 85% PFB; public 100/up-to-90 conflict; payout 14 days; recorded price $635. Execution must transfer from evaluation to funded trading. Test MT5, Match-Trader or TradeLocker specifications, the two-minute holding rule, self-owned copy limits, overnight exposure and funded news restrictions. If the method must change after passing, the evaluation did not validate the funded strategy. Keep the fee fully affordable even if no payout occurs.

daily-loss control

Fast Track is designed around skip evaluation. In the daily-loss control test, the buyer must reconcile $4,000 daily risk with $10,000 static overall risk, none target structure, confirm ticket distribution and 14 days cash-flow timing. The recorded checkout reference is $635. The useful verdict is based on expected cost per successful funded account, not fee divided by headline balance. skip evaluation is a legitimate reason to investigate this model; urgency to earn back the payment is not. Save checkout evidence, agreement terms and dashboard screenshots so later rule or price changes do not overwrite the purchase record.

overall drawdown

The practical overall drawdown question for Fast Track is whether the trader's real history fits the complete package—not one attractive percentage. That package is none target, $4,000 daily loss, $10,000 static overall drawdown, confirm ticket, 85% PFB; public 100/up-to-90 conflict split, 14 days payout timing and a $635 recorded displayed cost. Before purchase, translate every percentage into risk units. At $250 to $500 per independent idea, calculate the number of ordinary losses to the personal stop, not to the breach line. Preserve spread, commission and correlation room. Record balance, equity, the daily threshold and the current overall floor before every session. A promotion should be applied only after this risk map is acceptable.

consistency and days

For Fast Track, the consistency and days analysis starts from the recorded $635 displayed price, target none, daily limit $4,000, overall rule $10,000 static, distribution rule confirm ticket, 85% PFB; public 100/up-to-90 conflict split and 14 days payout timing. The critical source note is checkout must identify configuration. For decision quality, simulate a losing start, smooth progress and profit followed by retracement. Then calculate gross account profit, eligible request, trader share and the 2% processing fee in that order. Optional add-ons need a break-even calculation. Apply BRIDGE where eligible and rely on the final checkout total rather than assumed stacking.

payout economics

A $100K trader reviewing Fast Track should treat payout economics as a measurable operating constraint. Current facts are: target none; daily loss $4,000; maximum loss $10,000 static; consistency or qualifying condition confirm ticket; split 85% PFB; public 100/up-to-90 conflict; payout 14 days; recorded price $635. Execution must transfer from evaluation to funded trading. Test MT5, Match-Trader or TradeLocker specifications, the two-minute holding rule, self-owned copy limits, overnight exposure and funded news restrictions. If the method must change after passing, the evaluation did not validate the funded strategy. Keep the fee fully affordable even if no payout occurs.

platform execution

Fast Track is designed around skip evaluation. In the platform execution test, the buyer must reconcile $4,000 daily risk with $10,000 static overall risk, none target structure, confirm ticket distribution and 14 days cash-flow timing. The recorded checkout reference is $635. The useful verdict is based on expected cost per successful funded account, not fee divided by headline balance. skip evaluation is a legitimate reason to investigate this model; urgency to earn back the payment is not. Save checkout evidence, agreement terms and dashboard screenshots so later rule or price changes do not overwrite the purchase record.

buyer-fit decision

The practical buyer-fit decision question for Fast Track is whether the trader's real history fits the complete package—not one attractive percentage. That package is none target, $4,000 daily loss, $10,000 static overall drawdown, confirm ticket, 85% PFB; public 100/up-to-90 conflict split, 14 days payout timing and a $635 recorded displayed cost. Before purchase, translate every percentage into risk units. At $250 to $500 per independent idea, calculate the number of ordinary losses to the personal stop, not to the breach line. Preserve spread, commission and correlation room. Record balance, equity, the daily threshold and the current overall floor before every session. A promotion should be applied only after this risk map is acceptable.

$100K operational controls before and after purchase

Portfolio exposure

Group trades by economic driver. EURUSD, GBPUSD and gold can become one USD position, so four tickets may equal one concentrated idea. Set a combined open-risk cap below 1% and reduce it around correlated events. The control must be written before trading and reviewed after each session. A $100K notional balance does not reduce the need for conservative sizing; it increases the dollar consequence of a percentage mistake. Use a personal daily stop materially below the firm's limit and pause whenever dashboard terms conflict with the saved agreement.

Trailing-floor journal

For Instant, one-step and BNPL routes, record the highest closed balance and current floor after every close. A profitable account can have less remaining room than its starting balance suggests. Never estimate the floor from memory. The control must be written before trading and reviewed after each session. A $100K notional balance does not reduce the need for conservative sizing; it increases the dollar consequence of a percentage mistake. Use a personal daily stop materially below the firm's limit and pause whenever dashboard terms conflict with the saved agreement.

Static-floor journal

For two-step Standard, two-step Nano and the recorded Fast Track structure, the overall floor does not rise with profit. Still include floating loss, commission and swap when measuring equity distance to breach. The control must be written before trading and reviewed after each session. A $100K notional balance does not reduce the need for conservative sizing; it increases the dollar consequence of a percentage mistake. Use a personal daily stop materially below the firm's limit and pause whenever dashboard terms conflict with the saved agreement.

Consistency ledger

Track every profitable day, total period profit, highest day and the resulting ratio. Five equal days are 20%, six equal days are 16.67%, and three equal days are 33.33%. Equality may fail wording requiring below the threshold. The control must be written before trading and reviewed after each session. A $100K notional balance does not reduce the need for conservative sizing; it increases the dollar consequence of a percentage mistake. Use a personal daily stop materially below the firm's limit and pause whenever dashboard terms conflict with the saved agreement.

Payout worksheet

Separate account profit, eligible amount, cap, contractual split, processing fee and received amount. On 2 Step Nano the 2% cap is $2,000 per cycle; at 80%, that is $1,600 before fee if the cap is applied to gross eligible profit. The control must be written before trading and reviewed after each session. A $100K notional balance does not reduce the need for conservative sizing; it increases the dollar consequence of a percentage mistake. Use a personal daily stop materially below the firm's limit and pause whenever dashboard terms conflict with the saved agreement.

Platform rehearsal

Run the exact symbols, order types, EA logic and stop behavior on the intended platform. Verify server time and the 5 p.m. EST reset. A platform preference is secondary to reliable compliance and emergency closure. The control must be written before trading and reviewed after each session. A $100K notional balance does not reduce the need for conservative sizing; it increases the dollar consequence of a percentage mistake. Use a personal daily stop materially below the firm's limit and pause whenever dashboard terms conflict with the saved agreement.

Thirty-session test

Rehearse the selected rules on demo for at least twenty to thirty sessions. Record rule distance and best-day concentration. Instant or Fast Track should not be purchased merely to avoid evidence gathering. The control must be written before trading and reviewed after each session. A $100K notional balance does not reduce the need for conservative sizing; it increases the dollar consequence of a percentage mistake. Use a personal daily stop materially below the firm's limit and pause whenever dashboard terms conflict with the saved agreement.

Checkout evidence

Save model, size, platform, add-ons, base amount, BRIDGE entry, final total and agreement. BNPL requires separate evidence for activation treatment; Fast Track requires explicit product and split confirmation. The control must be written before trading and reviewed after each session. A $100K notional balance does not reduce the need for conservative sizing; it increases the dollar consequence of a percentage mistake. Use a personal daily stop materially below the firm's limit and pause whenever dashboard terms conflict with the saved agreement.

Prop Firm Bridge verdict on the Blue Guardian $100K account

The Blue Guardian $100K lineup is valuable because it offers genuinely different structures at one size. Our first choice for rule simplicity is 2 Step Standard for traders willing to complete two phases: static 8% overall loss, no consistency and clear 8%/4% targets. Our value choice is 2 Step Nano when the trader accepts the 3% daily limit, 50% funded consistency and 2% payout cap. Instant Standard is for proven traders who understand trailing drawdown and consistency—not simply those who dislike evaluations.

1 Step Standard is the clean one-phase option under the current 9% rule. 1 Step Nano is cheaper but asks more from profit distribution. BNPL solves initial cash timing rather than total affordability. Fast Track removes the evaluation but currently requires special care because its public split messaging conflicts.

Use BRIDGE after choosing the correct model, confirm the live price, and keep a copy of the terms. That sequence gives the coupon commercial value without letting the promotion dominate a risk decision.

Sources, methodology and verification

Prop Firm Bridge used its structured Blue Guardian record for account availability, prices and account-size mapping. Rules were checked against Blue Guardian’s official model pages on August 26, 2026, including Instant Standard, 1 Step Standard, 1 Step Nano, 2 Step Standard and 2 Step Nano.

Where official pages conflict, this guide states the conflict instead of selecting the most promotional figure. Prices were last recorded August 23, 2026 and must be confirmed at checkout. Written by Akash Mane, Founder and CEO of Prop Firm Bridge; fact-checked by Manoj Gholap.

Frequently asked questions

How much does a Blue Guardian $100K account cost?

The PFB record checked on 2026-08-23 lists prices from $10 to $635 depending on model. BNPL separates a $10 entry payment from its activation fee. Live promotions can change the total, so enter BRIDGE where eligible and confirm the checkout amount.

Which Blue Guardian $100K model has the largest overall loss allowance?

The 2 Step Nano and recorded Fast Track structures use a 10% static maximum loss, equal to $10,000. A static percentage is not automatically “easier”; daily limits and payout rules still control usable risk.

What is the current 1 Step Standard target on $100K?

For accounts purchased from August 20, 2026, the current target is 9%, equal to $9,000. Older accounts retain the prior 10% target.

What are the 2 Step Standard targets on $100K?

Phase 1 is 8% ($8,000) and Phase 2 is 4% ($4,000). Current purchases require three profitable days per phase, each producing at least 0.5%.

What are the 2 Step Nano targets on $100K?

Phase 1 is 8% ($8,000) and Phase 2 is 5% ($5,000), with no evaluation minimum trading days recorded.

Does Blue Guardian allow EAs on $100K accounts?

Yes, the current model records allow EAs, provided the setup and activity comply with Blue Guardian’s prohibited-strategy, ownership and risk rules.

Can I hold Blue Guardian $100K trades overnight or over weekends?

The model pages state overnight and weekend holding are allowed. Traders must still manage gap risk and funded-stage high-impact-news restrictions.

Is BRIDGE the Blue Guardian discount code?

Prop Firm Bridge records BRIDGE as the current 40% coupon for eligible Blue Guardian purchases. Apply it before payment and confirm the live total, since displayed campaigns and stacking rules can change.

Does BRIDGE reduce the BNPL activation fee?

Eligibility can depend on the live checkout configuration. Do not assume the code reduces both the $10 entry and later activation fee; verify each payable amount before committing.

What is the 2 Step Nano payout cap on $100K?

The cap is 2% of initial balance per profit cycle, equal to $2,000. Profit above the cycle cap remains in the account for a later eligible cycle under the published model rules.

How does the 2% payout processing fee affect rewards?

Blue Guardian’s general payout information records a 2% processing fee. If it is applied to a $2,000 trader reward, the fee would be $40; the payment screen is the final confirmation of the fee base.

Which $100K model has no evaluation?

Instant Standard and the recorded Fast Track route provide immediate funded-style access rather than a profit-target evaluation. They still impose funded risk, consistency or payout conditions.

Is the Blue Guardian $100K account real capital?

The current PFB record describes evaluation and funded environments as simulated. “$100K” refers to the notional account size used for rule calculations.

What is the minimum withdrawal?

The current model pages list $100 through Crypto and $500 through Rise, subject to model eligibility and payout-cycle conditions.

Who should avoid the $100K size?

Traders who size positions from the headline balance, cannot keep risk below the daily limit, or would need to recover the fee quickly should choose a smaller size or continue testing on demo.