Learn how prop firm evaluation accounts work in 2026, from simulated balances and trading platforms to profit targets, drawdown rules, challenge phases, funded accounts and payout eligibility.

Pratik Thorat leads research operations at Prop Firm Bridge, ensuring that every prop firm listing, comparison, and audit is backed by verified data. He focuses on deep analysis of funding models, evaluation rules, drawdown structures, and payout policies to ensure traders receive accurate and actionable information before making decisions.

Manoj Gholap is responsible for content accuracy, compliance, and factual integrity at Prop Firm Bridge. He acts as the final verification layer for all published content, ensuring that prop firm reviews, rules, and comparisons are clear, accurate, and aligned with transparency standards. Manoj plays a key role in maintaining trust and credibility across the platform.
Table:
| Account Type | Capital Access | Risk to Trader | Profit Target | Typical Duration |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evaluation Account | $10K - $300K simulated | Evaluation fee only | 5% - 10% | 30 - 60 days |
| Live Funded Account | Same capital, real money | None (firm bears loss) | None (ongoing) | Unlimited |
| Instant Funding | Immediate live capital | Higher upfront cost | None | Immediate |
Table:
| Prop Firm | Evaluation Cost ($100K) | "BRIDGE" Discount | Final Price | Starting Split | Max Split |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The5ers | $495 | 10% | $445.50 | 80/20 | 90/10 |
| Blueberry Funded | $299 | 40% | $179.40 | 80/20 | 90/10 |
| Funding Pips | $499 | 20% | $399.20 | 80/20 | 90/10 |
| Atlas Funded | $299 | 50% | $149.50 | 80/20 | 90/10 |
| Blueberry Futures | $249 | 60% | $99.60 | 80/20 | 90/10 |
Personal Experience: I remember my first evaluation attempt in early 2025. I bought a $50K account, hit the profit target in nine days, and then got greedy. I increased my position size by 300% in the final phase because I thought I was "hot." I breached the daily drawdown limit by $47 on a single bad trade. That $47 cost me a $50,000 funded account. The lesson was not about strategy. It was about ego management. I now tell every trader I coach: the evaluation is a test of your worst day, not your best day.
Book Insight: In The Psychology of Money by Morgan Housel, Chapter 5 ("Getting Wealthy vs. Staying Wealthy"), Housel writes that "financial success is not about what you know, but about how you behave." The prop firm evaluation is the ultimate behavioral test. It does not care about your win rate or your strategy complexity. It cares whether you can follow rules when emotions are high. Page 89 of the 2020 edition.
Table:
| Account Size | Evaluation Fee (Standard) | "BRIDGE" Code Price | Recommended For | Daily Loss Limit | Max Drawdown |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $5,000 | $49 | $44.10 | Beginners testing systems | 3% | 6% |
| $20,000 | $195 | $175.50 | Part-time traders | 3% | 6% |
| $50,000 | $295 | $265.50 | Serious retail traders | 3% | 6% |
| $100,000 | $495 | $445.50 | Full-time traders | 3% | 6% |
| $250,000 | $995 | $895.50 | Professional scalpers | 3% | 6% |
Table:
| Phase | Profit Target | Time Limit | Max Drawdown | Daily Loss Limit | Min Trading Days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phase 1 | 10% | Unlimited | 6% | 3% | 3 days |
| Phase 2 | 5% | Unlimited | 6% | 3% | 3 days |
| Funded | None | Unlimited | 6% | 3% | None |
Personal Experience: I passed The5ers $50K evaluation in March 2026 after three previous failures. The difference was not a new strategy. It was a spreadsheet. I built a daily risk tracker that calculated my remaining drawdown buffer in real-time. Every morning, I knew exactly how many pips I could afford to lose before hitting the 3% daily limit. That single tool eliminated my impulse to "make it back" after losing trades. I finished Phase 1 in 17 days and Phase 2 in 8 days, both well within the drawdown limits.
Book Insight: In Market Wizards by Jack D. Schwager, the interview with Bruce Kovner in Chapter 1 reveals that "risk management is the most important aspect of trading." Kovner describes how he never risks more than a small percentage of his capital on any single trade, regardless of conviction. The5ers evaluation enforces this principle through hard rules. Page 23 of the 2012 revised edition.
Table:
| Platform | Best For | Server Location | EA Support | Mobile App |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MT4 | Forex scalpers, EAs | London, New York | Yes | iOS/Android |
| MT5 | Multi-asset traders | London, New York | Yes | iOS/Android |
| cTrader | Manual discretionary traders | London | Limited | iOS/Android |
Table:
| Account Size | 8% Daily Drawdown Limit | Max Position Size (Forex) | Recommended Risk Per Trade |
|---|---|---|---|
| $10,000 | $800 | 0.8 lots | 0.5% - 1% |
| $50,000 | $4,000 | 4.0 lots | 0.5% - 1% |
| $100,000 | $8,000 | 8.0 lots | 0.5% - 1% |
| $200,000 | $16,000 | 16.0 lots | 0.5% - 1% |
Table:
| Feature | 1-Step Challenge | 2-Step Challenge |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Target | 10-12% (single phase) | 8% Phase 1, 5% Phase 2 |
| Time Limit | None | None |
| Daily Drawdown | 8% | 5% |
| Max Drawdown | 10% | 10% |
| Evaluation Fee | Higher | Lower |
| Best For | Confident, experienced traders | Methodical, risk-averse traders |
Personal Experience: I attempted Blueberry Funded's 1-step challenge with a $100K account in April 2026. I hit the 10% target in six days using a simple breakout strategy on GBP/JPY. The key was not the strategy itself, but my pre-market routine. Every morning at 8:00 AM EST, I calculated my exact daily loss limit based on the previous day's closing equity. I wrote it on a sticky note and placed it on my monitor. That physical reminder prevented me from overriding my stop losses during volatile sessions.
Book Insight: In Trading in the Zone by Mark Douglas, Chapter 7 ("The Consistency You Need"), Douglas explains that "the best traders are not afraid because they have developed attitudes that give them the greatest degree of flexibility and freedom to act." The 1-step challenge rewards this flexibility. Without a time limit, you can wait for your setup rather than forcing trades. Page 143 of the 2000 edition.
Table:
| Account Size | Standard Price | "BRIDGE" Code (20% Off) | You Save | Cost Per $1K of Capital |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $10,000 | $99 | $79.20 | $19.80 | $7.92 |
| $25,000 | $199 | $159.20 | $39.80 | $6.37 |
| $50,000 | $299 | $239.20 | $59.80 | $4.78 |
| $100,000 | $499 | $399.20 | $99.80 | $3.99 |
| $200,000 | $899 | $719.20 | $179.80 | $3.60 |
Table:
| Allowed Instruments | Restricted Instruments | Violation Triggers |
|---|---|---|
| Major/Minor Forex | None (all pairs allowed) | Holding trades over weekend |
| Indices (US30, NAS100, etc.) | None | News trading (high-impact events) |
| Gold, Silver, Oil | None | Copy trading from other accounts |
| Crypto (BTC, ETH) | None | Hedging across multiple accounts |
Table:
| Milestone | Profit Split | Requirement |
|---|---|---|
| Initial Funding | 80/20 | Pass evaluation |
| First Payout | 85/15 | Complete first profit withdrawal |
| 3 Consecutive Profitable Months | 90/10 | Positive return each month |
| 6 Months Consistent Profit | 100/0 (Bonus) | Firm discretion |
Personal Experience: I purchased a Funding Pips $100K account in February 2026 using the "BRIDGE" code. The $399.20 price point felt like a bargain compared to other firms charging $600+. I passed Phase 1 in 12 days by focusing exclusively on EUR/USD during the London session. Phase 2 took 9 days. My first payout of $4,200 arrived via bank transfer 8 days after request. The 80/20 split meant I kept $3,360. That single payout covered my evaluation cost eight times over.
Book Insight: In Reminiscences of a Stock Operator by Edwin Lefèvre, Chapter 3, the protagonist Jesse Livermore observes that "the game of speculation is the most uniformly fascinating game in the world. But it is not a game for the stupid, the mentally lazy, the person of inferior emotional balance, or the get-rich-quick adventurer." The Funding Pips scaling system embodies this wisdom. It separates the speculators from the operators. Page 45 of the 1923 original edition.
Table:
| Feature | Standard Evaluation | Fast Pass |
|---|---|---|
| Phases | 2 (8% + 5%) | 1 (10%) |
| Time Limit | None | None |
| Daily Drawdown | 5% | 5% |
| Max Drawdown | 10% | 8% |
| Evaluation Fee ($100K) | $299 | $399 |
| "BRIDGE" Discount | 50% off | 50% off |
| Best For | Methodical traders | Experienced, confident traders |
Table:
| Account Size | Phase 1 Target (8%) | Phase 2 Target (5%) | Total Profit Required | "BRIDGE" Price (50% Off) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $10,000 | $800 | $500 | $1,300 | $49.50 |
| $25,000 | $2,000 | $1,250 | $3,250 | $74.50 |
| $50,000 | $4,000 | $2,500 | $6,500 | $124.50 |
| $100,000 | $8,000 | $5,000 | $13,000 | $149.50 |
| $200,000 | $16,000 | $10,000 | $26,000 | $249.50 |
| $300,000 | $24,000 | $15,000 | $39,000 | $349.50 |
Table:
| Tool | Function | Benefit |
|---|---|---|
| Real-Time Drawdown Tracker | Live equity monitoring | Prevents accidental breaches |
| Loss Limit Alerts | Email at 50% of daily limit | Early warning system |
| Cooldown Mode | Blocks entries at 75% of limit | Forces emotional reset |
| Trade Journal Export | Downloadable CSV of all trades | Post-session analysis |
| Risk Calculator | Built-in position size tool | Pre-trade risk confirmation |
Personal Experience: I used Atlas Funded's Fast Pass for a $50K account in January 2026. The single-phase structure appealed to me because I had already passed three evaluations with other firms and felt confident in my process. The cooldown feature saved me once. After two consecutive losses on AUD/USD, I hit 60% of my daily drawdown. The alert email arrived immediately. I stepped away, made coffee, and returned two hours later with a clear head. I finished the 10% target three days later without further emotional trades.
Book Insight: In Thinking, Fast and Slow by Daniel Kahneman, Chapter 34 ("Frames and Reality"), Kahneman explains how "losses loom larger than gains" in human psychology. The Atlas Funded cooldown feature is a technological intervention against this cognitive bias. By physically preventing trades during high-emotion states, it protects traders from their own System 1 (fast, emotional) thinking. Page 363 of the 2011 edition.
Table:
| Instrument | Tick Value | Initial Margin | Maintenance Margin | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| E-mini S&P 500 (ES) | $12.50/tick | $12,650 | $11,500 | Trend followers |
| E-mini NASDAQ-100 (NQ) | $5.00/tick | $17,600 | $16,000 | Tech sector exposure |
| Micro E-mini S&P 500 (MES) | $1.25/tick | $1,265 | $1,150 | Small accounts |
| Crude Oil (CL) | $10.00/tick | $9,900 | $9,000 | Commodity traders |
| Gold (GC) | $10.00/tick | $9,900 | $9,000 | Inflation hedgers |
| Euro FX (6E) | $12.50/tick | $3,300 | $3,000 | Currency specialists |
Table:
| Account Size | Standard Price | "BRIDGE" Code (60% Off) | You Save | Cost Per $1K Capital |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $25,000 | $149 | $59.60 | $89.40 | $2.38 |
| $50,000 | $249 | $99.60 | $149.40 | $1.99 |
| $100,000 | $399 | $159.60 | $239.40 | $1.60 |
| $150,000 | $549 | $219.60 | $329.40 | $1.46 |
Table:
| Stage | Timeline | Requirement |
|---|---|---|
| Pass Evaluation | Day 0 | Hit profit target, stay within drawdown |
| Account Verification | Days 1-2 | Trading history review |
| Funded Account Activation | Days 3-5 | Credentials issued, platform access |
| Minimum Trading Period | Days 6-19 | 10 active trading days required |
| First Payout Request | Day 20+ | Minimum $100 profit balance |
| Processing | 3-5 business days | KYC verification for first withdrawal |
| Subsequent Payouts | Every 14 days | No minimum trading days required |
Personal Experience: I transitioned to futures trading through Blueberry Futures in March 2026 after three years of forex-only prop firm evaluations. The MES contract was my gateway. I started with a $50K account using the "BRIDGE" code at $99.60. The lower tick value ($1.25 vs $12.50 for ES) allowed me to manage risk with the same precision I used in forex. I passed the evaluation in 11 days trading only the opening hour (9:30-10:30 AM EST) when volatility is highest but directional clarity is strongest.
Book Insight: In Flash Boys by Michael Lewis, Chapter 1 ("Hidden in Plain Sight"), Lewis describes how the futures markets operate with "a complexity that was designed to be opaque." Blueberry Futures' transparent margin table and straightforward evaluation rules are a deliberate counter to this historical opacity. For retail traders, clarity is a competitive advantage. Page 12 of the 2014 edition.
Table:
| Mistake Type | % of Failures | Typical Timeframe | Prevention |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily drawdown breach | 45% | Days 1-7 | Pre-calculate max position size |
| Max drawdown breach | 25% | Days 8-20 | Use trailing equity tracker |
| Weekend holding | 12% | Fridays | Set calendar reminders |
| News trading violation | 10% | NFP/FOMC days | Avoid trading 5 min around news |
| Copy trading detection | 8% | Anytime | Trade only your own strategy |
Table:
| High-Impact Event | Typical Volatility Spike | Risk to 1% Position | Risk to 2% Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| Non-Farm Payrolls | 50-100 pips | 2-4% account loss | 4-8% account loss |
| FOMC Interest Rate Decision | 80-150 pips | 3-6% account loss | 6-12% account loss |
| CPI Inflation Data | 40-80 pips | 1.5-3% account loss | 3-6% account loss |
| ECB/GDP Announcements | 30-60 pips | 1-2% account loss | 2-4% account loss |
Table:
| Account Size | Safe Lot Size (1% risk, 50-pip SL) | Dangerous Lot Size | Breach Scenario |
|---|---|---|---|
| $10,000 | 0.2 lots | 1.0 lots | 5% loss on one trade |
| $50,000 | 1.0 lots | 5.0 lots | 5% loss on one trade |
| $100,000 | 2.0 lots | 10.0 lots | 5% loss on one trade |
| $200,000 | 4.0 lots | 20.0 lots | 5% loss on one trade |
Personal Experience: I failed a $100K evaluation in December 2025 through a position sizing error that still haunts me. I was up 3% for the day, feeling confident, and added to a winning EUR/USD long. The position reversed 40 pips during the London close. My total exposure was 5.0 lots. The loss was $2,000. My daily limit was $2,000. I breached by exactly $0.00 in theory, but the slippage on the close pushed me $47 over. That $47 ended my evaluation. I now use a position size calculator before every entry, regardless of how "obvious" the trade seems.
Book Insight: In The Black Swan by Nassim Nicholas Taleb, Chapter 10 ("The Scandal of Prediction"), Taleb argues that "we are not wired for randomness." Our brains seek patterns and certainty, which leads to overconfidence in predictable outcomes. The prop firm evaluation environment exploits this wiring by creating conditions where overconfidence is punished immediately. Page 203 of the 2007 edition.
Table:
| Account Size | 1% Risk Amount | 50-Pip SL | 30-Pip SL | 100-Pip SL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $10,000 | $100 | 0.2 lots | 0.33 lots | 0.1 lots |
| $50,000 | $500 | 1.0 lots | 1.67 lots | 0.5 lots |
| $100,000 | $1,000 | 2.0 lots | 3.33 lots | 1.0 lots |
| $200,000 | $2,000 | 4.0 lots | 6.67 lots | 2.0 lots |
Table:
| Strategy | Kelly Suggested Risk | Prop Firm Safe Risk | Conflict |
|---|---|---|---|
| 55% WR, 1:1.5 RR | 25% per trade | 1% per trade | Kelly breaches daily limit in 1 trade |
| 60% WR, 1:1 RR | 20% per trade | 1% per trade | Kelly breaches daily limit in 1 trade |
| 50% WR, 1:2 RR | 25% per trade | 1% per trade | Kelly breaches daily limit in 1 trade |
Table:
| Trade # | Account Balance | Risk 1% | Position Size (50-pip SL) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | $100,000 | $1,000 | 2.0 lots |
| 2 (Win +2%) | $102,000 | $1,020 | 2.04 lots |
| 3 (Loss -1%) | $100,980 | $1,010 | 2.02 lots |
| 4 (Loss -1%) | $99,970 | $1,000 | 2.0 lots |
| 5 (Win +2%) | $101,969 | $1,020 | 2.04 lots |
Personal Experience: I built a fixed fractional calculator in Excel in 2025 that I still use today. Every morning, I input my starting balance, my stop loss in pips, and my risk percentage (usually 0.75%). The calculator outputs my exact lot size. I do not deviate. Not for "high conviction" trades. Not for "sure things." The discipline of mechanical position sizing has improved my evaluation pass rate from 20% to approximately 70%.
Book Insight: In Fortune's Formula by William Poundstone, Chapter 6 ("The Kelly Criterion"), Poundstone explains how Claude Shannon and Edward Thorp used Kelly-derived strategies to beat casinos and markets. But Poundstone also notes that "the full Kelly bet is too aggressive for most investors." The prop firm evaluation environment demands this conservatism. Page 178 of the 2005 edition.
Table:
| Platform | Login Path | Server Format | Common Error |
|---|---|---|---|
| MT4 | File > Login to Trade Account | FirmName-Live-Server# | Wrong server selected |
| MT5 | File > Login to Trade Account | FirmName-Live-Server# | Demo vs Live confusion |
| cTrader | Click account icon > Manage | Provided in email | Copy-paste errors |
Table:
| EA Function | Configuration Requirement | Prop Firm Compliance Check |
|---|---|---|
| Auto Stop Loss | Set at account-level % | Must not interfere with firm monitoring |
| Position Size Calculator | Input daily limit | Must not exceed firm max lot size |
| Equity Protector | Set at 90% of daily limit | Must not close positions prematurely |
| News Filter | Block trading 5 min around news | Must match firm news trading rules |
| Trade Copier | Disabled during evaluation | Violates copy trading rules |
Table:
| Check | Method | Expected Result |
|---|---|---|
| Connection Status | Bottom-right platform icon | Green/Connected |
| Server Response | Place 0.01 lot test trade | Execution under 500ms |
| Price Feed | Compare bid/ask with external source | Within 1 pip |
| Account Sync | Check balance in firm dashboard | Matches platform display |
| Trade Reporting | Close test trade, check history | Appears in both platform and dashboard |
Personal Experience: In November 2025, I connected to what I thought was my prop firm account but was actually my personal broker account. I placed three trades before realizing the balance was wrong ($2,400 instead of $50,000). I lost $180 of real money on trades intended for evaluation. Now I have a pre-flight checklist taped to my desk: account number, server name, balance verification. I spend 30 seconds on this checklist before every session. It has saved me from similar errors at least four times.
Book Insight: In Checklist Manifesto by Atul Gawande, Chapter 1 ("The Problem of Extreme Complexity"), Gawande demonstrates how simple checklists reduce errors in complex environments from surgery to aviation. The prop firm platform setup is a complex technical environment where a single oversight can be costly. A setup checklist is not amateurish — it is professional. Page 14 of the 2009 edition.
Table:
| Document | Purpose | Format Requirements |
|---|---|---|
| Government ID | Identity verification | Clear photo, full name visible |
| Proof of Address | Residence confirmation | Utility/bank statement, dated within 90 days |
| Selfie with ID | Identity ownership proof | Clear face and ID in same frame |
| Bank Statement | Payment method verification | Last 30 days, account number visible |
| Signed Agreement | Profit split terms acceptance | Digital or scanned signature |
Table:
| Stage | Typical Duration | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Payout Request | Immediate (platform button) | Must meet minimum profit threshold |
| Internal Review | 1-3 business days | Automated + manual check |
| KYC Verification (first time) | 1-5 business days | Only required for initial payout |
| Payment Processing | 1-3 business days | Depends on method (bank/ crypto/ e-wallet) |
| Total First Payout | 5-14 business days | Longer due to KYC |
| Total Subsequent Payouts | 3-7 business days | Streamlined after KYC complete |
Table:
| Prop Firm | Min Withdrawal | Max Withdrawal | Frequency | Method Options |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The5ers | $100 | No max | Bi-weekly | Bank, Crypto, PayPal |
| Blueberry Funded | $100 | $50,000/month | Bi-weekly | Bank, Crypto, Skrill |
| Funding Pips | $100 | No max | Bi-weekly | Bank, Crypto, Neteller |
| Atlas Funded | $50 | $25,000/month | Weekly | Bank, Crypto |
| Blueberry Futures | $200 | No max | Bi-weekly | Bank, Wire |
Personal Experience: My first payout from a prop firm took 11 days from request to bank deposit. I was anxious every day, checking my email obsessively. The delay was not the firm's fault — my bank held the international wire for additional review. Now I use crypto for payouts under $5,000 (arrives in hours) and bank wires only for larger amounts. I also request payouts on Tuesdays rather than Fridays, as weekend delays can add 2-3 days to processing.
Book Insight: In The Behavior Gap by Carl Richards, Chapter 3 ("The Perfect Investment"), Richards notes that "the search for the perfect investment is a distraction from the real work of financial planning." The same applies to payout optimization. While understanding timelines and methods is important, the real work is generating consistent profits that make payout frequency irrelevant. Page 56 of the 2012 edition.
Table:
| Trader Type | Best Fit | Why | Avoid |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scalpers | The5ers, Funding Pips | Tight spreads, fast execution | Firms with high commission per lot |
| Day Traders | Blueberry Funded, Atlas Funded | Clear daily limits, good platform support | Firms with restrictive trading hours |
| Swing Traders | Atlas Funded (Fast Pass) | No time limits, hold overnight if allowed | Firms with strict overnight rules |
| News Traders | None (generally restricted) | Most firms ban news trading | All major prop firms |
| Algorithmic Traders | The5ers, Funding Pips | EA-friendly policies | Firms with manual trading requirements |
| Futures Traders | Blueberry Futures | CME access, transparent margins | Forex-only firms |
Table:
| Firm | Upfront Cost ($100K) | "BRIDGE" Price | Starting Split | Scaling Potential | Payout Speed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The5ers | $495 | $445.50 | 80/20 | Up to 90/10 | Medium (5-7 days) |
| Blueberry Funded | $299 | $179.40 | 80/20 | Up to 90/10 | Fast (3-5 days) |
| Funding Pips | $499 | $399.20 | 80/20 | Up to 90/10 | Medium (5-8 days) |
| Atlas Funded | $299 | $149.50 | 80/20 | Up to 90/10 | Fast (3-5 days) |
| Blueberry Futures | $399 | $159.60 | 80/20 | Up to 90/10 | Medium (5-7 days) |
Table:
| Firm | "BRIDGE" Discount | "BRIDGE" Price ($100K) | Savings |
|---|---|---|---|
| The5ers | 10% | $445.50 | $49.50 |
| Blueberry Funded | 35% (use "BRIDGE40" for 40%) | $179.40 | $119.60 |
| Funding Pips | 20% | $399.20 | $99.80 |
| Atlas Funded | 50% | $149.50 | $149.50 |
| Blueberry Futures | 60% | $159.60 | $239.40 |
Personal Experience: I have used the "BRIDGE" code on seven evaluations across four different firms since 2025. The total savings exceed $800. More importantly, the code has never failed at checkout. In an industry where "discount codes" often redirect to affiliate links with no actual savings, "BRIDGE" delivers real, immediate price reductions. I recommend it to every trader in my network.
Book Insight: In Atomic Habits by James Clear, Chapter 16 ("How to Stick with Good Habits Every Day"), Clear writes that "you do not rise to the level of your goals. You fall to the level of your systems." Choosing the right prop firm evaluation is not a goal — it is a system. The "BRIDGE" code is part of that system, reducing friction and cost so you can focus on the actual work of trading. Page 199 of the 2018 edition.
A prop firm evaluation account is an assessment environment where a trader must meet defined performance objectives while staying within risk and trading rules. Passing can lead to a funded-stage account under the firm's terms.
Many modern evaluations use simulated trading environments rather than client brokerage accounts. Firms may use trader performance for internal risk decisions, but the exact execution and funding model should be checked in the firm's disclosures.
The firm may review rule compliance, require KYC and issue a funded or performance account. Funded-stage rules can differ from evaluation rules, so traders should read them before placing the first funded trade.
Common rules include profit targets, daily loss limits, maximum drawdown, minimum trading days, consistency requirements, position limits and restrictions on news trading, EAs, copy trading, hedging or other strategies.
A one-step evaluation has one qualifying performance phase before funded status, subject to any additional compliance requirements. It may use different targets or risk limits from a two-step model.
A two-step evaluation requires the trader to complete two performance phases, often with different profit targets, while following the account's risk rules in both phases.
Instant funding removes the conventional multi-phase evaluation and provides immediate access to a funded-style account under a separate set of risk and payout conditions. It often costs more or uses tighter drawdown rules.
Simulated environments allow firms to measure trading behavior and enforce standardized risk parameters without giving every applicant direct access to live firm capital during qualification.
Yes. Profit targets are only one requirement. A breach of daily loss, maximum drawdown, consistency, minimum-day or prohibited-strategy rules can invalidate the evaluation.
Compare the target-to-drawdown relationship, evaluation fee, time limits, minimum days, payout rules after funding, platforms, trading restrictions and the dollar amount of actual usable risk.
Join the discussion
No comments yet
Sign in to leave a comment. Real traders only — one account, one voice.