QT Funded review 2026 with program rules, drawdown, payouts, prices and “BRIDGE” coupon/promo/discount code. In-depth account selection guide.
Akash Mane is the Founder and CEO of Prop Firm Bridge, where he leads the company’s vision, platform growth, and long term strategic direction. He oversees operations across research, marketing, content systems, SEO, and product positioning while driving the platform’s mission of becoming a trusted authority in the prop firm industry. At Prop Firm Bridge, Akash plays a direct role in shaping educational frameworks, comparison systems, and trader focused resources designed to help users make informed decisions with transparency and confidence. His work focuses on building scalable organic growth systems, improving platform authority, and strengthening trust through accurate, structured, and search optimized content. In addition to leadership responsibilities, he actively manages growth strategy, social media marketing, search visibility, and brand development to expand the platform’s reach across global trading audiences.
Manoj Gholap is responsible for content accuracy, compliance, and factual integrity at Prop Firm Bridge. He acts as the final verification layer for all published content, ensuring that prop firm reviews, rules, and comparisons are clear, accurate, and aligned with transparency standards. Manoj plays a key role in maintaining trust and credibility across the platform.
QT Funded Review 2026 + Exclusive Coupon Code “BRIDGE”: ONE, TWO, POWER, Instant, BNPL & 60% Off
Independently verified coupon: The Prop Firm Bridge research team independently tested QT Funded coupon code “BRIDGE” at the live checkout and confirmed the exact 60% discount stated in this review for the account types and sizes covered here. This coupon verification is separate from the editorial review and does not affect the PFB Score. Verified in 2026. Always confirm the final checkout total before payment.
This is a buyer’s decision guide, not a coupon landing page disguised as a review. The article answers the transactional query immediately, then spends the bulk of its length on the account architecture that will still matter after the checkout tab is closed.
Current QT Funded code: BRIDGE is recorded at 60% off current QT Funded evaluations. QT ONE, QT TWO, QT POWER, Instant and Buy Now Pay Later do not share one universal rule set, so select the model first and apply BRIDGE second.
Last verified in 2026. Always confirm the final price, selected account and live terms before payment.
QT Funded currently has a 84/100 PFB Score and PFB Verified status in the Prop Firm Bridge database. The current code covered here is “BRIDGE”, with 60% off under the current QT Funded coupon record.
For canonical data, read the QT Funded review and the QT Funded coupon page. Those two pages serve different purposes: one is the firm-level rule record; the other is the checkout verification record.
The account-selection principle used throughout this guide is simple: choose a rule set that fits the strategy, then choose a balance, then optimize the fee. Reversing that order often turns a “good deal” into a poor trading fit.
A review query and a coupon query often appear in the same session because the trader is close to making a purchase. That makes accuracy more important, not less. A person searching for a code needs the discount fact, but they also need the rule facts that determine whether buying the account makes sense.
For entity clarity, QT Funded coupon code “BRIDGE”, QT Funded promo code “BRIDGE” and QT Funded discount code “BRIDGE” refer to the same checkout relationship described here. The code does not create a special account with easier objectives.
Coupon verification is independent from editorial scoring. The code can change while the PFB Score remains the same, and a larger discount should never improve the review score.
| Program | Type | Target | Daily loss | Max loss | Drawdown | Split | Payout | Consistency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QT ONE | One Step | 6% | 3% trailing daily threshold based on the higher previous closing balance or equity | 6% static | Trailing daily threshold, Static maximum drawdown, 1% funded floating-loss limit | 70% | Every 4 trading days | None |
| QT TWO | Two Step | Phase 1: 8%; Phase 2: 5% | 4% fixed from the starting balance | 8% static | Fixed daily drawdown, Static maximum drawdown, 1% funded floating-loss rule | 80% | Every 14 days | Model-specific |
| QT POWER | Two Step | Phase 1: 6%; Phase 2: 6% | 4% fixed from the initial balance | 8% static | Fixed daily drawdown, Static maximum drawdown | 80% | Every 14 days for purchases from 11 August 2026 onward | 35% in evaluation and funded payout periods |
| QT Instant | Instant Funding | No evaluation; reach 8% before the first 5% withdrawal | 3% fixed from the starting account balance | 6% trailing from the highest recorded balance or floating equity | Fixed daily drawdown, Trailing maximum drawdown, 1% per-instrument exposure limit | 100% under the current plan conditions | Every completed 4-day cycle after all conditions are met | 30% |
| Buy Now Pay Later | Buy Now Pay Later | 6% | 3% trailing | 6% trailing | Trailing daily drawdown, Trailing maximum drawdown, 2% floating-loss limit | 80% | Every 14 days | None in evaluation; 20% for funded payouts |
This matrix is intentionally dense because the account names under one firm can hide substantial rule differences. Compare rows horizontally rather than reading only the cheapest fee or highest profit split.
QT ONE is a One Step route with a current target of 6%, daily-loss figure of 3% trailing daily threshold based on the higher previous closing balance or equity and maximum-loss figure of 6% static. The drawdown record says Trailing daily threshold, Static maximum drawdown, 1% funded floating-loss limit.
The current profit split is 70% and payout timing is Every 4 trading days. Minimum/qualifying days are No minimum in evaluation; 4 minimum days per funded payout cycle. Consistency is None.
News trading is listed as allowed, overnight holding is model-specific, and weekend holding is model-specific.
Current pricing references: $5,000 — $110; $10,000 — $190; $25,000 — $350; $50,000 — $625; $100,000 — $1,000.
Rule note: One-step evaluation with a 6% target, no minimum evaluation days and no consistency score. Funded payouts use a 70% split after each compliant four-day cycle.
The trader-fit question is whether these limits allow the strategy’s normal variance. A target can look small and still be hard if trailing loss is tight; a larger target can be manageable if the account gives wide static room and no deadline.
QT TWO is a Two Step route with a current target of Phase 1: 8%; Phase 2: 5%, daily-loss figure of 4% fixed from the starting balance and maximum-loss figure of 8% static. The drawdown record says Fixed daily drawdown, Static maximum drawdown, 1% funded floating-loss rule.
The current profit split is 80% and payout timing is Every 14 days. Minimum/qualifying days are 4 days in each evaluation phase; 4 days with at least 0.5% profit per funded payout cycle. Consistency is model-specific.
News trading is model-specific, overnight holding is model-specific, and weekend holding is model-specific.
Current pricing references: $10,000 — $70; $25,000 — $140; $50,000 — $275; $100,000 — $550; $200,000 — $1,000.
Rule note: Two-step evaluation followed by a risk review. Funded accounts use a 5% profit cap per cycle, 1% floating-loss rule and mandatory stop losses.
The trader-fit question is whether these limits allow the strategy’s normal variance. A target can look small and still be hard if trailing loss is tight; a larger target can be manageable if the account gives wide static room and no deadline.
QT POWER is a Two Step route with a current target of Phase 1: 6%; Phase 2: 6%, daily-loss figure of 4% fixed from the initial balance and maximum-loss figure of 8% static. The drawdown record says Fixed daily drawdown, Static maximum drawdown.
The current profit split is 80% and payout timing is Every 14 days for purchases from 11 August 2026 onward. Minimum/qualifying days are 4 days per evaluation phase; 4 minimum days per funded payout cycle. Consistency is 35% in evaluation and funded payout periods.
News trading is listed as allowed, overnight holding is model-specific, and weekend holding is model-specific.
Current pricing references: $5,000 — $35; $10,000 — $60; $25,000 — $125; $50,000 — $237; $100,000 — $475.
Rule note: Two-step evaluation with 6% targets in both phases, fixed 4% daily drawdown, 8% static maximum drawdown and a 35% consistency score.
The trader-fit question is whether these limits allow the strategy’s normal variance. A target can look small and still be hard if trailing loss is tight; a larger target can be manageable if the account gives wide static room and no deadline.
QT Instant is a Instant Funding route with a current target of No evaluation; reach 8% before the first 5% withdrawal, daily-loss figure of 3% fixed from the starting account balance and maximum-loss figure of 6% trailing from the highest recorded balance or floating equity. The drawdown record says Fixed daily drawdown, Trailing maximum drawdown, 1% per-instrument exposure limit.
The current profit split is 100% under the current plan conditions and payout timing is Every completed 4-day cycle after all conditions are met. Minimum/qualifying days are 4 profitable days of at least 1% each. Consistency is 30%.
News trading is listed as allowed, overnight holding is model-specific, and weekend holding is model-specific.
Current pricing references: $5,000 — $75; $10,000 — $125; $25,000 — $230; $50,000 — $375; $100,000 — $750.
Rule note: Immediate simulated funded account for purchases from 11 August 2026 onward. Strict exposure, stop-loss, profitable-day, consistency and payout-buffer rules apply.
The trader-fit question is whether these limits allow the strategy’s normal variance. A target can look small and still be hard if trailing loss is tight; a larger target can be manageable if the account gives wide static room and no deadline.
Buy Now Pay Later is a Buy Now Pay Later route with a current target of 6%, daily-loss figure of 3% trailing and maximum-loss figure of 6% trailing. The drawdown record says Trailing daily drawdown, Trailing maximum drawdown, 2% floating-loss limit.
The current profit split is 80% and payout timing is Every 14 days. Minimum/qualifying days are No minimum in evaluation; 5 minimum funded days per payout. Consistency is None in evaluation; 20% for funded payouts.
News trading is listed as allowed, overnight holding is model-specific, and weekend holding is model-specific.
Current pricing references: $5,000 — $5; $10,000 — $5; $25,000 — $5; $50,000 — $5; $100,000 — $5.
Rule note: One-step route with a $5 evaluation entry and a separate activation fee after passing. Activation must be completed within seven calendar days.
The trader-fit question is whether these limits allow the strategy’s normal variance. A target can look small and still be hard if trailing loss is tight; a larger target can be manageable if the account gives wide static room and no deadline.
Price should be evaluated as cost per suitable attempt, not as cost per displayed dollar of balance. A cheap account that repeatedly conflicts with the strategy is not cheap in practice.
$5,000 account: $110; $10,000 account: $190; $25,000 account: $350; $50,000 account: $625; $100,000 account: $1,000
$10,000 account: $70; $25,000 account: $140; $50,000 account: $275; $100,000 account: $550; $200,000 account: $1,000
$5,000 account: $35; $10,000 account: $60; $25,000 account: $125; $50,000 account: $237; $100,000 account: $475
$5,000 account: $75; $10,000 account: $125; $25,000 account: $230; $50,000 account: $375; $100,000 account: $750
$5,000 account: $5; $10,000 account: $5; $25,000 account: $5; $50,000 account: $5; $100,000 account: $5
Apply “BRIDGE” only after the model and size are chosen. For flat percentage savings, multiply the eligible base fee by the remaining percentage. For fixed-dollar or conditional campaigns, use the actual order summary rather than approximating.
The headline balance is not usable risk capital. Usable risk is the distance from current equity to the relevant breach boundary. A $100K label can coexist with only $3K, $4K or $6K of initial loss room depending on the model.
Convert every percentage into money. Then compare the cash loss room with normal stop size and expected losing streak. If six ordinary losses can occur in the strategy, risk per trade must be small enough that six losses plus slippage do not threaten the account.
Trailing drawdown requires repeated recalculation because the floor may rise after profits. Static drawdown is easier to visualize but can still be breached by correlated exposure or a large gap.
Evaluation and funded rules should be treated as two separate contracts even when many fields are identical. Some programs add consistency after passing; some tighten daily loss; some introduce payout qualification; some change profit split or drawdown behavior.
The first funded day is therefore a reset point for the trader’s risk plan. Re-read objectives, calculate the new breach floor and reduce size if the funded rules are tighter than the challenge rules.
Do not assume a rule mentioned in an evaluation FAQ automatically applies to the funded account. The exact model name and stage matter.
A payout-ready account usually needs more than positive P/L. Check account age, profitable-day requirements, consistency, minimum profit, buffer, KYC, open trades and the current request window.
Profit split should be read after eligibility. An advertised 90% means little until the account has satisfied every condition required for the profit to become withdrawable.
Consider leaving a buffer after withdrawal. If the request reduces balance without moving the loss floor proportionally, taking the maximum can make the next trading cycle unnecessarily fragile.
Strategy compatibility is a hard filter. A swing trader needs overnight/weekend permissions. A news trader needs exact event-window wording. A scalper needs execution and minimum-hold clarity. An EA user needs to distinguish automation from prohibited copying.
CFD traders also need leverage, rollover, spread expansion and symbol-specific risk awareness.
Allowed does not mean safe. A permitted martingale, grid or news approach can still be a poor fit under tight risk limits.
Prefer holding freedom and rule stability. Avoid models whose weekend or news restrictions force exits that the original strategy would not take.
Focus on daily-loss mathematics, commissions, execution and whether many small trades can accumulate risk unexpectedly.
Focus on the relationship between normal stop size and daily/overall room. A personal daily stop can protect the account before the firm limit is reached.
Verify automation, shared strategy and copy-trading restrictions. Owning the EA does not automatically make every execution pattern compliant.
Prefer the model whose rules can be explained from memory in one minute. Complexity creates avoidable breach risk when the trader is still learning the prop-firm environment.
Build a one-page risk sheet before trading. Record starting balance, current equity, daily threshold, maximum threshold, reset time, personal daily stop, risk per trade, maximum correlated exposure, news window, holding permissions, consistency and payout criteria.
Then stress-test the plan. Simulate a normal losing streak, a spread-widening event and two correlated positions moving against you together. If the account survives only when everything executes perfectly, the risk unit is too large.
Update the sheet after any payout or rule-stage change.
Rule traps include misunderstanding the drawdown reference, assuming no minimum days means “pass as fast as possible”, forgetting funded consistency, overlooking news windows and treating a payout cadence as automatic eligibility.
Pricing traps include choosing a bigger account solely because the percentage discount produces a larger dollar saving. The right comparison is strategy fit plus total expected cost over multiple attempts.
Information traps include relying on stale social posts after campaigns change. Current checkout and current account terms outrank old screenshots.
QT Funded currently holds a 84/100 PFB Score and PFB Verified status. The score is an editorial assessment of the firm and program environment. The coupon verification is a separate factual check.
Independent verification does not mean guaranteed future performance. It means the code state is checked separately from the commercial relationship. The trader should still confirm the final checkout price and current rules.
When traders ask “is QT Funded legit?”, translate that into observable questions about operations, disclosure, payout conditions, support and rule clarity rather than treating legitimacy as a one-word verdict.
Logical query variants include QT Funded coupon code “BRIDGE”, QT Funded promo code “BRIDGE”, QT Funded discount code “BRIDGE”, working QT Funded coupon 2026, QT Funded referral code, and account-size queries such as QT Funded $50K coupon code. The page uses these naturally to help search engines and AI assistants map the code to the correct firm.
Semantic coverage should support the reader, not create repetition. The deeper rule sections are what make this page more useful than a thin coupon page.
The discount is useful only after the account already passes the strategy-fit test.
QT Funded should be judged on the interaction between drawdown, objectives, funded-stage rules and payout conditions. The current PFB record is 84/100 with PFB Verified status, while the checkout relationship covered here is “BRIDGE” with 60% off under the current QT Funded coupon record.
A disciplined decision sequence is: verify the model, map the breach rules, test strategy compatibility, understand funded conditions, model payout eligibility, choose size, then use the coupon. That sequence protects the trader from letting a discount make the decision.
Disclosure: Prop Firm Bridge may earn compensation from certain links or codes. Editorial scoring and coupon verification are handled independently.
The true cost of a prop account is not one fee; it is the expected number of attempts multiplied by the fee, adjusted for any refunds or activation charges. A model that fits the strategy and reduces breach frequency can have a lower expected cost even when the first purchase is more expensive. “BRIDGE” reduces the first-order fee, but model fit controls the retry count.
Traders should therefore track why prior attempts failed. If failures cluster around daily-loss breaches, buying a larger nominal account with the same percentage rule may not solve the problem. A different drawdown structure or smaller per-trade risk may.
A strategy failure means the edge did not perform as expected over a meaningful sample. A process failure means the account was lost because the trader violated sizing, traded outside the plan, misunderstood a rule or chased a target. Prop evaluations amplify process failures because a single breach can terminate the account even when the long-term strategy still has positive expectancy.
Reviewing every closed attempt through that lens can improve future account selection and risk planning more than searching for a larger coupon.
Firms can launch new models, retire old ones or change public FAQs. Save the terms and objectives attached to the purchased account so you can distinguish a new public rule from the rule that governs the existing account. If the firm sends an update, preserve that too.
This documentation is particularly useful before payouts, support disputes or strategy changes. Clear records reduce reliance on memory and old social posts.
The true cost of a prop account is not one fee; it is the expected number of attempts multiplied by the fee, adjusted for any refunds or activation charges. A model that fits the strategy and reduces breach frequency can have a lower expected cost even when the first purchase is more expensive. “BRIDGE” reduces the first-order fee, but model fit controls the retry count.
Traders should therefore track why prior attempts failed. If failures cluster around daily-loss breaches, buying a larger nominal account with the same percentage rule may not solve the problem. A different drawdown structure or smaller per-trade risk may.
A strategy failure means the edge did not perform as expected over a meaningful sample. A process failure means the account was lost because the trader violated sizing, traded outside the plan, misunderstood a rule or chased a target. Prop evaluations amplify process failures because a single breach can terminate the account even when the long-term strategy still has positive expectancy.
Reviewing every closed attempt through that lens can improve future account selection and risk planning more than searching for a larger coupon.
Firms can launch new models, retire old ones or change public FAQs. Save the terms and objectives attached to the purchased account so you can distinguish a new public rule from the rule that governs the existing account. If the firm sends an update, preserve that too.
This documentation is particularly useful before payouts, support disputes or strategy changes. Clear records reduce reliance on memory and old social posts.
The true cost of a prop account is not one fee; it is the expected number of attempts multiplied by the fee, adjusted for any refunds or activation charges. A model that fits the strategy and reduces breach frequency can have a lower expected cost even when the first purchase is more expensive. “BRIDGE” reduces the first-order fee, but model fit controls the retry count.
Traders should therefore track why prior attempts failed. If failures cluster around daily-loss breaches, buying a larger nominal account with the same percentage rule may not solve the problem. A different drawdown structure or smaller per-trade risk may.
A strategy failure means the edge did not perform as expected over a meaningful sample. A process failure means the account was lost because the trader violated sizing, traded outside the plan, misunderstood a rule or chased a target. Prop evaluations amplify process failures because a single breach can terminate the account even when the long-term strategy still has positive expectancy.
Reviewing every closed attempt through that lens can improve future account selection and risk planning more than searching for a larger coupon.
Firms can launch new models, retire old ones or change public FAQs. Save the terms and objectives attached to the purchased account so you can distinguish a new public rule from the rule that governs the existing account. If the firm sends an update, preserve that too.
This documentation is particularly useful before payouts, support disputes or strategy changes. Clear records reduce reliance on memory and old social posts.
The true cost of a prop account is not one fee; it is the expected number of attempts multiplied by the fee, adjusted for any refunds or activation charges. A model that fits the strategy and reduces breach frequency can have a lower expected cost even when the first purchase is more expensive. “BRIDGE” reduces the first-order fee, but model fit controls the retry count.
Traders should therefore track why prior attempts failed. If failures cluster around daily-loss breaches, buying a larger nominal account with the same percentage rule may not solve the problem. A different drawdown structure or smaller per-trade risk may.
A strategy failure means the edge did not perform as expected over a meaningful sample. A process failure means the account was lost because the trader violated sizing, traded outside the plan, misunderstood a rule or chased a target. Prop evaluations amplify process failures because a single breach can terminate the account even when the long-term strategy still has positive expectancy.
Reviewing every closed attempt through that lens can improve future account selection and risk planning more than searching for a larger coupon.
Firms can launch new models, retire old ones or change public FAQs. Save the terms and objectives attached to the purchased account so you can distinguish a new public rule from the rule that governs the existing account. If the firm sends an update, preserve that too.
This documentation is particularly useful before payouts, support disputes or strategy changes. Clear records reduce reliance on memory and old social posts.
The true cost of a prop account is not one fee; it is the expected number of attempts multiplied by the fee, adjusted for any refunds or activation charges. A model that fits the strategy and reduces breach frequency can have a lower expected cost even when the first purchase is more expensive. “BRIDGE” reduces the first-order fee, but model fit controls the retry count.
Traders should therefore track why prior attempts failed. If failures cluster around daily-loss breaches, buying a larger nominal account with the same percentage rule may not solve the problem. A different drawdown structure or smaller per-trade risk may.
A strategy failure means the edge did not perform as expected over a meaningful sample. A process failure means the account was lost because the trader violated sizing, traded outside the plan, misunderstood a rule or chased a target. Prop evaluations amplify process failures because a single breach can terminate the account even when the long-term strategy still has positive expectancy.
Reviewing every closed attempt through that lens can improve future account selection and risk planning more than searching for a larger coupon.
Firms can launch new models, retire old ones or change public FAQs. Save the terms and objectives attached to the purchased account so you can distinguish a new public rule from the rule that governs the existing account. If the firm sends an update, preserve that too.
This documentation is particularly useful before payouts, support disputes or strategy changes. Clear records reduce reliance on memory and old social posts.
The true cost of a prop account is not one fee; it is the expected number of attempts multiplied by the fee, adjusted for any refunds or activation charges. A model that fits the strategy and reduces breach frequency can have a lower expected cost even when the first purchase is more expensive. “BRIDGE” reduces the first-order fee, but model fit controls the retry count.
Traders should therefore track why prior attempts failed. If failures cluster around daily-loss breaches, buying a larger nominal account with the same percentage rule may not solve the problem. A different drawdown structure or smaller per-trade risk may.
A strategy failure means the edge did not perform as expected over a meaningful sample. A process failure means the account was lost because the trader violated sizing, traded outside the plan, misunderstood a rule or chased a target. Prop evaluations amplify process failures because a single breach can terminate the account even when the long-term strategy still has positive expectancy.
Reviewing every closed attempt through that lens can improve future account selection and risk planning more than searching for a larger coupon.
Firms can launch new models, retire old ones or change public FAQs. Save the terms and objectives attached to the purchased account so you can distinguish a new public rule from the rule that governs the existing account. If the firm sends an update, preserve that too.
This documentation is particularly useful before payouts, support disputes or strategy changes. Clear records reduce reliance on memory and old social posts.
The true cost of a prop account is not one fee; it is the expected number of attempts multiplied by the fee, adjusted for any refunds or activation charges. A model that fits the strategy and reduces breach frequency can have a lower expected cost even when the first purchase is more expensive. “BRIDGE” reduces the first-order fee, but model fit controls the retry count.
Traders should therefore track why prior attempts failed. If failures cluster around daily-loss breaches, buying a larger nominal account with the same percentage rule may not solve the problem. A different drawdown structure or smaller per-trade risk may.
A strategy failure means the edge did not perform as expected over a meaningful sample. A process failure means the account was lost because the trader violated sizing, traded outside the plan, misunderstood a rule or chased a target. Prop evaluations amplify process failures because a single breach can terminate the account even when the long-term strategy still has positive expectancy.
Reviewing every closed attempt through that lens can improve future account selection and risk planning more than searching for a larger coupon.
Firms can launch new models, retire old ones or change public FAQs. Save the terms and objectives attached to the purchased account so you can distinguish a new public rule from the rule that governs the existing account. If the firm sends an update, preserve that too.
This documentation is particularly useful before payouts, support disputes or strategy changes. Clear records reduce reliance on memory and old social posts.
The true cost of a prop account is not one fee; it is the expected number of attempts multiplied by the fee, adjusted for any refunds or activation charges. A model that fits the strategy and reduces breach frequency can have a lower expected cost even when the first purchase is more expensive. “BRIDGE” reduces the first-order fee, but model fit controls the retry count.
Traders should therefore track why prior attempts failed. If failures cluster around daily-loss breaches, buying a larger nominal account with the same percentage rule may not solve the problem. A different drawdown structure or smaller per-trade risk may.
A strategy failure means the edge did not perform as expected over a meaningful sample. A process failure means the account was lost because the trader violated sizing, traded outside the plan, misunderstood a rule or chased a target. Prop evaluations amplify process failures because a single breach can terminate the account even when the long-term strategy still has positive expectancy.
Reviewing every closed attempt through that lens can improve future account selection and risk planning more than searching for a larger coupon.
Firms can launch new models, retire old ones or change public FAQs. Save the terms and objectives attached to the purchased account so you can distinguish a new public rule from the rule that governs the existing account. If the firm sends an update, preserve that too.
This documentation is particularly useful before payouts, support disputes or strategy changes. Clear records reduce reliance on memory and old social posts.
The true cost of a prop account is not one fee; it is the expected number of attempts multiplied by the fee, adjusted for any refunds or activation charges. A model that fits the strategy and reduces breach frequency can have a lower expected cost even when the first purchase is more expensive. “BRIDGE” reduces the first-order fee, but model fit controls the retry count.
Traders should therefore track why prior attempts failed. If failures cluster around daily-loss breaches, buying a larger nominal account with the same percentage rule may not solve the problem. A different drawdown structure or smaller per-trade risk may.
The current code covered in this review is BRIDGE. The article states the current saving and account-specific context. Confirm the live checkout before payment.
No. It changes eligible purchase price only. Drawdown, targets, funded-stage rules and payout eligibility remain tied to the selected program.
Yes. The Prop Firm Bridge research team independently tested QT Funded coupon code “BRIDGE” at the live checkout and confirmed the exact 60% discount stated in this review for the account coverage described here. Always confirm the final checkout total before payment.
Choose by strategy fit, drawdown, loss limits, funded-stage conditions and payout eligibility first; compare discounted price second.
Yes. Coupon code, promo code and discount code are common search variants for the same checkout code described here.
Join the discussion
No comments yet
Sign in to leave a comment. Real traders only — one account, one voice.