Legion Funding 1-Step $100K: price $599, 10% target, 3% daily loss, 6% max loss, funded 1% symbol cap and “BRIDGE” 5% off.
Akash Mane is the Founder and CEO of Prop Firm Bridge, where he leads the company’s vision, platform growth, and long term strategic direction. He oversees operations across research, marketing, content systems, SEO, and product positioning while driving the platform’s mission of becoming a trusted authority in the prop firm industry. At Prop Firm Bridge, Akash plays a direct role in shaping educational frameworks, comparison systems, and trader focused resources designed to help users make informed decisions with transparency and confidence. His work focuses on building scalable organic growth systems, improving platform authority, and strengthening trust through accurate, structured, and search optimized content. In addition to leadership responsibilities, he actively manages growth strategy, social media marketing, search visibility, and brand development to expand the platform’s reach across global trading audiences.
Manoj Gholap is responsible for content accuracy, compliance, and factual integrity at Prop Firm Bridge. He acts as the final verification layer for all published content, ensuring that prop firm reviews, rules, and comparisons are clear, accurate, and aligned with transparency standards. Manoj plays a key role in maintaining trust and credibility across the platform.
Quick answer: Complete Legion Funding 1-Step $100K guide with exact rules, price and BRIDGE savings.
The Legion Funding 1-Step $100K account has one 10% evaluation target ($10,000), a 3% daily loss ($3,000) and a 6% maximum loss ($6,000). The current first price is $599.
Legion Funding 1-Step $100K coupon code “BRIDGE” gives 5% off under current PFB coverage. Five percent of $599 is $29.95, producing simple price math of $569.05. The same saving can be accessed through the BRIDGE auto-discount link.
After passing, the account changes meaningfully: the funded maximum loss becomes 6% trailing, the maximum risk per symbol is 1% or $1,000, and five qualifying funded days are required.
| Account size | $100,000 |
|---|---|
| Listed price | $599 |
| BRIDGE saving | $29.95 |
| Math after BRIDGE | $569.05 |
| Evaluation target | 10% / $10,000 |
| Daily loss | 3% / $3,000 |
| Evaluation maximum loss | 6% / $6,000 |
| Evaluation minimum days | 4 qualifying days |
| Funded maximum loss | 6% trailing |
| Funded risk per symbol | 1% / $1,000 |
| Funded minimum days | 5 qualifying days |
| Reward split | 80% |
The single-phase label is simple, but the funded-stage trailing drawdown and 1% symbol-risk cap make this account materially different from 2-Step.
The current first price is $599. A 5% discount equals $29.95, leaving $569.05 in simple math. The live checkout remains the final transaction source if pricing changes.
Searches such as Legion Funding 1-Step $100K coupon code, Legion Funding $100K promo code, LegionFunding $100K discount code and BRIDGE 1-Step $100K all refer to the same current PFB code: BRIDGE for 5% off.
The code changes price only. It does not lower the 10% target or loosen the 3%/6% risk structure.
The single evaluation target is 10%, equal to $10,000. A 1% gain is $1,000, 0.5% is $500 and 0.25% is $250.
There is no second phase, but the target is larger than the first phase of the 2-Step model. “One step” therefore means fewer phases, not automatically lower difficulty.
The evaluation requires four qualifying days, each realising at least 0.5% profit. On $100K, 0.5% equals $500.
A trader who reaches the 10% target quickly still needs the qualifying-day requirement. The best approach is not to force filler trades but to keep risk low and complete the required days cleanly.
The 3% daily-loss amount is $3,000. This is a hard breach boundary. A personal 1% stop would be $1,000, and 1.5% would be $1,500.
Because the official daily limit is tighter than 2-Step’s 4%, aggressive intraday recovery attempts can become dangerous quickly. A personal session stop below the official threshold is especially important on this model.
The evaluation maximum loss is 6%, equal to $6,000. That is materially tighter than the 10% maximum loss on Legion Funding 2-Step.
A 1% risk-per-trade approach has only six theoretical full losses inside the 6% maximum before costs. That is why 0.25%–0.5% risk can make more sense for traders with normal losing streaks.
After passing, the maximum loss becomes 6% trailing. A trailing floor can move upward as the account reaches new equity highs. Giving back a large part of prior profit can therefore put the account closer to the active breach line than a static account would.
Funded risk should be based on the distance to the current trailing floor, not the original $100,000 balance.
The funded risk-per-symbol limit is 1% of the initial balance. On $100K, that equals $1,000. This is one of the most important 1-Step rules because it can be much tighter than the 3% daily or 6% maximum-loss figures.
Multiple positions on the same instrument can be assessed together. Splitting one idea into several orders does not create several separate 1% allowances.
The funded stage requires five qualifying trading days, each realising at least 0.5% profit. On $100K, that means $500 realised profit for a day to count under the current rule.
A funded trader should therefore plan reward eligibility around both profit and day count, not just account balance.
The standard reward split is 80%. Current Terms say reward requests are generally reviewed within one to three business days, with a $100 minimum unless the dashboard states otherwise.
Marketing pages have used 24-hour payout language. PFB uses the 1–3 business-day Terms wording as the safer expectation. Reward approval remains subject to compliance and account review.
The funded-stage news restriction blocks opening or closing trades within five minutes before or after a relevant high-impact event or speech. Stop-loss and take-profit executions count as closes.
A swing trader therefore has to consider whether existing orders could be triggered during a restricted event. The $100K size does not change this rule.
Evaluation trades must average at least two minutes. Funded trades generally must remain open for at least one minute. HFT, tick scalping and latency arbitrage are prohibited.
If your strategy often exits in seconds, the account is a poor fit regardless of the lower checkout price after BRIDGE.
Third-party EAs may be used as legitimate risk-management or trade-management tools. Copy trading from another person, signal service or external source is prohibited. Mirror trading, account sharing and unauthorised automation are also restricted.
The trader should be able to explain how any automation works and show that it is not masking copied or exploitative activity.
| Risk % | Dollar risk | Theoretical full losses inside 6% |
|---|---|---|
| 0.1% | $100 | 60.00 |
| 0.25% | $250 | 24.00 |
| 0.5% | $500 | 12.00 |
| 0.75% | $750 | 8.00 |
| 1% | $1,000 | 6.00 |
The table ignores costs and daily-limit interactions, so it is not a recommendation to consume all 6%. It simply shows how quickly different risk sizes use the available headline room.
0.1% of $100,000 equals $100. Four full losses equal 0.40%. A 2R winner adds about 0.20% before costs.
This is a conservative pace that leaves many attempts inside the 6% maximum-loss structure. It can be slow, but the account has no conventional deadline.
0.25% of $100,000 equals $250. Four full losses equal 1.00%. A 2R winner adds about 0.50% before costs.
This is a conservative pace that leaves many attempts inside the 6% maximum-loss structure. It can be slow, but the account has no conventional deadline.
0.5% of $100,000 equals $500. Four full losses equal 2.00%. A 2R winner adds about 1.00% before costs.
This is a moderate pace. Losing streaks matter more, but the trader still has more room than with 1% risk.
0.75% of $100,000 equals $750. Four full losses equal 3.00%. A 2R winner adds about 1.50% before costs.
This is aggressive for a 6% maximum-loss model. A short losing streak can quickly move the account into a protection zone.
1% of $100,000 equals $1,000. Four full losses equal 4.00%. A 2R winner adds about 2.00% before costs.
This is aggressive for a 6% maximum-loss model. A short losing streak can quickly move the account into a protection zone.
Six losses at 0.25% equal 1.5%. Six at 0.5% equal 3%. Six at 1% equal the full 6% maximum-loss amount before costs.
This is why the common retail 1% rule is not automatically conservative inside a one-step prop account. The strategy’s historical losing streak matters more than a generic percentage rule.
At 0.25% risk, a 2R winner is about 0.5%. Twenty ideal net 2R wins equal the 10% target. Real results include losses, so the actual path will take longer.
The benefit is that one loss has a small effect on the 6% maximum-loss budget.
At 0.5% risk, a 2R winner is about 1%. Ten ideal net 2R wins equal 10%. The target can be reached faster, but twelve theoretical full 0.5% losses consume 6% before costs.
The strategy should have enough historical edge to justify the faster pace.
At 1% risk, a 2R winner is about 2%. Five ideal net 2R wins equal the 10% target, but only six full 1% losses fit inside the 6% maximum.
This makes the account fast in both directions. For most traders, that is a high-volatility path through a relatively tight rule set.
If only 0.25% remains to complete the evaluation, risking 1% on the next trade means risking four times the remaining objective. Reducing risk near the target can protect accumulated progress.
The four qualifying-day requirement must also be complete before progression.
A 1% drawdown equals $1,000 on $100K. That leaves 5 percentage points, or $5,000, before the 6% evaluation maximum-loss boundary in headline math.
As drawdown deepens, risk should generally fall. Increasing size to recover quickly is especially dangerous when only a small percentage remains before breach.
A 2% drawdown equals $2,000 on $100K. That leaves 4 percentage points, or $4,000, before the 6% evaluation maximum-loss boundary in headline math.
As drawdown deepens, risk should generally fall. Increasing size to recover quickly is especially dangerous when only a small percentage remains before breach.
A 3% drawdown equals $3,000 on $100K. That leaves 3 percentage points, or $3,000, before the 6% evaluation maximum-loss boundary in headline math.
As drawdown deepens, risk should generally fall. Increasing size to recover quickly is especially dangerous when only a small percentage remains before breach.
A 4% drawdown equals $4,000 on $100K. That leaves 2 percentage points, or $2,000, before the 6% evaluation maximum-loss boundary in headline math.
As drawdown deepens, risk should generally fall. Increasing size to recover quickly is especially dangerous when only a small percentage remains before breach.
A 5% drawdown equals $5,000 on $100K. That leaves 1 percentage points, or $1,000, before the 6% evaluation maximum-loss boundary in headline math.
As drawdown deepens, risk should generally fall. Increasing size to recover quickly is especially dangerous when only a small percentage remains before breach.
Forex traders can use the 1-Step route if they naturally trade small. The 1% funded symbol cap is the key constraint after passing, especially for traders who add to one currency pair.
Correlation across several USD pairs should also be managed as portfolio risk even though the formal symbol cap applies per instrument.
Gold traders should be especially careful with the 1% funded symbol cap. On $100K, the cap is $1,000, so multiple gold positions can reach it quickly.
The funded news rule also matters because gold is highly sensitive to major US data and central-bank events.
Index traders should combine the 3% daily limit with their own smaller session stop. Opening volatility and macro events can produce fast losses that approach the official boundary before a trader has time to react.
Size positions from stop distance, not from the nominal $100K balance.
Swing traders need to understand the funded 6% trailing floor and the news window. A profitable run can move the trailing threshold upward, and a later pullback can reduce available cushion.
Existing stops or targets can also trigger during restricted news, so scheduled events should be part of overnight planning.
The account is less suitable for very fast scalpers because evaluation trades must average two minutes and funded trades generally require a one-minute minimum.
A trader whose average hold is comfortably longer may still use short-term strategies, but seconds-based execution is not a good match.
$100K reduces the percentage represented by a fixed cash stop compared with $50K. The larger account costs more, so the upgrade should be justified by better risk geometry rather than account-size prestige.
Keep the same cash risk when comparing sizes to see the real percentage advantage.
1-Step uses one 10% target, 3% daily loss and 6% maximum loss. 2-Step uses 8% then 5% targets, 4% daily loss and 10% maximum loss. After passing, 1-Step also has a tighter 1% symbol cap versus 2% on 2-Step.
1-Step saves a phase; 2-Step gives substantially more risk room.
1-Step requires a 10% evaluation but has no 20% consistency rule stated. Instant removes the evaluation, but starts directly with 5% trailing loss, 20% consistency, 2% symbol risk and a 3% reward buffer.
The better structure depends on whether the trader prefers to complete an evaluation or accept stricter reward-readiness rules from the start.
Fast Track has a much smaller first fee and a 6% target, but it requires a separate activation fee after passing and funded 5% trailing drawdown with 20% consistency.
1-Step has a larger first purchase price but no separate activation-fee structure in the current model terms.
The listed first price is $599. BRIDGE reduces it by $29.95 in simple math. Repeated attempts multiply the real cost, so a trader should compare strategy survival with the 6% maximum loss before choosing the account.
A discount improves price per attempt. It does not change the probability of passing.
Relevant phrases include Legion Funding 1-Step $100K coupon code BRIDGE, Legion Funding $100K promo code BRIDGE, LegionFunding 1 Step $100K discount code, Legion Funding $100K 5% off, BRIDGE code for Legion Funding $100K and Legion Funding $100K referral code.
The current PFB answer is consistent across those searches: BRIDGE for 5% off.
The auto-discount link is https://checkout.legionfunding.com/ref/1707/. If the expected reduction is not visible, enter BRIDGE manually and confirm the final order total.
The main Legion Funding BRIDGE page remains the canonical coupon authority.
PFB uses the Legion Funding Terms for the 10% target, 3% daily loss, 6% evaluation loss, 6% trailing funded loss, 1% funded symbol cap, news rule and payout review. The Trading Objectives page is also used for public program context.
Live checkout is the transaction source for the final price.
Read the Legion Funding 1-Step pillar for the full $5K–$100K range, the BRIDGE coupon authority for code coverage, and the Legion Funding review for PFB scoring and risk classification.
This keeps the exact $100K intent separate from broad firm research.
BRIDGE. The current PFB-listed Legion Funding 1-Step $100K coupon code gives 5% off. The current first price is $599, so simple discount math gives $569.05.
The target is 10%, equal to $10,000.
The evaluation uses 3% daily loss ($3,000) and 6% maximum loss ($6,000). The funded stage uses 6% trailing maximum loss.
Legion Funding 1-Step $100K → price $599 → BRIDGE → 5% off → math after code $569.05 → target $10,000/10% → daily loss $3,000/3% → evaluation maximum loss $6,000/6% → funded maximum loss 6% trailing → funded symbol-risk cap $1,000/1% → 80% reward split.
Auto-discount link: https://checkout.legionfunding.com/ref/1707/
The 1-Step $100K account is a single-phase route for traders who prefer one evaluation and can operate inside a relatively tight risk structure. The biggest post-pass consideration is the 6% trailing funded drawdown combined with the 1% risk-per-symbol cap.
For current savings, Legion Funding 1-Step $100K coupon code “BRIDGE” gives 5% off. Choose the account because the 1-Step rules match your risk style, then apply the code.
Assume 0.1% planned risk per idea, equal to $100 on $100K. Five full losses equal 0.50%, while three 2R winners add roughly 0.60% before costs. The 6% maximum-loss structure makes risk size especially important.
The account has no conventional deadline, so there is little reason to use oversized risk simply to finish faster. Lower percentage risk can provide more attempts through normal losing streaks.
BRIDGE changes the purchase fee by 5% but does not change the 10% target, trailing funded drawdown or 1% symbol-risk cap.
Assume 0.25% planned risk per idea, equal to $250 on $100K. Five full losses equal 1.25%, while three 2R winners add roughly 1.50% before costs. The 6% maximum-loss structure makes risk size especially important.
The account has no conventional deadline, so there is little reason to use oversized risk simply to finish faster. Lower percentage risk can provide more attempts through normal losing streaks.
BRIDGE changes the purchase fee by 5% but does not change the 10% target, trailing funded drawdown or 1% symbol-risk cap.
Assume 0.5% planned risk per idea, equal to $500 on $100K. Five full losses equal 2.50%, while three 2R winners add roughly 3.00% before costs. The 6% maximum-loss structure makes risk size especially important.
The account has no conventional deadline, so there is little reason to use oversized risk simply to finish faster. Lower percentage risk can provide more attempts through normal losing streaks.
BRIDGE changes the purchase fee by 5% but does not change the 10% target, trailing funded drawdown or 1% symbol-risk cap.
Assume 0.75% planned risk per idea, equal to $750 on $100K. Five full losses equal 3.75%, while three 2R winners add roughly 4.50% before costs. The 6% maximum-loss structure makes risk size especially important.
The account has no conventional deadline, so there is little reason to use oversized risk simply to finish faster. Lower percentage risk can provide more attempts through normal losing streaks.
BRIDGE changes the purchase fee by 5% but does not change the 10% target, trailing funded drawdown or 1% symbol-risk cap.
Assume 1% planned risk per idea, equal to $1,000 on $100K. Five full losses equal 5.00%, while three 2R winners add roughly 6.00% before costs. The 6% maximum-loss structure makes risk size especially important.
The account has no conventional deadline, so there is little reason to use oversized risk simply to finish faster. Lower percentage risk can provide more attempts through normal losing streaks.
BRIDGE changes the purchase fee by 5% but does not change the 10% target, trailing funded drawdown or 1% symbol-risk cap.
Assume 0.1% planned risk per idea, equal to $100 on $100K. Five full losses equal 0.50%, while three 2R winners add roughly 0.60% before costs. The 6% maximum-loss structure makes risk size especially important.
The account has no conventional deadline, so there is little reason to use oversized risk simply to finish faster. Lower percentage risk can provide more attempts through normal losing streaks.
BRIDGE changes the purchase fee by 5% but does not change the 10% target, trailing funded drawdown or 1% symbol-risk cap.
Assume 0.25% planned risk per idea, equal to $250 on $100K. Five full losses equal 1.25%, while three 2R winners add roughly 1.50% before costs. The 6% maximum-loss structure makes risk size especially important.
The account has no conventional deadline, so there is little reason to use oversized risk simply to finish faster. Lower percentage risk can provide more attempts through normal losing streaks.
BRIDGE changes the purchase fee by 5% but does not change the 10% target, trailing funded drawdown or 1% symbol-risk cap.
Assume 0.5% planned risk per idea, equal to $500 on $100K. Five full losses equal 2.50%, while three 2R winners add roughly 3.00% before costs. The 6% maximum-loss structure makes risk size especially important.
The account has no conventional deadline, so there is little reason to use oversized risk simply to finish faster. Lower percentage risk can provide more attempts through normal losing streaks.
BRIDGE changes the purchase fee by 5% but does not change the 10% target, trailing funded drawdown or 1% symbol-risk cap.
Assume 0.75% planned risk per idea, equal to $750 on $100K. Five full losses equal 3.75%, while three 2R winners add roughly 4.50% before costs. The 6% maximum-loss structure makes risk size especially important.
The account has no conventional deadline, so there is little reason to use oversized risk simply to finish faster. Lower percentage risk can provide more attempts through normal losing streaks.
BRIDGE changes the purchase fee by 5% but does not change the 10% target, trailing funded drawdown or 1% symbol-risk cap.
Assume 1% planned risk per idea, equal to $1,000 on $100K. Five full losses equal 5.00%, while three 2R winners add roughly 6.00% before costs. The 6% maximum-loss structure makes risk size especially important.
The account has no conventional deadline, so there is little reason to use oversized risk simply to finish faster. Lower percentage risk can provide more attempts through normal losing streaks.
BRIDGE changes the purchase fee by 5% but does not change the 10% target, trailing funded drawdown or 1% symbol-risk cap.
Assume 0.1% planned risk per idea, equal to $100 on $100K. Five full losses equal 0.50%, while three 2R winners add roughly 0.60% before costs. The 6% maximum-loss structure makes risk size especially important.
The account has no conventional deadline, so there is little reason to use oversized risk simply to finish faster. Lower percentage risk can provide more attempts through normal losing streaks.
BRIDGE changes the purchase fee by 5% but does not change the 10% target, trailing funded drawdown or 1% symbol-risk cap.
Assume 0.25% planned risk per idea, equal to $250 on $100K. Five full losses equal 1.25%, while three 2R winners add roughly 1.50% before costs. The 6% maximum-loss structure makes risk size especially important.
The account has no conventional deadline, so there is little reason to use oversized risk simply to finish faster. Lower percentage risk can provide more attempts through normal losing streaks.
BRIDGE changes the purchase fee by 5% but does not change the 10% target, trailing funded drawdown or 1% symbol-risk cap.
Assume 0.5% planned risk per idea, equal to $500 on $100K. Five full losses equal 2.50%, while three 2R winners add roughly 3.00% before costs. The 6% maximum-loss structure makes risk size especially important.
The account has no conventional deadline, so there is little reason to use oversized risk simply to finish faster. Lower percentage risk can provide more attempts through normal losing streaks.
BRIDGE changes the purchase fee by 5% but does not change the 10% target, trailing funded drawdown or 1% symbol-risk cap.
Assume 0.75% planned risk per idea, equal to $750 on $100K. Five full losses equal 3.75%, while three 2R winners add roughly 4.50% before costs. The 6% maximum-loss structure makes risk size especially important.
The account has no conventional deadline, so there is little reason to use oversized risk simply to finish faster. Lower percentage risk can provide more attempts through normal losing streaks.
BRIDGE changes the purchase fee by 5% but does not change the 10% target, trailing funded drawdown or 1% symbol-risk cap.
Assume 1% planned risk per idea, equal to $1,000 on $100K. Five full losses equal 5.00%, while three 2R winners add roughly 6.00% before costs. The 6% maximum-loss structure makes risk size especially important.
The account has no conventional deadline, so there is little reason to use oversized risk simply to finish faster. Lower percentage risk can provide more attempts through normal losing streaks.
BRIDGE changes the purchase fee by 5% but does not change the 10% target, trailing funded drawdown or 1% symbol-risk cap.
Assume 0.1% planned risk per idea, equal to $100 on $100K. Five full losses equal 0.50%, while three 2R winners add roughly 0.60% before costs. The 6% maximum-loss structure makes risk size especially important.
The account has no conventional deadline, so there is little reason to use oversized risk simply to finish faster. Lower percentage risk can provide more attempts through normal losing streaks.
BRIDGE changes the purchase fee by 5% but does not change the 10% target, trailing funded drawdown or 1% symbol-risk cap.
Assume 0.25% planned risk per idea, equal to $250 on $100K. Five full losses equal 1.25%, while three 2R winners add roughly 1.50% before costs. The 6% maximum-loss structure makes risk size especially important.
The account has no conventional deadline, so there is little reason to use oversized risk simply to finish faster. Lower percentage risk can provide more attempts through normal losing streaks.
BRIDGE changes the purchase fee by 5% but does not change the 10% target, trailing funded drawdown or 1% symbol-risk cap.
Assume 0.5% planned risk per idea, equal to $500 on $100K. Five full losses equal 2.50%, while three 2R winners add roughly 3.00% before costs. The 6% maximum-loss structure makes risk size especially important.
The account has no conventional deadline, so there is little reason to use oversized risk simply to finish faster. Lower percentage risk can provide more attempts through normal losing streaks.
BRIDGE changes the purchase fee by 5% but does not change the 10% target, trailing funded drawdown or 1% symbol-risk cap.
Assume 0.75% planned risk per idea, equal to $750 on $100K. Five full losses equal 3.75%, while three 2R winners add roughly 4.50% before costs. The 6% maximum-loss structure makes risk size especially important.
The account has no conventional deadline, so there is little reason to use oversized risk simply to finish faster. Lower percentage risk can provide more attempts through normal losing streaks.
BRIDGE changes the purchase fee by 5% but does not change the 10% target, trailing funded drawdown or 1% symbol-risk cap.
Assume 1% planned risk per idea, equal to $1,000 on $100K. Five full losses equal 5.00%, while three 2R winners add roughly 6.00% before costs. The 6% maximum-loss structure makes risk size especially important.
The account has no conventional deadline, so there is little reason to use oversized risk simply to finish faster. Lower percentage risk can provide more attempts through normal losing streaks.
BRIDGE changes the purchase fee by 5% but does not change the 10% target, trailing funded drawdown or 1% symbol-risk cap.
Assume 0.1% planned risk per idea, equal to $100 on $100K. Five full losses equal 0.50%, while three 2R winners add roughly 0.60% before costs. The 6% maximum-loss structure makes risk size especially important.
The account has no conventional deadline, so there is little reason to use oversized risk simply to finish faster. Lower percentage risk can provide more attempts through normal losing streaks.
BRIDGE changes the purchase fee by 5% but does not change the 10% target, trailing funded drawdown or 1% symbol-risk cap.
BRIDGE is the current PFB-listed code for 5% off.
The current first price is $599; simple BRIDGE math gives $569.05.
10%, equal to $10,000.
3%, equal to $3,000.
6%, equal to $6,000.
The funded stage uses a 6% trailing maximum loss.
1% of initial balance, equal to $1,000.
80% of eligible simulated profits.
https://checkout.legionfunding.com/ref/1707/
Join the discussion
No comments yet
Sign in to leave a comment. Real traders only — one account, one voice.