TTT Markets $750K 1-Step Pro review: price, target, drawdown, payouts, scaling, risk math and estimated 12.5% savings with BRIDGE.
Akash Mane is the Founder and CEO of Prop Firm Bridge, where he leads the company’s vision, platform growth, and long term strategic direction. He oversees operations across research, marketing, content systems, SEO, and product positioning while driving the platform’s mission of becoming a trusted authority in the prop firm industry. At Prop Firm Bridge, Akash plays a direct role in shaping educational frameworks, comparison systems, and trader focused resources designed to help users make informed decisions with transparency and confidence. His work focuses on building scalable organic growth systems, improving platform authority, and strengthening trust through accurate, structured, and search optimized content. In addition to leadership responsibilities, he actively manages growth strategy, social media marketing, search visibility, and brand development to expand the platform’s reach across global trading audiences.
Manoj Gholap is responsible for content accuracy, compliance, and factual integrity at Prop Firm Bridge. He acts as the final verification layer for all published content, ensuring that prop firm reviews, rules, and comparisons are clear, accurate, and aligned with transparency standards. Manoj plays a key role in maintaining trust and credibility across the platform.
Quick answer: The current Prop Firm Bridge record lists the TTT Markets $750K account only as a 1-Step Pro evaluation: $8,499 base price, 10% target ($75,000), 4% daily loss limit ($30,000), 8% overall loss limit ($60,000), and up to a 90% profit split. BRIDGE at 12.5% saves approximately $1,062.38, making the estimated eligible base total $7,436.63. TTT’s public site currently exposes a Pro selector and advertises up to $4 million capital and a 90% split, but its indexed Help Centre does not provide a Pro-specific rule sheet. Therefore this review does not import Standard 1-Step trailing rules into Pro; verify the $750K Pro dashboard and written terms before trading.
Verification note: Reviewed 25 August 2026 against TTT Markets’ live public site, indexed Help Centre, current Prop Firm Bridge challenge record and available checkout-facing information. Where a Pro-specific official source was unavailable, the article labels the point as unconfirmed instead of presenting a Standard-account rule as a Pro fact.
The $750,000 account is a specialized high-ticket evaluation, not merely a bigger version of every other TTT Markets plan. The only genuine route currently recorded at this size is 1-Step Pro. There is no $750K 2-Step Standard, 2-Step Lite, 1-Step Lite, Instant Funding or Subscription route in the verified account table. The article therefore analyzes one real product instead of manufacturing comparisons for search traffic.
At $8,499 before discounts, the purchase decision deserves a stricter due-diligence standard than a small evaluation. A trader should know exactly how daily and overall loss are calculated, whether any threshold trails, what counts as a valid trading day, how the funded profit split progresses, whether scaling applies to Pro, which strategies are prohibited, and whether recovery mechanisms exist. If those answers are not shown in the signed account terms, ask support in writing before paying.
Our verdict is cautious. The recorded numbers—10% target, 4% daily, 8% overall, up to 90% split and possible scaling—can look attractive for a proven professional process. But the absence of an indexed Pro-specific Help Centre section means traders should not rely on assumptions imported from Standard. The account is suitable only for someone who can independently verify the contract, afford to lose the fee and operate with conservative risk.
TTT’s live public selector displays Standard, Lite and Pro types, confirming Pro as a distinct product family. However, the publicly indexed page does not expose all configuration details in crawler-readable text. The current PFB record supplies the $750K Pro price and objective set, while the buyer’s live checkout and account agreement remain the final authority.
| Item | Current finding | Confidence and caveat |
|---|---|---|
| Available route | 1-Step Pro only | Confirmed in current PFB product record; official site shows Pro as a selectable family |
| Base price | $8,499 one-time | Current PFB record; confirm the live Pro checkout |
| Profit target | 10% = $75,000 | Current PFB record; consistent with general 1-Step objective |
| Daily loss limit | 4% = $30,000 | Current PFB record; Pro calculation method needs written confirmation |
| Overall loss limit | 8% = $60,000 | PFB record labels Pro static; no indexed Pro rule page independently confirms mechanics |
| Drawdown Upgrade | Not available on Pro | Current official add-on page says Drawdown Upgrade is unavailable on Pro |
| Account Protection | Not available on Pro | Current official add-on page excludes Pro |
| Profit split | Up to 90% | Current PFB Pro record and official firm-wide headline; stage sequence unconfirmed |
| Scaling | Firm-wide 1-Step messaging: 10% in 3 months out of 12, then double | Confirm that the $750K Pro contract participates and how $4M cap applies |
| Payout cycle | PFB record: every 14 trading days | Official general 1-Step page has different first-withdrawal conditions; confirm Pro terms |
| Buyback | No published $750K price found | Official buyback table stops at $500K; do not assume a $15,000 option exists |
The recorded base fee is $8,499. A 12.5% discount equals $1,062.375, normally displayed as $1,062.38. Subtracting that amount gives $7,436.625, normally displayed as $7,436.63. The calculation is straightforward: $8,499 × 0.125 = $1,062.375 saved; $8,499 × 0.875 = $7,436.625 estimated total.
Use BRIDGE through the TTT Markets partner checkout. The estimated figure is not a billing promise. Taxes, currency conversion, card or crypto processing, regional availability and campaign rules may change the displayed total. Do not complete payment until checkout visibly accepts the code and the product name says $750K 1-Step Pro.
The standard recorded overall loss allowance is $60,000, so the undiscounted $8,499 fee equals about 14.17% of that allowance. The estimated discounted fee equals about 12.39%. This ratio does not turn drawdown into owned capital; it simply helps compare acquisition cost with the maximum simulated loss boundary. A trader can still lose the entire fee on the first rule violation.
TTT Markets currently advertises a separate temporary seasonal evaluation code on its public pages. BRIDGE is the Prop Firm Bridge code recorded at 12.5% for eligible purchases. Do not assume the two offers stack. Compare the actual checkout totals and attached conditions. If a temporary campaign is valid on Pro and produces a lower lawful total, report that honestly rather than pretending BRIDGE is always mathematically highest.
Seasonal marketing can expire without notice or exclude premium products. BRIDGE should be entered and verified, not merely typed into an article. Preserve a screenshot of the accepted discount, exact product, currency, payment amount and terms.
TTT’s official Help Centre currently describes Standard 1-Step drawdown as trailing. The current PFB record, however, labels 1-Step Pro’s 8% overall drawdown as static. Because Pro is explicitly a separate product type and the official add-on page treats Pro differently, it would be unsafe to copy the Standard trailing rule into this article as though it were proven for Pro.
This review therefore uses careful language. The recorded Pro limit is 8% static, equal to $60,000 from a $750,000 start, but readers must obtain Pro-specific written confirmation of the floor, reference value, reset time, trailing behavior and any stop-trailing point. The article does not claim that Standard’s highest-equity logic automatically applies to Pro.
The difference is economically significant. A static floor would remain at $690,000. A fully trailing $60,000 distance could rise after a new high. For example, if the account reached $780,000, a simplified trailing floor might become $720,000. That is only an illustration of why classification matters—not a claim about Pro’s actual calculation.
A 10% objective on $750,000 equals $75,000, so the simple target balance is $825,000. Reaching that number is not the only requirement. Trading behavior, loss thresholds, prohibited strategies, platform rules, identity checks and any consistency review still matter. Profit created through excluded behavior can be removed or the account can be terminated.
The target-to-overall-loss ratio is 75,000 to 60,000, or 1.25. In other words, the required evaluation gain is larger than the recorded maximum loss allowance. This asymmetry is normal in many one-step evaluations, but it rewards patience. Trying to generate all $75,000 in a small number of sessions increases variance and can look like aggressive or all-in behavior.
Four percent of $750,000 is $30,000. This is a breach boundary, not a sensible daily budget. The safe operational question is not “How can I use all $30K?” It is “What internal stop keeps ordinary error, slippage and correlation far away from $30K?” Many disciplined traders would cap a session at 0.5% to 1% of balance—$3,750 to $7,500—depending on strategy evidence.
Because no indexed Pro-specific rule sheet was found, confirm whether the daily calculation uses starting balance, starting equity, highest intraday equity, or another reference. Also confirm server reset time. A 4% headline cannot be translated into safe execution until the reference and breach inequality are known.
Eight percent equals $60,000, giving a simple static floor of $690,000 if the current PFB classification is correct. The phrase “if correct” is deliberate. The official Standard page cannot settle Pro mechanics. Keep the support response, dashboard objectives and contractual terms together so any discrepancy can be resolved before risk is taken.
Even with a static floor, the daily rule can breach first. A trader with $20,000 accumulated profit might appear to have $80,000 distance above $690,000, yet a $30,000 daily rule still constrains the session. Overall cushion never overrides a separate daily boundary.
The current official Drawdown Upgrade page says the +20% upgrade is available to 1-Step Standard and 2-Step Standard, but not Lite or Pro. The current Account Protection page says protection is available on Standard evaluation models and not Pro. Accordingly, this review does not price a $750K Pro Drawdown Upgrade or Account Protection package.
If a checkout later displays an add-on on Pro, the buyer should ask whether that reflects a genuine product update and retain the written answer. Until then, adding 20% or 30% to $8,499 and presenting the result as a purchasable configuration would be misleading.
The current PFB record lists 1-Step Pro at up to 90%, and TTT’s official public site advertises a firm-wide maximum split of 90%. That supports the ceiling, but it does not establish the exact first, second and later payout progression for Pro. The Standard 1-Step sequence of 50%, 70% and 80% cannot be automatically applied because Pro is a separate tier and its headline ceiling differs.
Before purchase, request the Pro-specific split schedule in writing. Ask whether 90% begins immediately, requires a number of payouts, depends on scaling, or is subject to another milestone. Any payout table in this article would otherwise risk converting a ceiling into an opening rate.
The current PFB record says every 14 trading days for 1-Step Pro. TTT’s official general 1-Step withdrawal page says the first withdrawal becomes available after at least 21 calendar days and 14 trading days, with requests before Monday 10 PM GMT typically processed Wednesday. Those statements may describe different variants or stages.
We do not merge them into a false universal rule. A $750K Pro buyer should ask: when does the first payout clock start, are 14 trading days required, are later requests every 14 trading or calendar days, what is the cutoff, and which payment methods are available? The answer attached to the Pro contract governs.
TTT’s current public How It Works page says 1-Step and 2-Step accounts can double after achieving 10% for three months out of any 12-month period. Its homepage advertises up to $4 million in capital. A literal first doubling of $750,000 would be $1,500,000. A second would mathematically reach $3,000,000, below the headline cap.
However, the public statement is program-wide, not a Pro-specific contract. Confirm whether the $750K Pro participates, whether profit must be retained or withdrawn, how “10% for three months” is measured, and whether the account resets or changes after scaling. Do not advertise an automatic $4M ladder without those answers.
TTT’s official funded buyback page lists prices through $500K and says eligible 1-Step and 2-Step accounts may be reinstated after approval at 2% of account size. It does not publish a $750K line. Although 2% arithmetic would equal $15,000, this review does not call $15,000 an available buyback because the published table omits the size.
Ask support whether Pro is eligible at all, what the price is, which breach types qualify, what previous warnings remain and how long reinstatement takes. The absence of a published line is a reason to verify, not permission to extrapolate.
| Risk per trade | Dollar risk | 2R winner | Losses to $30K daily line | Losses to $60K overall line |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.05% | $375.00 | $750.00 | 80.0 | 160.0 |
| 0.1% | $750.00 | $1,500.00 | 40.0 | 80.0 |
| 0.15% | $1,125.00 | $2,250.00 | 26.7 | 53.3 |
| 0.2% | $1,500.00 | $3,000.00 | 20.0 | 40.0 |
| 0.25% | $1,875.00 | $3,750.00 | 16.0 | 32.0 |
| 0.3% | $2,250.00 | $4,500.00 | 13.3 | 26.7 |
| 0.4% | $3,000.00 | $6,000.00 | 10.0 | 20.0 |
| 0.5% | $3,750.00 | $7,500.00 | 8.0 | 16.0 |
| 0.75% | $5,625.00 | $11,250.00 | 5.3 | 10.7 |
| 1% | $7,500.00 | $15,000.00 | 4.0 | 8.0 |
These ratios ignore slippage, spread, commission and correlation. They show distance, not recommended utilization. A trader risking 1% uses $7,500 per idea; four full losses equal the entire $30,000 daily boundary before costs. At 0.25%, one loss is $1,875 and four losses equal $7,500, leaving a much larger operational buffer.
Suppose a strategy wins 45% of trades, averages 2R on winners and loses 1R on losers. Expectancy is 0.45×2 − 0.55×1 = 0.35R before costs. At 0.25% risk, one R is $1,875 and theoretical expectancy is $656.25 per trade. Dividing the $75,000 target by $656.25 suggests roughly 115 trades in expectation—not a promised timeline.
At 0.10% risk, one R is $750 and expected value at 0.35R is $262.50 per trade, implying roughly 286 trades in expectation. The slower approach may be psychologically easier and more resilient to variance. Unlimited-time marketing has value only if the Pro terms actually grant it and the trader uses the time rather than chasing a deadline.
TTT Markets coupon code BRIDGE guide, TTT Markets account types and sizes guide, TTT Markets 1-Step Standard, Lite and Pro review, TTT Markets 2-Step review, TTT Markets Instant Funding review, TTT Markets Subscription Account review, TTT Markets $200K review, TTT Markets $350K review, TTT Markets $500K review, and the main TTT Markets firm review provide broader context. Each page has a separate search intent: this article focuses only on the $750K Pro tier.
The scenarios below convert percentages into decisions. They are educational, not signals. Each assumes a $750,000 starting balance, the recorded $30,000 daily and $60,000 overall limits, and no commissions or slippage unless stated. Actual platform contract values must be used for position sizing.
This trader waits for a confirmed London breakout and retest. One planned loss is $375.00, a 1.5R winner is $562.50, and a 2R winner is $750.00. Four consecutive full losses remove $1,500.00, equal to 0.20% of initial balance. That sequence uses 5.0% of the recorded daily boundary and 2.5% of the recorded overall allowance.
The main hazard is several USD pairs moving together. The control is one aggregate dollar-risk cap across correlated positions. If two trades share the same risk driver, their stop-loss amounts are combined before either order is opened. Nominally separate tickets do not create independent risk when the underlying market shock is the same.
Because Pro lacks an indexed product-specific rule sheet, the trader checks the dashboard threshold before and after every closed position and records the value. If the floor moves unexpectedly, trading stops and support is contacted. This avoids relying on either the Standard trailing model or the PFB static label without observing the delivered Pro mechanics.
After two losses, size does not increase. After two wins, size also does not jump merely because the account is ahead. Consistent risk preserves the validity of the strategy sample and reduces the chance that one trade dominates performance. The $75,000 objective is approached as a sequence of ordinary decisions, never as one oversized event.
This trader waits for a confirmed London breakout and retest. One planned loss is $750.00, a 1.5R winner is $1,125.00, and a 2R winner is $1,500.00. Four consecutive full losses remove $3,000.00, equal to 0.40% of initial balance. That sequence uses 10.0% of the recorded daily boundary and 5.0% of the recorded overall allowance.
The main hazard is several USD pairs moving together. The control is one aggregate dollar-risk cap across correlated positions. If two trades share the same risk driver, their stop-loss amounts are combined before either order is opened. Nominally separate tickets do not create independent risk when the underlying market shock is the same.
Because Pro lacks an indexed product-specific rule sheet, the trader checks the dashboard threshold before and after every closed position and records the value. If the floor moves unexpectedly, trading stops and support is contacted. This avoids relying on either the Standard trailing model or the PFB static label without observing the delivered Pro mechanics.
After two losses, size does not increase. After two wins, size also does not jump merely because the account is ahead. Consistent risk preserves the validity of the strategy sample and reduces the chance that one trade dominates performance. The $75,000 objective is approached as a sequence of ordinary decisions, never as one oversized event.
This trader waits for a confirmed London breakout and retest. One planned loss is $1,125.00, a 1.5R winner is $1,687.50, and a 2R winner is $2,250.00. Four consecutive full losses remove $4,500.00, equal to 0.60% of initial balance. That sequence uses 15.0% of the recorded daily boundary and 7.5% of the recorded overall allowance.
The main hazard is several USD pairs moving together. The control is one aggregate dollar-risk cap across correlated positions. If two trades share the same risk driver, their stop-loss amounts are combined before either order is opened. Nominally separate tickets do not create independent risk when the underlying market shock is the same.
Because Pro lacks an indexed product-specific rule sheet, the trader checks the dashboard threshold before and after every closed position and records the value. If the floor moves unexpectedly, trading stops and support is contacted. This avoids relying on either the Standard trailing model or the PFB static label without observing the delivered Pro mechanics.
After two losses, size does not increase. After two wins, size also does not jump merely because the account is ahead. Consistent risk preserves the validity of the strategy sample and reduces the chance that one trade dominates performance. The $75,000 objective is approached as a sequence of ordinary decisions, never as one oversized event.
This trader waits for a confirmed London breakout and retest. One planned loss is $1,500.00, a 1.5R winner is $2,250.00, and a 2R winner is $3,000.00. Four consecutive full losses remove $6,000.00, equal to 0.80% of initial balance. That sequence uses 20.0% of the recorded daily boundary and 10.0% of the recorded overall allowance.
The main hazard is several USD pairs moving together. The control is one aggregate dollar-risk cap across correlated positions. If two trades share the same risk driver, their stop-loss amounts are combined before either order is opened. Nominally separate tickets do not create independent risk when the underlying market shock is the same.
Because Pro lacks an indexed product-specific rule sheet, the trader checks the dashboard threshold before and after every closed position and records the value. If the floor moves unexpectedly, trading stops and support is contacted. This avoids relying on either the Standard trailing model or the PFB static label without observing the delivered Pro mechanics.
After two losses, size does not increase. After two wins, size also does not jump merely because the account is ahead. Consistent risk preserves the validity of the strategy sample and reduces the chance that one trade dominates performance. The $75,000 objective is approached as a sequence of ordinary decisions, never as one oversized event.
This trader waits for a confirmed London breakout and retest. One planned loss is $1,875.00, a 1.5R winner is $2,812.50, and a 2R winner is $3,750.00. Four consecutive full losses remove $7,500.00, equal to 1.00% of initial balance. That sequence uses 25.0% of the recorded daily boundary and 12.5% of the recorded overall allowance.
The main hazard is several USD pairs moving together. The control is one aggregate dollar-risk cap across correlated positions. If two trades share the same risk driver, their stop-loss amounts are combined before either order is opened. Nominally separate tickets do not create independent risk when the underlying market shock is the same.
Because Pro lacks an indexed product-specific rule sheet, the trader checks the dashboard threshold before and after every closed position and records the value. If the floor moves unexpectedly, trading stops and support is contacted. This avoids relying on either the Standard trailing model or the PFB static label without observing the delivered Pro mechanics.
After two losses, size does not increase. After two wins, size also does not jump merely because the account is ahead. Consistent risk preserves the validity of the strategy sample and reduces the chance that one trade dominates performance. The $75,000 objective is approached as a sequence of ordinary decisions, never as one oversized event.
This trader waits for a confirmed London breakout and retest. One planned loss is $2,625.00, a 1.5R winner is $3,937.50, and a 2R winner is $5,250.00. Four consecutive full losses remove $10,500.00, equal to 1.40% of initial balance. That sequence uses 35.0% of the recorded daily boundary and 17.5% of the recorded overall allowance.
The main hazard is several USD pairs moving together. The control is one aggregate dollar-risk cap across correlated positions. If two trades share the same risk driver, their stop-loss amounts are combined before either order is opened. Nominally separate tickets do not create independent risk when the underlying market shock is the same.
Because Pro lacks an indexed product-specific rule sheet, the trader checks the dashboard threshold before and after every closed position and records the value. If the floor moves unexpectedly, trading stops and support is contacted. This avoids relying on either the Standard trailing model or the PFB static label without observing the delivered Pro mechanics.
After two losses, size does not increase. After two wins, size also does not jump merely because the account is ahead. Consistent risk preserves the validity of the strategy sample and reduces the chance that one trade dominates performance. The $75,000 objective is approached as a sequence of ordinary decisions, never as one oversized event.
This trader waits for a confirmed London breakout and retest. One planned loss is $3,750.00, a 1.5R winner is $5,625.00, and a 2R winner is $7,500.00. Four consecutive full losses remove $15,000.00, equal to 2.00% of initial balance. That sequence uses 50.0% of the recorded daily boundary and 25.0% of the recorded overall allowance.
The main hazard is several USD pairs moving together. The control is one aggregate dollar-risk cap across correlated positions. If two trades share the same risk driver, their stop-loss amounts are combined before either order is opened. Nominally separate tickets do not create independent risk when the underlying market shock is the same.
Because Pro lacks an indexed product-specific rule sheet, the trader checks the dashboard threshold before and after every closed position and records the value. If the floor moves unexpectedly, trading stops and support is contacted. This avoids relying on either the Standard trailing model or the PFB static label without observing the delivered Pro mechanics.
After two losses, size does not increase. After two wins, size also does not jump merely because the account is ahead. Consistent risk preserves the validity of the strategy sample and reduces the chance that one trade dominates performance. The $75,000 objective is approached as a sequence of ordinary decisions, never as one oversized event.
This trader trades only after volatility and structure align. One planned loss is $375.00, a 1.5R winner is $562.50, and a 2R winner is $750.00. Four consecutive full losses remove $1,500.00, equal to 0.20% of initial balance. That sequence uses 5.0% of the recorded daily boundary and 2.5% of the recorded overall allowance.
The main hazard is fast wicks, spread expansion and macro releases. The control is reduced news exposure and a hard platform-side stop. If two trades share the same risk driver, their stop-loss amounts are combined before either order is opened. Nominally separate tickets do not create independent risk when the underlying market shock is the same.
Because Pro lacks an indexed product-specific rule sheet, the trader checks the dashboard threshold before and after every closed position and records the value. If the floor moves unexpectedly, trading stops and support is contacted. This avoids relying on either the Standard trailing model or the PFB static label without observing the delivered Pro mechanics.
After two losses, size does not increase. After two wins, size also does not jump merely because the account is ahead. Consistent risk preserves the validity of the strategy sample and reduces the chance that one trade dominates performance. The $75,000 objective is approached as a sequence of ordinary decisions, never as one oversized event.
This trader trades only after volatility and structure align. One planned loss is $750.00, a 1.5R winner is $1,125.00, and a 2R winner is $1,500.00. Four consecutive full losses remove $3,000.00, equal to 0.40% of initial balance. That sequence uses 10.0% of the recorded daily boundary and 5.0% of the recorded overall allowance.
The main hazard is fast wicks, spread expansion and macro releases. The control is reduced news exposure and a hard platform-side stop. If two trades share the same risk driver, their stop-loss amounts are combined before either order is opened. Nominally separate tickets do not create independent risk when the underlying market shock is the same.
Because Pro lacks an indexed product-specific rule sheet, the trader checks the dashboard threshold before and after every closed position and records the value. If the floor moves unexpectedly, trading stops and support is contacted. This avoids relying on either the Standard trailing model or the PFB static label without observing the delivered Pro mechanics.
After two losses, size does not increase. After two wins, size also does not jump merely because the account is ahead. Consistent risk preserves the validity of the strategy sample and reduces the chance that one trade dominates performance. The $75,000 objective is approached as a sequence of ordinary decisions, never as one oversized event.
This trader trades only after volatility and structure align. One planned loss is $1,125.00, a 1.5R winner is $1,687.50, and a 2R winner is $2,250.00. Four consecutive full losses remove $4,500.00, equal to 0.60% of initial balance. That sequence uses 15.0% of the recorded daily boundary and 7.5% of the recorded overall allowance.
The main hazard is fast wicks, spread expansion and macro releases. The control is reduced news exposure and a hard platform-side stop. If two trades share the same risk driver, their stop-loss amounts are combined before either order is opened. Nominally separate tickets do not create independent risk when the underlying market shock is the same.
Because Pro lacks an indexed product-specific rule sheet, the trader checks the dashboard threshold before and after every closed position and records the value. If the floor moves unexpectedly, trading stops and support is contacted. This avoids relying on either the Standard trailing model or the PFB static label without observing the delivered Pro mechanics.
After two losses, size does not increase. After two wins, size also does not jump merely because the account is ahead. Consistent risk preserves the validity of the strategy sample and reduces the chance that one trade dominates performance. The $75,000 objective is approached as a sequence of ordinary decisions, never as one oversized event.
This trader trades only after volatility and structure align. One planned loss is $1,500.00, a 1.5R winner is $2,250.00, and a 2R winner is $3,000.00. Four consecutive full losses remove $6,000.00, equal to 0.80% of initial balance. That sequence uses 20.0% of the recorded daily boundary and 10.0% of the recorded overall allowance.
The main hazard is fast wicks, spread expansion and macro releases. The control is reduced news exposure and a hard platform-side stop. If two trades share the same risk driver, their stop-loss amounts are combined before either order is opened. Nominally separate tickets do not create independent risk when the underlying market shock is the same.
Because Pro lacks an indexed product-specific rule sheet, the trader checks the dashboard threshold before and after every closed position and records the value. If the floor moves unexpectedly, trading stops and support is contacted. This avoids relying on either the Standard trailing model or the PFB static label without observing the delivered Pro mechanics.
After two losses, size does not increase. After two wins, size also does not jump merely because the account is ahead. Consistent risk preserves the validity of the strategy sample and reduces the chance that one trade dominates performance. The $75,000 objective is approached as a sequence of ordinary decisions, never as one oversized event.
This trader trades only after volatility and structure align. One planned loss is $1,875.00, a 1.5R winner is $2,812.50, and a 2R winner is $3,750.00. Four consecutive full losses remove $7,500.00, equal to 1.00% of initial balance. That sequence uses 25.0% of the recorded daily boundary and 12.5% of the recorded overall allowance.
The main hazard is fast wicks, spread expansion and macro releases. The control is reduced news exposure and a hard platform-side stop. If two trades share the same risk driver, their stop-loss amounts are combined before either order is opened. Nominally separate tickets do not create independent risk when the underlying market shock is the same.
Because Pro lacks an indexed product-specific rule sheet, the trader checks the dashboard threshold before and after every closed position and records the value. If the floor moves unexpectedly, trading stops and support is contacted. This avoids relying on either the Standard trailing model or the PFB static label without observing the delivered Pro mechanics.
After two losses, size does not increase. After two wins, size also does not jump merely because the account is ahead. Consistent risk preserves the validity of the strategy sample and reduces the chance that one trade dominates performance. The $75,000 objective is approached as a sequence of ordinary decisions, never as one oversized event.
This trader trades only after volatility and structure align. One planned loss is $2,625.00, a 1.5R winner is $3,937.50, and a 2R winner is $5,250.00. Four consecutive full losses remove $10,500.00, equal to 1.40% of initial balance. That sequence uses 35.0% of the recorded daily boundary and 17.5% of the recorded overall allowance.
The main hazard is fast wicks, spread expansion and macro releases. The control is reduced news exposure and a hard platform-side stop. If two trades share the same risk driver, their stop-loss amounts are combined before either order is opened. Nominally separate tickets do not create independent risk when the underlying market shock is the same.
Because Pro lacks an indexed product-specific rule sheet, the trader checks the dashboard threshold before and after every closed position and records the value. If the floor moves unexpectedly, trading stops and support is contacted. This avoids relying on either the Standard trailing model or the PFB static label without observing the delivered Pro mechanics.
After two losses, size does not increase. After two wins, size also does not jump merely because the account is ahead. Consistent risk preserves the validity of the strategy sample and reduces the chance that one trade dominates performance. The $75,000 objective is approached as a sequence of ordinary decisions, never as one oversized event.
This trader trades only after volatility and structure align. One planned loss is $3,750.00, a 1.5R winner is $5,625.00, and a 2R winner is $7,500.00. Four consecutive full losses remove $15,000.00, equal to 2.00% of initial balance. That sequence uses 50.0% of the recorded daily boundary and 25.0% of the recorded overall allowance.
The main hazard is fast wicks, spread expansion and macro releases. The control is reduced news exposure and a hard platform-side stop. If two trades share the same risk driver, their stop-loss amounts are combined before either order is opened. Nominally separate tickets do not create independent risk when the underlying market shock is the same.
Because Pro lacks an indexed product-specific rule sheet, the trader checks the dashboard threshold before and after every closed position and records the value. If the floor moves unexpectedly, trading stops and support is contacted. This avoids relying on either the Standard trailing model or the PFB static label without observing the delivered Pro mechanics.
After two losses, size does not increase. After two wins, size also does not jump merely because the account is ahead. Consistent risk preserves the validity of the strategy sample and reduces the chance that one trade dominates performance. The $75,000 objective is approached as a sequence of ordinary decisions, never as one oversized event.
This trader enters retracements after the cash-market opening impulse. One planned loss is $375.00, a 1.5R winner is $562.50, and a 2R winner is $750.00. Four consecutive full losses remove $1,500.00, equal to 0.20% of initial balance. That sequence uses 5.0% of the recorded daily boundary and 2.5% of the recorded overall allowance.
The main hazard is rapid equity changes and repeated entries. The control is a maximum number of attempts plus a session stop. If two trades share the same risk driver, their stop-loss amounts are combined before either order is opened. Nominally separate tickets do not create independent risk when the underlying market shock is the same.
Because Pro lacks an indexed product-specific rule sheet, the trader checks the dashboard threshold before and after every closed position and records the value. If the floor moves unexpectedly, trading stops and support is contacted. This avoids relying on either the Standard trailing model or the PFB static label without observing the delivered Pro mechanics.
After two losses, size does not increase. After two wins, size also does not jump merely because the account is ahead. Consistent risk preserves the validity of the strategy sample and reduces the chance that one trade dominates performance. The $75,000 objective is approached as a sequence of ordinary decisions, never as one oversized event.
This trader enters retracements after the cash-market opening impulse. One planned loss is $750.00, a 1.5R winner is $1,125.00, and a 2R winner is $1,500.00. Four consecutive full losses remove $3,000.00, equal to 0.40% of initial balance. That sequence uses 10.0% of the recorded daily boundary and 5.0% of the recorded overall allowance.
The main hazard is rapid equity changes and repeated entries. The control is a maximum number of attempts plus a session stop. If two trades share the same risk driver, their stop-loss amounts are combined before either order is opened. Nominally separate tickets do not create independent risk when the underlying market shock is the same.
Because Pro lacks an indexed product-specific rule sheet, the trader checks the dashboard threshold before and after every closed position and records the value. If the floor moves unexpectedly, trading stops and support is contacted. This avoids relying on either the Standard trailing model or the PFB static label without observing the delivered Pro mechanics.
After two losses, size does not increase. After two wins, size also does not jump merely because the account is ahead. Consistent risk preserves the validity of the strategy sample and reduces the chance that one trade dominates performance. The $75,000 objective is approached as a sequence of ordinary decisions, never as one oversized event.
This trader enters retracements after the cash-market opening impulse. One planned loss is $1,125.00, a 1.5R winner is $1,687.50, and a 2R winner is $2,250.00. Four consecutive full losses remove $4,500.00, equal to 0.60% of initial balance. That sequence uses 15.0% of the recorded daily boundary and 7.5% of the recorded overall allowance.
The main hazard is rapid equity changes and repeated entries. The control is a maximum number of attempts plus a session stop. If two trades share the same risk driver, their stop-loss amounts are combined before either order is opened. Nominally separate tickets do not create independent risk when the underlying market shock is the same.
Because Pro lacks an indexed product-specific rule sheet, the trader checks the dashboard threshold before and after every closed position and records the value. If the floor moves unexpectedly, trading stops and support is contacted. This avoids relying on either the Standard trailing model or the PFB static label without observing the delivered Pro mechanics.
After two losses, size does not increase. After two wins, size also does not jump merely because the account is ahead. Consistent risk preserves the validity of the strategy sample and reduces the chance that one trade dominates performance. The $75,000 objective is approached as a sequence of ordinary decisions, never as one oversized event.
This trader enters retracements after the cash-market opening impulse. One planned loss is $1,500.00, a 1.5R winner is $2,250.00, and a 2R winner is $3,000.00. Four consecutive full losses remove $6,000.00, equal to 0.80% of initial balance. That sequence uses 20.0% of the recorded daily boundary and 10.0% of the recorded overall allowance.
The main hazard is rapid equity changes and repeated entries. The control is a maximum number of attempts plus a session stop. If two trades share the same risk driver, their stop-loss amounts are combined before either order is opened. Nominally separate tickets do not create independent risk when the underlying market shock is the same.
Because Pro lacks an indexed product-specific rule sheet, the trader checks the dashboard threshold before and after every closed position and records the value. If the floor moves unexpectedly, trading stops and support is contacted. This avoids relying on either the Standard trailing model or the PFB static label without observing the delivered Pro mechanics.
After two losses, size does not increase. After two wins, size also does not jump merely because the account is ahead. Consistent risk preserves the validity of the strategy sample and reduces the chance that one trade dominates performance. The $75,000 objective is approached as a sequence of ordinary decisions, never as one oversized event.
This trader enters retracements after the cash-market opening impulse. One planned loss is $1,875.00, a 1.5R winner is $2,812.50, and a 2R winner is $3,750.00. Four consecutive full losses remove $7,500.00, equal to 1.00% of initial balance. That sequence uses 25.0% of the recorded daily boundary and 12.5% of the recorded overall allowance.
The main hazard is rapid equity changes and repeated entries. The control is a maximum number of attempts plus a session stop. If two trades share the same risk driver, their stop-loss amounts are combined before either order is opened. Nominally separate tickets do not create independent risk when the underlying market shock is the same.
Because Pro lacks an indexed product-specific rule sheet, the trader checks the dashboard threshold before and after every closed position and records the value. If the floor moves unexpectedly, trading stops and support is contacted. This avoids relying on either the Standard trailing model or the PFB static label without observing the delivered Pro mechanics.
After two losses, size does not increase. After two wins, size also does not jump merely because the account is ahead. Consistent risk preserves the validity of the strategy sample and reduces the chance that one trade dominates performance. The $75,000 objective is approached as a sequence of ordinary decisions, never as one oversized event.
This trader enters retracements after the cash-market opening impulse. One planned loss is $2,625.00, a 1.5R winner is $3,937.50, and a 2R winner is $5,250.00. Four consecutive full losses remove $10,500.00, equal to 1.40% of initial balance. That sequence uses 35.0% of the recorded daily boundary and 17.5% of the recorded overall allowance.
The main hazard is rapid equity changes and repeated entries. The control is a maximum number of attempts plus a session stop. If two trades share the same risk driver, their stop-loss amounts are combined before either order is opened. Nominally separate tickets do not create independent risk when the underlying market shock is the same.
Because Pro lacks an indexed product-specific rule sheet, the trader checks the dashboard threshold before and after every closed position and records the value. If the floor moves unexpectedly, trading stops and support is contacted. This avoids relying on either the Standard trailing model or the PFB static label without observing the delivered Pro mechanics.
After two losses, size does not increase. After two wins, size also does not jump merely because the account is ahead. Consistent risk preserves the validity of the strategy sample and reduces the chance that one trade dominates performance. The $75,000 objective is approached as a sequence of ordinary decisions, never as one oversized event.
This trader enters retracements after the cash-market opening impulse. One planned loss is $3,750.00, a 1.5R winner is $5,625.00, and a 2R winner is $7,500.00. Four consecutive full losses remove $15,000.00, equal to 2.00% of initial balance. That sequence uses 50.0% of the recorded daily boundary and 25.0% of the recorded overall allowance.
The main hazard is rapid equity changes and repeated entries. The control is a maximum number of attempts plus a session stop. If two trades share the same risk driver, their stop-loss amounts are combined before either order is opened. Nominally separate tickets do not create independent risk when the underlying market shock is the same.
Because Pro lacks an indexed product-specific rule sheet, the trader checks the dashboard threshold before and after every closed position and records the value. If the floor moves unexpectedly, trading stops and support is contacted. This avoids relying on either the Standard trailing model or the PFB static label without observing the delivered Pro mechanics.
After two losses, size does not increase. After two wins, size also does not jump merely because the account is ahead. Consistent risk preserves the validity of the strategy sample and reduces the chance that one trade dominates performance. The $75,000 objective is approached as a sequence of ordinary decisions, never as one oversized event.
This trader uses daily structure and wider invalidation. One planned loss is $375.00, a 1.5R winner is $562.50, and a 2R winner is $750.00. Four consecutive full losses remove $1,500.00, equal to 0.20% of initial balance. That sequence uses 5.0% of the recorded daily boundary and 2.5% of the recorded overall allowance.
The main hazard is overnight gaps, swaps and unverified weekend permission. The control is written holding approval and smaller overnight risk. If two trades share the same risk driver, their stop-loss amounts are combined before either order is opened. Nominally separate tickets do not create independent risk when the underlying market shock is the same.
Because Pro lacks an indexed product-specific rule sheet, the trader checks the dashboard threshold before and after every closed position and records the value. If the floor moves unexpectedly, trading stops and support is contacted. This avoids relying on either the Standard trailing model or the PFB static label without observing the delivered Pro mechanics.
After two losses, size does not increase. After two wins, size also does not jump merely because the account is ahead. Consistent risk preserves the validity of the strategy sample and reduces the chance that one trade dominates performance. The $75,000 objective is approached as a sequence of ordinary decisions, never as one oversized event.
This trader uses daily structure and wider invalidation. One planned loss is $750.00, a 1.5R winner is $1,125.00, and a 2R winner is $1,500.00. Four consecutive full losses remove $3,000.00, equal to 0.40% of initial balance. That sequence uses 10.0% of the recorded daily boundary and 5.0% of the recorded overall allowance.
The main hazard is overnight gaps, swaps and unverified weekend permission. The control is written holding approval and smaller overnight risk. If two trades share the same risk driver, their stop-loss amounts are combined before either order is opened. Nominally separate tickets do not create independent risk when the underlying market shock is the same.
Because Pro lacks an indexed product-specific rule sheet, the trader checks the dashboard threshold before and after every closed position and records the value. If the floor moves unexpectedly, trading stops and support is contacted. This avoids relying on either the Standard trailing model or the PFB static label without observing the delivered Pro mechanics.
After two losses, size does not increase. After two wins, size also does not jump merely because the account is ahead. Consistent risk preserves the validity of the strategy sample and reduces the chance that one trade dominates performance. The $75,000 objective is approached as a sequence of ordinary decisions, never as one oversized event.
This trader uses daily structure and wider invalidation. One planned loss is $1,125.00, a 1.5R winner is $1,687.50, and a 2R winner is $2,250.00. Four consecutive full losses remove $4,500.00, equal to 0.60% of initial balance. That sequence uses 15.0% of the recorded daily boundary and 7.5% of the recorded overall allowance.
The main hazard is overnight gaps, swaps and unverified weekend permission. The control is written holding approval and smaller overnight risk. If two trades share the same risk driver, their stop-loss amounts are combined before either order is opened. Nominally separate tickets do not create independent risk when the underlying market shock is the same.
Because Pro lacks an indexed product-specific rule sheet, the trader checks the dashboard threshold before and after every closed position and records the value. If the floor moves unexpectedly, trading stops and support is contacted. This avoids relying on either the Standard trailing model or the PFB static label without observing the delivered Pro mechanics.
After two losses, size does not increase. After two wins, size also does not jump merely because the account is ahead. Consistent risk preserves the validity of the strategy sample and reduces the chance that one trade dominates performance. The $75,000 objective is approached as a sequence of ordinary decisions, never as one oversized event.
This trader uses daily structure and wider invalidation. One planned loss is $1,500.00, a 1.5R winner is $2,250.00, and a 2R winner is $3,000.00. Four consecutive full losses remove $6,000.00, equal to 0.80% of initial balance. That sequence uses 20.0% of the recorded daily boundary and 10.0% of the recorded overall allowance.
The main hazard is overnight gaps, swaps and unverified weekend permission. The control is written holding approval and smaller overnight risk. If two trades share the same risk driver, their stop-loss amounts are combined before either order is opened. Nominally separate tickets do not create independent risk when the underlying market shock is the same.
Because Pro lacks an indexed product-specific rule sheet, the trader checks the dashboard threshold before and after every closed position and records the value. If the floor moves unexpectedly, trading stops and support is contacted. This avoids relying on either the Standard trailing model or the PFB static label without observing the delivered Pro mechanics.
After two losses, size does not increase. After two wins, size also does not jump merely because the account is ahead. Consistent risk preserves the validity of the strategy sample and reduces the chance that one trade dominates performance. The $75,000 objective is approached as a sequence of ordinary decisions, never as one oversized event.
This trader uses daily structure and wider invalidation. One planned loss is $1,875.00, a 1.5R winner is $2,812.50, and a 2R winner is $3,750.00. Four consecutive full losses remove $7,500.00, equal to 1.00% of initial balance. That sequence uses 25.0% of the recorded daily boundary and 12.5% of the recorded overall allowance.
The main hazard is overnight gaps, swaps and unverified weekend permission. The control is written holding approval and smaller overnight risk. If two trades share the same risk driver, their stop-loss amounts are combined before either order is opened. Nominally separate tickets do not create independent risk when the underlying market shock is the same.
Because Pro lacks an indexed product-specific rule sheet, the trader checks the dashboard threshold before and after every closed position and records the value. If the floor moves unexpectedly, trading stops and support is contacted. This avoids relying on either the Standard trailing model or the PFB static label without observing the delivered Pro mechanics.
After two losses, size does not increase. After two wins, size also does not jump merely because the account is ahead. Consistent risk preserves the validity of the strategy sample and reduces the chance that one trade dominates performance. The $75,000 objective is approached as a sequence of ordinary decisions, never as one oversized event.
This trader uses daily structure and wider invalidation. One planned loss is $2,625.00, a 1.5R winner is $3,937.50, and a 2R winner is $5,250.00. Four consecutive full losses remove $10,500.00, equal to 1.40% of initial balance. That sequence uses 35.0% of the recorded daily boundary and 17.5% of the recorded overall allowance.
The main hazard is overnight gaps, swaps and unverified weekend permission. The control is written holding approval and smaller overnight risk. If two trades share the same risk driver, their stop-loss amounts are combined before either order is opened. Nominally separate tickets do not create independent risk when the underlying market shock is the same.
Because Pro lacks an indexed product-specific rule sheet, the trader checks the dashboard threshold before and after every closed position and records the value. If the floor moves unexpectedly, trading stops and support is contacted. This avoids relying on either the Standard trailing model or the PFB static label without observing the delivered Pro mechanics.
After two losses, size does not increase. After two wins, size also does not jump merely because the account is ahead. Consistent risk preserves the validity of the strategy sample and reduces the chance that one trade dominates performance. The $75,000 objective is approached as a sequence of ordinary decisions, never as one oversized event.
This trader uses daily structure and wider invalidation. One planned loss is $3,750.00, a 1.5R winner is $5,625.00, and a 2R winner is $7,500.00. Four consecutive full losses remove $15,000.00, equal to 2.00% of initial balance. That sequence uses 50.0% of the recorded daily boundary and 25.0% of the recorded overall allowance.
The main hazard is overnight gaps, swaps and unverified weekend permission. The control is written holding approval and smaller overnight risk. If two trades share the same risk driver, their stop-loss amounts are combined before either order is opened. Nominally separate tickets do not create independent risk when the underlying market shock is the same.
Because Pro lacks an indexed product-specific rule sheet, the trader checks the dashboard threshold before and after every closed position and records the value. If the floor moves unexpectedly, trading stops and support is contacted. This avoids relying on either the Standard trailing model or the PFB static label without observing the delivered Pro mechanics.
After two losses, size does not increase. After two wins, size also does not jump merely because the account is ahead. Consistent risk preserves the validity of the strategy sample and reduces the chance that one trade dominates performance. The $75,000 objective is approached as a sequence of ordinary decisions, never as one oversized event.
This trader runs deterministic signals with fixed fractional risk. One planned loss is $375.00, a 1.5R winner is $562.50, and a 2R winner is $750.00. Four consecutive full losses remove $1,500.00, equal to 0.20% of initial balance. That sequence uses 5.0% of the recorded daily boundary and 2.5% of the recorded overall allowance.
The main hazard is prohibited logic, correlation and execution bursts. The control is code audit, portfolio breaker and compliance confirmation. If two trades share the same risk driver, their stop-loss amounts are combined before either order is opened. Nominally separate tickets do not create independent risk when the underlying market shock is the same.
Because Pro lacks an indexed product-specific rule sheet, the trader checks the dashboard threshold before and after every closed position and records the value. If the floor moves unexpectedly, trading stops and support is contacted. This avoids relying on either the Standard trailing model or the PFB static label without observing the delivered Pro mechanics.
After two losses, size does not increase. After two wins, size also does not jump merely because the account is ahead. Consistent risk preserves the validity of the strategy sample and reduces the chance that one trade dominates performance. The $75,000 objective is approached as a sequence of ordinary decisions, never as one oversized event.
This trader runs deterministic signals with fixed fractional risk. One planned loss is $750.00, a 1.5R winner is $1,125.00, and a 2R winner is $1,500.00. Four consecutive full losses remove $3,000.00, equal to 0.40% of initial balance. That sequence uses 10.0% of the recorded daily boundary and 5.0% of the recorded overall allowance.
The main hazard is prohibited logic, correlation and execution bursts. The control is code audit, portfolio breaker and compliance confirmation. If two trades share the same risk driver, their stop-loss amounts are combined before either order is opened. Nominally separate tickets do not create independent risk when the underlying market shock is the same.
Because Pro lacks an indexed product-specific rule sheet, the trader checks the dashboard threshold before and after every closed position and records the value. If the floor moves unexpectedly, trading stops and support is contacted. This avoids relying on either the Standard trailing model or the PFB static label without observing the delivered Pro mechanics.
After two losses, size does not increase. After two wins, size also does not jump merely because the account is ahead. Consistent risk preserves the validity of the strategy sample and reduces the chance that one trade dominates performance. The $75,000 objective is approached as a sequence of ordinary decisions, never as one oversized event.
This trader runs deterministic signals with fixed fractional risk. One planned loss is $1,125.00, a 1.5R winner is $1,687.50, and a 2R winner is $2,250.00. Four consecutive full losses remove $4,500.00, equal to 0.60% of initial balance. That sequence uses 15.0% of the recorded daily boundary and 7.5% of the recorded overall allowance.
The main hazard is prohibited logic, correlation and execution bursts. The control is code audit, portfolio breaker and compliance confirmation. If two trades share the same risk driver, their stop-loss amounts are combined before either order is opened. Nominally separate tickets do not create independent risk when the underlying market shock is the same.
Because Pro lacks an indexed product-specific rule sheet, the trader checks the dashboard threshold before and after every closed position and records the value. If the floor moves unexpectedly, trading stops and support is contacted. This avoids relying on either the Standard trailing model or the PFB static label without observing the delivered Pro mechanics.
After two losses, size does not increase. After two wins, size also does not jump merely because the account is ahead. Consistent risk preserves the validity of the strategy sample and reduces the chance that one trade dominates performance. The $75,000 objective is approached as a sequence of ordinary decisions, never as one oversized event.
This trader runs deterministic signals with fixed fractional risk. One planned loss is $1,500.00, a 1.5R winner is $2,250.00, and a 2R winner is $3,000.00. Four consecutive full losses remove $6,000.00, equal to 0.80% of initial balance. That sequence uses 20.0% of the recorded daily boundary and 10.0% of the recorded overall allowance.
The main hazard is prohibited logic, correlation and execution bursts. The control is code audit, portfolio breaker and compliance confirmation. If two trades share the same risk driver, their stop-loss amounts are combined before either order is opened. Nominally separate tickets do not create independent risk when the underlying market shock is the same.
Because Pro lacks an indexed product-specific rule sheet, the trader checks the dashboard threshold before and after every closed position and records the value. If the floor moves unexpectedly, trading stops and support is contacted. This avoids relying on either the Standard trailing model or the PFB static label without observing the delivered Pro mechanics.
After two losses, size does not increase. After two wins, size also does not jump merely because the account is ahead. Consistent risk preserves the validity of the strategy sample and reduces the chance that one trade dominates performance. The $75,000 objective is approached as a sequence of ordinary decisions, never as one oversized event.
This trader runs deterministic signals with fixed fractional risk. One planned loss is $1,875.00, a 1.5R winner is $2,812.50, and a 2R winner is $3,750.00. Four consecutive full losses remove $7,500.00, equal to 1.00% of initial balance. That sequence uses 25.0% of the recorded daily boundary and 12.5% of the recorded overall allowance.
The main hazard is prohibited logic, correlation and execution bursts. The control is code audit, portfolio breaker and compliance confirmation. If two trades share the same risk driver, their stop-loss amounts are combined before either order is opened. Nominally separate tickets do not create independent risk when the underlying market shock is the same.
Because Pro lacks an indexed product-specific rule sheet, the trader checks the dashboard threshold before and after every closed position and records the value. If the floor moves unexpectedly, trading stops and support is contacted. This avoids relying on either the Standard trailing model or the PFB static label without observing the delivered Pro mechanics.
After two losses, size does not increase. After two wins, size also does not jump merely because the account is ahead. Consistent risk preserves the validity of the strategy sample and reduces the chance that one trade dominates performance. The $75,000 objective is approached as a sequence of ordinary decisions, never as one oversized event.
This trader runs deterministic signals with fixed fractional risk. One planned loss is $2,625.00, a 1.5R winner is $3,937.50, and a 2R winner is $5,250.00. Four consecutive full losses remove $10,500.00, equal to 1.40% of initial balance. That sequence uses 35.0% of the recorded daily boundary and 17.5% of the recorded overall allowance.
The main hazard is prohibited logic, correlation and execution bursts. The control is code audit, portfolio breaker and compliance confirmation. If two trades share the same risk driver, their stop-loss amounts are combined before either order is opened. Nominally separate tickets do not create independent risk when the underlying market shock is the same.
Because Pro lacks an indexed product-specific rule sheet, the trader checks the dashboard threshold before and after every closed position and records the value. If the floor moves unexpectedly, trading stops and support is contacted. This avoids relying on either the Standard trailing model or the PFB static label without observing the delivered Pro mechanics.
After two losses, size does not increase. After two wins, size also does not jump merely because the account is ahead. Consistent risk preserves the validity of the strategy sample and reduces the chance that one trade dominates performance. The $75,000 objective is approached as a sequence of ordinary decisions, never as one oversized event.
This trader runs deterministic signals with fixed fractional risk. One planned loss is $3,750.00, a 1.5R winner is $5,625.00, and a 2R winner is $7,500.00. Four consecutive full losses remove $15,000.00, equal to 2.00% of initial balance. That sequence uses 50.0% of the recorded daily boundary and 25.0% of the recorded overall allowance.
The main hazard is prohibited logic, correlation and execution bursts. The control is code audit, portfolio breaker and compliance confirmation. If two trades share the same risk driver, their stop-loss amounts are combined before either order is opened. Nominally separate tickets do not create independent risk when the underlying market shock is the same.
Because Pro lacks an indexed product-specific rule sheet, the trader checks the dashboard threshold before and after every closed position and records the value. If the floor moves unexpectedly, trading stops and support is contacted. This avoids relying on either the Standard trailing model or the PFB static label without observing the delivered Pro mechanics.
After two losses, size does not increase. After two wins, size also does not jump merely because the account is ahead. Consistent risk preserves the validity of the strategy sample and reduces the chance that one trade dominates performance. The $75,000 objective is approached as a sequence of ordinary decisions, never as one oversized event.
This trader takes only A-grade setups from a written playbook. One planned loss is $375.00, a 1.5R winner is $562.50, and a 2R winner is $750.00. Four consecutive full losses remove $1,500.00, equal to 0.20% of initial balance. That sequence uses 5.0% of the recorded daily boundary and 2.5% of the recorded overall allowance.
The main hazard is forcing activity to satisfy assumed trading-day rules. The control is waiting for valid setups and confirming the actual Pro calendar. If two trades share the same risk driver, their stop-loss amounts are combined before either order is opened. Nominally separate tickets do not create independent risk when the underlying market shock is the same.
Because Pro lacks an indexed product-specific rule sheet, the trader checks the dashboard threshold before and after every closed position and records the value. If the floor moves unexpectedly, trading stops and support is contacted. This avoids relying on either the Standard trailing model or the PFB static label without observing the delivered Pro mechanics.
After two losses, size does not increase. After two wins, size also does not jump merely because the account is ahead. Consistent risk preserves the validity of the strategy sample and reduces the chance that one trade dominates performance. The $75,000 objective is approached as a sequence of ordinary decisions, never as one oversized event.
This trader takes only A-grade setups from a written playbook. One planned loss is $750.00, a 1.5R winner is $1,125.00, and a 2R winner is $1,500.00. Four consecutive full losses remove $3,000.00, equal to 0.40% of initial balance. That sequence uses 10.0% of the recorded daily boundary and 5.0% of the recorded overall allowance.
The main hazard is forcing activity to satisfy assumed trading-day rules. The control is waiting for valid setups and confirming the actual Pro calendar. If two trades share the same risk driver, their stop-loss amounts are combined before either order is opened. Nominally separate tickets do not create independent risk when the underlying market shock is the same.
Because Pro lacks an indexed product-specific rule sheet, the trader checks the dashboard threshold before and after every closed position and records the value. If the floor moves unexpectedly, trading stops and support is contacted. This avoids relying on either the Standard trailing model or the PFB static label without observing the delivered Pro mechanics.
After two losses, size does not increase. After two wins, size also does not jump merely because the account is ahead. Consistent risk preserves the validity of the strategy sample and reduces the chance that one trade dominates performance. The $75,000 objective is approached as a sequence of ordinary decisions, never as one oversized event.
This trader takes only A-grade setups from a written playbook. One planned loss is $1,125.00, a 1.5R winner is $1,687.50, and a 2R winner is $2,250.00. Four consecutive full losses remove $4,500.00, equal to 0.60% of initial balance. That sequence uses 15.0% of the recorded daily boundary and 7.5% of the recorded overall allowance.
The main hazard is forcing activity to satisfy assumed trading-day rules. The control is waiting for valid setups and confirming the actual Pro calendar. If two trades share the same risk driver, their stop-loss amounts are combined before either order is opened. Nominally separate tickets do not create independent risk when the underlying market shock is the same.
Because Pro lacks an indexed product-specific rule sheet, the trader checks the dashboard threshold before and after every closed position and records the value. If the floor moves unexpectedly, trading stops and support is contacted. This avoids relying on either the Standard trailing model or the PFB static label without observing the delivered Pro mechanics.
After two losses, size does not increase. After two wins, size also does not jump merely because the account is ahead. Consistent risk preserves the validity of the strategy sample and reduces the chance that one trade dominates performance. The $75,000 objective is approached as a sequence of ordinary decisions, never as one oversized event.
This trader takes only A-grade setups from a written playbook. One planned loss is $1,500.00, a 1.5R winner is $2,250.00, and a 2R winner is $3,000.00. Four consecutive full losses remove $6,000.00, equal to 0.80% of initial balance. That sequence uses 20.0% of the recorded daily boundary and 10.0% of the recorded overall allowance.
The main hazard is forcing activity to satisfy assumed trading-day rules. The control is waiting for valid setups and confirming the actual Pro calendar. If two trades share the same risk driver, their stop-loss amounts are combined before either order is opened. Nominally separate tickets do not create independent risk when the underlying market shock is the same.
Because Pro lacks an indexed product-specific rule sheet, the trader checks the dashboard threshold before and after every closed position and records the value. If the floor moves unexpectedly, trading stops and support is contacted. This avoids relying on either the Standard trailing model or the PFB static label without observing the delivered Pro mechanics.
After two losses, size does not increase. After two wins, size also does not jump merely because the account is ahead. Consistent risk preserves the validity of the strategy sample and reduces the chance that one trade dominates performance. The $75,000 objective is approached as a sequence of ordinary decisions, never as one oversized event.
This trader takes only A-grade setups from a written playbook. One planned loss is $1,875.00, a 1.5R winner is $2,812.50, and a 2R winner is $3,750.00. Four consecutive full losses remove $7,500.00, equal to 1.00% of initial balance. That sequence uses 25.0% of the recorded daily boundary and 12.5% of the recorded overall allowance.
The main hazard is forcing activity to satisfy assumed trading-day rules. The control is waiting for valid setups and confirming the actual Pro calendar. If two trades share the same risk driver, their stop-loss amounts are combined before either order is opened. Nominally separate tickets do not create independent risk when the underlying market shock is the same.
Because Pro lacks an indexed product-specific rule sheet, the trader checks the dashboard threshold before and after every closed position and records the value. If the floor moves unexpectedly, trading stops and support is contacted. This avoids relying on either the Standard trailing model or the PFB static label without observing the delivered Pro mechanics.
After two losses, size does not increase. After two wins, size also does not jump merely because the account is ahead. Consistent risk preserves the validity of the strategy sample and reduces the chance that one trade dominates performance. The $75,000 objective is approached as a sequence of ordinary decisions, never as one oversized event.
This trader takes only A-grade setups from a written playbook. One planned loss is $2,625.00, a 1.5R winner is $3,937.50, and a 2R winner is $5,250.00. Four consecutive full losses remove $10,500.00, equal to 1.40% of initial balance. That sequence uses 35.0% of the recorded daily boundary and 17.5% of the recorded overall allowance.
The main hazard is forcing activity to satisfy assumed trading-day rules. The control is waiting for valid setups and confirming the actual Pro calendar. If two trades share the same risk driver, their stop-loss amounts are combined before either order is opened. Nominally separate tickets do not create independent risk when the underlying market shock is the same.
Because Pro lacks an indexed product-specific rule sheet, the trader checks the dashboard threshold before and after every closed position and records the value. If the floor moves unexpectedly, trading stops and support is contacted. This avoids relying on either the Standard trailing model or the PFB static label without observing the delivered Pro mechanics.
After two losses, size does not increase. After two wins, size also does not jump merely because the account is ahead. Consistent risk preserves the validity of the strategy sample and reduces the chance that one trade dominates performance. The $75,000 objective is approached as a sequence of ordinary decisions, never as one oversized event.
This trader takes only A-grade setups from a written playbook. One planned loss is $3,750.00, a 1.5R winner is $5,625.00, and a 2R winner is $7,500.00. Four consecutive full losses remove $15,000.00, equal to 2.00% of initial balance. That sequence uses 50.0% of the recorded daily boundary and 25.0% of the recorded overall allowance.
The main hazard is forcing activity to satisfy assumed trading-day rules. The control is waiting for valid setups and confirming the actual Pro calendar. If two trades share the same risk driver, their stop-loss amounts are combined before either order is opened. Nominally separate tickets do not create independent risk when the underlying market shock is the same.
Because Pro lacks an indexed product-specific rule sheet, the trader checks the dashboard threshold before and after every closed position and records the value. If the floor moves unexpectedly, trading stops and support is contacted. This avoids relying on either the Standard trailing model or the PFB static label without observing the delivered Pro mechanics.
After two losses, size does not increase. After two wins, size also does not jump merely because the account is ahead. Consistent risk preserves the validity of the strategy sample and reduces the chance that one trade dominates performance. The $75,000 objective is approached as a sequence of ordinary decisions, never as one oversized event.
Use the smallest planned risk. Confirm symbol specifications, spread, commission, rollover, server time, platform stability and dashboard calculations. Do not infer Pro rules from a Standard screenshot or article. Reconcile every number with the delivered objectives.
Trade one established setup family. Record planned R, realized R, maximum adverse excursion and any floating-equity peak. Keep daily risk far inside the external limit. A clean sample is more useful than a fast but noisy 3% gain.
If the account is ahead, avoid target fixation. Maintain or reduce size. Review whether profit is concentrated in one session or instrument and whether that pattern could complicate a consistency review. Ask support before changing methods or automation.
As the target approaches, audit every compliance condition. Confirm whether the next step is funded activation, KYC, a minimum-day check or another review. Do not keep trading after a completion threshold merely to create extra profit unless the program directs it.
A high fee magnifies the cost of ambiguity. Obtain the Pro rule sheet first.
The corrective action is to add this item to the pre-trade checklist, define the evidence required, and refuse to trade while the answer is ambiguous. On a $750K label, process discipline matters more than confidence. Documentation protects decision quality even when it cannot guarantee an outcome.
The database record is useful but does not replace the signed product terms.
The corrective action is to add this item to the pre-trade checklist, define the evidence required, and refuse to trade while the answer is ambiguous. On a $750K label, process discipline matters more than confidence. Documentation protects decision quality even when it cannot guarantee an outcome.
Standard and Pro are different selectors and add-on eligibility already differs.
The corrective action is to add this item to the pre-trade checklist, define the evidence required, and refuse to trade while the answer is ambiguous. On a $750K label, process discipline matters more than confidence. Documentation protects decision quality even when it cannot guarantee an outcome.
The $30K line is an external breach threshold, not a risk target.
The corrective action is to add this item to the pre-trade checklist, define the evidence required, and refuse to trade while the answer is ambiguous. On a $750K label, process discipline matters more than confidence. Documentation protects decision quality even when it cannot guarantee an outcome.
A ceiling does not establish the opening split or progression.
The corrective action is to add this item to the pre-trade checklist, define the evidence required, and refuse to trade while the answer is ambiguous. On a $750K label, process discipline matters more than confidence. Documentation protects decision quality even when it cannot guarantee an outcome.
Two-percent arithmetic is not proof that the omitted $750K size is eligible.
The corrective action is to add this item to the pre-trade checklist, define the evidence required, and refuse to trade while the answer is ambiguous. On a $750K label, process discipline matters more than confidence. Documentation protects decision quality even when it cannot guarantee an outcome.
Official pages exclude Pro from Drawdown Upgrade and Account Protection.
The corrective action is to add this item to the pre-trade checklist, define the evidence required, and refuse to trade while the answer is ambiguous. On a $750K label, process discipline matters more than confidence. Documentation protects decision quality even when it cannot guarantee an outcome.
Only the live checkout can validate eligible promotions.
The corrective action is to add this item to the pre-trade checklist, define the evidence required, and refuse to trade while the answer is ambiguous. On a $750K label, process discipline matters more than confidence. Documentation protects decision quality even when it cannot guarantee an outcome.
Several tickets can function as one concentrated macro bet.
The corrective action is to add this item to the pre-trade checklist, define the evidence required, and refuse to trade while the answer is ambiguous. On a $750K label, process discipline matters more than confidence. Documentation protects decision quality even when it cannot guarantee an outcome.
Sunk-cost pressure often produces exactly the aggressive behavior policies prohibit.
The corrective action is to add this item to the pre-trade checklist, define the evidence required, and refuse to trade while the answer is ambiguous. On a $750K label, process discipline matters more than confidence. Documentation protects decision quality even when it cannot guarantee an outcome.
Artificial activity may not qualify and can weaken the compliance record.
The corrective action is to add this item to the pre-trade checklist, define the evidence required, and refuse to trade while the answer is ambiguous. On a $750K label, process discipline matters more than confidence. Documentation protects decision quality even when it cannot guarantee an outcome.
The headline balance is not personal cash and payouts remain rule-dependent.
The corrective action is to add this item to the pre-trade checklist, define the evidence required, and refuse to trade while the answer is ambiguous. On a $750K label, process discipline matters more than confidence. Documentation protects decision quality even when it cannot guarantee an outcome.
No. The current verified product record lists $750K only under 1-Step Pro. Instant Funding ends at smaller sizes, so describing $750K as instant would be inaccurate.
No. It is recorded as Pro. This matters because official add-on pages explicitly exclude Pro, and Standard drawdown rules should not be transferred without confirmation.
No official Pro-specific indexed source was found confirming trailing mechanics. The current PFB record labels the 8% overall limit static. Buyers should confirm the Pro contract rather than importing Standard’s trailing rule.
At 12.5%, BRIDGE is worth approximately $1,062.38 against an $8,499 base fee, producing an estimated $7,436.63 eligible total before other charges.
This review ranks sources in this order: signed Pro account terms and dashboard objectives; exact live checkout configuration; a Pro-specific official Help Centre page if published; official firm-wide pages; and the current PFB structured record. A general Standard rule never outranks a separate Pro contract.
The official site confirms that Pro is a selectable family and currently advertises up to $4 million capital, up to 90% profit split and a general scaling framework. The PFB record supplies the $750K-specific price and numerical objectives. The absence of an indexed Pro rule page is disclosed throughout rather than hidden.
Ask support whether the 4% calculation begins from balance, equity, or the higher value at a fixed server reset. For example, an account beginning a session at $760,000 balance with $765,000 floating equity can produce a different threshold depending on the formula. Record the displayed boundary before opening risk and compare it again after positions close.
This check matters most when carrying an overnight trade. A positive floating position near reset may raise a reference under some models, while a static calculation may ignore that peak. Because the Pro page is not indexed, the dashboard and written support answer must settle the question.
If Pro’s recorded 8% static classification is correct, the initial floor is $690,000. Ask whether the floor remains there after the account reaches $800,000, after a payout, and after scaling. Those three events can be treated differently by proprietary programs.
Create a journal column called current overall floor. Enter the exact dashboard number, not a mental estimate. When the account changes stage, verify the value before trading again. This prevents old evaluation arithmetic from being carried into a funded or scaled account.
The word static should be supported by a Pro-specific screenshot, contract clause or support response. A generic article claiming that a firm uses fixed drawdown is weaker evidence than the rule attached to this exact product.
If support confirms static drawdown, save the response with the order number. If the dashboard later moves, stop trading and reconcile it. If support instead confirms trailing mechanics, the PFB record needs correction; the trader should use the stricter delivered rule immediately.
Up to 90% describes a maximum, not necessarily payout one. Ask for the full sequence using a concrete example: if eligible funded profit is $10,000 on the first request, what exact amount goes to the trader? Repeat the question for later requests and after scaling.
This converts marketing language into cash-flow arithmetic. A 70% opening split would imply $7,000 on $10,000, while 90% implies $9,000. The $2,000 difference is too material to leave to assumption on an $8,499 evaluation.
Pro is not merely a large Standard account. TTT’s official add-on material already distinguishes Pro by excluding it from protection and drawdown upgrades. That is evidence that other conditions may also differ.
Whenever a rule page says only 1-Step, ask whether it includes every 1-Step family or only Standard. Do not use a favorable generic answer if a later Pro contract is more restrictive. Product-specific language should always control.
A coupon percentage matters only if checkout accepts it on the $750K Pro configuration. Enter BRIDGE, verify the line-item discount, then compare any temporary seasonal code separately. Do not add the two percentages together.
Save the pre-discount subtotal, discount amount and final total. If the displayed saving is not approximately $1,062.38 on an unchanged $8,499 base price, check eligibility, currency and taxes before paying.
A long EURUSD position, long GBPUSD position and short USDCHF position can all lose during a strong-dollar move. Three nominally separate 0.25% risks can therefore behave like one concentrated 0.75% theme.
Set a portfolio cap for each macro driver. If the aggregate reaches the cap, a new correlated trade is rejected or an existing trade is reduced. This is safer than counting tickets and assuming diversification.
The external $30,000 daily line should never be the planned stop. A trader might select a $5,000 internal daily cap, leaving $25,000 for slippage, calculation differences and operational error.
The correct buffer depends on tested volatility and execution, but it should be explicit. Once the internal stop is hit, the platform is closed and the next session begins without recovery trades.
Ask for the precise reset time and timezone, then convert it to the trader’s local time with daylight-saving changes considered. A position held across reset can belong to two calculation windows or alter the next day’s reference.
Place the reset time in the trading calendar. Fifteen minutes before it, review floating equity, swaps and open exposure. If the rule remains unclear, close or reduce risk rather than using an assumed reset.
A position can move $12,000 into profit and then close at $3,000. Under some trailing-equity designs, the $12,000 peak matters even though it was never booked. Under a truly static Pro rule, it may not move the overall floor.
Use a test-sized position or official worked example to understand the behavior before normal sizing. Capture the dashboard at the equity peak and after closure. Observed mechanics should match the written rule.
The PFB record says every 14 trading days, while the general official 1-Step page describes 21 calendar days plus 14 trading days for the first request. Ask Pro support to state the first and recurring clocks separately.
Begin counting only from the event specified in writing—first funded trade, activation, or another date. Record valid days honestly; tiny placeholder trades may not qualify and can create compliance concerns.
The public site describes 10% profit in three months out of twelve. Ask whether each month must independently close at least 10%, whether cumulative profit counts, and whether withdrawals reduce the measured result.
Also ask what happens when $750K doubles to $1.5M: new drawdown dollars, profit split, platform account and payout schedule. Scaling is valuable only when the post-scale rules are known.
An EA can be allowed in principle while its behavior is prohibited. Review whether it performs copy trading, signal replication, martingale sizing, grids, latency exploitation, excessive stacking or high-frequency bursts.
Document ownership and logic, set maximum order frequency, cap total exposure and retain version history. If support requests an explanation, a clear strategy record is stronger than claiming the bot was purchased from a third party.
Broad firm pages say many programs allow swing positions, while 1-Step prohibited material mentions weekend holding. Pro’s exact permission must be confirmed rather than inferred from either statement.
A swing trader should ask separately about overnight, Friday close, crypto weekend hours and holiday gaps. If permission depends on an add-on but Pro add-ons are unavailable, the strategy may be incompatible.
The official buyback table does not list $750K. Do not present the mathematical 2% figure of $15,000 as an available product. Eligibility, price and exclusions need a direct Pro answer.
Before considering recovery, compare the cause of breach with the cost of a new evaluation. Reinstating an account without changing the failed process can make a large fee an emotional sunk-cost trap.
The public site notes that platform and service availability can vary by country. Confirm the buyer’s country, payment method and chosen platform before purchase, especially where MT5 access or payment processing may be restricted.
Use identity information that exactly matches the payment and verification documents. Account sharing or inconsistent identity details can block activation or payout regardless of trading profit.
Combine the order receipt, accepted BRIDGE discount, Pro label, objective screen, drawdown definitions, payout schedule, split progression, scaling terms and support answers into one dated folder.
Review this pack after any product update and before a payout request. A disciplined evidence trail does not guarantee approval, but it prevents decisions based on memory and makes factual discrepancies easier to resolve.
A stop-loss defines intended risk, not guaranteed execution. Model a normal fill, a moderately adverse fill and an extreme volatility fill. If 0.25% planned risk is $1,875, add realistic spread and slippage allowances for the instrument rather than treating $1,875 as an inviolable maximum. The account’s internal daily stop should accommodate those execution differences without approaching the external line.
Run the stress test for each instrument separately because gold, major FX and indices do not share identical contract sizes or gap behavior. If a scenario can breach the internal stop from one ordinary adverse fill, reduce size before the order is placed.
An evaluation fee, a discounted checkout total and a refundable fee are three different concepts. This review confirms only the recorded base price and BRIDGE arithmetic. It does not promise that the $750K Pro fee is refunded after a payout because no Pro-specific official refund clause was found in the indexed material.
Ask support to identify the exact refund event, amount, exclusions and payment route. If the answer is not part of the agreement, budget as though the $7,436.63 estimated discounted fee is permanently spent.
Before choosing MT5 or WebTrader, compare symbol names, contract sizes, minimum lots, lot steps, commission, spread behavior, swaps and stop-distance restrictions. A lot calculator built for another broker can produce the wrong dollar risk even when the percentage formula is correct.
Validate the calculator with a tiny order and compare planned versus platform-reported exposure. Store a specification sheet for every traded symbol and update it if the platform changes. Accurate position sizing begins with contract data, not with the account headline.
When the account reaches 7%, the remaining distance to a 10% target is $22,500. That is not a reason to increase size. A target-protection protocol can cut risk by 25% or 50%, limit the trader to the strongest session, and stop after one full loss. This makes the last part slower but protects the larger body of completed work.
At 9.5%, only $3,750 remains under simple arithmetic. A single 0.5% risk would equal the remaining target and can also erase progress. Use the same verified edge at reduced risk and wait for the dashboard to confirm completion before assuming the evaluation has passed.
Ask whether trading should stop after a payout request and while review is pending. Continuing to trade can reduce eligible profit, create a rule breach or change the amount under review. The safest workflow is to follow the dashboard instruction exactly and retain the submitted request confirmation.
Reconcile the requested gross profit with the confirmed Pro split, minimum amount and method fees. A payout certificate or request status is not the same as cleared funds, so financial planning should wait for actual receipt.
The TTT Markets $750K account should be considered only as 1-Step Pro. Its recorded $8,499 price, $75,000 target, $30,000 daily limit and $60,000 overall limit create a serious, high-cost evaluation. BRIDGE can reduce an eligible base purchase by approximately $1,062.38, but a discount does not resolve rule ambiguity or improve a strategy.
Proceed only after confirming the Pro-specific drawdown method, payout sequence, first split, scaling eligibility, holding permissions and recovery options in writing. The article deliberately does not copy Standard trailing rules, advertise nonexistent add-ons, invent a 2-Step route or extrapolate an unpublished buyback price.
Created and directed by Akash Mane, Founder & CEO of Prop Firm Bridge. Fact-checked by Manoj Gholap. This material is educational, not financial advice. Prop evaluations may use simulated accounts; fees can be lost; payouts and scaling are conditional; past performance does not guarantee future outcomes.
The current Prop Firm Bridge product record lists one $750K route: 1-Step Pro. No $750K Standard, Lite, 2-Step, Instant Funding or Subscription route is included.
The recorded base price is $8,499. Confirm the exact product and total at the live TTT Markets checkout because pricing and eligibility can change.
At 12.5%, BRIDGE saves approximately $1,062.38 from the $8,499 base price, producing an estimated eligible total of $7,436.63 before taxes, conversion or fees.
The current PFB record lists a 10% target, equal to $75,000, for a simple target balance of $825,000.
The current record lists 4% daily, equal to $30,000, and 8% overall, equal to $60,000. The Pro-specific calculation method should be confirmed in the delivered terms.
An indexed official Pro rule page was not found. The PFB record labels Pro overall drawdown static, but buyers should confirm this in writing and must not assume Standard’s trailing rule applies.
Current official add-on pages exclude Pro from Drawdown Upgrade and Account Protection, so this review does not present either as available.
The current record and TTT’s public headline indicate up to 90%. The exact opening split and progression for Pro should be confirmed before purchase.
TTT advertises a general 1-Step scaling framework of 10% profit for three months out of 12 and a headline maximum allocation up to $4 million. Confirm that the $750K Pro contract participates and how its cap works.
TTT’s official buyback table currently stops at $500K. Do not assume that 2% arithmetic creates a $750K option; ask support whether Pro is eligible and obtain the exact price in writing.
